Is AI going to steal your job? Probably not, new study finds
Many people fear their jobs will become obsolete as the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) develops in the workplace.
And whilst there's undoubtedly going to be a shift in skills needed for the future of the workforce, new data from PwC's 2025 Global AI Jobs Barometer suggests that companies that embrace AI innovation are 'creating more jobs, not less'.
'We looked at nearly a billion job postings across 20 countries, 80 different sector classifications.
'This is a massive pool of data to see whether or not this thing that we all worry about is AI destroying jobs, is happening. And the headline is exactly the opposite,' Joe Atkinson, PwC's Global Chief AI Officer, told Euronews.
How is AI affecting the job market?
The companies that use AI to increase productivity are seeing a 3 fold increase in their revenue per employee.
Generally speaking, when a company is doing well, life for its employees is usually better too. The results of the barometer support this, with employees in AI-exposed industries seeing their salaries growing twice as quickly as elsewhere.
'Those individuals that can augment their skills with AI skills, not only secure their jobs because their jobs will change, they also earn a greater wage. And the wage premium in this year's study was as high as 56 per cent,' Atkinson added.
Managing an AI team
Most of us wouldn't decline a bigger salary, and that 56 per cent increase is up from 25 per cent last year.
So, what do we need to do to optimise this workplace opportunity?
'AI, I always describe it as a practical skill, in addition to a knowledge skill. You have to understand the AI, but you also have to use the AI,' Atkinson told Euronews.
'So the thing that workers can do, I think, is the exact same thing that employers can do, which is get your teams working in AI. Learn it not just by analysis, learn it by doing, and see how these tools apply'.
The barometer also suggests accessibility to these sorts of jobs is on track to increase. Degree requirements for jobs in AI-exposed sectors are still high but appear to be falling faster than in other sectors.
Managerial roles could also change with the adoption of AI, in particular agentic AI.
'Most of us in five or ten years will be managing many more [AI] agents than we will people,' said Atkinson.
'And that combination of agentic capability and workforce is a skill that, frankly, doesn't even really exist in the workforce today. We're going to have to build that. Employers are going to partner with their people to develop that kind of capability,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
EU Commission to call on companies to sign AI Code
The European Commission will next week stage a workshop in an effort try to convince companies to sign the Code of Practice on general-purpose AI (GPAI) before it enters into force on 2 August, according to a document seen by Euronews. The Code of Practice on GPAI, a voluntary set of rules, aims to help providers of AI models, such as ChatGPT and Gemini, comply with the EU's AI Act. The final version of the Code was set to come out early May but has been delayed. The workshop, organised by the Commission's AI Office, will discuss the final code of practice, as well as 'benefits of signing the Code', according to the internal document. In September 2024 the Commission appointed thirteen experts to draft the rules, using plenary sessions and workshops to gather feedback. The process has been criticised throughout, by tech giants as well as publishers and rights-holders concerned that the rules violate the EU's Copyright laws. The US government's Mission to the EU sent a letter to the EU executive pushing back against the Code in April, claiming that it stifles innovation. In addition, Meta's global policy chief, Joel Kaplan, said in February that it will not sign the Code because it took issue with the then latest version. An EU official told Euronews in May, that US companies 'are very proactive' and there was sense that 'they are pulling back because of a change in the administration', following the trade tensions between the US and EU. Euronews reported last month that US tech giants Amazon, IBM, Google, Meta, Microsoft and OpenAI have called upon the EU executive to keep its Code 'as simple as possible', to avoid redundant reporting and unnecessary administrative burdens'. A spokesperson for the European Commission previously said the Code will appear before early August, when the rules on GPAI tools enter into force. The Commission will assess companies' intentions to sign the code, and carry out an adequacy assessment with the member states. The EU executive can then decide to formalise the Code through an implementing act. The AI Act – which regulates AI tools according to the risks they pose to society – entered into force gradually last year, however, some provisions will only apply in 2027.
