Scots lose faith in the SNP's soft touch justice system as 1 in 3 live in fear of rising crime levels
One in three Scots are living in fear of rising crime levels amid plummeting police numbers, a damning new poll has found.
Three times as many people also feel crime levels are getting worse rather than better.
The findings emerged as new figures showed the eye-watering scale and cost of overtime for Police Scotland's stretched frontline.
The Scottish Conservatives said law-abiding Scots had 'clearly lost trust' in the SNP 's 'soft-touch justice system', while the body representing frontline officers called on ministers to making policing 'a greater priority for Government'.
SNP justice Secretary Angela Constance said she was 'concerned' by the survey results.
The Survation poll for 1919 Magazine asked more than 1,000 adults to describe how much their local area crime rate had changed in the past two years.
A total of 34 per cent some a lot or a little more, 44 per cent 'about the same' and only 11 per cent a little or a lot less. The rest were undecided or declined to say.
Nearly two-thirds (62 per cent) were not confident local officers had the resources to prevent crime and only a third thought the force could muster a visible local presence.
Most Scots (51 per cent) also doubted local police could respond quickly to calls.
The largest group (46 per cent) also lacked confidence in the force's ability to solve crimes, compared to 43 per cent expressing confidence.
Scottish Tory community safety spokeswoman Sharon Dowey said: 'This damning survey exposes how badly the SNP's soft-touch justice system is failing Scots.
'The Nationalists have consistently cut police resource, which has left them unable to investigate certain crimes.
'Law-abiding Scots have clearly lost trust in the SNP's system which continually panders to offenders and leaves victims as an afterthought.
'SNP ministers need to urgently show some common sense and start to prioritise frontline policing by delivering the resources required to keep communities safe.'
The SNP came to power in 2007 promising to add at least 1,000 police officers to the 16,265 full-time equivalents then in post - a target hit within two years.
But numbers fell after the 2021 election, sinking below the inherited level last year to just 16,207 before rising again to 16,533 in the first quarter of 2025.
Figures released by the Tories yesterday showed officers racked up 4.5 million hours overtime in the past five years, with hours up 7.5 per cent last year to 773,151.
The party said it showed a frontline stretched to 'breaking point'.
David Threadgold, chair of the Scottish Police Federation, said: 'When police have the tools and the resources, they have the ability to get the job done - but at present we're not able to carry out basic police functions like interacting with the public to prevent crime in the first place.
'Operational cops are hamstrung because they are carrying out health functions.
'Policing has got to become a greater priority for government.'
Labour MSP Pauline McNeill added: 'The SNP has allowed basic policing to decline, therefore trust in the police service is being eroded. Members of the public must be given the reassurance that when they need help, our police will be there for them.
'Unfortunately, this SNP government has failed to back Police Scotland, just as it has allowed public services to decline.'
Ms Constance highlighted record funding of £1.64 billion for policing this year.
'I am concerned to hear there is a perceived increase in crime being experienced by some.
'I want to reassure people that Scotland continues to be a safe place to live with reported crime falling by more than half since 1991.
'The flagship Scottish Crime and Justice Survey also showed people feel safer in their communities.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
To all who think capitalism can drive progressive change, it won't – and here's the shocking proof
The axe fell with shocking suddenness. On Thursday Aberdeen Group plc terminated its Financial Fairness Trust without notice and sacked the CEO, Mubin Haq, the chair and all the trustees, leaving eight staff dangling. The company tells me it plans to move in a different direction. That dreaded phrase marks the end of 16 remarkable years, during which the trust sponsored some of the most influential research into inequality and its financial causes. Aberdeen is a wealth management and investment company. I admired its willingness to fund research not in its own immediate interest, but for the sake of social improvement, as a sign that decent capitalism was possible. Now that's over. The mood has changed. Wildfires started by President Trump are engulfing global companies as his administration attempts to bar asset and retirement plan managers from considering environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors in investment decisions and targets private sector diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives with executive orders. Companies doing good are at risk. I ask Aberdeen if that's why it has shut down the trust. It denies it strongly, saying it is just a 'natural evolution'. Expect an explosive backlash. Just look at the list of research organisations it has previously given funding to but is now casting off: the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), the Resolution Foundation, the Royal United Services Institute, Bright Blue, the New Economics Foundation, the Centre for the Analysis of Taxation (CenTax), the Child Poverty Action Group, the High Pay Centre and Transport for All. It has also funded funeral poverty research by Quaker Social Action and consumer research by Which?. The trust has £3.6m of grants promised, in a field where small sums for social research projects can profoundly affect policy and politics. Paul Johnson, the outgoing IFS director, says this money is 'a crucial part of the UK's research funding infrastructure focused on improving the financial security of those on lower incomes'. He talks ruefully of billions of pounds for scientific research but a pittance for social research. 