Corruption-accused Mapisa-Nqakula changes lawyers; case postponed to June
She made a brief appearance in the dock on Friday, where she faces 12 counts of fraud and money laundering.
The former Speaker allegedly received R4.5 million in kickbacks from a contractor when she was defence minister.
She's maintained her innocence, claiming the charges were politically motivated.
Mapisa-Nqakula returned to the dock on Friday morning, taking a seat right at the centre and keeping her head down until her matter was called.
Her lawyer, Advocate Graham Kerr-Philips, told the court that they would no longer be on the case.
"We appear to inform your lordship that our attorney's mandate has been withdrawn, so we are here to withdraw with your lordship's consent and to hand over to those who will take over from us."
After Mapisa-Nqakula confirmed the changes, her new lawyer, Advocate Cronje Kriel, came on record.
"We have been briefed, we have been in contact with our learned colleagues."
At the same time, the court is yet to receive the outcome of representations made by Mapisa-Nqakula's lawyers to National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) head Shamila Batohi.
The matter has been postponed to June.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
6 hours ago
- The Citizen
What do you think of Malema's Bill to nationalise the Reserve Bank?
If the South African Reserve Bank Amendment Bill is passed in parliament, there will be no more checks and balances. Parliament wants to know what you think of Julius Malema's Bill aimed at nationalising the South African Reserve Bank. Malema tabled the South African Reserve Bank Amendment Bill in parliament in 2018 and published for comment at the end of May 2018. However, it lapsed at the end of the fifth parliament, but the National Assembly revived it in October 2019. According to Cabinet, the Bill also lapsed at the end of the sixth parliament but was revived by the National Assembly in July 2024. In September last year, the standing committee on finance resolved to open the Bill to another round of public comment. The South African Reserve Bank Amendment Bill seeks to establish the state as the sole shareholder of the Reserve Bank's shares, while the minister of finance will exercise the rights attached to the shares in the bank the state owns. ALSO READ: The ANC's war about nationalising the Reserve Bank is pointless Aims of the South African Reserve Bank Amendment Bill The South African Reserve Bank Amendment Bill also aims to amend the South African Reserve Bank Act to: delete certain definitions; insert a definition; provide for the minister to appoint certain board directors; provide for the tenure of appointed directors; deal with the filling of casual vacancies for appointed directors; repeal certain sections of the Act; give the minister the power to appoint auditors of the Reserve Bank; give the minister the power to make regulations regarding the appointment of appointed directors; and provide for related matters. ALSO READ: Why the Reserve Bank should not be nationalised Free SA already had its say The organisation Free SA already made a formal submission to parliament, expressing its strong opposition to the South African Reserve Bank Amendment Bill, warning that the proposed nationalisation of the central bank threatens the country's economic stability, institutional independence and international credibility. While the Amendment Bill does not alter the Reserve Bank's constitutional mandate to protect the value of the rand, Free SA cautions that it will undermine the very independence that makes this mandate effective. 'An independent central bank is the cornerstone of any credible economic system. Handing full control of the Reserve Bank to political authorities opens the door to fiscal dominance, inflationary pressure and potentially disastrous economic mismanagement,' Reuben Coetzer, spokesperson of Free SA, says. He points out that Free SA's submission details the economic, legal, institutional and reputational risks of centralising the Reserve Bank's governance in the executive. Drawing on examples from Zimbabwe and Venezuela, he says the submission illustrates how loss of central bank independence historically led to hyperinflation, currency collapse and widespread poverty. ALSO READ: The slow nationalisation of the South African Reserve Bank Specific dangers in South African Reserve Bank Amendment Bill The submission highlights these specific dangers in the South African Reserve Bank Amendment Bill: Inflation risk: politicised monetary policy could lead to the Reserve Bank financing government deficits, weakening the rand and driving up inflation; Governance concerns: transferring all shareholder powers to the minister of finance eliminates external oversight and invites politicisation of appointments; Legal ambiguity: while technically constitutional, the Bill may undermine the spirit of section 224 of the Constitution, which demands independence 'without fear, favour or prejudice'; Investor flight: market confidence in South Africa's monetary policy regime could erode, resulting in capital outflows and higher borrowing costs. 'Symbolic ownership should not come at the cost of real economic harm. The Reserve Bank is one of South Africa's most respected institutions. Undermining its independence, whether deliberately or by accident, will hurt ordinary South Africans most, especially the poor who suffer first and worst from inflation.' Coetzer says Free SA calls on all members of parliament to reject the Amendment Bill and to uphold the constitutional and economic safeguards that protect South Africa's monetary integrity. 'Reform should focus on strengthening accountability and transparency within the Reserve Bank, not eroding the institutional checks that preserved macroeconomic stability through some of the country's most turbulent years.'
