logo
Pushing The Limits Of Modern LLMs With A Dinner Plate?

Pushing The Limits Of Modern LLMs With A Dinner Plate?

Forbes12-05-2025
Cerebras Systems
If you've been reading this blog, you probably know a bit about how AI works – large language models parse enormous amounts of data into tiny manageable pieces, and then use those to respond to user-driven stimuli or events.
In general, we know that AI is big, and getting bigger. It's fast, and getting faster.
Specifically, though, not everyone's familiar with some of the newest hardware and software approaches in the industry, and how they promote better results. People are working hard on revealing more of the inherent power in LLM technologies. And things are moving at a rapid clip.
One of these is the Cerebras WSE or Wafer Scale Engine – this is a massive processor that can power previously unimaginable AI capabilities.
First of all, you wouldn't call it a microprocessor anymore. It's famously the size of a dinner plate – 8.5 x 8.5 inches. It has hundreds of thousands of cores, and a context capability that's staggering.
But let me start with some basic terminology that you can hear in a presentation by Morgan Rockett, previously an MIT student, talking about the basics when it comes to evaluating LLM output.
LLMs are neural networks. They use a process of tokenization, where a token is one small bit of data that gets put into an overall context for the machine programming question.
Then there is context – the extent to which the program can look back at the previous tokens, and tie them into the greater picture.
There's also inference – the way that the computer thinks in real time when you give it a question or produce a response.
Another term that Rockett goes over is rate limits, where if you don't own the model, you're going to have to put up with thresholds imposed by that model's operators.
What Rockett reveals as he goes along explaining the hardware behind these systems is that he is a fellow with Cerebras, which is pioneering that massive chip.
Looking at common hardware setups, he goes over four systems – Nvidia GPUs, Google TPUs, Grok LPUs (language processing units,) and the Cerebras WSE.
'There's really nothing like it on the market,' he says of the WSU product noting that you can get big context and fast inference, if you have the right hardware and the right technique. 'In terms of speed benchmarks, Cerebras is an up and coming chip company. They have 2500 tokens per second, which is extremely fast. It's almost instant response. The entire page of text will get generated, and it's too fast to read.'
He noted that Grok is currently in second place with around 1600 tokens per second.
The approach showcased in this presentation was basically a selection of given chunks of a large file, and the summarization of the contents of that file.
Noting that really big files are too big for LLMs to manage, Rockett presents three approaches – Log2, square root, and double square root – all of which involve taking a sampling of chunks to get a cohesive result without overloading your model, using a 'funnel' design.
In a demo, he showed a 4 to 5 second inference model on a data set of 4 GB, the equivalent, he said, of a 10-foot-tall stack of paper, or alternately, 4 million tokens.
The data he chose to use was the total archive of our available information around the transformational event of the assassination of JFK in the 60s.
Rockett showed the model using his approach to summarize, working with virtually unlimited RAM, where tokenization was the major time burden.
With slotted input techniques, he said, you could get around rate limits, and tokenization can conceivably be worked out.
Check out the video for a summary on the archive, going over a lot of the CIA's clandestine activities in that era, and tying in the Bay of Pigs event and more.
Going back to practical uses for the Cerebras processor, Rockett mentioned legal, government and the trading world, where quick information is paramount.
I wanted more concrete examples, so I asked ChatGPT. It returned numerous interesting use cases for this hardware, including G42, an AI and cloud company in the United Arab Emirates, as well as the Mayo Clinic, various pharmaceutical companies, and the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (here's a story I did including Lawrence Livermore's nuclear project).
Then I asked a different question:
'Can you eat dinner off of a Cerebras WSE?'
'Physically?' ChatGPT replied. 'Yes, but you'd be committing both a financial and technological atrocity … the Cerebras Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE) is the largest chip ever built—Using it as a plate would be like eating spaghetti off the Rosetta Stone—technically possible, but deeply absurd.'
It gave me these three prime reasons not to attempt something so foolhardy (I attached verbatim):
'In short: You could eat dinner off of it,' ChatGPT said, 'Once. Then you'd have no chip, no dinner, and no job. Using it as a plate would be like eating spaghetti off the Rosetta Stone, technically possible, but deeply absurd.'
Touché, ChatGPT. Touché.
That's a little about one of the most fascinating pieces of hardware out there, and where it fits into the equation of context + inference. When we supercharge these systems, we see what used to take a long time happening pretty much in real time. That's a real eye-opener.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Children in the U.S. Are Dying at a Higher Rate than Kids in Similar Countries, Study Says
Children in the U.S. Are Dying at a Higher Rate than Kids in Similar Countries, Study Says

