Does Edinburgh's Royal Mile need 72 tourist gift shops?
The Royal Mile is the ancient spine of Edinburgh, visited by five million tourists each year. The collective name for four streets that thread through the city's Old Town, it is home to a 900-year-old castle, a palace and a parliament.
But the people who live there claim they are now seeing the overtourism problems being experienced across Europe.
With tourists comes tourist shops, and BBC Scotland News walked the length of the Royal Mile to count up a total of 72 stores, selling everything from kilts to Highland cow fridge magnets.
They are part of an industry that supports more than 40,000 jobs in Edinburgh.
But locals say having so many similar shops in one place is symptomatic of the challenges that mass tourism brings.
The gift shops - most of which are run by three main operators - sell every imaginable Scotland or Edinburgh-themed item, from postcards and soft toys to clothing.
Included are two shops which only sell Christmas-related gifts.
The Royal Mile is also home to 42 cafes or restaurants, 13 bars, eight jewellers and three kilt retailers.
That's in addition to the museums, cathedral, court, primary school and homes located along the steep and narrow pavements.
'I'm not against tourism, I just think it has gone too far'
One man who is almost uniquely qualified to understand the impact of tourism on the Royal Mile is 77-year-old Jimmy Robertson.
He has lived on the Canongate, at the bottom of the Royal Mile, since birth and proudly refers to himself as a Canongotian.
Jimmy, who has lived in five different homes, can list the "useful shops" that used to be a stone's throw away.
They include hairdressers, butchers, grocers and a doctors' surgery - which is now a whisky shop.
He said it used to be "a normal area" where people would live and work.
"It was probably in the 1980s you saw a lot of people moving out and the street beginning to change," he explained.
Jimmy used to work at the brewery which is now the site of the Scottish Parliament.
He has long enjoyed sitting outside the 17th Century Canongate Kirk, where one of the benches has an inscription to his late mother.
Jimmy added: "I would sit on that bench and you'd watch the world go by, saying hello to folk you knew coming by.
"Now I sit there and it feels like it is just tourists that pass me by.
"I'm not against tourism, I just think it has gone far in how it affects people who live here."
Jimmy said he now had to go out of the area to get his food shopping, or rely on relatives to bring it to him.
He said the council was to blame for allowing too many tourist shops to open in one area.
It is a point that some critics argue is borne out by data published by the City of Edinburgh Council last year which shows it owns and rents out 35 shops along the Royal Mile, many of which are leased to tourism businesses.
Hanna Wesemann lives just off the Royal Mile and both her children attended Royal Mile Primary School.
In 2004, this Victorian-era built school had 165 pupils but now the roll is down to 118 pupils – well below its 210 capacity.
The 29% fall in pupils does not surprise Hanna, who says the Old Town increasingly "does not feel like a good area to bring up a family".
Hanna puts this down to the pressures of tourism and the blight of anti-social behaviour by problem drug and alcohol users outside her flat, which requires regular calls to the police.
She said: "It feels like all that's left here is shops for tourists, tourists, and people who have multiple and complex needs.
"It [the Royal Mile] is on our doorstep but we never go there because there's nothing for us.
"There used to be some useful shops, even charity shops, but now they are all gone and all I can see is gift shops which all seem to sell the same stuff."
Increase in international visitors to Edinburgh
Only London beats Edinburgh in terms of the most popular places to visit in the UK.
Domestic visitors account for the bulk of the city's tourists staying for at least one night - a total of 2.6m in 2023, up from 2.47m in 2015.
But it is overseas visitors who are driving Edinburgh's increasing popularity.
After a dramatic fall in the Covid years, Edinburgh now attracts one million more international visitors every year than it did a decade ago.
Combined with domestic visitors, that is 4.98m total overnight trips by all visitors in 2023.
Where to accommodate these tourists, especially in peak periods like the Edinburgh festivals, has been a topic of hot discussion in the city for years.
Edinburgh saw a well documented surge in residential properties being turned over to holiday lets in the previous decade.
The number of listings by Airbnb in the city jumped from 1,900 in 2014 to 9,000 three years later.
New laws requiring operators of short-term lets to have a licence has reduced this tally but data from Inside Airbnb - an independent website which gathers data on Airbnb's operations - suggests there are still just under 6,000 listings for Edinburgh properties today.
BBC Scotland News counted 96 key boxes of the type typically used for holiday lets on, or just off, the Royal Mile earlier this month.
The impact of holiday lets on people living in the most popular tourist areas is very familiar to Hanna and her family.
She explained: "They're not bad people but they don't consider this as an area where people live as normal residents.