'We have no Large Hadron Colliders.' Aberdeen should beware the swathe of distinguished economists, researchers, academics, public servants, public thinkers and charitable entrepreneurs it has unthinkingly cut off in this political assault. The trust was founded in 2009, using unclaimed assets after the demutualisation of Standard Life, which later merged with Aberdeen Asset Management. Last week, its website shut down instantly, with the misleading notice 'Please bear with us and we will aim to resume normal service as quickly as we can'. There will be no normal service. David Norgrove, the summarily sacked chair, is not going quietly. Neither is he someone to be treated so high-handedly. He is a former chair of the UK Statistics Authority, the Pensions Regulator, the Low Pay Commission, the M&S pension fund, the Family Justice Review and more. He is outraged at how the trust was cancelled in a day. 'Shoddy behaviour,' he says to me, then adds: 'Abrupt, rude, ungracious.' This will, he says, 'be damaging to them'. Aberdeen did lose £5bn in net outflows in the first quarter of this year – its share price has somewhat revived since – but says all the funds will still go to charity. I ask if there is a guarantee that the latest £3.6m of grant funding letters will be honoured. The reply is weaselly: 'The various funding relationships will be under review and that will include looking at what contractual commitments are in place, so it's too early to be definitive.' CenTax is a grant recipient left in limbo over the future of its promised three years of funding. This week the trust was about to start on another £2m round: due for grants were the Living Pension Foundation, to sign up 500 companies to join Aviva, L&G and others pledging more livable pensions. The Child Poverty Action Group will now get no funds for an annual forensic review of child poverty strategy, nor will the High Pay Centre receive money for research into remuneration committees that focuses on entire workforces, not just top executives. Why is Aberdeen trashing its reputation? Because times have changed. Doing good is not fashionable in the business world. Johnson says: 'I presume some of the trust's funding is not compatible with Aberdeen. It's an overreaction to our research on pension tax relief, or the Resolution Foundation's work in wealth tax reliefs.' Most social research is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and the Nuffield Foundation, but he says after the trust, there are 'no significant others'. Aberdeen says the only reason for the change is to divert its funds to a conventional charitable foundation that supports individuals, such as young unemployed people – although this is funding that won't lead to a larger questioning of social, financial or tax systems. The company is already famous for idiocy – it abolished the Es in its name in 2021 to become the unpronounceable 'Abrdn', claiming it was a 'modern, agile, digitally-enabled brand'. Mocked for 'irritable vowel syndrome', it joined disaster rebrands such as Royal Mail's Consignia and PwC Consulting's Monday. It makes you question any decisions their boards make. But this is serious. It's a symptom of darkening business attitudes. Research this month shows that 56% of senior financial professionals in the UK now 'believe their leadership will place less focus on ESG principles over the next five years'. WPP, one of the largest media companies in the world, removed all mentions of DEI from its latest annual report. Research by the Observer found that mentions of ESG declined by 22% in last year's annual reports from FTSE 100 companies. Amazon is scaling back its DEI policy, calling this civilisational regression an 'evolution'. Former trustees suggest Aberdeen may have had complaints from clients who hate research about poverty and wealth that exposes unjust tax reliefs for the rich. When I ask, its press officer does admit he sometimes has to tell journalists from the Telegraph and others that Aberdeen Group plc is not responsible for the research its trust may fund: every trust-funded report has a disclaimer saying the trust is entirely independent of the company. This turns out, sadly, not to be true, since Aberdeen can cancel it at whim. This week will mark the launch in Westminster of a trust-funded two-year commission into pensions by the IFS, with the former minister David Gauke chairing its advisory committee and Torsten Bell, the pensions minister and former head of the Resolution Foundation, speaking. The chair of Aberdeen Group, Douglas Flint, who is due to attend, may find himself less in favour than when he was invited to join Labour's City advisers as part of a financial services review. He lobbies for less regulation of banks, calling the post-financial-crash restrictions 'disproportionate'. If I were him, I wouldn't dare turn up. Polly Toynbee is a Guardian columnist
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Scottish Labour MPs urged to join rebellion and stop disability cuts
SNP's Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said that the vote would be a 'test of fairness' for Scottish Labour MPs. However, in response to the call, the party told Flynn to get his 'own house in order' and hit out at the SNP. Last week, more than 120 Labour MPs signed an amendment that would have blocked the looming changes to Personal Independence Payments (PIP) and the sickness-related element of Universal Credit (UC). The cuts, which would reportedly save £4.8 billion by 2029-30, would have pushed 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, into poverty. READ MORE: Social Security Scotland is 'shining example of what independence can do' The rebellion forced the UK Government to make 'concessions'. Now the legislation will allow current PIP claimants to keep their benefits, but tighten eligibility for new claimants. Those currently receiving the UC health element, as well as new claimants meeting the severe conditions criteria, will have their incomes 'fully protected in real terms'. However, the SNP and other critics have said this is still not good enough. With a vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Bill set for Tuesday, it has been widely reported that 50 Labour MPs are set to defy the Government whip. It could be the biggest rebellion of Starmer's premiership yet. SNP MP Flynn said Scottish Labour MPs have the power to stop the UK Government's 'attack on disabled