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Children in the U.S. Are Dying at a Higher Rate than Kids in Similar Countries, Study Says

A new study published by the Journal of the American Medical Association suggested that American children are in worse health than their counterparts in other countries Babies are 1.78 times more likely to perish, and children aged 1 to 19 are 1.8 times more likely to die than those in comparable countries Author Dr. Chris Forrest pointed out that the worrying trends are like a "proverbial canary in the coal mine," pointing to a larger problem within AmericaA new study shed light on a worrying trend in the health of American children. In a Monday, July 7 study published by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), research suggested that American children are in worse health than those growing up in other developed countries. Additionally, they are progressively less healthy than they were in previous years. The study examined trends in the health of children between 2007 and 2023. It found that in the U.S., "children's health has deteriorated across a broad spectrum of indicators." Data and trends between 2007 and 2022 suggest that infants are 1.78 times more likely to die in the U.S. than in other countries of a similar standing. Children between the ages of 1 and 19 were also 1.8 times more likely to die than their counterparts in other countries. In the latter group, there was a marked difference in the likelihood of dying from "firearm-related incidents" and "motor vehicle crashes," with American children dramatically more likely to perish as a result of these avoidable tragedies. In perspective, this amounts to approximately 54 more children dying per day in America, per the study. The findings come after deaths in the U.S. were in line with other countries in the 1960s. The study also suggested that American children were 14% more likely to suffer a chronic condition than their counterparts. The likelihood of being diagnosed with a chronic condition also increased from 39.9% to 45.7% in America between 2011 and 2023. Examples of chronic issues that children are now battling include the likes of "depression, anxiety and loneliness increased, as did rates of autism, behavioral conduct problems, developmental delays, speech language disorders and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders." 'I think we all should be disturbed by this,' Dr. Chris Forrest, a professor of pediatrics at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and director of the Applied Clinical Research Center, told CNN. 'Kids in this country are really suffering.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Speaking to the outlet, Forrest noted that he has seen a change in his patients since he started practicing medicine in the '90s. He attributed that to a variety of elements, saying that it comes together to create "a very toxic environment." While the Make America Healthy Again Commission, fronted by U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy has targeted chemicals in food and elsewhere as a cause for America's worsening health, Forrest said that the problem runs much deeper. "It's not just the chemicals. It's not just the food and the iPhones. It's a much broader. It's much deeper. It's what we call the developmental ecosystem, and it makes it very challenging to change it,' Forrest told CNN. 'That's a hard answer for people who want a pithy message that tells them how to fix the issues. It's about where they're growing up, where they're going to school, they're playing, where their families live, their neighborhoods, and it's not just one population. It's the whole nation that needs help.' Another element that he highlighted was that "women are also suffering in this country," suggesting that children are being born into already sickening households. Citing the research, he said, 'This means the same kid born in this country is much more likely to die than if they were born in Germany or Denmark. Why are we allowing this to happen?' For Forrest, the research is comparable to "the proverbial canary in the coal mine." "When [children's] health is deteriorating, that means the foundation of our nation is also deteriorating," he concluded. Read the original article on People

Amazon vs Walmart: who will win the mid-year discount showdown?
Amazon vs Walmart: who will win the mid-year discount showdown?

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Amazon vs Walmart: who will win the mid-year discount showdown?