"You can't build a relationship with someone for three days and I'm really tired of going upstairs every few days and saying 'Can you please be quiet, we have to go to work in the morning'."
While much of the focus on where tourists stay has been on the controversy around holiday lets, there are now 181 hotels in Edinburgh - more than twice as many as there were in 2005.
What tourism does for Edinburgh's economy
There is little doubt that tourism plays a key role in the city's economy.
Hosting the world's largest arts festival every August is a big part of that but tourism is now an all-year round industry.
It is estimated the average overnight visitor spent £435 in 2023.
That filters down to a range of businesses, from coffee shops to taxi firms, supporting thousands of jobs.
A spokesman for the Gold Brothers Group - which owns 16 shops on the Royal Mile and employs 340 people in peak season - said claims about too many tourists were nothing new.
But he added that there was still capacity for more visitors outwith the festivals in August.
The spokesman said: "Our view is that a number of priority issues are being overlooked due to a fixation on tourist numbers.
"The urgent priorities for residents, business owners and visitors to the Old Town are cleanliness as the place is filthy; anti-social behaviour; and criminality including violence and a serious 'theftdemic'.
"Maybe Edinburgh's local population could come and visit and reflect on what the Royal Mile looked like years ago with its poorly maintained shops with little or no investment and then, without prejudice, consider the quality of outlets now."
The spokesman called on the City of Edinburgh Council to "stride to its A game" by cleaning the Old Town more often and ensuring it is "safe and a joy to behold".
Edinburgh 'a great place to live and visit'
Council leader Jane Meagher said the local authority was determined ensure the Royal Mile was "clean and well-maintained".
She also told BBC Scotland News the Old Town High Street was thriving.
Meagher added: "Shopfronts are open, supporting local jobs and our economy, with a great mix of businesses in the area from independent kiltmakers to homemade crafts.
"As one of the biggest landlords in the area we encourage this mix and work to make sure properties are occupied."
The council leader acknowledged anti-social behaviour remained a concern but said the local authority was working with Police Scotland to address problems.
Additional CCTV has also been installed around the Tron and Hunter Square.
Meagher said: "We're also making the Royal Mile a safer place for pedestrians and cyclists, while making sure it is clean and well-maintained.
"Our refurbishment of North Bridge is a visible commitment of our plans to ensure the area remains at the beating heart of the city, as is the extra £1m we're investing this year to tackle litter and graffiti in our communities."
The funding includes additional resources for washing pavements and closes in the Old Town.
Meagher said: "Once Edinburgh's visitor levy has launched, we hope to invest even more money to manage the impact tourism has, to ensure our city remains a great place to live and to visit."
The future of tourism in Edinburgh
Getty Images
The latest Scottish census suggests just under 9,000 people live in the areas in and around the Royal Mile.
This covers the tall blocks of flats that flank either side of the Royal Mile and the nearby council-built estate of Dumbiedykes, which has about 600 homes but no shop, GP surgery, pharmacy or post office.
All of these residents feel the direct pressure tourism can bring but there are wider pressures on the city too.
A 8.4% jump in the city's population in the 10 years to 2023 has contributed to a deepening housing and homelessness crisis.
Next year Edinburgh will introduce the kind of tourist tax that is common around Europe and city leaders have pledged to invest the £50m it is expected to raise every year on infrastructure improvements.
This has been mostly welcomed but some fear it might not be enough to help Edinburgh adapt to the growing demands of tourism.
