logo
Florida's ‘Forgotten Coast' Attracts Homebuyers Looking for a Vacation Retreat

Florida's ‘Forgotten Coast' Attracts Homebuyers Looking for a Vacation Retreat

Yahoo01-07-2025
Beyond Florida's glitzy billionaire destinations like Palm Beach and Miami, affluent homebuyers are flocking in droves to some of the Sunshine State's lesser-known enclaves in search of holiday retreats.
Nestled along the Gulf Coast, Gulf County and Walton County last year experienced a boom in second-home sales, outperforming more elite and celebrated spots.
Pacaso, the California-based real estate company specializing in luxury vacation homes, has released its 2024 list of the top 20 vacation home markets. The rankings are based on the ratio of secondary to primary homes and annual price growth from 2023 to 2024.
Although the top spot went to New Jersey's famed Cape May County, Florida's Gulf County clinched silver thanks to its 77% second- to primary-home ratio and an average home price of $1,003,183.
Located in Florida's panhandle, Gulf County is part of the 'Forgotten Coast,' which refers to a stretch of undeveloped coastline devoid of high-rises and strip malls, and renowned for its pristine beaches, stunning vistas, and starry skies unspoiled by light pollution.
'Gulf County, part of the Panama City metro area, boasts 244 miles of white-sand shoreline,' according to Pacaso.
Home to just over 14,000 inhabitants, according to the 2020 U.S. Census Bureau, Gulf County offers a laid-back coastal lifestyle that's perfect for nature lovers and beach bums. People with a taste for adventure and the great outdoors can enjoy fishing, sailing, diving, and snorkeling, as well as kayaking and paddleboarding.
The Forgotten Coast is also just a short drive away from more bustling beach destinations like Panama City and Destin.
'The beaches near Florida's Forgotten Coast boast easy access from states to the West,' says Realtor.com® senior economic research analyst Hannah Jones. 'Buyers may be able to find better deals on Florida's Gulf Coast, which could draw some attention away from higher-priced locales.'
According to the latest housing data from Realtor.com, the median list price in Gulf County in May was $675,000, down 6.5% from its peak a year ago, but up more than 72% compared with mid-2019.
As of last month, Gulf County had more than 360 homes for sale, marking the highest May inventory on record.
The priciest city in the county is Port St. Joe, where the typical home was sold for $495,000 in March, which was more than 30% higher than the county median.
Situated on the 'Emerald Coast' in northwestern Florida, Walton County ranked third on Pacaso's list of the top vacation home markets in the U.S. owing to a winning combination of secondary- to primary-home ratio of 67% and an average home price of $1,444,503.
'Walton County is home to the renowned 30A, a scenic coastal highway, and features many popular beach towns along the Emerald Coast, including Alys Beach, Seacrest, and Seaside, making it a prime spot to scoop up a vacation home,' writes Pacaso.
The area boasts 26 miles of postcard-perfect sugar-white beaches, 15 rare coastal dune lakes, and more than 200 miles of hiking trails, including the 19-mile Timpoochee Trail, which can be explored on foot or by bike.
History buffs are sure to be charmed by the quaint town of DeFuniak Springs, dotted with nearly 200 historic buildings, including what is believed to be Florida's oldest continuously operating library, founded in 1886.
Compared with Gulf County, Walton County is more high-priced, with a median list price of $965,000 as of May, down 3.4% year over year but up more than 53% from six years ago.
According to the most recently available sales figures from March, the median sale price in Walton stood at $690,000 that month, representing a surge of more than 86% from March 2019.
The town of Santa Rosa Beach was the area's most expensive, with the median sale price of $850,000 in March.
Walton County had over 2,600 homes listed for sale in May, up nearly 14% from a year prior.
'Walton County offers buyers top-notch beaches and ample amenities at a lower price than some of the more popular Florida beach towns,' says Jones.
Among the 13 states represented on Pacaso's 2024 list, Florida had the highest number of ranked vacation home markets, claiming five spots.
Besides Gulf and Walton counties, Collier County ranked fifth, Palm Beach County ranked 12th, and Nassau County snagged the 17th spot.
Home Prices Fall in a Major Texas City as National Price Growth Slows to Weakest Pace in 2 Years
This Type of Flooring Will Make Your House 'Unsellable,' According to HGTV Experts
U.S. Is Set To Gain a Record 7,500 of the World's Millionaires—and This Sun-Soaked State Is Red-Hot
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The housing market is changing. Is a low-fee real estate agent the way to go?
The housing market is changing. Is a low-fee real estate agent the way to go?

