Trump's oil triumphalism will end in American tears
Chris Wright, ex-fracker and now US energy secretary, came as a conquering hero, vowing to end the 'irrational quasi-religious policies on climate change' of the Biden era and boldly claiming the moral high ground. He accused green elites of robbing the West's forgotten half of their right to affordable energy and condemning the Global South to grinding poverty.
'Roughly 1bn people live lives remotely recognisable to us in this room. We wear fancy clothes mostly made out of hydrocarbons. We travel in motorised transport. We heat our homes in winter, cool them in summer, store myriad foods in our refrigerators and have light and entertainment at the flip of a switch. What about the other 7bn people? They want what we have,' he said.
This is a revealing window into the mental world of Trumpism. Has Wright any idea what the world looks like in 2025? Has he visited China lately? Does he think that most people in Asia, Latin America and the Middle East have no fridges, no lighting, no TVs, no heating and rags for clothes? Or is he just making it up?
Days earlier in London he declared war on the energy transition: 'Net zero 2050 is a sinister goal. It's a terrible goal. It's unachievable by any practical means.'
He should read the ''New Joule Order', a report this week by the Carlyle Group, which argues that large parts of the world are about to decarbonise at breakneck speed for reasons that have nothing to do with net zero. They want to rid themselves off traded oil and gas because these fuels are a strategic danger, and because there are now better alternatives.
'The energy transformation is on the cusp of re-accelerating. It will be driven by the quest for security, with nations creating a diversified energy mix of joules to insulate themselves from geopolitical, macro and financial risks,' it says.
Carlyle argues the Bretton Woods dollar system, with 'the US Navy as its muscle', has been the lifeblood of the oil economy for 80 years. Pax Americana is now disintegrating and the world can no longer rely on the free flow of crude and liquefied natural gas. 'If trade is under threat, then so are fossil fuels,' it says.
Well, indeed. China is the world's biggest importer of crude and LNG, and it is moving with alacrity to end this state of affairs. Most tankers pass through the Strait of Malacca, easily choked by US warships. The 'Malacca Dilemma' has guided Chinese strategic planning for two decades.
It is why China hit its target of 1,200 gigawatts (GW) of solar and wind power last year, six years ahead of schedule. It is why sales of electric vehicles (EVs) and plug-in hybrids will reach almost 100pc of the Chinese car market this decade. Citigroup thinks the EV share could hit 65pc as soon as this March.
Vietnam is achieving China's trajectory in even less time. Sales of EVs were almost 60pc of the new vehicle market in February, led by patriotic purchases of Vinfast's VF 3 starting at $11,800 (£9,115). CERAWeek has not got the memo that emerging Asia will never need all the crude and LNG that big oil wants to sell them.
Wright says the UK and Europe are committing industrial suicide in the name of climate policy. This cannot be allowed to stand. Germany fuelled its economy on cheap Russian gas until 2022. It was already becoming the sick man of Europe even then.
He is correct that America's fracking boom has led to a US petrochemical and rust bowl revival – though it has not saved US aluminium – but Europe had no such option. The North Sea has been in decline since the early 2000s. Europe's geology is poor. Explorers never found fracking gems comparable to America's Permian, Marcellus and Bakken, at least not at viable cost in exploitable regions.
Wright said there was 'no physical way' that wind, solar and renewables could replace fossil fuels. 'We need more energy. Lots more energy. That much should be obvious,' he said.
Actually, we don't, once you understand the fallacy of primary energy demand. When you switch to an LED light bulb you cut energy use eightfold. If you power it off renewables, you cut energy use by another two thirds, since two thirds of the energy used in gas or coal fired plants is wasted in heat. You get the point. Cutting-edge scholarship suggests that the world needs only 40pc to 45pc of today's energy supply to meet all our needs. Technology is magic.
I suspect that we are seeing the last spasm of serious green rejectionism, rather like the anti-auto backlash around 1905 when cars were a fickle toy of the rich. That all changed after Ford came out with its dependable mass market T Model for the working man in 1908.
The electro-tech revolution is in rude good health. Two trillion dollars were invested in renewable energy in 2024, and $1 trillion in oil and gas. Think tank Ember says 77pc of global electricity added last year came from clean energy. It will approach 100pc this year. Thereafter, renewables will eat into fossil demand for power.
