logo
Bihar Mahagathbandhan has frozen out Pappu Yadav, but why it may need him

Bihar Mahagathbandhan has frozen out Pappu Yadav, but why it may need him

Indian Express8 hours ago
As the Opposition hit the streets of Bihar last week to protest against the electoral roll revision in the state and attempted to enforce a bandh, an awkward situation unfolded.
Video clips from the march against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) showed security officials physically stopping the Independent MP from Purnia, Pappu Yadav, from boarding the vehicle carrying Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition (LoP) Rahul Gandhi, state LoP Tejashwi Yadav, and other leaders of the Mahagathbandhan (Grand Alliance). While there were videos of Gandhi's party colleague Kanhaiya Kumar also facing a similar treatment — allegedly not to ruffle Tejashwi — Pappu Yadav subsequently became the bigger talking point.
Though the Purnia MP insisted it was 'not an insult', claiming that he had fallen, and added that it he did not mind getting insulted for the public – 'not just once but even a million times' – the episode revealed that the Independent MP continues to remain out in the cold, on the margins of Opposition politics in the state.
The truck incident came a year after the five-term MP with considerable influence in the Seemanchal region turned the tables on the Mahagathbandhan, after his attempts to join it failed. Before the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, he failed to merge his Jan Adhikar Party with the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), and when that fell through, he merged it with the Congress. His wife Ranjeet Ranjan is a Congress Rajya Sabha MP from Chhattisgarh.
But when an expected ticket from his new party did not materialise as Purnia was allotted to the RJD during the seat-sharing talks, Pappu Yadav rebelled, alleging the Mahagathbandhan was trying to end his political career. He contested the election on his own and defeated Janata Dal (United) candidate Santosh Kumar by 23,847 votes. The RJD finished a distant third, polling only 27,120 votes.
This act of disobedience earned him the Opposition alliance's wrath and he has been shut out ever since. The latest episode comes at a time when the Purnia MP has oscillated between touting his loyalty to the alliance and chafing at his exclusion. He has joined Opposition protests, including one against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, but the Mahagathbandhan has kept him at an arm's length.
However, given the importance of Pappu Yadav in Muslim-dominated Seemanchal, the Opposition may need to rethink its strategy when it comes to him and has been careful in framing what happened during the July 9 march. Both the RJD and the Congress said the MP's exclusion from the protest march was down to 'security protocols' that are in place around Gandhi, the LoP.
'Every leader has their own identity and the Congress respects that. However, we must adhere to the protocols set by the security officer. Above all, it is crucial to stay focused on the issue for which we are marching, for the millions of people in Bihar. The Opposition is together and we are fully committed to addressing the concerns of the people of Bihar and raising objections to the verdict issued by the Election Commission. We will not allow them to infringe upon the voting rights of EBCs (Extremely Backward Classes), OBCs (Other Backward Classes), Adivasis, and other marginalised communities,' said Congress spokesperson Gyan Ranjan Gupta.
RJD spokesperson Mrityunjay Tiwari also said it was a matter of protocol and that the Congress decides who should be up on the stage with Gandhi. 'The Congress provided the names and based on those, the security personnel granted permission. In such a large crowd, not everyone could have been on stage. At events with such large crowds, security personnel need to maintain special security as per the protocol and it is important that everyone respects that,' he said.
However, JD(U) leader and state minister Ashok Kumar Choudhary said Pappu Yadav and Kanhaiya were removed because Tejashwi 'does not like them' and that it had exposed fissures in the alliance. 'The RJD dictates how the Congress should work in Bihar … It was deeply embarrassing, you can't even share the stage with Rahul Gandhi just because your alliance partner doesn't like it. Is this a way to treat a partner?'
Contrary to his earlier image of a political figure on the periphery of state politics, Pappu Yadav has now established roots in the Kosi–Seemanchal belt, largely because of his public service and relief efforts. His regular social initiatives, from health camps to disaster relief, have significantly bolstered his on-the-ground image.
During the Covid-19 second wave in 2021, he became known as one of Patna's 'oxygen men,' moving from hospital to hospital to arrange free oxygen cylinders and critical medicines for patients and providing essential aid to struggling families at no cost. When north Bihar faced floods late last year, the Purnia MP toured Saharsa and Darbhanga on a motorcycle, distributing cash and relief supplies and setting up community kitchens.
Actions such as these have solidified Yadav's grassroots influence and independent electoral appeal in the region, helping him maintain a strong connection with a network of young volunteers. Given his grip in the region, where the ongoing SIR will likely pose a threat to the RJD and the Congress's vote base of the poor and minorities, Yadav may end up being either a valuable ally or a challenging figure for the Opposition alliance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ro Khanna pushes for release of Epstein client list, asks who the rich persons being protected
Ro Khanna pushes for release of Epstein client list, asks who the rich persons being protected

Time of India

time16 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Ro Khanna pushes for release of Epstein client list, asks who the rich persons being protected