Eyewitness News
12 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
NPA says currently no need to merge corruption cases against former Transnet execs
JOHANNESBURG - The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) said there is currently no need to merge corruption cases against former Transnet executives. Brian Molefe, Siyabonga Gama, and Anoj Singh are facing two separate cases connected to an alleged corrupt locomotive procurement deal. ALSO READ: The group appeared in the Palm Ridge Magistrates Court on Monday, alongside Transnet's former chief engineer, facing charges of fraud, corruption, and money laundering. In the latest case, they're accused of unlawfully diverting R93 million to a company linked to the controversial Gupta family. Molefe, Gama, and Singh are due to go on trial in February 2026 in a separate case involving fraud and corruption worth almost R400 million. Although both cases relate to the procurement of locomotives, they are being pursued independently, as they involve different contracts. Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) spokesperson Henry Mamothame said, despite the connection between the cases, they cannot be merged. 'We are dealing with very complex matters. These are matters that emanate from state capture. In our approach as IDAC, we investigate the whole information that was provided in the State Capture Commission. That's why we have staggered our approach against the accused persons. 'This case also emanates from the acquisition of the 1,064 locomotives, stemming from the previous case, but the facts are different. In this matter, we have three contracts from the first case.' The former Transnet executives will return to court on 6 October.
IOL News
14 hours ago
- IOL News
Ex-HR manager sentenced for stealing R6 million from special needs school to feed his gambling addiction
This case highlights the necessity of safeguarding our educational institutions, ensuring that those entrusted with oversight and management uphold the highest ethical standards in their dealings, lest they exploit those most in need. Image: File image Ralton Christopher Fischer, a 44-year-old former Human Resources Manager at the New Hope School, was sentenced to 12 years in prison for defrauding the institution of over R6 million. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson, Lumka Mahanjana, said the Pretoria Specialised Commercial Crimes Court delivered the verdict on Monday, imposing a six-year suspension for five years contingent upon Fischer not being convicted of fraud or theft in the interim. Mahanjana explained that Fischer's fraudulent activities occurred between July 2018 and April 2022 during his tenure at New Hope School, an establishment designed to cater to learners with special educational needs, including children with disabilities. She said his role involved managing payments for staff under the School Governing Body (SGB), but rather than safeguarding the funds, Fischer exploited his position by orchestrating fraudulent payments into various bank accounts registered in his name. These transactions, which involved numerous banks including ABSA, Standard Bank, Discovery Bank, and Capitec, facilitated a staggering sum well over R6 million. The deception came to light when Fischer attempted to send financial documents to a colleague while requesting them to be forwarded to his personal email. The NPA said the colleague observed irregularities in the documents and promptly raised the alarm. A preliminary investigation ensued and ultimately revealed payments made to non-existent, or 'ghost', employees. Fischer was arrested on 4 April 2023, leading to a guilty plea in court where he claimed the money was used to support his gambling addiction and to purchase a luxury VW Golf GTI valued at R150,000. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In a dramatic counter to Fischer's plea for leniency—citing his responsibilities as a father to four minor children, two of whom require additional support—Advocate Abram Machitela, representing the State, argued vehemently for a custodial sentence. He underscored both the serious nature of Fischer's crimes and the blatant abuse of a position of trust, noting that his actions had drastic repercussions on the school community and its vulnerable learners. The financial ramifications were notable, with the institution facing over R500,000 in tax liabilities stemming from Fischer's conduct. Magistrate Du Preez resonated with the prosecution's stance, declaring that Fischer's crimes stemmed not merely from addiction, but from a self-serving greed. The magistrate noted Fischer's lack of genuine remorse, arguing that his guilty plea was more a reflection of the robustness of the State's evidences rather than true contrition. This assessment led to a firm ruling that only a direct sentence of imprisonment was suitable given the severity of the case. The NPA's welcoming of the court's sentence serves as a powerful statement that individuals who exploit public institutions will be held accountable for their actions. IOL