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The housing market is changing. Is a low-fee real estate agent the way to go?

When Jonny Ballesteros and his fiancée, Jen, began house-hunting, they weren't sure what to expect. It was the first purchase for the couple, who are both 29, and in the competitive San Diego-area market where they lived, they needed some hands-on guidance. But the real estate agents they contacted were no help. They appeared to be too busy to offer the kind of service the couple wanted. They decided instead to work with a new company that offers flat-fee brokerage services for buyers. Shop Top Mortgage Rates Personalized rates in minutes A quicker path to financial freedom Your Path to Homeownership While the cost savings was helpful, Ballesteros also felt he and Jen got the support they needed: suggested homes that matched their criteria, viewing appointments, and online chats about everything from scheduling to questions about process. "We truly needed that hand-holding because it was our first property,' Ballesteros told USA TODAY. In an age when Americans do everything from writing their wills to ordering their groceries online and without a middleman, the residential real estate industry remains stubbornly entrenched in tradition. But one year after a landmark lawsuit changed the way commissions are negotiated, some upstarts think the time is finally right. "The settlements haven't actually changed the transaction much yet," said Ben Bear, co-founder and CEO of TurboHome, the company that helped the Ballesteros. "But what it has done is educated buyers that hey, high commissions don't really make sense." At the same time, Bear said, new technology makes it possible for companies "to deliver a high level of service that does have a lot of personal touch, at a lower price point." TurboHome, which has been around since 2022, is currently only available in California and Texas. Other companies offering similar services for buyers include ShopProp and Arrivva. The longstanding approach to real estate transactions in America had a commission of roughly 5% to 6% paid by the seller and divided between the agents for the buyer and the seller – a hefty surcharge that some observers believe inflated home sale prices. For the home that Johnny and Jen bought, which cost $679,000, the buyer's agent's commission traditionally could have been $20,000 or more. TurboHome's fee was less than half that – $7,500. And the seller agreed to pay it, so the couple paid nothing and was able to apply the money to their loan. How the real estate commission lawsuits changed consumer attitudes A report released in June by the left-leaning think tank Consumer Policy Center explained how the commission lawsuits have helped erode traditional arrangements. 'By focusing public attention on 5-6 percent commissions through news coverage, the changes persuaded some consumers to question traditional real estate brokerage services,' wrote Stephen Brobeck and Wendy Gilch. More recently, they added, the industry jockeying between Zillow and other listings portals and brokerages has helped focus attention on how real estate information is displayed, which may persuade homeowners to sell their properties in non-traditional ways. Douglas Miller is a long-time attorney and real estate industry gadfly who instigated the first of the commission lawsuits filed starting in 2019 against big brokerages and the National Association of Realtors, one of the largest professional lobby groups in the country. A recent analysis shows that commissions paid to real estate agents have barely budged over the past few years. The new upstarts are not "discount brokers," he said. 'They are 'fair fee brokers,' I think is a better way to put it," Miller said in an interview. "The traditional agents want to label them as, 'You are using somebody who's charging less, you're going to get what you pay for.' I would say no, what you're going to get is an overpaid agent if you use a traditional agent.' One of Miller's biggest bugaboos is that the vast majority of real estate agents do almost no deals on a regular basis. According to a 2024 analysis from Brobeck, half of all agents reported no or only one sale the previous year, while 70% did five or fewer. 'In terms of personnel, the residential real estate industry is clearly a part-time industry,' the report concluded. As Miller sees it, the lower-cost companies that focus on transactions probably have more experience than many agents do. The National Association of Realtors did not respond to a USA TODAY request for comment. When does it make sense to work with a traditional real estate agent? Lisa Gill, an analyst with Consumer Reports, thinks that there are advantages to working with traditional agents. "Real estate is still very much a relationship business," she said. "Particularly in very competitive markets, it can benefit both buyers and sellers to have a representative who's tapped into a network of agents." TurboHome's Bear agrees. There are plenty of types of transactions where a buyer or seller may want the kind of high-touch experience Gill describes. But there are also other advantages to companies like TurboHome, which doesn't require that clients be exclusive to them. That means that if another real estate agent is able to find a property, there's no penalty for walking away and choosing to be represented by that agent. Gill also notes that experienced professionals can bring wisdom and context that go beyond the checklist of transactions involved in a sale. Working without a traditional agent might be akin to 'building a house without hiring a general contractor,' she said. It's likely that many sales can be done without that expertise, but on the rare occasion that things do go wrong it may wind up costing more in time and money to fix. Still, evidence is mounting that for many Americans, the 'bare-bones' approach works perfectly well. Miller, a practicing lawyer, is also a licensed Realtor who facilitates dozens of sales every year, making him one of the Realtor Association's top producers in Minnesota, he says. He charges half the amount a traditional agent would – 1.5% of the transaction or less – on the home's sale price or list price, whichever is cheaper, to avoid the perceived conflict of interest that comes from a sale price being bid up. The 2025 Consumer Policy Center report, meanwhile, focuses on the seller experience, evaluating companies Ideal Agent, Houwzer, Trelora, Simple Showing, and 1% Lists, with a special nod for one called Clever, which had more –and more-experienced – agents on its staff. While consumers using those companies need to do a little extra research, the report says, including being absolutely sure which specific services are offered and evaluating the individual agent that will be involved in the transaction, they conclude that 'low fee brokers do represent a viable alternative for home sellers.' Read next: Should you sell your own home? Why a FSBO may look more tempting This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Housing market is changing. Is a low-fee real estate agent the answer?

