Possible Postal Service changes present challenge to Alaska Bypass Mail
In late February, Alaska Senate President Gary Stevens, R-Kodiak, and House Speaker Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham, issued a letter to the state's congressional delegation voicing concerns over active and proposed federal spending cuts. In a list of potentially targeted agencies and programs they included one unique to Alaska: Bypass Mail.
Bypass Mail is an Alaska-only classification of parcel post mail that bypasses U.S. Postal Service facilities. It includes food and other products that are shipped from Anchorage and Fairbanks through private carriers to retailers off of the road system. Bypass Mail must be from a single seller to a single recipient, shrink-wrapped and moved on pallets for ease of storage, and in a minimum order of 1,000 pounds. The USPS subsidizes the service, at an estimated cost of $133 million in 2022.
Alaskans' concern over Bypass Mail is rooted in recent comments by President Donald Trump, who recently suggested ending the independence of the U.S. Postal Service. On Feb. 21, the Washington Post reported that Trump planned to transfer the USPS to the Department of Commerce. The president added the next day that the Commerce secretary was 'going to look at' postal reform. On March 5, presidential adviser Elon Musk announced his support for privatizing the Postal Service, saying, 'I think we should privatize the Post Office and Amtrak for example …. We should privatize everything we possibly can.'
Calls to privatize the Postal Service have occurred since the 1980s, with rural delivery serving as a primary target. That's especially true for Alaska, where much of the state relies on air mail delivery. Virginia Congressman Gerry Connolly, ranking Democrat on the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform was succinct last month in his estimation of what privatization would mean for the state, telling CNN, 'If you privatize the Postal Service, there's not a piece of mail that could be delivered in Alaska for any kind of reasonable price.'
Those who oppose Bypass Mail, including the national-level Postal Service leaders, have repeatedly argued that it is not a mail service like others provided by the USPS. Instead, it is more similar to a private freight service. A 2011 USPS report referred to it as 'a freight service that includes items seemingly considered nonmailable anywhere else in the United States.'
Bypass mail grew organically, out of the inability in the 1970s for Anchorage post offices to process the high volume of parcel post that was shipped to the bush. This mail reached its final destination by air and postal employees at that time began shifting large orders directly to the air carriers in a system they devised on their own.
Rural mail service through the U.S. has been protected against previous cost-cutting attempts by a mandate in the 1970 Postal Reauthorization Act, which was co-sponsored by Alaska U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens, created the USPS as the independent agency it is today. It codified into law that the USPS must provide 'equitable service to all Americans.'
Bypass Mail has periodically been targeted for criticism. It was the subject of a strongly negative 2011 USPS report, followed by a 2014 congressional hearing. Then-Congressman Don Young testified at the time to the often unspoken and unsolvable part of the Alaska mail problem: lack of roads. 'Now, you build me some highways, Mr. Chairman,' he challenged California Republican Congressman Darrell Issa, 'and I will go along with you.' The hearing resulted in no changes to the Bypass Mail system.
Postmaster General Louis DeJoy suggested eliminating Bypass entirely in 2020, but backed down in the face of political opposition.
While those seeking to eliminate Bypass have suggested that without it shippers would promptly turn to freight services, Grant Aviation's Vice President of Commercial Operations Dan Knesek is mindful of parcel post's history. He cautions that those seeking to discontinue the program should be aware of how parcel post was previously the overwhelming choice for most Alaskan shippers and what returning to it would entail for the USPS.
'If those [thousands of pounds of] boxes were not shipped via Bypass, every box would be taken individually into the local post office by the shipper, every box would be weighed individually by a postal employee, and every box would then have to be stored in the post office until every box was separately dispatched for delivery. When it arrived in the destination village, the USPS would have to have employees out at that airport to receive every single box and either store them in those post offices or deliver them immediately. Right now,' he concluded, 'none of that storage and none of that handling is done by postal employees. It is almost entirely done by the aviation industry in Alaska. If the post office was to remove Bypass then it would need to invest in warehouses, hangars, trucks, forklifts, staff and everything else to do what the carriers are doing, and have done, in Alaska for decades.'
Under the current system, USPS's only responsibility for Bypass Mail is to cover some of its costs. Once received by a carrier, the shipments are always under their control. The USPS thus is freed from responsibility for storage, loading, unloading, and delivery.
Last year, according to Knesek, Grant Aviation moved 17 million pounds of U.S. mail as a Bush air carrier, with the majority of it Bypass Mail. Bush carriers serve small villages, mainline carriers serve hub destinations where the mail is then disseminated to Bush carriers.
