
Chinese PL-15 vs French Rafale: Proxy clash hints at deeper China-West military rivalry
Listen to article
The recent escalation between Pakistan and India, which brought both nuclear-armed neighbours to the brink of full-scale war, marked a significant shift in the nature of warfare between the two countries.
For the first time, French-made 4.5 gen Rafale fighter jets operated by India were downed in combat.
Unlike previous conflicts, Pakistan did not rely on US-supplied weaponry, while India has increasingly shifted from Russian arms to equipment sourced from Western countries.
The development is viewed not just as a Pakistan-India engagement, but as a real-world proxy test of Chinese versus Western military technology—potentially fuelling new competition in the global arms market and drawing diplomatic attention from Paris, Washington, and NATO-aligned states.
Several analysts have highlighted the air force engagements, with some pointing to the possible role of Chinese-supplied PL-15 air-to-air missiles perhaps being the difference-maker.
Images shared on social media show a section of the missile's fuselage with visible serial markings and a seeker test port. Another image appears to show the missile's seeker head, equipped with an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, known for improved tracking and resistance to jamming.
So 1st Use of PL-15 Very Long Range Air to Air Missile by PAF. pic.twitter.com/LMR1vgBk55 — International Defence Analysis (@Defence_IDA) May 7, 2025
Confirmed Indian Air Force 🇫🇷-made Dassault Rafale lost.
Was it shot down using 🇨🇳-made PL-15 air-to-air missile ? Or 🇨🇳-made HQ-9BE air defense system ? https://t.co/5Wl01Si54S pic.twitter.com/B12GygNfWa — MenchOsint (@MenchOsint) May 7, 2025
Air-to-air PL-15 missile
The PL-15, developed by China's Aviation Industry Corporation (AVIC), is a long-range, radar-guided missile designed to engage high-value airborne targets at ranges exceeding 200 kilometres.
PL-15 is China's standard active-radar-guided AAM, and it was intended to at least match the performance of the US-made AIM-120D Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM).
Screen grab
Its export version, the PL-15E, is reported to have a maximum range of 145 kilometres and is integrated with Pakistan's JF-17 Block III and J-10CE fighters.
The domestic version in use of the Chinese military has a reported range of between 300-500 kilometers.
South Asian combat theatre
The Pakistan Air Force (PAF) released visuals on April 26 showing JF-17s armed with PL-15E and PL-10 missiles. Pakistan's fleet includes an estimated 45–50 JF-17 Block IIIs and 20 J-10CEs—approximately 70 aircraft capable of deploying the PL-15E.
The missile's guidance system includes inertial navigation, Beidou satellite updates, a two-way datalink, and AESA radar terminal homing.
It features a dual-pulse solid rocket motor and can reach speeds exceeding Mach 5. The warhead, typically high-explosive fragmentation, weighs between 20 to 25 kilograms.
The weapon may have been sourced directly from China's People's Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF), a claim not independently verified.
India's air force, meanwhile, relies on Rafales equipped with Meteor missiles, Su-30MKIs with R-77s, and S-400 SAM systems. PL-15's range may allow Pakistani fighters to launch from beyond India's engagement envelopes.
While Pakistan officially confirmed the use of Chinese-made J-10C fighter jets from Chengdu in the downing of Indian Rafales, it has not specified the munitions used.
However, fragments of a PL-15 missile were reportedly recovered from a field near Hoshiarpur in India's Punjab state, potentially marking the first known use of the Chinese missile in active combat.
The development comes after two US officials told Reuters that a Chinese-made Pakistani fighter aircraft was responsible for shooting down at least two Indian military jets, underscoring a major operational milestone for Beijing's advanced fighter systems.
A senior French intelligence official also confirmed to CNN that at least one IAF Dassault Rafale jet had been downed during the skirmish with the Pakistan Air Force.
The debris discovery adds pressure to regional air defence planning and underscores shifting dynamics in South Asia's arms landscape. India's diversified procurement contrasts with Pakistan's increasingly centralised reliance on Chinese systems.
Chinese state media have highlighted the PL-15E's export readiness and advanced production lines. The system's presence in an active conflict may provide China with operational feedback and expand its influence in the global arms market. Neither China nor Pakistan has commented on the missile's appearance.
The deployment of the Chinese-made PL-15 missile in South Asia presents a direct technological counter to Western systems like the US AIM-120D AMRAAM and France's Meteor missile.