Co-living buildings offer ‘attainable luxury' for Chicago's young professionals, students
Co-living buildings offer ‘attainable luxury' for Chicago's young professionals, students

Chicago Tribune

time32 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Co-living buildings offer ‘attainable luxury' for Chicago's young professionals, students

Nestled in the heart of the Printer's Row district in the South Loop, Straits Row appears like any other high-rise in downtown Chicago. It has a modern interior design and high-end amenities that are standard for luxury housing in the area. But the building has a feature that separates it from most such high rises in the city: Half of its units are co-living apartments, where tenants rent a single bedroom and share a kitchen and living room with other tenants. Rents at co-living buildings are often 20% to 30% below the market rate for a studio or one-bedroom in the same neighborhood. Straits Row, at 633 S. LaSalle St., began leasing in February. The 18-story building has 132 units and 358 beds, with half the units traditional apartments and half co-living apartments. The bedrooms and living rooms are fully furnished, so residents new to the city can move in without bringing furniture. The building's amenities include a workspace, a gym, a pool and lounges. The city has only a handful of co-living buildings, but the trend has grown in recent years, driven by high housing costs in urban areas, according to a report by market consulting firm Grand View Research. The global market size was $7.8 billion in 2024, and is expected to more than double to just over $16 billion by 2030, according to the report. The model allows students and young professionals to live in popular neighborhoods without the high price tag of a traditional apartment or the headache of finding roommates, said Nick Melrose, founder and CEO of Melrose Ascension Capital. Melrose developed the building alongside Q Investment Partners, a Singapore-based firm that bought the site in 2019. At Straits Row, the rent for a single room in a four-bedroom starts at $1,699. That's well below the average studio apartment rent of $2,186 in Printer's Row, according to 'This gives them the option to live in an apartment that is a nice apartment — it gives a luxurious vibe at a lower cost,' said Madison Kerrigan, the building's property manager. The location made it a great spot for co-living, Melrose said. It caters to students at several college campuses within a short radius, including DePaul University's Loop campus, Columbia College Chicago and Roosevelt University. Multiple transit options nearby offer a quick commute for young professionals working downtown. Three miles north in Lincoln Park, Post Chicago offers a similar setup, with 107 units that are mostly co-living. The building, at 853 W. Blackhawk St., is part of the Big Deahl, a 7-acre project by Structured Development that put up residential buildings on a site previously zoned for industrial buildings. The project also includes a 34-unit affordable condo building and a traditional apartment building. J. Michael Drew, founding principal at Structured Development, said the firm pursued a co-living project to offer an affordable option in a hot neighborhood for young professionals. Beyond the standard amenities, Post Chicago also offers weekly cleaning for co-living tenants. 'Lincoln Park is the most desired neighborhood for incoming graduates who are entering the workforce,' he said. 'But it's one of the more expensive neighborhoods to find housing.' For Manuel Carcamo, co-living was an easy choice as a student and when he was just starting his career. Although he lives in a studio now in Straits Row, Carcamo previously lived in two co-living units. The first was as a student at the University of Indiana's Indianapolis campus, renting a room in a four-bedroom, two-bathroom unit. He wanted to live off campus but couldn't afford to live on his own, so co-living was a convenient option. Having roommates helped build social interactions and helped him explore the new city, he said. 'I moved to Indianapolis from Chicago having known nobody there,' he said. 'So moving into a four-bedroom apartment with three strangers, that was kind of daunting, but it did also work out for me, in terms of connecting me with some of my best friends.' Those bonds Carcamo made have remained. This October, he said, he's officiating the wedding of one of his college roommates. After college, Carcamo moved to Columbus, Ohio, and co-living was again a cheaper, convenient way to secure housing. This time, he lived in a two-bedroom, two-bathroom co-living apartment with one roommate. 