The price of solar panels has fallen from $4 a watt in 2008, to 74 cents in 2013, and nine cents as of December 2024, close to free power. It is why the Pakistani people are deserting the grid and taking matters into their own hands by installing 22 GW of solar capacity in a single year.
Battery cells costs are already below the 'holy grail' tipping point of $100 per kilowatt hour, halving last year in China to $50. Nothing can compete with the duo of solar and batteries for the great majority of the world's population living in tropical and mid-latitudes.
Chris Wright evangelised African leaders last week with calls for a fossil blitz to reach 600m people without electricity. 'We've had years of Western countries shamelessly saying don't develop coal, coal is bad. That's just nonsense,' he said.
He is pushing a drug. The last thing Africa should do is to lock into an obsolete energy infrastructure, trapped in dependency on oil, gas and coal imports for half a century. It has the chance to leapfrog directly to solar mini-grids and cheap Asian EVs without needing thousands of miles of pylons, or needing to truck in fuel for transport.
Trump's zeal for foisting ever more US oil, gas and coal on the world makes even less sense given that the US itself will struggle to produce much more.
Two of the great lions of the fracking era warned at CERAWeek that the boom is already over. 'US oil production is beginning to plateau,' said Harold Hamm, founder of Continental Resources.
Scott Sheffield, former boss of Pioneer, said the best tiers would be exhausted by 2028. 'Everybody is running out of Tier 1 inventory,' he said.
The US is taking a big risk by doubling down on fossils and combustion cars. It may find in the 2030s that it has achieved the worst of all words: left on the sidelines of the global electro-tech economy, while at the same dependent again on imported oil and gas.
Will Trump end up being the man who blew America's energy independence?
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
20 minutes ago
- UPI
State Department to burn birth control worth $9.7M meant for poor nations
The U.S. government plans to destroy $9.7 million of contraceptives for poor nations, mainly in Africa, after the nation "explored all possible options to prevent the destruction." UPI file photo | License Photo July 27 (UPI) -- The U.S. government plans to destroy a stockpile of contraceptives worth $9.7 million for poor nations, mainly in Africa, after the State Department "explored all possible options to prevent the destruction." The contraceptives include nearly 2 million doses of injectables, 900,000 implantable devices and more than 2 million oral packets, according to internal auditing in April obtained by The Washington Post. Chelsea Polis, a researcher with Guttsmacher Institute, which supports abortion rights, told the newspaper that the contraceptives could provide more than 650,000 women with pregnancy protection for up to one year and 950,000 women for three years. U.S. laws and rules prohibit sending U.S. aid to organizations that provide abortion services, counsel about the procedure or advocate for the right overseas. "The State Department confirms that a preliminary decision was made to destroy certain abortifacient birth control commodities from terminated Biden-era USAID contracts," a spokesperson said in a statement. "Only a limited number of commodities have been approved for disposal. No HIV medications or condoms are being destroyed." The destruction will cost $167,000, the spokesperson said. Most contraceptives have less than 70% of shelf life before expiration, the spokesperson said. The Guardian contacted an aide who visited the warehouse in Belgium and found the earliest expiration date was 2027. Two-thirds didn't have any labels. Belgium, the United Nations and humanitarian groups said they unsuccessfully stopped the destruction plans for the contraceptives. The U.S. Agency for International Development, which Trump disbanded and merged into the State Department, was to have distributed them. They are part of a $9.5 billion program over 10 years to provide aid to more than 40 nations. The government said it based its decision on a policy that restricts funding for reproductive-related actions in the Mexico City Policy and the Kemp-Kasten amendment. President Ronald Reagan instituted the policy in 1985 and it has become a political issue. It has rescinded by Democratic presidents and reinstated by Republicans several times, including by President Donald Trump when he returned to office in January. A bipartisan group of U.S. legislators doesn't want the contraceptives to be destroyed, including Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Democrats Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire and Brian Schatz of Hawaii. "This is a waste of U.S. taxpayer dollars and an abdication of U.S. global leadership in preventing unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions and maternal deaths," said Shaheen, who in June sent a letter to the Secretary of State Marco Rubio about the matter. The U.N. Population Fund and the International Planned Parenthood Federation were interested in receiving the contraceptives. "UNFPA was in conversation with Chemonics about purchasing the contraceptives but didn't receive an answer from them," UNFPA spokesman Eddie Wright said. "It's the height of hypocrisy for a government to preach efficiency and cutting