E.coli fears, selection spat and Cambridge dominance: What to know about the storied Boat Race
The men's race first took place in 1829. The women's crews have been racing along the same course between Putney and Mortlake since 2015, and before that in other locations from 1927.
Here's what to know about the races:
They come with a health warning again
A year on, the races are back on the Thames and so are concerns about the quality of the water on the 4.2-mile (6.8-kilometer) course.
Testing, starting in March 10, by the River Action campaign group along the racing section of the river found that 29.5% of samples exceeded safe limits of E.coli for entering the water. The group says that is almost three times the threshold for bathing waters rated 'poor.'
Health fears were also raised ahead of last year's race.
E.coli bacteria normally live in the intestines of healthy people and animals. Most strains are harmless, cause relatively brief diarrhea and most people recover without much incident, according to the Mayo clinic. But small doses of some strains — including just a mouthful of contaminated water — can cause a range of conditions, including urinary tract infection, cystitis, intestinal infection and vomiting, with the worst cases leading to life-threatening blood poisoning.
As a result, Erica Popplewell, River Action's head of communities, said 'we strongly suggest that the winning team on Sunday think twice before throwing their cox in the Thames' — a nod to the customary celebration by members of the winning crew.
Organizers accepted that the testing 'shows there is more work to be done to get our waterways where we all want them to be.' They recommend competitors follow directives in British Rowing's 'Poor Water Quality Guidance,' which includes covering up open wounds, regular handwashing, taking a shower as soon as possible after the race, and 'highlighting the risks of entering the water.'
Steve Redgrave, a five-time Olympic gold medalist in rowing for Britain, said: 'It's a real worry that in 2025 unsafe water quality in the Thames is still a concern.'
Eligibility row fans the flames
Oxford and Cambridge have long been rivals on and off the water, but rarely has there been as much hostility between the universities heading into a Boat Race.
Sparks flew a few weeks ago when three Cambridge rowers were banned from taking part because they are undertaking a postgraduate teaching course — a PGCE — which Oxford argued is a certificate as opposed to a degree. The Boat Race has an independent panel ruling on the eligibility of students in the race and it sided with Oxford.
Cambridge didn't take it well, with one of its former rowers — Olympic gold medalist Imogen Grant — describing Oxford's complaint as 'slimy' and another — former world champion rower Cath Bishop — saying it was 'utter madness' and a 'new low in relations' between the university boat clubs.
Former PGCE students from Cambridge and Oxford previously had been allowed to race, but revised criteria has been jointly agreed to by the two clubs.
The decision has weakened the Cambridge crews, depriving them of Matt Heywood (men's) and Molly Foxell and Kate Cowley (women's).
Can the Light Blues dominance continue?
Cambridge is enjoying a strong run in the Boat Race, on both the men's and women's side.
Its women have won seven races in a row and its men are seeking a sixth win in the last seven races.
Overall, Cambridge is leading Oxford 87-81 in the men's event — there was one dead heat, in 1877 — while Cambridge leads 48-30 in the women's event.
There will be a US flavor
Two Americans who rowed at the Paris Olympics last year are among the crews.
In the men's race, Nick Rusher — a bronze medalist in the men's eight in Paris — will be in the No. 7 seat for Oxford.
