Surprising personality trait means you're better at saving money
They see the wallet half full.
The power of positivity might seem like hocus pocus, but having an optimistic outlook could literally benefit one's bank account, according to a sunny study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Per the research, conducted by scientists from the University of Colorado Boulder and the University of New Hampshire, positive people on average saved 16.9% more than their more pessimistic counterparts, the American Psychological Association reported.
These results dispelled popular misconceptions that optimistic people save less because they assume everything will work out financially.
'We often think of optimism as rose-colored glasses that might lead people to save less for the future,' said the study's lead author, Joe Gladstone, Ph.D., from the University of Colorado Boulder, in a statement.
'But our research suggests optimism may actually be an important psychological resource that helps people save, especially when facing economic hardship.'
To deduce the impact of a positive attitude on one's bank account, researchers analyzed data from eight large population surveys spanning the US, the UK and 14 European countries. The pool comprised 140,000 total participants ranging from young adults to retirees.
They reportedly rated their level of optimism based on how they responded to statements such as 'I am always optimistic about my future' and 'Overall, I expect more good things to happen to me than bad.'
Respondents were also asked to report their income, savings and even total assets.
Researchers found that, on average, those with sunny dispositions saved more than their less positive brethren by a substantial factor.
For example, if someone saved $62,410, their optimistic attitude correlated to an extra $10,547 saved compared to their negative Nancy counterparts.
Best of all, this rule held true across different countries, ages, genders, employment statuses and other factors — suggesting a strong correlation between a positive outlook and staying afloat financially.
Furthermore, researchers found that the financial effect of 'optimism was similar to what previous research has found for conscientiousness, a personality trait that's widely recognized for its positive influence on financial outcomes,' Gladstone said.
'Optimism also appears to exert a slightly stronger influence on savings behavior than financial literacy and risk tolerance.'
The benefit of positivity on conserving cabbage was most pronounced among lower-income brackets. Gladstone attributed this phenomenon to the fact that higher-income individuals have more ways to save, including mortgage payments, retirement contributions and, most notably, higher earnings that make it easier not to shell out dough.
Of course, there were some caveats to this so-called theory that people can convert a carpe diem disposition to cash.
'For someone living paycheck to paycheck, saving can feel futile,' Gladstone noted. 'But an optimistic outlook may provide the motivation to set aside money despite present challenges.'
He added, 'A mindset of hope for the future, paired with the skills to manage money wisely, may be key to helping more people build financial security.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
15 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Musk Rages as Trump Tax Bill Slashes Electric Vehicle Credits
Elon Musk slammed the US Senate's latest version of President Donald Trump's multi-trillion dollar tax bill Saturday, raging online that the cuts to electric vehicle and other clean energy credits would be 'incredibly destructive' to the country. Musk, the chief executive officer of Tesla Inc. and SpaceX, posted on his social media platform X about the bill, which the Senate was planning to put to an initial vote on Saturday. Musk recently left Trump's side after working for several months as the head of Trump's so-called Department of Government Efficiency.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Two Workers for SEC's EDGAR System Charged With Insider Trading
(Bloomberg) -- Two men who worked for the Securities and Exchange Commission's EDGAR public filing system were charged with insider trading after allegedly pocketing $1 million by stealing non-public information obtained through their jobs. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown Justin Chen and Jun Zhen, both of Brooklyn, New York, were charged in a federal complaint with obtaining material, non-public information about companies like Purple Innovation Inc., Ondas Holdings Inc., SigmaTron International Inc., and Signing Day Sports Inc. through their work at EDGAR, according to Brooklyn US Attorney Joseph Nocella. Prosecutors say that between March and June 2025 the pair engaged in a scheme to obtain information about these companies, which announced they had entered into merger agreements or partnerships 'that resulted in significant increases in the share price of each company's stock.' Chen, 31, and Zhen, 29, purchased shares in the companies before the announcements, 'and sold those shares at a significant profit immediately after the announcement,' according to a complaint filed in federal court in Brooklyn. 