'I think it's a great opportunity for people that are really looking to put their head down, get their start in their career, and try to figure out the city,' Carcamo said. Now, Carcamo said, he prefers the privacy of a studio apartment. He works from home and having the comfort of his own space is the main reason he chose to live in a studio when he came back to Chicago. But he said he wouldn't rule out co-living again. Melrose has three other buildings in development: A $90 million, 19-story building at 626 S. Wabash Ave. that has some co-living units, and two buildings in Fulton Market that are traditional apartments. Melrose said he wants to ensure all his buildings offer 'attainable luxury,' catering to a middle demographic that would have a hard time renting in much of downtown Chicago. 'We have opened up a demographic that would love to live here that couldn't otherwise afford to do it, until we built something like this,' Melrose said. 'That feels better to me than catering to some lawyer or doctor. There's nothing wrong with that, it's just that's not what drives me.' For developers and building owners, co-living can generate more income than a traditional building with the same number of units. Renting by the room allows developers to charge more per square foot than they could with a usual two- or four-bedroom apartment. According to a 2020 report by Cushman & Wakefield, co-living can increase net operating income by an average of 15% because of the higher density, while offering lower rents. Co-living buildings have slightly higher operating costs than traditional apartments, the report said. They often have shorter lease terms and more turnover, and Drew said having the right management is important to take advantage of those returns. 'As long as you're operating it efficiently and effectively, yes, the returns can be, and are proving to be, better than a conventional' property, he said. But securing financing on a co-living project can be difficult. Straits Row was initially planned as an all-co-living building, and Melrose said there was some hesitancy from institutional lenders to finance the project, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic rocked the housing market. That led the developers to change the building to half co-living and half traditional. 'There's a market for 500 (co-living) beds, but with lenders, especially, who are the most conservative folks in our industry, it was the path of least resistance,' he said of the decision to put fewer co-living units in Straits Row. 'So that got lenders a lot more interested.' Drew said at Post Chicago, there was less hesitancy from lenders about the co-living model. He said the rising rent environment means lenders understand the demand for lower-cost alternatives. 'The attraction to a lender is that they recognize the ability to push rents and to be able to take advantage of a market when you're in a rising rent environment,' he said. Co-living has seen significant growth in the last decade, especially in high-cost cities such as New York and San Francisco. According to the Cushman & Wakefield report, there were fewer than 100 co-living beds available in 2014 in North America. That grew to more than 7,000 by the end of 2019. Gail Lissner, an appraiser and managing director for Integra Realty Resources, said some of the earliest co-living buildings in Chicago were smaller apartment buildings that were repurposed. One example was a three-flat in Lincoln Park that was turned into a 12-bedroom co-living building. As the model gained traction, interest from developers and lenders led to larger, new-construction buildings such as Straits Row and Post Chicago that looked more like luxury housing. Now, renters can find large, modern co-living buildings in Pilsen, the South Loop, the Near West Side, Lincoln Park and elsewhere. Co-living isn't likely to take over the Chicago housing scene, but experts said it's an underserved market that is likely to remain strong as rents continue to rise. Lissner said co-living buildings operate best near big employers and universities. 'I think they belong in certain locations,' she said. 'They belong in the downtown market where you have the employment. They work well where you have universities. So we tend to see them clustered a little bit more there.' Part of the challenge of operating a complex with co-living apartments is making sure renters know about it, Melrose said. It's easier to recruit students, who are used to dorm-style living, but Melrose said he thinks the renter base of young professionals will grow as they become more accustomed to that style of living. Kerrigan, the building's property manager, is active in Chicago housing Facebook groups and online forums to pitch Straits Row to people looking for an affordable option downtown. The complex also partners with universities and corporations to market itself to prospective city residents. 'A lot of it is building partnerships and just making sure that Straits Row is known as the newest co-living spot,' Kerrigan said. 'We do sometimes have to explain what co-living is, but once we explain that, people seem to really like it.'