Additionally, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, which currently has figures through November 2024, reports that Bering Air moved 13.8 million pounds that year, Alaska Central Express moved 11.3 million pounds, Ryan Air moved 11 million pounds and Wright Air Service moved 5.4 million pounds. Several other companies flew figures less than one million pounds and Everts Air Cargo, which flies both mainline and Bush mail, flew just over 25 million pounds.
When asked to comment on privatization and how it would affect Alaska, a USPS spokesperson replied that there was no statement at this time as the 'inquiry is centered on action by the administration and cuts that haven't happened.'
Meanwhile, on March 14, DeJoy released a letter informing Congress that the USPS had entered into an agreement with the General Services Administration and Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The agencies were going to assist USPS in 'identifying and achieving further efficiencies'.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Epstein Scandal Is Just the Beginning of Government's Failures To Protect Kids
If people are really concerned about child sex trafficking, they should not treat it like a political tool. While it's always a good thing when child sexual exploitation receives the attention it deserves, the issue should be more than political fodder or a talking point for conspiracy theorists. It is, of course, important for the public to recognize and expose powerful people who exploit the vulnerable. That list is long—allegations have plagued Matt Gaetz, Bill Cosby, Robert Kraft, Linda McMahon, and Sean Combs, to name a few from recent headlines. The circumstances around Jeffrey Epstein's ability to obtain a secret plea deal while running an international child sex ring should absolutely be exposed. That being said, the problem of child sexual abuse and exploitation merits sustained attention. If people really care about sexual exploitation and trafficking, their focus should be on how the powerful fail to put children first both in politics and in society. A major battleground in the fight to protect children is social media and AI regulation. Following reports that leading Big Tech companies knew about their products' negative effects on children—including increased risks of sexual exploitation—legislators sprang into action. At the same time, however, other leading congressional figures have disrupted those efforts, allowing the exploitation to continue unchecked. People holds signs calling for the release of files regarding late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein participate in a protest as part of the 'Good Trouble Lives On' national day of action against the administration of... People holds signs calling for the release of files regarding late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein participate in a protest as part of the 'Good Trouble Lives On' national day of action against the administration of US President Donald Trump in Houston, Texas, on July 17, 2025. More RONALDO SCHEMIDT / AFP/Getty Images Last year, for example, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) did Big Tech's bidding to sink the Kids Online Safety Act, preventing it from receiving a vote in the House after it passed the Senate 91-3. Conservative news outlets identified Meta's control over House leadership as key to killing child protection legislation. This was the same congressional leadership that slipped a Big Tech-friendly non-budget provision into the budget bill that would have repealed all state legislation trying to curb AI exploitation of children. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) tried to do the same in the Senate, but was fortunately defeated when Sens. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) had the courage to amend it—their amendment passed 99-1. But now that courage is being rewarded by Big Tech efforts to sneak the regulation moratorium into other legislation. Big Tech spent $51 million lobbying just last year, including to defeat legislation such as child online safety measures. Meta alone spent nearly $6 million dollars last quarter lobbying against, among others, child online safety provisions. The public should condemn these actions and, as we've already seen, if this child protection legislation can actually get to a vote, it passes in overwhelming margins. If those who are upset about Jeffrey Epstein really care about child sex trafficking, they should also be outraged at the Trump administration, which is currently undermining child sex trafficking protections. The Department of State "shut down" the office primarily responsible for combating human trafficking—the Office to Monitor and Prevent Human Trafficking—a move which one former U.S. ambassador-at-large to monitor and combat trafficking in persons describes as making it "impossible" to carry out what the law requires to address human trafficking. The administration also cut funding to a group that was tracking the nearly 20,000 Ukrainian children kidnapped by Russian soldiers from their families and brought to Russia, a well-known hub of human trafficking. Domestically, the Department of Justice cut more than $500 million in grants to victim services including "direct funding for victims' services for survivors of human trafficking." Additionally, it gutted the Civil Rights Division, which houses the Human Trafficking Prosecution Unit. If those following the Epstein scandal really care about the sexual assault of children, they should continue to act when the Epstein story fades, to address the government's assault on the nearly 40 percent of trafficking victims who are children. The government—by carrying Big Tech's water in legislatures, by cutting offices that enforce trafficking laws, and by cutting services to trafficking victims—is not only abandoning victims but facilitating their exploitation. Activists who truly care about child exploitation must continue to pressure Congress and the executive branch to act to protect children as vigorously as they demand answers in the Epstein case. Mary Graw Leary is a Professor of Law at the Catholic University of America focusing on criminal law and human trafficking and a former state and federal prosecutor. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.


