Urgent NDIS warning issued that 10,000 vulnerable children will lose access to services: 'Tip of the iceberg'
On July 1, the Albanese government froze pay rates for allied health workers for a sixth consecutive year and slashed travel reimbursements.
According to a national peak body, at least 25 major NDIS providers have already been forced to consider closure or significant service reductions.
National Disability Services CEO Michael Perusco has warned that thousands of children with disabilities could lose access to their therapists.
'It will impact well over 10,000 participants, most of whom are children. It's important to say that's the tip of the iceberg,' he told the Daily Telegraph,
A grassroots campaign called It's Now or Never is leading a charge against the cuts, calling on the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) and its board to urgently review the pricing structure.
The petition has amassed tens of thousands of signatures in less than a month, with 56,009 signed as of publication.
A coalition of peak bodies, including the Australian Physiotherapy Association, Dietitians Australia, Australian Podiatry Association, Australian Psychological Society, Australian Association of Social Workers, and Behaviour Support Practitioners Australia are spearheading the push.
They warn that the revised pricing guide threatens both participant access and provider sustainability.
'This decision follows five years of pay freezes across the sector, paired with rising operating costs,' a joint statement from peak bodies read.
'It's stretching NDIS providers to breaking point.'
The NDIA has also flagged its intention to eliminate higher price loadings for services in regional areas of WA, SA, Tasmania, and the NT, a move that could result in a reduction of up to $40.06 per hour in those areas.
'This change would devastate already underserved communities,' the campaign said.
'The price placed on support is shrinking, and it's making it harder to put the person first.'
On Friday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he was not happen about the continued growth of the NDIS.
'The vision of the NDIS is a great one. It's one we should be really proud of as Australians,' Albanese said.
'But we need to make sure that it is made more sustainable... The vision of the NDIS wasn't that those sort of numbers (of children) go on the system.'
The NDIS is now set to cost more than the entire defence budget, with taxpayer funding expected to hit $52billion in 2025, surpassing defence spending, which is forecast at $51billion.
According to the 2025–26 federal budget, the NDIS recorded the second-fastest annual growth in major government payments, behind only interest on debt.
Projections show the scheme's cost will balloon to over $64billion by the end of the decade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
DR MAX PEMBERTON: Why we can't expect Kate to get back to 'normal' any time soon
It doesn't matter how much money you have, how famous you are, how luxurious your life appears to be, being diagnosed with cancer is never easy. It affects every aspect of your life, not just your health. Thankfully, more of us are surviving what was once a dire prognosis, however recovery time does take much longer than people anticipate. And it's not always an easy ride.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: The VERY strange ailments that are netting sufferers a free, brand-new car funded by the taxpayer
Taxpayers are funding cars for people with conditions including 'constipation', 'tennis elbow' and 'anxiety'. New figures reveal the government-backed Motability scheme is also being used to provide vehicles for drivers who have abused alcohol or drugs. Motability was set up to help those with serious physical disabilities get around. But the bloated scheme is now being used by people with a wide variety of ailments. A table shows they include over 32,000 new motors for people suffering anxiety or other depressive disorders, while 40 cars went to people with 'tennis elbow', a condition which the NHS advises 'usually goes away with rest'. A further 20 people suffering from constipation made use of Motability, along with 190 who had 'social phobia', the official figures show. Ten people struggling with a 'failure to thrive' got a taxpayer-funded car, and so did another 20 with a 'food intolerance'. A full breakdown of the figures was released in response to a Parliamentary Question and published by the Guido Fawkes website which said some £600million was funnelled from the Department for Work and Pensions into the scheme in 2024, and, as of April, some 589,000 benefits claimants in England and Wales have the publicly-subsidised cars. Online 'influencers' dish out tips for getting Motability cars, including this TikTok user hiding his full face with a red balaclava offering advice on claiming a £31,000 car for 'essentially free' In other videos, he advises his followers how to find out if they are eligible for the Motability scheme (left) and reveals how he acquired his Seat Arona 'for free' (right) Constipation and 'tennis elbow'...some of the more startling conditions for getting a taxpayer-funded car ADHD/ADD: 9,090 Alcohol misuse: 770 Anxiety and depressive disorders: 32,160 Anxiety disorders - other/type not known: 2,600 Back pain: 6,760 Constipation: 20 Depressive disorder: 7,460 Elbow disorders - other/type not known: 50 Obesity: 800 OCD: 650 Phobia - social: 190 Tennis elbow (lateral epicondylitis): 40 Allergy risk of anaphylaxis unknown or not fully assessed: 10 Failure to thrive: 10 Food intolerance: 20 The way the scheme works, eligible benefit claimants – meaning those who receive an enhanced rate for qualifying mobility difficulties - can choose to swap a portion of their payments for a new car, scooter or powered wheelchair. The figures show that 800 cars have gone to people with obesity and 230 to those with Tourette's syndrome. Some 770 people with 'alcohol misuse' conditions and another 220 with drug misuse issues lease cars from Motability. The campaign group Crush Crime claims it is 'easier for a drunk-driver to get a free car than a lifetime driving ban', adding: 'Yes, they can get a car BECAUSE they have an alcohol problem.' Motability stressed that 'anyone with an unspent drink-driving conviction cannot drive our vehicles'. Motability came under fire recently as it emerged people online boasted of gaming the system