
Day camp, summer school and after-school programs in limbo during Trump administration review
The administration is withholding more than $6 billion in federal grants for after-school and summer programs, English language instruction, adult literacy and more as part of a review to ensure
grants align with President Donald Trump's priorities
.
The move leaves states and schools in limbo as they budget for programs this summer and in the upcoming school year, introducing new uncertainty about when — or if — they will receive the money. It also sets the stage for a clash with Democrats, who say the administration is flouting the law by holding back money Congress appropriated.
Without the money, schools say they won't be able to provide free or affordable after-school care for low-income kids while their parents work, and they may not be able to hire staff to teach
children who are learning English
. Even classes or camps underway this summer could be in jeopardy.
For instance, the Boys and Girls Clubs of America depend on some of the withheld money to run camps and other summer programming for low-income students. If funding isn't restored soon, the programming may end mid-season, said Boys and Girls Club President Jim Clark.
After-school programming in the fall could also take a hit. 'If these funds are blocked, the fallout will be swift and devastating,' Clark said. As many as 926 Boys and Girls Clubs could close, affecting more than 220,000 kids, the group said.
Programs that rely on the money were expecting it to be distributed July 1, but an Education Department notice issued Monday announced the money would not be released while the programs are under review. The department did not provide a timeline and warned that 'decisions have not yet been made' on grants for the upcoming school year.
'The Department remains committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the President's priorities and the Department's statutory responsibilities,' Education Department officials wrote in the notice, which was obtained by The Associated Press.
The department referred questions to the Office of Management and Budget, which did not respond to a request for comment.
After-school child care at risk
In Gadsden City Schools in Alabama, officials say they'll have no choice but to shutter their after-school program serving more than 1,200 low-income students if federal funds aren't released. There's no other way to make up for the frozen federal money, said Janie Browning, who directs the program.
Families who rely on after-school programs would lose an important source of child care that keeps children safe and engaged while their parents work. The roughly 75 employees of the district's after-school programs may lose their jobs.
'Those hours between after school and 6 o'clock really are the hours in the day when students are at the most risk for things that may not produce great outcomes,' Browning said. 'It would be devastating if we lost the lifeline of afterschool for our students and our families.'
Jodi Grant, executive director of the Afterschool Alliance, said withholding the money could cause lasting damage to the economy.
Some advocates fear the grants are being targeted for elimination, which could force schools to cut programs and teachers. Trump's 2026 budget proposal called for Congress to zero out all of the programs under review, signaling the administration sees them as unnecessary.
Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., pressed the administration to spend the money as Congress intended.
'Every day that this funding is held up is a day that school districts are forced to worry about whether they'll have to cut back on afterschool programs or lay off teachers instead of worrying about how to make sure our kids can succeed,' Murray said in a statement.
What the money funds
The six grant programs under review include one known as 21st Century Community Learning Centers. It's the primary federal funding source for after-school and summer learning programs and supports more than 10,000 local programs nationwide, according to the Afterschool Alliance. Every state runs its own competition to distribute the grants, which totaled $1.3 billion this fiscal year.
Also under review are $2 billion in grants for teachers' professional development and
efforts to reduce class size
; $1 billion for academic enrichment grants, often used for science and math education and accelerated learning; $890 million for students who are learning English; $376 million to educate the children of migrant workers; and $715 million to teach adults how to read.
These programs account for over 20% of the federal money the District of Columbia receives for K-12 education, according to an
analysis
by the Learning Policy Institute, a think tank. California alone has over $800,000 in limbo, while Texas has over $660,000.
'Trump is illegally impounding billions of dollars appropriated by Congress to serve students this fiscal year,' said Tony Thurmond, California's state superintendent, in a statement. 'The Administration is punishing children when states refuse to cater to Trump's political ideology.
The loss of funds could 'put several more school districts in extreme financial distress,' said Chris Reykdal, superintendent of public instruction in Washington state. Districts have already adopted budgets, planned programming and hired staff, assuming they'd receive the money, Reykdal said.
If the funding freeze remains, children learning English and their parents would be especially affected. Some districts use the money to pay for summer programming designed for English learners, family engagement specialists who can communicate with parents and professional development training for staff. Rural districts would be hit the hardest.
'They're trying to send a message,' said Amaya Garcia, who oversees education research at New America, a left-leaning think tank. 'They don't believe that taxpayer funding should be used for these children.'