Claire Collins, who also raced at the Tokyo Games in 2021 and was a world championship medalist in 2022, will row for Cambridge at No. 6.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
7 hours ago
- USA Today
Claressa Shields-Laila Ali feud escalates: What champ had to say
Claressa Shields is putting her undisputed heavyweight title on the line against Lani Daniels Saturday, July 26, but a piece of her mind is occupied by someone else. Laila Ali. Shields and her team have said they put $15 million in escrow for Ali — provided she agrees to fight Shields. Four days since they made the offer, Ali has yet to respond, according to Shields. 'Do you want to entertain a fight or do you not?'' Shields said, referring to Muhammad Ali's daughter. 'And I think that she should let me and the public know because the public is very, very interested. ... "Honestly, a fight with me and Laila Ali would be one of the biggest fights in women's boxing. I think we should do it for the culture. We should do it for the boxing culture. We should do it for so many to prove who is the best.'' On second thought... "I don't need to prove to the world that I'm better than Laila,'' Shields said. "I think everyone knows that." Ali did not respond to requests for comment left by USA TODAY Sports by email and voicemail and text message on a phone number listed in her name. Shields, 30, also suggested Ali, 47, should not be considered too old to fight. 'I see people complaining and saying her age and everything,'' Shields said. 'But Laila has been constantly picking at me, constantly talking trash about me for the past, I don't know, six, seven years. And she always talks about how she can come out of retirement and the reason she hasn't come out of retirement (is) because nobody's good enough, the bag isn't good enough.'' Raising the stakes Shields and her team raised the stakes July 18 when, in a video published by TMZ, they said they had put $15 million in escrow for Ali. Ali, the eighth of Muhammad Ali's nine children, was 24-0 with 21 knockouts during a pro boxing career that spanned from 1999 to 2007. Shields, a two-time Olympic gold medalist, is 16-0 with 3 KOs as a pro. Does Shields think Ali will take the fight? 'Listen, I have no idea,'' she replied, "but I know I can be 60 and if one of these young girls come calling me out when they got $15 million, I'm stepping out. I'm stepping up and I'm going to get the money. Especially if I'm in good shape and I'm helping and I believe that I can still fight. I'm definitely going to do it.'' Shields indicated that Ali's disrespect for her is one reason she wants to fight. 'When you said I didn't have skills, I didn't have power, that I can't keep you off of me, that I'm not skilled enough, I'm not good enough,'' Shields said. 'I just want to get inside the ring with her to show her I am a hundred times better than you, even though I'm smaller than you. Because Laila is bigger than me, but size do not win fights. 'Hopefully by beating her I earn her respect and she can put up a good fight and she can earn mine because she don't got mine either.''


Hamilton Spectator
7 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
American defender Caleb Wiley again loaned to Watford by Chelsea
American defender Caleb Wiley was again loaned from Chelsea to second-tier Watford on Tuesday after spending the second half of last season with the Hornets. The 20-year-old left back joined Chelsea from Major League Soccer's Atlanta United last July and was loaned to Strasbourg for the 2024-25 season. He made three starts and three substitute appearances for the Ligue 1 club. His last appearance was Nov. 24, when he dislocated a shoulder during a collision against Nice. Wiley had surgery, the loan was cut short and he was loaned to Watford, where he debuted on March 8. He has made three appearances for the U.S. and also was on the American team at last year's Olympic soccer tournament. ___ AP soccer:


The Hill
7 hours ago
- The Hill
Trans women athletes to face exclusion from Olympic, Paralympic activities
Transgender women athletes will now face exclusion from U.S. Olympic and Paralympic activities, according to new policy from the United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee (USOPC). 'In our world of elite sport, these elements of fairness demand that we reconcile athlete inclusion and athlete opportunity,' reads a statement on the USOPC website. 'The only way to do that for all genders, and specifically for those who are transgender, is to rely on real data and science-based evidence rather than ideology. That means making science-based decisions, sport by sport and discipline by discipline, within both the Olympic and Paralympic movements.' A Monday note on a page about 'transgender athlete participation in sport' reads 'please refer to the USOPC athlete safety policy' and links a document, a portion of which states it 'will continue to collaborate with various stakeholders with oversight responsibilities' to guarantee 'that women have a fair and safe competition environment consistent with Executive Order 14201.' In Executive Order 14201, titled 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports,' President Trump stated the U.S. is against 'male competitive participation in women's sports' as a matter 'of safety, fairness, dignity, and truth.' The order bars trans athletes from competing in girls' and women's sports. The new policy was first reported by The New York Times. Trump said in February that his administration will not let transgender athletes compete in the 2028 Los Angeles Summer Olympics. A USOPC spokesperson said the organization notified its 'community of stakeholders' of the new policy via email on Tuesday. 'As many of you are aware, the Administration issued Executive Order 14201 earlier this year aimed at protecting women's sport. Since then, the USOPC has engaged in a series of respectful and constructive conversations with federal officials,' USOPC President Gene Sykes and CEO Sarah Hirshland wrote in the email, a copy of which was obtained by The Hill. 'As a federally chartered organization, we have an obligation to comply with federal expectations,' they wrote, adding further down, 'Our revised policy emphasizes the importance of ensuring fair and safe competition environments for women. All National Governing Bodies are required to update their applicable policies in alignment.' Sykes and Hirshland's statement does not say whether the policy change will impact female athletes with differences in sex development (DSD). A USOPC spokesperson declined to answer, telling The Hill in an email that there is 'no additional info to share at the moment.'