What you need to know about Labor's new super tax
But people with superannuation funds of more than $3 million will face an additional 15 per cent tax on any investment returns (including interest, dividends or capital gains) they earn on the amount above this threshold.
For example, someone with a $3.5 million super balance will continue to be taxed the discounted rate of 15 per cent on everything they earn on the first $3 million of their balance. Investment returns on the additional $500,000 will be taxed at 30 per cent.
What are unrealised gains?
A controversial element of Labor's tax reform is that the super tax would also apply to 'unrealised gains', which refers to the growth in the value of an asset or investment that an investor holds but hasn't yet cashed in.
Loading
For example, an investor could hold property or shares that increase (and decrease) in value over time. However, unless they sell these assets, any rise or fall in their value is seen as 'paper profits' because they have not yet been converted into cash and locked in.
Generally, earnings are not taxed until they hit your pocket. But Labor's tax on unrealised gains would mean Australians with superannuation balances of more than $3 million – while relatively wealthy – would receive a tax bill even if they hadn't actually earned any income (potentially forcing them to sell assets to pay that bill, and reduce the total amount of money in the nation's super pool, affecting returns for all super members).
If a person records an unrealised loss one year – where their super balance falls due, for example, to a market downturn – that unrealised loss will be used to offset the tax on earnings from their super balance in future years.
The final tax bill is generally paid directly by your super fund to the Australian Tax Office. For self-managed super funds, the tax amount is usually paid through BPAY or using a debit or credit card.
What is indexing?
Indexation of the super tax – or lack thereof – is another aspect that some people have criticised.
Indexing refers to the practice of increasing a threshold or entitlement to change in line with another measure such as inflation, wages or tax.
In the case of the super tax, Labor has not promised to tie the threshold for the 30 per cent tax rate to changes in price growth. This is a problem because $3 million this year will not have the same purchasing power as the same amount in 20 years' time.
Assuming an inflation rate of 2.5 per cent, an indexed threshold would capture funds with more than $5 million in 2045.
While the proposed tax only affects about one in 200 Australians now, it would apply to many more if not indexed. Independent MP Monique Ryan, for example, has criticised the lack of indexation, saying it means the tax could affect all of Gen Z by the time they turn 60.
What does the treasurer say?
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has stood by the new tax, first announced by Labor in early 2023.
Chalmers, speaking on a podcast with Michelle Grattan this week, maintained it was a 'modest change' that still gave concessional treatment – although slightly less so – to people with large super balances.
'This will help us fund our priorities, whether it's Medicare, the tax cuts and other priorities in our budget repair,' he said, noting he had consulted widely on the changes and that the controversial inclusion of unrealised gains was 'the best, simplest way to go about it' according to advice from Treasury.
Chalmers also said it was wrong to assume the $3 million threshold would never change.
'There are so many instances in the tax system where thresholds aren't indexed, and from time to time, governments take decisions to raise those thresholds,' he said. 'I'm anticipating that that's what would happen here.'
Who is talking about it?
Several prominent figures have chipped into the conversation around the super change: among them, former treasury secretary (and author of the Henry Tax Review) Ken Henry and former RBA governor Phil Lowe.
Loading
In an article in The Australian, Lowe said the change was not an example of good public policy design, saying the government should explore alternatives.
In the same article, Henry said the system needed to be more equitable. 'To do that, you do not need to tax unrealised capital gains,' he said, pointing to suggestions in his more-than-decade-old review.
What happens next?
Chalmers told The Conversation in a podcast that he was yet to start talks with the Senate crossbench. Labor will likely need support from the Greens to get the proposal turned into law.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

AU Financial Review
10 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Retro remote work rules no fix for Victoria's productivity plunge
Victorian Labor Premier Jacinta Allan's pledge to enshrine in law public servants' and private sector workers' right to work from home at least two days a week may be smart short-term politics. However, it's typically poor public policy from Australia's most far-left government, whose long-term rule has coincided with Victoria's economic and financial decline. This includes cellar-dwelling labour productivity, which has grown more slowly in Victoria over the past decade than in any other state or territory. Allan's proposed legislation is likely to be struck down by a constitutional challenge in the High Court, legal experts warn. Yet the retail political purpose is to wedge the Liberal opposition ahead of the next state election due in November next year. Victorian Labor is aligning itself with the female voters who led the backlash that, during the federal election campaign, forced the Coalition to ditch its plan to force Canberra-based bureaucrats to work from the office full-time.

AU Financial Review
10 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Alarm bells ring about Chalmers' tax hike stitch-up
Alarm bells are ringing about Jim Chalmers' economic reform roundtable this month. Rather than the orchestrated union-friendly industrial relations shakeup at the 2023 Jobs and Skills Summit, the preordained outcome of the three-day talkfest in Canberra is shaping up as higher taxes on the wealthy and big business to pay for Labor's ever bigger spending agenda. The Australian Council of Trade Unions on Sunday unveiled its wishlist for the gathering in Canberra on Sunday. This includes proposing cherry-picked tax hikes targeting the well-off (a minimum 25 per cent tax on personal incomes over $1 million and on family trusts), mining companies (a new levy on LNG exports) and so-called fossil subsidies (a $20 million annual cap on the fuel tax excise rebate).

Sydney Morning Herald
10 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Labor's rank and file demand housing towers remain in public hands
The Victorian Labor Party membership has issued an edict to the Allan government against selling any public land as it knocks down and rebuilds Melbourne's mid-century housing commission towers. Debate over how to best to redevelop the high-rise sites will shift from the weekend's Labor state conference to federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers' Economic Reform Roundtable in two weeks' time, where housing advocates will push for tax changes to stimulate government investment in public housing. The state conference on Sunday passed a resolution calling on the Victorian government to retain public ownership of all land across the housing commission tower sites and lobby Canberra to create a GST exemption for materials and services used to build and maintain public housing. The proposed tax reform, which would also extend Commonwealth Rent Assistance to public housing tenants, is intended to arrest a 30-year-slide in the supply of public housing stock, which is being replaced by community housing where not-for-profit landlords can charge higher rents. Labor for Housing advocacy group co-convenor Julijana Todorovic said state governments, including in Victoria, needed to build more public housing alongside community housing, and were pressing for the tax changes to remove what she described as a 'public housing penalty'. Loading 'The reality is because of federal government taxation settings, it is far more economical for state governments to build community housing than it is public housing,' she told the conference. 'The federal government is penalising public housing tenants and their provider, the state, purely for being public. We say this is wrong.' Victorian Minister for Housing and Building Harriet Shing, speaking to this masthead on the sidelines of the conference, confirmed that tax arrangements for both forms of social housing were part of ongoing discussions with Canberra.