I've interviewed around 500 people. I can trace all my best and worst hires back to this single interview question.
I've interviewed around 500 people. I can trace all my best and worst hires back to this single interview question.

Business Insider

time33 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

I've interviewed around 500 people. I can trace all my best and worst hires back to this single interview question.

This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Eli Rubel, a 37-year-old Denver-based serial entrepreneur and CEO of Profit Labs. His identification has been verified by Business Insider. This story has been edited for length and clarity. At any given time, I employ between 40 and 50 people on a full-time basis. I've probably interviewed around 500 people. I created my first company, an enterprise contract management software in 2010, and sold that business in 2014. Next, I bought a commerce business, spent four years turning it around, and sold it. Then, in 2019 I started a marketing agency called Matter Made, and in 2022, I started a second agency called No Boring Design. Today I still own both of those businesses but I have talented leaders run them. I just started a third agency called Profit Labs, which is a bookkeeping and accounting firm for agency owners. It took a lot of reps to figure out what felt like a genuine interview process for me. Now, I can trace every one of my best and worst hires back to this single interview question. My go-to interview question has evolved Originally I used to ask candidates, "have you heard of the zones of genius?" Most people hadn't heard of it at the time. I think it's more popular now and it's the concept that everybody has a zone of excellence, competence, and incompetence. So I would ask them "Can you walk me through your zones?" I discovered that the problem with the zone of genius question was that if you say zone of incompetence, people are on the defensive. They may think that they need to be careful about what they say because they're in an interview. It's still one of my favorite questions but it evolved into the question that I eventually got to, which is, "what gives you energy and what takes away energy in a working environment?" People tend to answer the question honestly That one question has made or saved me more money than any ATS or hiring tool I've ever used. When it's framed like that, it feels like you're an ally by asking the question. It's kind of like, "hey, I'm here to protect you from the things that don't that take away your energy." So I think people are just much more at ease and authentic when they answer the question. There is no right or wrong answer because ultimately I'm looking to figure out if this person is going to be well-aligned for the role. I don't want them to be a bad fit just as much as they don't want to be. For example, if they're interviewing for a facing account manager role and they answer the question by saying, "I love dealing with people and that gives me energy, and what takes it away is when a client pushes back on an idea that I share," that would be a huge flag for me. That tells me this person is not right for an account manager role because they're going to get their ideas shot down all the time. It's a red flag as it relates to this role, but it's not a bad thing in general. Maybe there's another role that is better for them, though. If I know what their skill set is, I can find a place for them where they're not pitching ideas to clients that are going to get shot down, but they can still leverage their skill of dealing with people. It's almost always the case that whatever they responded to the question is directly related to what I later see in manager feedback or in performance reviews.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store