Over 11 mn refugees risk losing aid because of funding cuts: UN
That corresponds to a full third of the number reached last year by the UN refugee agency, UNHCR.
In a new report, the agency highlighted a deadly confluence of factors pummelling millions of refugees and displaced people globally: "rising displacement, shrinking funding and political apathy".
"We are right now facing a deadly cocktail," UNHCR's head of external relations, Dominique Hyde, told reporters in Geneva.
"We are incredibly concerned for refugees and displaced populations around the world."
Dramatic aid cuts by the United States and other countries have left UNHCR and other aid organisations facing gaping shortfalls.
UNHCR has said it needs $10.6 billion to assist the world's refugees this year, but so far it has received just 23 percent of that amount.
As a result, the agency said it was seeing $1.4 billion of essential programmes being cut or put on hold.
The impact, Hyde cautioned, risks being that "up to 11.6 million refugees and people forced to flee are losing access to humanitarian assistance provided by UNHCR".
The agency said families were being forced to choose between feeding their children, buying medicines and paying rent.
Malnutrition is especially severe for refugees fleeing war-ravaged Sudan, where the UN has been forced to reduce food rations and nutrition screening, she said, decrying the "devastating impact for children who have fled to Chad".
The cuts have also forced UNHCR to pause the movement of new arrivals from border areas to safer locations in Chad and South Sudan, "leaving thousands stranded in remote locations", the agency said.
Health and education services for refugees are also being scaled back worldwide.
In camps in Bangladesh hosting nearly a million Rohingya refugees from Myanmar, education programmes for some 230,000 children risk being suspended.
UNHCR also said its entire health programme in Lebanon was at risk of being shuttered by the end of the year.
Funding for aid programmes is not the only issue.
nl/apo/jhb
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
11 hours ago
- SBS Australia
UN Secretary-General says worsening Gaza situation is a moral stain on the entire world
The United Nations is warning that conditions now in Gaza are catastrophic, and will get even worse quickly. UN spokesperson Stephanie Tremblay says food shortages and malnutrition are pushing Gaza's most vulnerable beyond the edge. 'Hunger and malnutrition increase the risk of illnesses that weaken the immune system, especially among women, children, older people and those with disabilities and chronic diseases. The consequences can turn deadly fast. ... Just yesterday, the local health authorities announced that two more people died from starvation. In the meantime, the trickle of supplies that are making it into Gaza are nowhere near adequate to address the immense needs." Only five out of 15 planned humanitarian missions were completed this week due to access denials or obstructions. The UN says it is ready to act, but claims it is being blocked at almost every turn. "If Israel opens the crossings, lets fuel and equipment in, and allows humanitarian staff to operate safely, we will accelerate the delivery of food aid, health services, clean water and waste management, nutrition supplies and shelter materials. Ensuring that these elements are in place will be critical to scaling-up assistance in the event of a ceasefire. However, right now, various constraints imposed by the Israeli authorities on aid delivery continue to hamper our ability to respond." Israel continues to deny it's responsible for what the World Health organisation claims is a man-made famine in Gaza. Meanwhile, an Israeli airstrike has hit a school sheltering displaced families in Gaza City. At least five people were killed. Witnesses, including this man, Mohammed Abu Odeh, describe a scene of blood, rubble and body parts. 'We were sitting in God's protection, getting ready for prayer. Suddenly, there was a targeting of the school. We rushed quickly toward the classroom (the targeted place was a classroom, a room). We found body parts scattered all over the ground - adults, children, women, and kids. No one here was left without being targeted and martyred." Another man in the area, Mohammed Jendya says Gazans are being asked to endure too much. 'We endured starvation. Now we have to endure rockets? We can't even get flour, and they're dropping missiles on us. It's injustice.' In soup kitchen lines, mothers hold out empty pots. One woman, Umm Mohammed, says she has no lentils, no rice, not even bread to give her children. At a shelter nearby, Samah Matar watches over her two sons, both with cerebral palsy. Four-year-old Ameer weighs just 7.4 kilograms. His older brother, Youssef, has lost nearly a third of his body weight since the war began. Ms Matar says she can't provide for them. 