'In total, Chen and Zhen have made a profit of more than $1 million from their trading.' Agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation arrested Chen and Zhen Friday night at John F. Kennedy International Airport as they were planning to board a flight to Hong Kong, said John Marzulli, a spokesman for Nocella. Chen worked as an EDGAR operator and assistant manager while Zhen worked as an EDGAR operator and typeset manager, prosecutors said. The two had access to the company announcements before they were filed. Both men are charged with securities fraud, which carries a prison term of as long as 25 years, prosecutors said. Chen and Zhen made their initial court appearances in federal court in Brooklyn on Saturday before US Magistrate Judge Vera Scanlon, who ordered them held without bail. Chris Wright, a lawyer for Zhen, and Charles Millioen, a lawyer for Chen, didn't immediately return email messages seeking comment about their clients. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Better Dividend Stock: Kinder Morgan vs. Enterprise Products Partners
Kinder Morgan is one of the largest midstream operators in North America. Enterprise Products Partners is one of the largest midstream operators in North America. One of these two midstream giants has a better track record of reliably paying investors for sticking around. 10 stocks we like better than Kinder Morgan › If you are looking at Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI) and its 4.1% dividend yield, you should also consider Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) and its 6.8% distribution yield. But the reason for preferring Enterprise over Kinder Morgan is only partly to do with the yield, particularly if you are a dividend-focused investor. Here's what you need to know to decide between these two midstream giants. From a big-picture perspective, both Kinder Morgan and Enterprise Products Partners operate in the energy sector. This sector is known for being volatile, thanks to the huge impact that oil and natural gas prices have on the financial results of most energy companies. But not all energy companies, since Kinder Morgan and Enterprise are largely toll takers, charging fees for moving oil and natural gas around the world. Essentially, these midstream players sit between the upstream (energy production) and the downstream (chemicals and refining). The pipelines, storage, and transportation assets they own generate reliable fees, with the price of the commodities moving through their systems far less important than demand for the services they provide. And demand for energy tends to be fairly high even when energy prices are low. So both Kinder Morgan and Enterprise have attractive and reliable business models in what is an otherwise volatile industry. From this perspective, Kinder Morgan and Enterprise are very similar. They are also very similar when it comes to the size of their asset portfolios, which are among the largest in North America. In fact, both businesses have market caps in the $60 billion to $70 billion range. But they aren't interchangeable. Midstream investments are generally considered for the reliable income stream they provide to investors. The lofty dividend yields of both Kinder Morgan and Enterprise are part of that story. However, there's a back history that investors shouldn't ignore. In 2016, the energy sector was going through a difficult period. Enterprise increased its distribution. Kinder Morgan cut its distribution by 75%. To be fair, it was the right move for the company, but it was a terrible outcome for income investors. The real problem, however, is that just a couple of months prior to the cut, management was guiding for a dividend increase of as much as 10%. The cash freed up from the dividend cut was used to strengthen Kinder Morgan's balance sheet and to invest in growth opportunities. So the cut made the business stronger, with management eventually getting dividend growth back on track. But even here there was a problem. It set out an aggressive dividend growth schedule and then fell short of that plan during the difficult energy market in 2020, during the coronavirus pandemic. In other words, Kinder Morgan has let dividend investors down during each of the most recent energy industry downturns. Enterprise increased its distribution modestly in 2020, but that is basically what it has done for years. In fact, at this point, Enterprise has reliably increased its distribution year in and year out for 26 consecutive years. Kinder Morgan looks like it is in much better financial and business shape today than it was in 2016. And the 2020 dividend miss was reasonable, too, given the uncertainty at the time. But if being able to trust how the management teams of the investments you own address what's important to you, Enterprise will be the better investment option. And you'll collect a higher yield while you're at it. Before you buy stock in Kinder Morgan, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Kinder Morgan wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Kinder Morgan. The Motley Fool recommends Enterprise Products Partners. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Dividend Stock: Kinder Morgan vs. Enterprise Products Partners was originally published by The Motley Fool