Edinburgh becomes first 'tourist tax' city in Scotland
'I was homeless - now I show tourists my city's hidden side'
Record number of overseas tourists visit Scotland in 2023
Tourism
Scotland
Edinburgh
Impacts of tourism
Airbnb
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves challenges Cabinet to buy British
Rachel Reeves has challenged Cabinet ministers to do more to buy British as she seeks to boost flagging economic growth. The Chancellor and Pat McFadden, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, sent out the message in a letter to the Cabinet. It urged ministers to use procurement contracts, which are in the Government's gift, to help generate jobs in the UK by supporting British companies. The intervention comes amid a consultation about whether rules can be changed to give the Government more freedom to give contracts to UK firms. Each year £400bn is spent in public sector procurement, meaning small changes in approach could have a significant impact. Ms Reeves is facing difficult economic circumstances in her Budget this autumn, with official growth forecasts halved for 2025. New tax rises appear increasingly inevitable given that pressure on the public finances has intensified and the Chancellor will not break her borrowing rules. Excerpts of the letter from Ms Reeves and Mr McFadden were shared with The Telegraph. The pair wrote: 'We want people around the UK to feel the full impact of government spending through investment in skills and high quality jobs. That's why we're going further to ensure public procurement expenditure boosts British industry, jobs, skills, productivity, and expands the supply side. 'Every department needs to be pulling this procurement lever to support economic growth and strengthen our economic security. It is possible to do this within our trade agreements, as other countries do.' They added: 'We are asking all Secretaries of State to satisfy themselves that your department, and arms length bodies, have the commercial capacity and capability to ensure the creation of British jobs, productivity enhancing opportunities, and skills are prioritised in every major contract.' They also told colleagues to 'set ambitious and stretching targets for increasing your procurement spend with SMEs (Small and Medium-sized Enterprises) and social enterprises while stripping away requirements and processes that are barriers to these firms competing with established players'. At one point they wrote: 'Your commercial team is not a back office function – it is a strategic policy lever and must be a priority.' Ms McFadden was once Sir Tony Blair's political secretary and has emerged as a key confidant of Keir Starmer in recent years. As the most senior minister in the Cabinet Office he is overseeing cross-government attempts to tackle Whitehall bureaucracy and make savings in the civil service. Whether the rhetoric of Ms Reeves and Mr McFadden will lead to a step change in procurement approach remains to be seen. During the Conservatives' 14 years in office government ministers often talked publicly about the importance of using the Government machine to support British businesses. A consultation issued by the Cabinet Office is looking at changes to procurement rules that make it easier for the government to boost British industry. It will report back in September.
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
There won't be a wealth tax – but Rachel Reeves can't afford to rule it out just yet
Normally, when politicians decline to rule something out, a sceptical media and public believe they are about to do it. But there should be one exception to this rule. Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves and other ministers are refusing to rule out introducing a wealth tax in this autumn's Budget, when the chancellor is likely to raise taxes by at least £20bn to stick within her fiscal rules. I'm told Starmer and Reeves will not bring in a new wealth tax, such as the 2 per cent levy on assets of more than £10m advocated by a growing number of Labour MPs and Neil Kinnock, the party's former leader, to raise £10bn. A wealth tax is an easy slogan and fits on to a banner. It would do nicely for the Starmer allies hoping to nudge him in a more progressive direction as he seeks a long overdue 'story' for his government. But Reeves and Starmer are not convinced. The chancellor thinks wealth taxes don't work. Twelve developed nations had them in 1990s but only three remain; only one, in Switzerland, brings in lots of money. Reeves burnt her own fingers by targeting non-doms – a process begun by Jeremy Hunt, the outgoing Tory chancellor. I'm told Reeves privately dismissed fears the rich would respond by leaving the UK, saying: "They always say that, but it never happens." It is happening, and she is now considering changing her plan to make worldwide assets, including those in foreign trusts, liable to inheritance tax. One government insider told me: 'People can choose where to pay their taxes. It's very easy to move countries and they are doing it.' A new wealth tax would be complex, take years to introduce and probably not be worth the candle. Dan Neidle, founder of Tax Policy Associates, said its study found such a tax would 'lower long-run growth and employment, thanks to a decline in foreign and domestic investment. It would make UK businesses more fragile and less competitive, and create strong incentives for capital reallocation and migration.' Why not just say no to a wealth tax now? Reeves offered one explanation to her Tory predecessor Norman Lamont at a Lords committee hearing this week. He told her he found it 'a bit strange' the government has not ruled out the move. Reeves replied that if she ruled out one tax rise, the media would move on to the next option, and assume that one was going to happen if she failed to rule it out. A fair point – but not her only reason. Reeves and Starmer need to build bridges with the parliamentary Labour Party after it filleted their welfare legislation, so rejecting a wealth tax now would inflame tensions. I suspect that when the Budget comes, Reeves and her allies will whisper to Labour MPs they are introducing a form of wealth tax through other measures, while avoiding headlines about implementing a specific one. Another reason not to rule out a wealth tax is to help message discipline. Labour certainly needs more of that: ministers unwittingly fuelled speculation about tax rises in media interviews by giving different definitions of "working people'. Far easier to say taxes are a matter for the Budget and we don't comment in advance. Some senior Labour figures think Reeves's reticence is because she is considering proposals that are close to being a wealth tax – for example, increasing property-based taxes. I think she should bring in higher council tax bands for the most expensive properties. It's ludicrous that this tax is based on 1991 property values, and that in England, people in homes valued at more than £320,000 pay the same amount in their local authority. Reform could be sold as a genuine levelling up measure the Tories flunked as it would cut bills in the north and Midlands while raising them in the south. Alternatively, Reeves could increase capital gains tax for the second Budget running, perhaps by bringing it into line with income tax rates, which are higher. Some in government favour a rise in income tax with the money earmarked for defence, as I have suggested. Another option is to raise the top rate of income tax from 45 per cent to 50 per cent. But both ideas would leave Labour open to the charge of breaching its manifesto pledge not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT. Reeves could argue that circumstances had changed in a more dangerous world. But breaking its promise might be a step too far for an already deeply unpopular PM and party. I don't think there will be a wealth tax. However, the rich shouldn't celebrate. The Budget will increase existing taxes on the wealthy, in line with the government's mantra of protecting "working people", while ensuring 'those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden'. Health warning: creating losers is not pain-free for them or the government, as Reeves discovered when she brought in the ' family farms tax '. But reforming some taxes under a better banner – 'fair tax' – is her best shot.