'The two boys have cerebral palsy. I can't even find milk or nappies for them because of the high rise in prices in Gaza, which led to malnourishment in both children. I am also a breastfeeding mother, I have a son who is 10-month-old suffering from malnourishment. The weight of the children is very low, their bones are protruding, I can't provide them with milk or nappies, not even bread, sugar to make them some tea, I cannot provide it for them.' U-N Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has made some of his most forceful comments yet on the situation in Gaza. 'From the beginning, I have repeatedly condemned the horrific 7 October terror attacks by Hamas. But nothing can justify the explosion of death and destruction since. The scale and scope is beyond anything we have seen in recent times. I cannot explain the level of indifference and inaction we see by too many in the international community. The lack of compassion. The lack of truth. The lack of humanity. ... Children speak of wanting to go to heaven, because, at least, they say, there is food there. We hold video calls with our own humanitarians who are starving before our eyes." He is demanding an immediate and permanent ceasefire, the release of all hostages, and unimpeded humanitarian access. He says the UN stands ready to scale up operations, if only given the chance. 'Our plans are ready, and they are finalised. we know what works – and we know what does not. ... We need action. An immediate and permanent ceasefire. The immediate and unconditional release of all hostages, and immediate and unimpeded humanitarian access. At the same time, we need urgent, concrete, and irreversible steps towards a two-state solution.' Despite those calls, the path to peace appears to have grown narrower. Both Israel and the United States have pulled out of ceasefire negotiations in Qatar. US President Donald Trump citing what he calls Hamas' unwillingness to make a deal. 'Hamas didn't want to make a deal. I think they want to die. And it got to a point where you have to finish the job... They're going to be hunted down.' Mr Trump says Hamas forfeited its leverage by refusing to release the last hostages. He's also defended US humanitarian contributions. "We contributed $60 million to food and supplies and everything else. We hope the money gets there because, you know, that money gets taken, the food gets taken. We're going to do more, but we gave a lot of money. We gave a majority of the money, and the sad part is that no other country other than us gives anything." Mr Trump's claim is disputed by multiple aid organisations and donor states, who say the bottleneck is not money, but access. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu echoed President Trump's tone, stating Israel is considering what he says are alternative options to both retrieve hostages and defeat Hamas, signalling a likely intensification of the military campaign. But Mr Guterres says this matter goes well beyond a military or ancient ideological battle. "This is not just a humanitarian crisis. It is a moral crisis that challenges the global conscience. ... But words don't feed hungry children.'
SBS Australia
3 days ago
- SBS Australia
The big biosecurity question at the centre of Australia's US beef move
The federal government has lifted a ban on beef imports from the United States, expanding access to products sourced from Canada and Mexico. It's a move some experts say risks Australia's biosecurity and may be politically motivated. Although the US has been able to send beef to Australia since 2019, any cattle raised in Canada or Mexico before being slaughtered and processed in the US was previously barred due to biosecurity concerns. Now, following a decade-long science-based review, that restriction is gone. But some question whether Australia's strict biosecurity laws are being used for political gain, with the government facing questions over whether the move was made to appease US President Donald Trump. Biosecurity concerns One key concern was that Mexico's livestock tracking system could inadvertently allow beef from disease-affected regions to enter Australia. But the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry said the new changes follow the introduction of more robust movement controls in the US in late 2024 and early 2025, allowing for better tracing of cattle through the supply chain. Professor Michael Ward, a veterinary public health expert at the University of Sydney, said the decision opens Australia up to more risk because disease traceability in North America is "not quite as strong" as in Europe. Australia allows imports of beef products from a limited number of European countries. "You can potentially have cattle coming from lower disease status areas caught up in what gets exported, and then trying to work out where it's come