While the Meteor is widely regarded as superior in terms of no-escape zones and sustained propulsion via ramjet, the PL-15's longer range and advanced AESA guidance give it a strategic edge in first-launch scenarios—particularly when fired from standoff ranges.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
38 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
China's GDP grows 5.3% in H1 despite global headwinds
Listen to article Defying all predictions, China's economy grew by 5.3% year-on-year in the first half of 2025, according to preliminary data released by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), as Beijing rejigged its trade strategy in the wake of US President Donald Trump's tariff offensive. Beijing stayed ahead of the curve and outmanoeuvred the trade assault by reconfiguring supply chains, broadening its export footprint beyond US markets and shoring up domestic demand to keep growth on track. The overall size of GDP reached 66,053.6 billion yuan ($9.1 trillion), demonstrating China's resilience despite global economic headwinds. The 5.3% GDP growth was higher than the average prediction of 5.1% made by 40 economists interviewed by Reuters. "This is a hard-won achievement, particularly considering the sharp fluctuations in the international situation and heightened external pressures since the second quarter," said NBS Deputy Commissioner Sheng Laiyun. He credited the "highly valuable" numbers to stable progress in the implementation of macro-policy, industrial growth topped by high-tech industries and 68.8% from domestic demand. The breakdown shows that the primary industry contributed 3,117.2 billion yuan, with a YoY increase of 3.7%, driven mainly by stable production in agriculture. The secondary industry accounted for 23,905 billion yuan, up 5.3%, and the services sector witnessed the highest growth, contributing 39,031.4 billion yuan, up 5.5%. China's GDP grew 5.4% YoY in the first quarter and 5.2% in the second, showing steady economic momentum despite the global turmoil spawned mainly by Trump's trade tariffs. The manufacturing sector continues to be the engine of China's economic growth. Industrial output grew 6.8% YoY in June, a sharp pickup from May's 5.8% growth. High-tech industries, new-energy cars and robotics industries were the main drivers of growth, showing the country's strategic focus on technological independence and industrial upgrade. "China will still pursue high-level self-reliance and strength in science and technology," said Wen Bin, Chief Economist of China Minsheng Bank. He believes new schemes, such as the science and technology bond board and associated financial instruments, would further boost tech-led development. High-tech production rose by 9.7% in June, contributing to overall industrial growth. Industries like electric vehicles (EVs), lithium batteries and high-end machinery are witnessing consistent demand both locally and globally. The Chinese government has been promoting industrial innovation through subsidies that target specific sectors, tax breaks and investment incentives, further cementing the sector's growth. "Booming industries, especially the use of digital and green technologies, drove tremendous breakthroughs across industries — illustrating the pace of the nation's technological advances," said Peking University Economist Cao Heping. Despite ongoing global trade uncertainties, Chinese exporters have benefited from reviving international demand and a short-term trade truce with the US. In June 2025, exports expanded by 5.8% YoY, after a 4.8% rise in May. This is the best export growth since mid-2024. Hu Qimu, Deputy Secretary-General of the Forum 50 for Digital-Real Economies Integration, told Xinhua: "The first-half GDP growth reflects the strong resilience of China's economy, underpinned by its comprehensive industrial system and vast market capacity." China's total exports went up by almost 6% in the first half of 2025, ensuring a healthy trade surplus of about $586 billion. Exports to Southeast Asia shot up by 16.8% YoY, showing the country's increasing trade partnership with regional members via agreements like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). China's huge domestic market remains a pillar, supporting long-term economic expansion. Retail sales rose 4.8% in June, after higher 6.4% gains in May. The moderation is attributed by analysts to a mix of risk-averse consumer behaviour and gradual rebalancing in the real estate market. Still, policy measures to spur consumption, such as subsidies for environmentally friendly appliances, electric cars, and rural revitalisation measures, are helping to support it. The introduction of "trade-in" programmes for home appliances and incentives for car replacements have moderated some consumers' wariness. The services sector also recorded a good 5.5% expansion in the first half, reflecting steady demand across segments like transport, finance, health care and internet services. The services industry now represents virtually 60% of China's GDP, highlighting the nation's shift to a more consumption- and services-based economy. The policymakers have used a cautious yet bold strategy to maintain economic growth. The People's Bank of China (PBoC) slashed interest rates earlier this year and pumped in liquidity to stimulate lending and spur business activity. Targeted fiscal policies have aimed at upgrading infrastructure, high-tech industry, and small- and medium-sized