Umatilla School District in rural eastern Oregon — with a sizable population of migrant families and students learning English — relies heavily on federal funding for its after-school and summer school programs. Superintendent Heidi Sipe says she is meeting with state officials soon to find out if the district will have to plan an early end to summer school, an option 20% of students are using. Come this fall, if federal money stays frozen, she'll have to lay off staff and eliminate after-school programs attended by around half the district's students.
'It's an essential service in our community because we don't have any licensed child care centers for school-age children,' she said.
Sipe said it's particularly frustrating to deal with these funds being put into limbo because the school district was in the middle of a five-year grant period.
'It feels preventable,' she said, 'and it feels as though we could have done a better job planning for America's children.'
___
The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's
standards
for working with philanthropies, a
list
of supporters and funded coverage areas at
AP.org
.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel's Iran strategy heavily banks on US getting good nuclear deal, sources say
Israel also hopes that Trump can successfully place limits on Iran's ballistic missile supply, but this is even more uncertain. Israel is feeling ascendant after its significant achievements against Iran during the June 13-24 war. Still, sources have said that the current strategy going forward is overwhelmingly banking on the US nailing Tehran down to a tough and long new nuclear deal. If the US does not secure such an airtight deal, Israel is unclear on what its strategy or next steps would be. In contrast to the ceasefire deal and end of the war with Hezbollah on November 27, 2024 which in and of itself set clear limits on Hezbollah's right to rearm and clearly outlined how Israel could proactively enforce those limits, the Iran ceasefire simply stopped the fighting between the sides with zero provisions regarding the future. This lack of a clear plan and certainty is true about how much Israel thinks it can hold back the Islamic Republic from rebuilding its heavily damaged nuclear weapons program, and sources have indicated that the plan may even be less clear regarding imposing and enforcing limits on Iran's ballistic missile program. Jerusalem's ideal world would be a US-brokered deal that ends Iran's nuclear program or ends its uranium enrichment and advanced centrifuges for a period of multiple decades, as well as keeps its quantity of ballistic missiles with a range to hit Israel down at the current 500-1,000 total missiles level. But what if Iran only agrees to certain concessions, but not others? For example, Iran could agree not to enrich uranium for the next year or two, during a period of time when it may not in any event be able to do so after the Israeli and American attacks, followed by enriching uranium at "low levels" like it did under the 2015 JCPOA nuclear deal. This would basically be accepting the offer that US President Donald Trump was offering them before the war, except now they would be "losing" nothing because they cannot, at least for some period of time, do very much uranium enrichment right now anyway. Would Trump reject such a deal and potentially allow Iran to rebuild its nuclear program with no limits and no IAEA inspectors? The part about the IAEA inspectors is not theoretical, as since June 13, the UN nuclear inspectors have had no access to any aspects of the Iranian nuclear program. In fact, as of Wednesday, Iran also formally announced that it has indefinitely cut ties with the IAEA. This does not mean that Jerusalem and Washington are blind about what is happening in Iran. On Tuesday, The Jerusalem Post reported that Israeli satellites took tens of millions of photos of Iranian territory leading up to and ruing the 12-day war. But wherever the IAEA had electronic surveillance, it had 24-7 surveillance even indoors, even underground, something which is difficult even for top intelligence agencies to achieve. In short, IAEA inspections have never been sufficient by themselves, but they are crucial and invaluable. If the world was partially blind regarding Iran's nuclear program when Iran rolled back cooperation with the IAEA in 2021 and again in 2022, it is truly blind now. The only good news so far on the nuclear front is that even Iran is starting to admit that its nuclear facilities, including Fordow, were badly damaged. This means that even if the world is blind, there could be several months or more of little new progress by Iran toward reconstituting its nuclear program, no matter how hard it tries. Prior to the war, the Islamic Republic's ballistic missile program was not even on the table. Now, Israel will try to inject it onto the table, arguing that Iran's three massive ballistic missile attacks on the Jewish state in April 2024, October 2024, and this month make it a new existential threat. What if Trump settles for a nuclear deal, but with no limits on ballistic missiles? Israel was worried about Iran building a facility which could jump its missile inventory from 2,500 to 4,000 in around a year or so, and to 8,800 in around two years. Such numbers could overwhelm Israel's missile shield in a far more devastating way than even the 28 Israelis killed and 1,250 wounded from the 12-day war. Presumably, then, Israel would attack before the numbers ballooned that much. But how soon would Israel attack? When will the numbers get back to the pre-war 2,500 level? Earlier, such as when Iran builds and starts to operate a new ballistic missile production facility? Or yet earlier, as soon as it starts to build such a facility? Or maybe Israel can agree to Iran building unlimited ballistic missiles as long as their range falls below the 1,500 kilometer range to hit the Jewish state, given that many Iranian missiles do fall below that range. Will Jerusalem really risk ballistic missile attacks on hospitals, universities, and central Israel just to stop a facility from being built? And if it won't, will it get harder to respond even as the process goes forward because Israeli leaders will need to admit they are afraid of the Iranian response? Jerusalem has some time to let Trump try to resolve these issues. But if Trump cannot resolve them in the coming weeks or months, Israel will likely need to make some clear, hard, and uncompromising decisions about being ready to enforce certain limits, with coordination with the US and a yellow light to strike, even if there is not full-throated approval.