from, that becomes really difficult," he said. "You can't really [separate those markets] in the US because it's such a bigger market and it's integrated … If a cow is moved to the US and it's there for three months, is it then an American cow? "You're basically increasing the pool of potentially risky animals, and that then flows into the risk assessment." The main risks associated with beef imports are the introduction of diseases such as mad cow disease and foot and mouth disease. Both the US and Mexico are free from both diseases. Canada is free of foot and mouth disease, but has had some cases of mad cow disease in the past. Ward said it's not "reasonable to believe all three countries have the same risk". "They're different systems, different countries, different raising conditions, different administrations. As you increase the number of countries, you're going to increase the risk." A spokesperson for the Department of Agriculture said the review was the culmination of "a decade of science and risk-based import assessment and evaluation … to make sure Australia's robust biosecurity measures are upheld". They added that the government would "not compromise on our enviable biosecurity status or our food standards, ever". Is biosecurity being used as a bargaining tool? Some believe the change could help Australia negotiate a better trade deal with the US — particularly on tariffs. As part of his sweeping global tariffs, Trump introduced a baseline 10 per cent tariff on many Australian goods in April. "[Australians] ban American beef," Trump said at the time. "Yet, we imported [US]$3 billion ($4.5 billion) of Australian beef from them just last year alone … They don't want it because they don't want it to affect their farmers." Nationals leader David Littleproud has accused the Albanese government of using the beef industry to appease Trump as it continues to pursue a broader tariff exemption. "It looks as though it's [biosecurity] been traded away to appease Donald Trump," Littleproud said on ABC's Radio National on Thursday. Coalition frontbencher James Paterson called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to "stand up ... and explain" to Australia's beef farmers that the government hasn't "watered down" biosecurity. Ward is also concerned the government is "playing off" biosecurity protections to secure a better deal. "It seems like a trade-driven decision," he said. He warned that the short-term economic gain from lifting tariffs could pale in comparison to the potential cost of a disease outbreak. "It's a huge concern — once you have introduced a disease — foot and mouth disease, for example — years and years and millions of dollars are spent trying to control that," he said. "That short-term gain — if it is tariff-driven — whether what the benefit of that is compared to a long-term disease scenario, it just doesn't add up. You really have to think about the long-term." Trade Minister Don Farrell has denied any link between the decision and pressure from the US. "There's nothing suspicious about this," he told Sky News. "If we want to export our beef overseas, then we have to accept that other countries will want to import their beef into Australia." "We're not going to allow our biosecurity rules to be impacted by the trade issues." How has the industry responded? Some industry groups say they support science-based decision-making but expressed frustration over the lack of transparency. "Science must remain the cornerstone of technical market access decisions," Australian Meat Industry Council CEO Tim Ryan said in a statement. "This progress on the US's access request demonstrates Australia's consistency in applying internationally recognised standards, which is vital to the long-term sustainability of our sector." The National Farmers Federation (NFF) said the decision needed to come "separate from any tariff negotiations". "The NFF's been clear that the revised request from the US needed to undergo the standard, science-based assessment to protect our biosecurity, and should be dealt with separate from any tariff negotiations," the organisation said in a statement. Cattle Australia CEO Will Evans said the announcement came without proper consultation. "There's going to be a lot of people today who feel blindsided by this, there's going to be a lot of people who are going to feel really frustrated and threatened by this," he told ABC radio. 'This science-based process has been, and always should be, conducted completely independently of any international trade negotiations," he added. Ward said that without seeing the final risk assessment, it's hard to judge whether the safeguards are sufficient. "It's a bit surprising," he said. "I would have thought if it's good science, you publicise it." SBS News has contacted Agriculture Minister Julie Collins for comment. With additional reporting from AAP.