enterprises. China has given emphasis to structural change and specific interventions. "China's economic performance this year is a visible rebound and upturn — owing primarily to more solid macroeconomic policies, pointing to a string of monetary easing measures — and a significant boost in fiscal spending," writes Xi Junyang, Professor at Shanghai University of Finance and Economics. International economists are of the view that this strategy demonstrates faith in the intrinsic health of the economy and avoids over-expansion of credit. Considering the Chinese economy's stable path, a number of global financial institutions such as Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and Morgan Stanley have now upped their projections for the country's economic growth rate in 2025. Local authorities have been given the ability to speed up infrastructure expenditure and bring forward strategic projects, such as digital economy centres and renewable energy facilities, further supporting growth. The provisional trade truce with the US, reached in May 2025, has brought welcome relief for Chinese exporters. Analysts foresee a YoY growth in the 5-5.2% range, slightly higher than the government's official target. They believe China's push for high-quality, innovation-based growth is setting the foundation for long-term development. The government's measures to spur domestic demand, promote green technologies, and stabilise property markets are seen supporting the economic momentum. The writer is a student and independent contributor


Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan embassy to host matchmaking event for Pak, Chinese entrepreneurs
BEIJING: In a bid to attract investment and strengthen business ties, the Pakistan Embassy in China will organise a matchmaking event between Pakistani and Chinese entrepreneurs in Beijing by the end of next month. 'We are expecting 100 to 150 Pakistani business leaders or company representatives to visit China during the upcoming meeting of heads of government of Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) member states. For them, we are arranging matchmaking sessions with nearly 300 Chinese companies,' Ghulam Qadir, Commercial Counsellor at Pakistan Embassy in Beijing said on Sunday. Talking to APP, he noted that meetings will be scheduled in advance, allowing participants to familiarise themselves beforehand. 'Rather than meeting for the first time on the event day— which usually leads to limited outcomes— we aim to facilitate meaningful connections through early engagement and preparation,' he explained. A ministerial committee led by Federal Minister for Planning, Development and Reforms, Ahsan Iqbal, has been formed to oversee the initiative. Federal Commerce Minister Jam Kamal Khan serves as the convener, while Special Assistant to the Prime Minister for Industries and Production, Haroon Akhtar Khan, is the co-convener. Ghulam Qadir expressed optimism about the event's impact, anticipating significant results and long-term benefits. He highlighted seven priority sectors identified to boost Chinese investment and bilateral trade: Electric Vehicles (EVs) & Battery Storage, Solar Panel Manufacturing, Steel, Copper, Food & Agriculture, Information & Communication Technology (ICT), and Chemicals/ Petrochemicals. Qadir emphasised the potential of electronic vehicles or EVs in reducing Pakistan's fuel import bill, which amounts to billions of dollars annually. The government has launched a new EV policy and aims to attract more investment from companies like BYD, Geely, and Chery in Pakistan. The sectors including battery production, and charging infrastructure will also improve. With over $2 billion spent annually on solar panel imports, Pakistan is seeking to localize production. 'There are strong demand, an existing market, and the potential for exports,' he said, noting that local manufacturing will cut imports and generate jobs. The government is also looking to introduce green steel technology from China, Qadir noted, adding that steel is essential for EVs, construction, and other key industries. Pakistan offers ample land and demand for setting up such industries. Currently, Pakistan exports raw copper worth around $1 billion. 'We aim to process and refine copper locally, increasing export value to $4–5 billion with the right investments,' he said, adding that collaboration with Chinese firms is crucial. Terming food and agriculture sectors the backbone of the economy, Qadir said the government is focusing on improving crop yields, livestock quality, and food processing capabilities. This would enable Pakistan to export surplus agricultural products to meet China's growing demand. In the area of Information & Communication Technology, Pakistan has a skilled and cost-effective tech workforce, while China has a huge market,' he said, emphasising the scope for partnerships in the ICT sector. Pakistan imports significant volumes of oil and petroleum products. 'We are encouraging joint ventures with Chinese companies for investment and technology transfer in petrochemical sectors which would help serve local needs and open up export opportunities,' he said. Qadir concluded by stressing the need for robust cooperation in these seven sectors, alongside chemicals and petrochemicals. He stated that such partnerships will drive technology transfer, attract foreign investment, expand local manufacturing, increase exports, and create employment opportunities in Pakistan.