Politico
16 minutes ago
- Politico
NRCC memo outlines GOP talking points for selling megabill
The memo reveals how the party hopes to communicate a potential vulnerability ahead of next year's midterms. In particular, the NRCC wants members to cast the bill's Medicaid cuts — already a top target of Democrats — as an overhaul that will strengthen the program. The organization also highlights polls showing voters support work requirements and removing ineligible recipients from coverage. 'With the One Big Beautiful Bill signed into law by President Trump just a few weeks ago, this is a critical opportunity to continue to define how this legislation will help every voter and push back on Democrat fearmongering,' the NRCC wrote in the memo. The comprehensive memo from Republicans' campaign arm shows just how crucial the messaging battle will be ahead of 2026, as both parties expect the megabill, recently signed into law, to become one of the top issues of the cycle. Republicans want to avoid letting Democrats control the message around the bill, especially given that midterms historically favor the party that is out of power — and rule of the House could be decided by just a few seats. By equipping the conference with ample talking points, the NRCC is hoping members can stave off the onslaught of attacks from Democrats. The memo relays a few areas the NRCC wants members to focus on, including getting ahead of the attacks that Democrats have already started waging about the bill. 'We can't let them control the narrative,' the NRCC said of Democrats. Congressional Republicans joined President Donald Trump in signing their 'one big beautiful' bill last week. | Evan Vucci/AP In warning GOP members not to fall for Democratic 'trackers,' or political operatives who will try to get them to say damaging info, while they are back home, the NRCC advised, 'They are not reporters or constituents; you do not owe them a response.' In addition to Medicaid, the NRCC urged its members to highlight tax relief, immigration, business reforms and 'holding elites accountable.'


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Republicans across the country are pushing bills to stop government 'weather modification'
'They're upset over what they call chemtrails they see in the sky,' Greene said of constituents who have contacted her about the issue. 'They're continually upset about it, and they're engaged on it. But it hadn't gotten there on a wide scale. Remember the flooding in Dubai? That was one of the first times I saw, like, 'Oh, this went mainstream, and people are paying attention.'' A Democrat who works on environmental policy said the episode has them feeling as bleak as ever about the future of their field. 'I saw someone tweet the other day a picture of the sky, and it was blue,' this person said. 'And then 20 minutes later, there were clouds. And they said, 'How is this possible?' And I'm like, have people just never looked up?' This person said the focus on geoengineering has crystallized in their mind as the next stage of the Republican response to the impact of climate change. 'It went from 'we don't believe in climate change' to 'we actually believe in this other thing,'' this person said. 'It absolutely is their response to climate change.' Greene and Burchett's legislation still has a long road ahead of it before it could become law, which Greene acknowledged in the interview. But in Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis signed such legislation into law last month. That bill was a high-level priority for Republican state Attorney General James Uthmeier, DeSantis' former chief of staff. At Uthmeier's urging, the state's Republican-dominated Legislature passed a bill this year that makes weather modification and geoengineering a third-degree felony punishable by a fine of up to $100,000. The bill passed with only Republican votes. 'Florida does appear to have seen evidence of weather modification activities in the state,' a spokesman for the attorney general's office said. 'We don't yet know what impacts cloud-seeding or aerosol releases have on environmental or human health, which is all the more reason why Florida wants to raise public awareness and stop weather modification experiments in the state.' In Florida, a decades-old law requires permission from the state for anyone to alter the weather. State officials told the Tampa Bay Times that no one has ever applied under the law. In a letter this month, Uthmeier warned publicly owned airports across the state that they must be in compliance with the new law, which requires public airports to report planes with weather modification devices to the state, and suggested that weather modification may have triggered the flooding in Texas. 'Because airports are most likely to catch those who seek to weaponize science in order to push their agenda, your compliance with these reporting obligations is essential to keeping our state safe from these harmful chemicals and experiments,' Uthmeier wrote this month. The Trump administration is also trying to address the concerns. This month, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin directed readers to his agency's new resources on geoengineering and contrails. (Contrails are naturally forming condensation trails from rockets and other aircraft.) Those new websites shut down claims of government weather control, saying the government was not engaged in solar geoengineering testing and that the 'federal government is not aware of there ever being a contrail intentionally formed over the United States for the purpose of geoengineering or weather modification.' Bartolotta highlighted the new information now available on the EPA's website, saying its mention of the issue is more evidence that her concerns are valid and adding that she is worried about potential adverse health impacts. 'I know so many people today, they're finally noticing, and it gets worse and worse and worse,' she said. 'Every single day, you can't look at the sky and not see huge stripes sprayed by all these planes every single day and every night.'