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
EU Commission to call on companies to sign AI Code in workshop
The European Commission will next week stage a workshop in an effort try to convince companies to sign the Code of Practice on general-purpose AI (GPAI) before it enters into force on 2 August, according to a document seen by Euronews. The Code of Practice on GPAI, a voluntary set of rules, aims to help providers of AI models, such as ChatGPT and Gemini, comply with the EU's AI Act. The final version of the Code was set to come out early May but has been delayed. The workshop, organised by the Commission's AI Office, will discuss the final code of practice, as well as 'benefits of signing the Code', according to the internal document. In September 2024 the Commission appointed thirteen experts to draft the rules, using plenary sessions and workshops to gather feedback. The process has been criticised throughout, by tech giants as well as publishers and rights-holders concerned that the rules violate the EU's Copyright laws. The US government's Mission to the EU sent a letter to the EU executive pushing back against the Code in April, claiming that it stifles innovation. In addition, Meta's global policy chief, Joel Kaplan, said in February that it will not sign the Code because it took issue with the then latest version. An EU official told Euronews in May, that US companies 'are very proactive' and there was sense that 'they are pulling back because of a change in the administration', following the trade tensions between the US and EU. Euronews reported last month that US tech giants Amazon, IBM, Google, Meta, Microsoft and OpenAI have called upon the EU executive to keep its Code 'as simple as possible', to avoid redundant reporting and unnecessary administrative burdens'. A spokesperson for the European Commission previously said the Code will appear before early August, when the rules on GPAI tools enter into force. The Commission will assess companies' intentions to sign the code, and carry out an adequacy assessment with the member states. The EU executive can then decide to formalise the Code through an implementing act. The AI Act – which regulates AI tools according to the risks they pose to society – entered into force gradually last year, however, some provisions will only apply in 2027.
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
Estonia's PM: Everyone should reach 5% defence spending, even Spain
All European nations in NATO need to contribute to the continent's security and reach the 5% GDP defence spending target, including Spain, Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal told Euronews in an exclusive interview. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said he received an opt-out on the significant demand in defence spending from NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. But Michal explained Rutte told him this was not the case. '(Rutte) said that no, no exemptions. So I would say that Pedro Sánchez will also have to elaborate on how he will fulfil the major criteria,' explained Michel. Moreover, Michal said, the need to defend NATO territory should be based on solidarity, not just proximity to Russia. "It's not only the question of kilometres how far you are from Russia, it's also about recognising that Europe and NATO work as a team", he said. "NATO is only the strongest alliance because everybody contributes and everybody has certain capabilities", said Michal. Sánchez said his country — which currently spends 1.5% on defence — could meet the requirements of adequate defence by reaching the original aim of 2% by the end of this year. However, he said spending 5% is not in line with Spain's 'worldview'. Michal agreed that to meet such a massive investment, the money must be sacrificed from other budgetary priorities. 'We cut spending, we are borrowing. And we also raise taxes', he said. 'To be honest it's not always all that popular, but to explain it to people I would say that it's probably quite simple but because we are doing it for ourselves, for our kids, for a neighbourhood, for our countries', he said. At over 4.5%, Estonia is consistently one of the highest spenders on defence, necessarily so given its history and proximity to Russia. Michal said the threat from Russia will remain high as long as Russian President Vladimir Putin lives because it is war and conflict that keeps him in control. 'We know our neighbour,' he stated. 'For Putin, it's all about being in power." "To be honest, Putin needs conflict like fish needs water because if you don't have a conflict then probably people in Russia will be asking, where is my son, where's my husband, where are my assets,' Michal said. 'So to keep everybody under the lead, keep people quiet, keep the regime in power. Putin needs this kind of conflict,' he said. Estonia has pledged to raise defence spending to 5.4% by next year, while the other 32 NATO members have agreed to spend 5% of GDP on security by 2035.