Amazon is extending its annual Prime Day to a four‑day event starting today (8 July), while rival Walmart has launched a six‑day Walmart Deals sale beginning the same day. The overlap marks a high‑stakes ecommerce rivalry aimed at capturing US consumer spending during mid‑summer, a window traditionally quieter than Black Friday. Amazon's Prime Day, now in its 11th year, will run from 8 to 11 July – double its traditional two‑day format. For the first time, 'Today's Big Deals' will drop themed offers daily at midnight PDT, with limited quantities per theme. The event targets members of the Amazon Prime programme, which surpassed 200 million global subscribers as of June 2025. Prime Day caters to categories such as tech, home, beauty, fashion and appliances – with heavy discounts expected on big‑ticket items like TVs, laptops, headphones and kitchenware. Walmart has responded by launching its own summer promotion, Walmart Deals, which will start online and in its 4,600 US stores on 8 July and run through 13 July – six full days. Unlike Prime Day, the sale is open to all shoppers, though Walmart+ members receive early access from 7 pm ET on 7 July. This marks the first time Walmart has hosted simultaneous in‑store and online summer deals, covering electronics, home, toys, beauty and back‑to‑school items. The extended duration and multi‑channel approach reflect Walmart's strategy of blending ecommerce growth with its physical footprint. Industry analysts say the timing battle reflects broader trends in retail. Amazon still dominates US online sales, accounting for over 40 per cent of ecommerce, but Walmart's online division is growing more than 20 per cent year on year . eMarketer analyst Sky Canaves notes that Amazon's shift to July 8 was a clear signal – prompting Walmart and others to accelerate their own campaigns. For shoppers, the overlap offers both opportunity and complexity. Experts advise comparing prices using tools like CamelCamelCamel or Keepa, and tracking both events to identify the best deals. Prime members benefit from exclusive timed drops and AI‑driven recommendations through Alexa+ and Amazon's Rufus assistant. Meanwhile, Walmart's model allows non‑members to shop immediately, with Walmart+ users gaining early entry and perks like free delivery. Analysts forecast Prime Day will generate around $23 billion in total sales this year, including third‑party sellers. Walmart reported $79 billion in ecommerce revenue in 2024, and is ramping up tech investment to improve delivery speed and product availability. Amid global inflation and shifting consumer habits, mid‑July has emerged as a prime opportunity for big‑ticket bargains. The showdown between Amazon's extended Prime Day and Walmart's debut of Walmart Deals means savvy shoppers can expect broader choice and deeper savings on gadgets, home essentials, beauty and school supplies. By comparing options across both platforms, consumers can maximise discounts and delivery flexibility during this high‑stakes summer sale season. "Amazon vs Walmart: who will win the mid-year discount showdown?" was originally created and published by Retail Insight Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Elon Musk connects with indie Andrew Yang on billionaire former Trump ally's third party push
Elon Musk connects with indie Andrew Yang on billionaire former Trump ally's third party push

Fox News

time31 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Elon Musk connects with indie Andrew Yang on billionaire former Trump ally's third party push

As Elon Musk moves forward with forming a third party in hopes of rocking the nation's longstanding two-party system, the world's richest person is reaching out to a one-time presidential candidate who has started his own independent party. Musk, the billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX who spent the first four months of President Donald Trump's second administration as a special White House advisor steering the recently created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), spoke with Andrew Yang, Fox News has confirmed. A source familiar with the conversation said that the two discussed Musk's push to create the "America Party," which Musk aims to field some candidates in next year's midterm elections. "I'm excited for anyone who wants to move on from the duopoly," Yang said in a statement to Fox News. "And I'm happy to help give someone a sense of what the path looks like." News of the conversation was first reported by Politico. Yang grabbed national attention in the 2020 election cycle, as the entrepreneur went from an extreme longshot to briefly being a contender for the Democratic presidential nomination. But Yang soured on the two-party system after an unsuccessful 2021 run for New York City mayor. He then formed the independent Forward Party, which has been recognized in a handful of states and aims to eventually gain ballot access from coast to coast. Yang and Musk are far from strangers. Musk in 2019 supported Yang's unsuccessful presidential bid. Musk became the top donor of the 2024 election cycle, dishing out nearly $300 million in support of Trump's bid through America PAC, a mostly Musk-funded super PAC aligned with Trump. Trump named Musk to steer DOGE soon after the November election, and the president repeatedly praised Musk during his headline-making and controversial tenure at the cost-cutting effort. But a feud between Musk and Trump broke out days after Musk left the White House in late May, as Musk dubbed the administration's massive landmark spending bill - which Trump called his "big, beautiful bill" - a "disgusting abomination," which he said would sink the nation into unsustainable debt. Musk also argued that Trump would not have won last year's presidential election without all of his support. Musk announced the launch of the "America Party" on his social media platform X on Saturday, a day after Trump signed the sweeping domestic policy package into law. The measure narrowly passed the Senate and House last week along near party-line votes in the Republican-controlled chambers. Trump on Sunday ridiculed Musk's move. "I think it's ridiculous to start a third party," Trump told reporters. "It's always been a two-party system, and I think starting a third party just adds to confusion. The president added that "third parties have never worked. So, he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous." Starting an independent or third party, and gaining ballot access in states across the country, is extremely difficult.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store