Express Tribune
7 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Jinnah foresaw a grim future for Pakistan
The writer is a chemical engineer with interest in Society, Politics & Economy. Contact him at: Listen to article Pakistan, born from majority-Hindu apathy, now suffers majority-Muslim ethnic apathy, a tragic comedy. Durkheim (1858), founder of modern sociology, noted mechanical solidarity creates superficial unity but deeper apathy, explaining our socio-political chaos and economic decline. Recent conflict with India showed tactical wins using Chinese tech, but it didn't end hostilities, and more conflicts to follow with pauses. It is, however, troubling to see apathy in Balochistan, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, and parts of Sindh regarding military victory signifying anemic national cohesion. This demands a revisit to Jinnah's original goal for Pakistan: save some, not all, Muslims in India. He united willing Mohajirs and unwilling Bengal, Punjab, Sindh, NWFP and Balochistan under his vision of a modern democratic state. Sadly, his Pakistan was quickly captured and system was subverted for some while masses and smaller provinces suffered. Mohajirs reduced to "second class citizens" and their political leadership twisted into clown for everyone's amusement. Ironic for descendants of those who fought British Raj (1857) and made Pakistan possible (1947). Still! Redemption lies restoring integrity and moral values not going after material gains, Jinnah's hallmark. Jinnah knew existential threat posed by PakRaj (British-loyalist feudal-military-bureaucratic trio) to unity among different groups and his founding principle — a country for people. Despite poor health, he acted fast: To fight feudalism, Jinnah chose non-feudal leaders in all provinces. Just months before his death, he disbanded landlord system in Sindh (blocked by court) and pushed land reforms in Punjab (sabotaged by legislature). Jinnah's land reforms died with him. West Pakistan stayed feudal, but East Pakistan implemented land reforms by 1950. Ayub and Bhutto's half-measures failed and no one dare talk about land reform in Pakistan since 1977. Jinnah kept military under civilian rule, fired General Messervy for ignoring him on Kashmir and placed military policy under cabinet control. His death allowed military to regain influence with feudals and bureaucrats — something Jinnah had forbidden. His bureaucratic reforms replaced feudal-backed recruits with merit-based ones. An exam under his watch in February 1948 had only 12% feudal recruits. After his death, English test barriers and vague interviews increased feudal share to 65% by 1965. Jinnah expected a grim future for Pakistan without reforms, and he was right. PakRaj initiated country's capture via malafide actions of Ghulam Muhammad and Iskander Mirza - both ex-ICS officers who carried contempt for politicians and democratic process. Using government-dismissal powers, they destroyed democracy between 1948 and 1958. Later, same provision serves a hanging sword over successive governments until last used by Musharraf in 2007. Mirza's tyranny led to martial law as he remained in power, but immediately replaced by Ayub's military dictatorship under judicial cover provided by Justice Munir — mother of all tragedies which State of Pakistan has yet to see, as its last judicial pillar fell. With that ended checks and balances system letting PakRaj do as it pleases. Institutional failures followed: Ayub's failed idea of basic democracies, Bangladesh's creation in 1971, and cycles of dictatorship and managed democracy — Bhutto, Zia, Benazir, Musharraf, Sharifs, Imran, PDM versions. Each rule made institutional decay worse. Why? PakRaj response has been always in "National Interest" (framed as required); over time they became all powerful entity beyond imagination, meanwhile joined by opportunistic politicians, industrialists, businesses tycoons and enablers. So, they control state and operate unaccountably. Period. It would be unfair not to see their performance accumulated over time, which can be evaluated under Scripture's guidance "By their fruits ye shall know them" (Matthew 7:16). The harvest has been bitter. Governance has collapsed: Pakistan ranks poorly globally — all in worst tiers: Corruption 135, Rule of law 129, Political change 100, Governance 122, among others. Economy is equally damning: FY25 shows growth is just 2.68% (target 3.6%) creating more poverty, which is made worse by an increasing population growing at 2.7% annually. Public debt stands at Rs76.01 trillion (74.60% of GDP) with servicing at Rs9.775 trillion (51% of federal spending). Yet politicians approve their own pay rises while Cabinet expanded — a further arrogant act under misrule. Tax shortfall and mismanagement: Feudal escape taxes. SOE losses Rs851 billion, power sector losses Rs660 billion, elitist IPPs-related circular debt Rs2.5 trillion, UGF Rs190 billion, corruption costs 1.4% of GDP and an unknown amount of tax evasion. Pakistan borrows new money to service old debts — absolutely hostage to IMF and the US. Human cost is staggering: About 44.7% live below Rs2,324/day ($4.20/day) and 16.5% live in absolute poverty below Rs840/day ($3.0/day); actual figures will be higher given old database (2018-19). Even with military victory against India, Pakistan is losing war for human dignity which India is winning — only 23.89% of Indians live below $4.20/day, and just 5.3% live in absolute poverty below $3.0/day (CES 2022/23 data). Future? More of same suffering: development spending stays around 0.9% of GDP, health under 0.9%, education below 0.8% — warranting shameful "education emergency". Despite numerous national and international studies on countries' ailments and state commissions since 1949, PakRaj has set aside most recommendations and arrogantly ignored decades of real failures as country continues to decline. C'est la vie! Surely, PakRaj will not give up its power and privileges, nor can we expect them to; I along with them and masses await the coming reckoning, as John Elia said: Hashar main bataon ga tujhy Jo hashar tu nay kiya hay mera What lies before us is a simple binary decision. Do nothing — Accept PakRaj's fiascos disguised as "success" in governance, economy and battlefield wins at mercy of US/China. Or, Do what must be done — Finish Jinnah's structural reforms. Empower educated middle class, entrepreneurs and professionals. Adapt 21st-century realities — digital governance, global economic integration and climate challenges that didn't exist in 1947. History has proved Jinnah was right. He warned: without change we will remain exposed — fragile, divided and easily ruled. The reality always begs core question — whether Pakistan will heed it before it's too late.