Ro Khanna pushes for the release of the Epstein Files. California Democrat rep Ro Khanna will file an amendment to an Act that would require Attorney General Pam Bondi to release Epstein's client list as the Donald Trump administration is already in a tough spot over the issue. Khanna said he will file an amendment to the GENIUS Act, a cryptocurrency bill slated to be marked up by the House Rules Committee on Tuesday. Axios reported that the amendment would require Bondi to "retain, preserve and compile any records or evidence related to any investigation, prosecution or incarceration" of Epstein. Bondi would then have to "release and publish" the records "on a publicly available website" within 30 days of the GENIUS Act being signed into law. But it's highly unlikely that Ro Khanna's amendment would make it to the House floor. 'Why are the Epstein files still hidden? Who are the rich & powerful being protected?' Khanna wrote on social media Sunday while announcing his plans. A vote would 'put every Congress member on record' about making the files public, he continued. Rep. Mark Veasey (D-Texas) also announced on social media that he'll be introducing a resolution Monday demanding the release of the files. 'Either [President Donald Trump] and his acolytes fueled the rumors of the significance of these Epstein files to help his campaign, or something is there!' he wrote, suggesting the possibility of a cover-up. The handling of the Epstein files created a major rift in the Donald Trump administration and FBI deputy director Dan Bongino was on the verge of resigning over his disagreement with Pam Bondi. Bondi overpromised for months about Epstein releases and then the administration announced that Epstein did not have any client list and hence, there would be no more investigation or prosecution in the case. 'Dan Bongino is a very good guy. I've known him a long time. I've done his show many, many times. And he sounded terrific, actually, no, I think he's in good shape," President Donald Trump said on Bongino.

DoE to start admissions for EWS students for Class 2 and above against vacant seats
DoE to start admissions for EWS students for Class 2 and above against vacant seats

The Hindu

time23 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

DoE to start admissions for EWS students for Class 2 and above against vacant seats

The Directorate of Education (DOE) recently announced that it will initiate online admissions to fill vacant seats with students from the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) and the Freeship category for classes 2 and above in private and unaided recognised schools running on DDA-allotted land. The Directorate of Education (DoE) has directed all District Deputy Directors (DDEs) to collect and update data on the current and expected vacancies across schools. The data will be verified with support from DDE Zone officials and Directorate of Education nominees. The DoE in a circular dated July 10, stated that as per the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009, schools are under an obligation to admit children from weaker sections against 25% of the total seats in elementary classes. The DoE added that vacancies in higher classes need to be filled, and the Delhi High Court had allowed it to develop a mechanism to fill these vacant seats of the EWS category from Class 2 and above, as well. It stated that it had done so for the past three academic sessions.

U.S. Supreme Court allows Trump to lay off nearly 1,400 Education Department employees
U.S. Supreme Court allows Trump to lay off nearly 1,400 Education Department employees

The Hindu

time34 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

U.S. Supreme Court allows Trump to lay off nearly 1,400 Education Department employees

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday (July 14, 2025) cleared the way for President Donald Trump's administration to resume dismantling the Department of Education, part of his bid to shrink the federal government's role in education in favour of more control by the states. In the latest high court win for Mr. Trump, the justices lifted a federal judge's order that had reinstated nearly 1,400 workers affected by mass layoffs at the department and blocked the administration from transferring key functions to other federal agencies. A legal challenge is continuing to play out in lower courts. The court's action came in a brief, unsigned order. Its three liberal justices dissented. A group of 21 Democratic attorneys general, school districts and unions behind a pair of legal challenges had warned in court papers that Mr. Trump's shutdown efforts threatened to impair the department's ability to perform its core duties. Editorial | Lessons not learnt: On Trump and the Department of Education Created by Congress in 1979, the Department of Education's main roles include administering college loans, tracking student achievement and enforcing civil rights in schools. It also provides federal funding for needy districts and to help students with disabilities. Federal law prohibits the department from controlling school operations including curriculum, instruction and staffing. Authority over these decisions belongs to state and local governments, which provide more than 85% of public school funding. The department's Republican critics have portrayed the department as a symbol of bureaucratic waste, underlining the need for smaller federal government in favor of greater state power. In March, Mr. Trump sought to deliver on a campaign promise to conservatives by calling for the department's closure. 'We're going to be returning education, very simply, back to the states where it belongs,' Mr. Trump said on March 20 before signing an executive order to close the department to the 'maximum extent' allowed by law. Mr. Trump said that certain 'core necessities' would be preserved, including Pell grants to students from lower-income families and federal funding for disadvantaged students and children with special needs, though he said those functions would be redistributed to other agencies and departments. Mr. Trump in March directed that the department transfer its $1.6 trillion student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration and its special education services to the Department of Health and Human Services. Although formally eliminating the department would require an act of Congress, the downsizing announced in March by Education Secretary Linda McMahon aimed to slash the department's staff to roughly half the size it was when Mr. Trump took office in January. Boston-based U.S. District Judge Myong Joun, an appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden, concluded in a May 22 ruling that the mass firings would 'likely cripple the department.' He ordered the affected workers to be reinstated and also blocked the administration's plan to hand off department functions to other federal agencies. The plaintiffs, Mr. Joun wrote, are 'likely to succeed in showing that defendants are effectively disabling the department from carrying out its statutory duties by firing half of its staff, transferring key programs out of the department, and eliminating entire offices and programs.' The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on June 4 rejected the Trump administration's request to pause the injunction issued by the judge. The Justice Department in a court filing asking the Supreme Court to lift Mr. Joun's order, accused him of judicial overreach. The plaintiffs warned that mass firings at the department could delay the disbursement of federal aid for low-income schools and students with special needs, prompting shortfalls that might require cutting programs or teaching staff. They also argued in court papers that Mr. Trump's shutdown effort would undermine efforts to curb discrimination in schools, analyze and disseminate critical data on student performance and assist college applicants seeking financial aid.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store