New York Post
41 minutes ago
- New York Post
Zohran Mamdani's rent freeze will warp NYC's housing market — and hurt us all
The city's Rent Guidelines Board boldly embraced common sense Monday by voting to permit rent increases for the city's nearly one million rent-stabilized apartments — modest ones of 3% for one-year and 4.5% for two-year leases. It was a courageous move in today's political climate. Of course, struggling property owners should be able to collect enough rent to cover their rising expenses — insurance, property taxes, utility costs, not to mention sheer overall inflation. Advertisement Yet Zohran Mamdani, city Democrats' mayoral nominee, is only doubling down on his promise not to raise, but to freeze regulated rents. We've seen this rent-freeze movie before, though — and we should be grateful to the RGB for not green-lighting a sequel. Former two-term Mayor Bill de Blasio, who has endorsed Mamdani's rent-freeze pledge, did just that three times during his eight years in office, and throughout his tenure his RGB appointees never approved an increase of more than 1.5%. Advertisement As a result, the city reaped a whirlwind of deferred maintenance and health hazards. In 2021, the federal Census Bureau's New York City Housing and Vacancy Survey told the de Blasio era's sorry housing story: It found — in its understated bureaucratic language — 'a higher prevalence of most individual maintenance deficiencies relative to earlier cycles.' Translation: Freezing rents resulted in crumbling apartments. The report compared the condition of rent-stabilized units with those that are unregulated — and its results should be eye-opening for those wanting to follow in de Blasio's footsteps. Advertisement As de Blasio left office, 33% of rent-stabilized units (316,000 apartments) had rodents, twice as many as unregulated ones. Roughly twice as many regulated apartments were found to have leaks, heating breakdowns, broken plaster or peeling paint, toilet malfunctions, elevator outages and mold. As much as progressives may want to blame greedy slumlords for all these woes, the reality is that squeezing rental income — for property owners who must pay banks that certainly won't freeze mortgage payments — means repairs and improvements are more likely to be put off. Advertisement Something had to give, and under de Blasio, it did. The 2021 report also pointed to what has since become an increasing trend: 'ghost apartments' — units simply held off the market because the cost of repairing and operating them makes them money-losers. In 2021 more than 28,000 units were off the market because they were 'awaiting renovation,' as the Census Bureau report optimistically put it. Another 27,000 were off the market for 'other' reasons. Even as overall housing supply increased, under de Blasio the city saw 'a continued net loss of the lowest-cost units and a net increase of higher-cost units relative to 2017.' In other words, high-end units not subject to rent stabilization were increasing. The mayor so intent on addressing inequality actually ushered in the opposite. This is what a rent freeze leads to: Apartments that are pest-infested and shabby — or simply not on the market at all. Under Mayor Eric Adams, whose signature 'City of Yes' initiative seeks to increase housing construction rather than freeze rent, the city has seen an increase of 275,000 occupied housing units (153,000 rentals and 123,000 owner-occupied). That's not been nearly enough to loosen a super-tight housing market with a vacancy rate of just 1.4% percent — and it reflects developers' reluctance to build, for fear that even new units might become subject to rent regulation, as federally subsidized units are. Advertisement Developers have been put off as well by the end of a state property-tax abatement law that meant to encourage more residential housing. The replacement law allows fewer of the higher-income units that help projects make economic sense. And, as always, low turnover in rent-regulated units — where residents stay put because they've got such a good deal — increases the demand for non-regulated apartments, pushing up their rents. There's little doubt a Mayor Mamdani would appoint a Rent Guidelines Board friendly to his rent freeze. After all, it's his signature issue. Advertisement He'll have to ignore what that board has been told by Mark Willis of the Furman Center on Real Estate at NYU: that owners of rent-stabilized properties in The Bronx are, on average, losing a stunning $120 per month on every apartment, leaving 200,000 units, concentrated in that borough, under 'severe distress.' If you think we can't