waste, only to turn around and recklessly destroy lifesaving supplies when the need has never been greater," Micah Grzywnowicz, regional director of the International Planned Parenthood Federation European Network, said in a statement MSI Reproductive Choices offered to pay for shipping and repackaging. MSI provides abortion services. "The complete dismantling of the world's largest donor for international family planning has been a catastrophe for the global supply chain of contraceptives," said Sarah Shaw, associate director of advocacy and for the organization. Sub-Saharan Africa has experienced an increase in teen births, according to a study at Columbia University in 2024. The number of births climbed from 4.5 million births in 2000 to 6.1 million in 2021as they decreased in the rest of the world. In Africa, 30% of all woman use birth control but more than half would use it if available, according to DebboAfrica, a healthcare company for African women. Worldwide, around half of women of reproductive age of 15-19 use some form of contraception, according to Focus2030. Foreign aid cuts could lead to more than 14 million additional deaths by 2023, including two-thirds children, according to a study published in Lancet earlier this month. Congress earlier this month passed legislation to remove $8 billion in foreign assistance. The Atlantic reported earlier this month that 551 tons of emergency food were expiring and will be incinerated rather than being fed to almost 1.5 million children in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Almost 800,000 Mpox vaccines to be sent to Africa also are not usable because they are past their expiration date, Politico reported earlier this month.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump ‘really likes' TikTok— but admin warns Chinese ownership not acceptable as dead deadline looms
President Trump likes TikTok but the Chinese-owned short video app, used by some 170 million Americans, has to move to US ownership, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said on Sunday. 'The President really likes TikTok, and he said it over and over again, because, you know, it was a good way to communicate with young people,' Lutnick said in an interview on Fox News Sunday with Shannon Bream. 'But let's face it, you can't have the Chinese have an app on 100 million American phones, that is just not okay. So, it's got to move to American ownership, it's got to move to American technology, American algorithms,' he said. 'I know the President is positive towards TikTok, if it can move into American hands.' Advertisement 3 Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Sunday that President Trump likes TikTok because 'it was a good way to communicate with young people.: FOX NEWS Lutnick's comments follow his warning last week that TikTok will have to stop operating in the U.S. if China does not approve a deal for the app. He told CNBC on Thursday that US must control the algorithm that makes the social media platform work. Advertisement TikTok parent ByteDance has a Sept. 17 deadline to divest the platform's US assets. Last month, President Trump extended by 90 days to Sept. 17, a deadline for China-based ByteDance to divest the US assets of TikTok. Trump's action took place despite a 2024 law that mandated a sale or shutdown by Jan. 19 of this year if there had not been significant progress. 3 President Trump has set a Sept. 17 deadline for Chinese firm ByteDance to divest TikTok's US assets. Getty Images 'China can have a little piece or ByteDance, the current owner, can keep a little piece. But basically, Americans will have control. Americans will own the technology, and Americans will control the algorithm,' Lutnick said. Advertisement 'If that deal gets approved, by the Chinese, then that deal will happen,' he added. 'If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark, and those decisions are coming very soon.' 3 A deal that was in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm stalled. Chidori_B – A deal had been in the works this spring that would spin off TikTok's US operations into a new US-based firm, majority-owned and operated by US investors. This stalled after China indicated it would not approve it following Trump's announcements of steep tariffs on Chinese goods. Trump has three times granted reprieves from federal enforcement of the law that mandated the sale or shutdown of TikTok that was supposed to take effect in January.


Business Upturn
an hour ago
- Business Upturn
TOP RANKED ROSEN LAW FIRM Encourages Vera Bradley, Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation
NEW YORK, July 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) resulting from allegations that Vera Bradley may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public. SO WHAT: If you purchased Vera Bradley securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On June 11, 2025, Vera Bradley announced its financial results for the first quarter of the 2026 fiscal year. Commenting on the results, Vera Bradley's CEO stated that '[o]ur first quarter results were disappointing as top line and profitability trends from the previous several quarters continued.' On this news, Vera Bradley's stock fell 19% on June 11, 2025. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. At the time Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ——————————- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]