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
There is a way to boost economic growth without spending money
Repeatedly, we hear Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves are putting pressure on ministers and departments to generate ideas for economic growth. So, here is one: the third sector. Start using the civil society, as it's also called, to its full potential, to drive the economy. A new report from the Gradel Institute of Charity at Oxford University, A Third Way of Doing Growth, makes a persuasive case for a fresh look at this frequently ignored national resource. Research by Pro Bono Economics for the study suggests the third sector creates at least £39.5bn of economic value a year if volunteer hours are factored in – and well over £100bn if the full economic contribution by the sector is assessed. Adds the report: 'Statistical evidence also shows that there are many persistent societal challenges that the third sector can often tackle more effectively (and therefore more cost-efficiently) than the public or private sector alone.' So, a win-win. Stephen Bubb, executive director of the Gradel Institute and a former head of the charity leaders' representative body, Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations, argues that a huge opportunity is being missed. 'The government should think about the third sector and how they can harness its energy and strength,' he says. Bubb said similar to Tony Blair in his third term as prime minister. The result was the appointment of Ed Miliband as the first third sector minister and a white paper. As with many such initiatives, it was promptly forgotten as the government changed. It was resurrected, of sorts, under David Cameron with his 'big society' push. 'Cameron got the point about how civil society could be used more,' says Bubb, 'but he tried to implement it at the same time as the austerity programme.' As a result, it never took off. What is different this time is that Labour are desperate for something new that does not involve the spending of vast sums of public money. The report makes a few key recommendations. Firstly, deliver better social business models for social care. Currently, the market is dominated by private firms, which are mostly extractive, putting little back, taking out their profits. New businesses mean new jobs, new tax revenues, and significant net gains for local economies. Secondly, focus on prevention to reduce crisis management. A lot of the focus in the third sector is on assisting people once they are in crisis. 'The prisons are full,' says Bubb. 'The state is hopeless at rehabilitation. Charities are good at it, they know what they are doing. Prisoners leaving and going into jobs is seeing them making a positive contribution to society, to the economy. Charites are better at helping them in securing work than the state. It's the same with mental health – the charities' record in this area is also much better.' Rebuild social connection to drive social mobility. A decline in investment in public social infrastructure, combined with Covid and the rise of social media, has led to 'a crisis of social connection in the UK – one of the most important factors in social mobility and economic inclusion,' the report says. The problem is especially acute among the nearly 1 million young adults not in employment, education, or training (Neets). 'The most effective means to engage this cohort is through charitable and voluntary institutions which – through community-based approaches and one-to-one engagement – have a proven ability to connect with those most distant from society.' Help government rewire delivery of public services. Starmer has talked about his ambition for a 'complete rewiring of the British state' to better serve the needs of the people. 'By involving the third sector in this endeavour, government has enormous potential to move away from for-profit commissioning to innovating services built around people's real-life needs and a far greater focus on rewarding organisations based on the outcomes achieved.' To that end, they suggest creating a 'Civil Society Satellite Account' in the national accounts, so there is clarity as to the third sector's full value (similar to how tourism and other sectors are treated). Sixteen countries already do this, but not the UK. They also recommend opening up public sector procurement to the third sector to transform service delivery. Of the £350bn a year that the government spends on procurement, only £21bn is administered by the third sector, meaning their skills, abilities and perspectives are simply not being efficiently deployed. Other suggestions include: building a national programme of volunteering, aimed particularly at those 18-25 Neets; and creating innovative partnerships to rebuild the social infrastructure critical for inclusive growth. As Bubb says: 'It is not so much a policy shift but the better, more focused use of an enormous resource.' It also plays to Labour ideology. Put like that, you do wonder what Starmer and Reeves are waiting for.