people'. Of the 50 MPs reportedly set to rebel, the only Scottish MP in the cohort is Brian Leishman, who said on Sunday he was not 'proud' of Starmer's first year in charge. (Image: House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA Wire) Labour have 402 MPs in total, with 237 opposition politicians able to vote in Parliament. According to the Institute for Government, this gives Labour an effective working majority of 165 votes in the House of Commons. This means 83 Labour MPs would need to rebel to ensure a Government defeat, with all opposition and independent MPs also voting against the Government. If all remaining 36 Scottish Labour MPs joined with their colleagues and the opposition in voting against the legislation, it would take the number of rebels to 86. This would stop the legislation from passing at the second stage and moving on to the House of Lords. Flynn said that the parliamentary maths are 'becoming clear' and urged Scottish Labour MPs to block the legislation. READ MORE: Poverty levels in Scotland below UK for 20 years, graphs show 'This legislation, which would create a cruel two-tier disability system, is an attack on disabled people and its fate now rests in the hands of Scottish Labour MPs,' he said. 'The choice ahead of those Scottish Labour MPs is simple – they can either support Keir Starmer's cuts or they can support disabled people. 'This is a test of fairness and a test of values – how can any MP vote for a system that means if you have an accident that causes a disability, develop a disability over time or if you have a child with a disability, you will receive less support than those who have come before you.' Flynn said it was also a test for Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, who has so far backed the cuts despite the growing rebellion. 'People in Scotland will be watching to see how he instructs his Scottish Labour MPs to vote today – and they won't forget if he fails to do the right thing,' he said. "People in Scotland know that the SNP will strongly oppose these cuts - we will vote against them and work against them at every single parliamentary stage and step. 'The Scottish people should be able to expect that every Labour MP in Scotland will do the exact same.' It comes as modelling published by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) suggested around 150,000 people will be pushed into poverty by 2030 due to the welfare cuts, as the plans currently stand. READ MORE: Why did the BBC uphold its flawed claim on UK income inequality? A Scottish Labour spokesperson said: 'With 240,000 children in Scotland living in poverty, record numbers of homeless young people, rising sexual crime and the NHS on its knees, Stephen Flynn should hang his head in shame over what the SNP have done to Scotland. 'With the SNP now reviewing the application of their own ADP benefit, the hypocrisy that they have displayed over the current welfare bill has been exposed for all to see. 'Stephen Flynn should get his own house in order and apologise to the Scots being failed every day by his knackered and incompetent party.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
'I've been told SNP will ban conversion practices in new parliament'
But the plans were shelved after John Swinney succeeded Mr Yousaf as First Minister. The Scottish Government confirmed in the Programme for Government that its proposals were being put on hold during the current parliamentary term, which ends in May next year, and that the administration will instead work with UK ministers on agreeing Westminster-led legislation that would include Scottish measures. A specific ban in Scotland was agreed between former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon and the Scottish Greens as part of the Bute House Agreement which saw the smaller pro independence party brought into government for the first time in 2021. But when the deal collapsed, it was among the policies to be subsequently dropped. READ MORE: In an interview with The Herald Ms Roddick was asked if she was disappointed the Scottish Government won't bring in a ban on conversion practices in this parliament. "When the Programme for Government came forward, I was very clear in the chamber that this was a disappointment," she said. "I acted very much on the evidence that was presented when I was minister, as I sat down with people who have historically or recently been subjected to the kind of torment that the SNP is committed to banning. I know it [will] continue to happen until we bring this ban in." She added: "I have had reassurances that work continues and that the Scottish Government, failing an agreement with the UK Government, will bring a bill forward next session. So to me that is reassuring." The decision signalled another significant shift by the Scottish Government under Mr Swinney's leadership away from Ms Sturgeon's rights-focused policy agenda. But campaigners against conversion practices reacted furiously. 'This is the latest in a growing list of betrayals for LGBTQ+ Scots from this Scottish Government. Scotland could have banned conversion therapy years ago,' a spokesperson for End Conversion Therapy Scotland said at the time. 'LGBTQ+ rights are under attack right now, in a way we haven't seen since Thatcher's section 28 ban on 'promoting homosexuality'. Queer people are crying out for some solidarity from politicians. Instead, this news is a stab in the back.' During Ms Sturgeon's and Mr Yousaf's governments the SNP became embroiled in major internal rows over equalities policies. The SNP suffered its biggest backbench rebellion over Gender Recognition Reform Bill (GRRB), designed to make the process easier for trans people to change their legal gender. Later former rural affairs secretary Fergus Ewing - who was among the SNP GRRB rebels - called for Mr Swinney to drop plans for a ban on conversion practices. Mr Ewing is now standing as an independent candidate against Ms Roddick in Inverness and Nairn at next year's Holyrood election. Polls suggest the SNP will remain the largest party at Holyrood after the election in May next year, with a reduced number of MSPs. Such the polling trend continues, it may mean the SNP will continue as a minority government. The Scottish Government was approached for comment.