to get new cars 'basically free'. Incredibly, the publicly-funded private company is now so big it buys one in five new cars sold in Britain – and friends or relatives of Motability customers can drive them too. The boss earns £750,000 and – as the Mail revealed earlier this year – Motability is sitting on a £4billion stockpile. Meanwhile TikTok 'influencers' are fuelling the Motability scandal by encouraging Britons to cash in on brand new cars. A non-refundable advance payment based on the value of the vehicle due at the outset is required, but at a significantly lower cost. The scheme has been coming under fire for months amid fears the system is being abused. The boom in claimants, who must be in receipt of benefits in the form of the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) or the Disability Living Allowance (DLA), has proved lucrative for Motability, whose turnover soared to £7billion last year. Meanwhile Motability Operations, the company behind the Motability charity, is sitting on a surplus of £4billion - all of which is stemming from taxpayers' money. One TikTok 'influencer', masking his full face with a red balaclava, handed out tips to claim a £31,000 car for 'essentially free'. He tells his 25,000 followers the best way to obtain PIP and Motability, even advising people to take the Government to court if they are turned down. In one video, he reveals the best way to cash in on an Abarth 695 Sport, worth around £31,000, saying: 'To get this car, all you have to do is pay £599... but there's a catch. You have to be in the Motability scheme, meaning you have to be getting PIP, more specifically the Motability aspect of it. 'You need to get 12 points of that, however if you have a family member on PIP or if you are on PIP yourself you can exchange your allowance to get this car.' In other videos, first reported by The Sun, he advises his followers how to find out if they are eligible for the Motability scheme and reveals how he acquired his Seat Arona, worth up to £29,850, 'for free'. Filming a video while driving around in the car, he says: 'A question I get asked a lot is how did I get my car completely free? I've got this car completely free, so the way I got this car was through the Motability scheme. 'The way I got this car was going into a dealership, giving them the letter, them confirming the benefit and just getting the car ordered... it came within four days.' Another user shared a video boasting how her four-year-old autistic daughter can be 'driven around in style' after the family replaced their Vauxhall Zafira with a flash new Skoda Kodiaq. The vehicle is usually worth around £36,000 but can be leased for £3,299 on the Motability scheme. Motability claimants are supposed to prove they struggle to leave their home or cannot plan and follow a journey route without help to get the required '12 points'. John O'Connell, at the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'The Government must look at the criteria before this situation gets worse.' Motability Operations, which runs the Motability scheme, said: 'To use the Motability Scheme, you must receive a higher rate mobility allowance. Eligibility for the allowance is determined and awarded by the Government.' The Department for Work and Pensions, which makes the decisions on who is eligible for disability benefit claims, said: 'People in receipt of an eligible benefit can choose to join the Motability Scheme. Any misuse of the scheme is a matter for Motability and, where appropriate, the police.' One of the most notorious incidents involving a Motability recipient hit the headlines in May last year when a couple called Bernard and Ann McDonagh were convicted of a string of 'dine and dash' offences. When the McDonaghs and their children went to the Bella Ciao restaurant in Swansea one day last April, they were clearly in the mood to splash out. Their main courses included the two most expensive items on the menu – T-bone and fillet steaks – and when it came to pudding they ordered 'double desserts'. 'They wanted two brownies on a plate,' the owner of the restaurant said later. But when the time came to settle the £329 bill for her party of five, Mrs McDonagh tried to pay with a savings account card. After this had been declined twice, she told the proprietor: 'I'm going to go to the car to get another card, I'll leave my son here as proof that you can trust me.' Unfortunately, for Bella Ciao's bottom line, McDonagh Jr made a run for it shortly afterwards and the family made their escape in a blue Ford Transit van. It later emerged that the McDonaghs had been given the brand-new vehicle by Motability on a three-year lease but, far from putting them on the road to productive employment, it became their getaway vehicle. Their choice of a Ford Transit is illustrative of the range of models that are available to Motability's clients, who are presented with an eye-catching catalogue of gleaming new vehicles. By handing over £60 of their weekly PIP mobility benefit, a claimant can find themselves driving away with an all-electric Dacia Spring – retail price £15,000 – for no upfront cost. In exchange for the full £75.75 weekly allowance, a claimant can 'purchase' a petrol Nissan Juke SUV – retail price £23,000. For people in dire need of assistance with transportation owing to a disability, these vehicles can be essential to their physical and mental wellbeing. But it becomes less clear as to the immediate benefits to the taxpayer when you look further down the list of vehicles purchased by Motability – which enjoys zero VAT on the hire and resale of its vehicles. For an upfront payment of £7,999, customers can walk away with a brand-new BMW i4 M Sport, which retails at £50,000 and accelerates from 0-60mph in five seconds, or, for the same upfront price, a Mercedes-Benz CLA Coupe. Once the lease on a vehicle is up, Motability sells it on the open market, with the profits going back into the company. Labour peer John Mann, who has previously raised concerns about the company, says: 'Motability is making too much money. It needs tighter criteria. There needs to be a return of some of this money they have accrued to the exchequer. 'I also question why it is necessary for its customers to change to a new vehicle so regularly. Cars last a long time and the whole point of Motability must be to help people live a normal life. Three years per car is too short a time-frame.'