return to the bad old days of 'The Bronx is burning,' think again. And don't buy city Comptroller Brad Lander's snake-oil claim that regulated landlords are making a killing. Yes, they earned a 12% return this year — but only after four years of zero net operating income. New Yorkers can see for themselves the damage wrought by a combination of artificially low rents and deferred maintenance. Advertisement Just look at the city's 177,000 public housing units, where chronic elevator breakdowns trap residents in their homes and constant heating outages leave them shivering. A rent freeze will bring us housing equality, all right — if you define that as equally poor conditions in both public and private rent-regulated apartments. Howard Husock is an American Enterprise Institute senior fellow and author of 'The Poor Side of Town — And Why We Need It.'
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump announces trade deal with Vietnam
President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that the US will charge 20% tariffs on imports from Vietnam under a new trade deal reached during last-minute negotiations. Products sent from Vietnam to the US had faced a 46% levy, which was set to go into effect next week as part of Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs announced in April. Dozens of other economies, including the European Union and Japan, are still scrambling to make their own deals with the US before the planned increases. Under the agreement, Vietnam will charge no tariffs on US products, Trump said in a social media post. Tariffs, which are a tax on imports, are almost always paid by the company that is buying the goods rather than the business which makes the product. While importers can decide to absorb the extra charge, they often choose to pass it on to the consumer. Many of the US trading partners are worried that will drive down demand for things made in their countries. In the "Great Deal of Cooperation", as Trump called it, the US will also impose a steeper tariff of 40% on goods that pass through Vietnam in a process known as "trans-shipping". Peter Navarro, Trump's senior counsellor on trade and manufacturing, has said that a third of all Vietnamese exports to the US were actually Chinese products shipped through Vietnam. The president said on social media: "Vietnam will do something that they have never done before, give the United States of America TOTAL ACCESS to their Markets for Trade. "In other words, they will 'OPEN THEIR MARKET TO THE UNITED STATES,' meaning that we will be able to sell our product into Vietnam at ZERO Tariff." Vietnam has become a major manufacturing hub for a number of major brands such as Nike, Apple, the Gap and Lululemon. It was a beneficiary of firms moving factories out of China to avoid the tariffs Trump announced during his first term in office. Share prices of companies making goods in Vietnam initially rose on news of the deal, although those gains were trimmed after it emerged products will still face a 20% tax. Adam Sitkoff, executive director of the American Chamber of Commerce in Hanoi, told the BBC World Business Report he was optimistic that the trade deal leaves Vietnam "in a good position", adding that "companies that ship from [Vietnam] to the US are going to keep doing it". But on the proposed tariff for so-called trans-shipping, Mr Sitkoff questioned the definition of the term, suggesting it can be "a vague and often politicised term in trade enforcement". "It's unclear how much illegal re-routing Vietnamese officials will even be able to catch, or how much exists," he said. Vietnam's General Secretary To Lam held a phone call with Trump on Wednesday, during which he reiterated an invitation for the US president to visit the country. Separately, the Trump family has recently announced development projects in Vietnam. The country's government approved a plan by the Trump Organization and local business Kinh Bac City Development to invest $1.5bn in hotels, golf courses and luxury real estate. The Trump Organization is also scouting for locations to build a Trump Tower in Ho Chi Minh City. Trump initially imposed steep levies on trading partners around the world in April , citing a lack of "reciprocity", but then announced a pause where they were all lowered to 10%. Many countries then approached the US to negotiate trade deals, according to the White House. Since April, Washington had so far only announced a pact with Britain and a deal to temporarily lower retaliatory duties with China. Nike pledges to cut reliance on Chinese factories Trump's tariffs leave China's neighbours with an impossible choice