News.com.au
4 days ago
- News.com.au
‘Horror show': Plea to evacuate Gaza journalists as hunger crisis reaches tipping point
A major news agency has pleaded for its contributors to be evacuated from Gaza amid fears they could starve to death during the strip's humanitarian crisis and blockade. Agence France-Presse (AFP) called on Israel to allow freelance journalists and their families to leave the Palestinian territory, saying they faced an 'appalling situation'. 'For months, we have been helplessly witnessing the dramatic deterioration of their living conditions,' AFP said in a statement overnight. 'Their situation is now untenable, despite their exemplary courage, professional commitment, and resilience.' The plea comes as Gaza authorities report 21 children died due to malnutrition and starvation over the past three days, and UN head Antonio Gutteres described events in Gaza as a 'horror show'. A six-week-old baby was among 15 people who died in a single day, according to local health officials. Global outcry has also intensified over reports of civilians being shot dead at aid centres, with UN officials saying more than 1000 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces at food distribution sites since late May. Israel has also been blamed for attacking warehousing and staff living areas at Gaza's main aid hub in Deor al-Balah, which housed World Health Organization staff. 'Refuse to see them die' The AFP's journalist union says one freelance writer, three photographers and six video freelancers remained in Gaza a long 21 months into the war. In a post on X, the union shared a devastating missive from one of its members written on July 19. 'I don't have the power to cover media anymore,' photographer Bashar Taleb wrote. 'My body is lean and I no longer have the ability to walk. 'Gaza. 19.7.2025.' The union said he had been living in the same conditions as all Gazans, and 'for over a year, he has lived in complete destitution and works at enormous risk to his life'. 'Since AFP was founded in August 1944, we have lost journalists in conflicts, we have had wounded and prisoners in our ranks, but none of us can recall seeing a colleague die of hunger,' the union said. 'We refuse to see them die.' 'Living the catastrophe' The director of Al-Shifa hospital in Gaza, Mohammed Abu Salmiya, warned on Tuesday that Gaza was heading towards 'alarming numbers of deaths' due to lack of food. He said new cases of starvation were arriving at the hospital 'every moment', following the deaths of nearly two dozen children from malnutrition in recent days. 'We are heading towards alarming numbers of deaths due to the starvation inflicted on the people of Gaza,' Mr Abu Salmiya said. AFP journalist Ahlam Afana, 30, said an exhausting 'cash crisis' – from exorbitant bank charges and sky-high prices for food – was adding to the issue. She said the costs of every day items such as rice, pasta, oil and fruit were sky high: 'We can't afford them. I don't even remember how they taste. 'The danger isn't just the bombing. Hunger is slowly killing our bodies and threatening our ability to carry on. 'Now, I'm not just reporting the news. I'm living the catastrophe and documenting it at the same time.' Another contributor based in Gaza City, Khadr Al-Zanoun, said he had lost 30 kilograms since the war began. His family was 'barely hanging on', he said. Global patience wears thin More than 1000 people have been killed trying to get aid since the US- and Israel-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) started operations, the UN said overnight. An officially private effort, the GHF began operations on May 26 after Israel halted supplies into the Gaza Strip for more than two months, sparking famine warnings. GHF operations have been marred by chaotic scenes and near-daily reports of Israeli forces firing on people waiting to collect rations in the Palestinian territory, where the Israeli military is seeking to destroy Hamas. UN human rights office spokesman Thameen Al-Kheetan said since July 21, 1054 people were killed in Gaza while trying to get food. He added: '766 of them were killed in the vicinity of GHF sites and 288 near UN and other humanitarian organisations' aid convoys'. This week 28 nations – including Australia, the UK, France and Canada – penned an open statement calling for an immediate end to the war and release of remaining hostages. 'The Israeli government's denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable,' the statement read. 'Israel must comply with its obligations under international humanitarian law.' Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at the weekend described recent events in Gaza as 'completely indefensible' and said Israel was fast losing international support. The joint statement of western nations was criticised by Israel as 'disconnected from reality', while the US ambassador to Israel called it 'disgusting'. UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy, however, said he was 'sickened' at events in Gaza and called the current aid scheme 'a grotesque spectacle'.