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE I took steroids for almost a decade due to peer pressure. They led me down a dark path and changed my body irreversibly... But I still miss them
A powerlifting coach who took steroids for almost a decade has warned the drugs take a toll on users' bodies and mental health - but their use will never be stopped. Anabolic steroids, a type of performance-enhancing drug (PEDs) related to testosterone, have long been controversial in the fitness world. Even the mention of PEDs can be divisive, with figures like Aussie swimmer James Magnussen criticised for participating in the 'Enhanced Games', where the use of drugs was encouraged. Anabolic steroids are illegal without a medical prescription in Australia, but that hasn't stopped people increasingly using them for means other than better health. Gus Cooke, 36, trained using anabolic steroids for bodybuilding and powerlifting competitions over 10 years while living in Brisbane - but gave them up in 2023. 'When I initially started taking them, I didn't really want to, but it was a bit of peer pressure,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'The sport kind of created this need to keep up and do what everyone else is doing, and so you are led down a dark path. 'Rather than sending you backwards, like a party drug, it's making you perform better. 'It's an addictive feeling. Winning is addictive - but then you start to realise the health concerns.' After his last competition two years ago, Mr Cooke decided it was time for a change and came off steroids before moving to Phuket, Thailand, with his wife. But that is when the difficulties really began. 'If you've been on them for a long time, you're going to have neurochemistry changes. (It) starts to impact your mental health,' he said. 'Then, it starts to get paired with muscle loss quite quickly. 'After long-term use, you've got quite a bit of suppression, meaning that your natural production (of testosterone) has slowed down.' Mr Cooke is now taking TRT, Testosterone Replacement Therapy, which is a legal, medically prescribed drug. 'My maturity and sensibility is stronger than the desire to want to go back on (them) but it doesn't mean you don't miss it,' he said. 'I do miss taking it (but) I never will again. I don't see any need.' As a coach, he now focuses on mitigating the risks of his clients who do take steroids. 'I know so much about training and more effective ways of managing performance enhancement to the degree that you can perform better if managed at much lower dosages. 'You can't stop the use. You never will stop the use. There was no point criminalising it because all you do is create an underground subculture of steroid use. 'If I demonise it, (my athletes) will go do it behind doors and, because there is little support, I need to be that support for them.' While the use of anabolic agents in Australia is illegal without a prescription, there is a trend of increasing non-medical use. The Australian National Drug Strategy Household Survey recorded that non-medical anabolic steroid use almost tripled in the 18 years between 2001 and 2019. Experts have also raised concerns about the link between social media images and the use of steroids. Research published in the American Psychological Association in 2024 highlighted the link between social media-influenced body image concerns and behaviors such as anabolic-androgenic steroid use among men. While the findings were mixed, there were some damning conclusions made. 'It was clear that appearance-related social media use is related to a more negative body image and greater odds of anabolic-androgenic steroid use in men,' it said. Mr Cooke said steroid use by social media influencers led to two issues - some people promote it as a 'magic pill', while others do not disclose that their gains are influenced by drugs, leading to followers becoming disappointed. 'With the people who are more public about it, you've got this high performer who's also, at the same time, using it to make it look "cool",' he said. 'And people see it as that magic pill.' Meanwhile, Mr Cooke warned that the second group are seeing an idolised image that is 'unrealistic'. 'You've got people who've been doing this for a really long time showing their results, and people get disheartened because they're not given the context. 'The reality is that anything worth getting in terms of a really chiselled physique isn't attainable without anabolic steroids. 'It can be done naturally, but doesn't look the same.' What is the answer? For Mr Cooke, if steroid-use is inevitable in the industry, it needs to be managed rather than banned. 'There needs to be both infrastructure to keep the market accountable and infrastructure for athletes to feel safe, to get help,' he said. 'There only needs to be basic knowledge out there to reduce so much harm. 'It's so underground no one knows what to do, and people need access to medical facilities to test if there's contaminants, to test what they're taking and then how to safely use it.' The proof of the point seems to have been made in Australian world-first research, with Griffith University running a steroid testing trial which was paired with education. Anonymous users submitted steroids for a composition analysis, including for purity. According to the results published in May this year, almost a quarter of the substances tested contained unexpected steroids. Over half were incorrectly dosed. The trial also revealed more than 80 per cent of participants would change or reduce their use of steroids after being shown the results of the research. 'Criminalisation and stigmatisation have led to these individuals turning to peers, social networks, online forums and drug coaches,' lead researcher Dr Tim Piatkowski said at the time. 'These strategies are a form of folk pharmacology or 'bro science' and can sometimes lack appropriate oversight from medical professionals.
