
Former 6th District Rep. Beverly Byron dies at 92
Beverly's husband, Goodloe Byron, had been the incumbent representative of Maryland's 6th Congressional District when he died suddenly of a heart attack during a jog along the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal. Beverly Byron had just been appointed to take his place on the ballot.
Up until that point, Beverly had no political aspirations of her own. She did, however, have years of behind-the-scenes experience supporting her husband's campaigns for the Maryland General Assembly and later for Congress.
Beverly, a Democrat, easily won election that fall and went on to serve seven terms in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Her time in elected office ended after a successful primary challenge by then-state Del. Thomas Hattery in 1992, but she remained active in local political circles for the rest of her life.
On Sunday, Beverly Byron died of heart failure at her home in Frederick, her family said. She was 92.
Born in Baltimore in 1932, Beverly was the daughter of Ruth and Harry Butcher. As a child, she lived in Washington, D.C., at the Wardman Park Hotel while her father served as a wartime Naval aide to General Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Beverly was a graduate of the National Cathedral School in Washington, D.C., and later attended Hood College in Frederick. She married Goodloe, the father of her three children, in 1952.
Kimball on Monday recalled 'a cast of characters' rotating through the family's living room as he grew up to help with phone banking, printing campaign materials and keeping track of votes on election night.
'My mother organized all of it,' Kimball said. 'And you would not believe how organized it was.'
As a congresswoman, Beverly frequently worked across the aisle and became known as a conservative figure in the Democratic party. She championed military and national security issues, serving as chair of the Military Personnel and Compensation subcommittee of the U.S. House Armed Services Committee.
Roy Dyson, a Democrat who represented Maryland's 1st Congressional District from 1981 to 1991, served with Beverly on the Military Personnel and Compensation Subcommittee.
In an interview on Monday, Dyson praised Beverly as 'very diligent' and 'a very hard worker' for whom he had great admiration.
'She was one of the people who was decent, who made Congress respected,' he said.
Ron Young, whose tenure as mayor of Frederick overlapped with both Goodloe and Beverly's time in the U.S. House, said the congresswoman worked closely with officials in Frederick to achieve their goals over the years.
He said Beverly has been 'an icon in Frederick for a long time, as has the whole family.'
Goodloe, who represented the 6th District from 1971 until his death, was the son of William and Katharine Byron, both of whom also held the seat.
Beverly's mother-in-law Katharine also won election to the 6th District seat following the death of her husband. Unlike Beverly, she only served one term.
After leaving Congress, Beverly continued to be a leader in the community, chairing the boards of CareFirst Blue Cross Blue Shield, Maryland Technology and Development Corporation, and the Board of Visitors of the U.S. Naval Academy.
She was appointed in 1993 by then-President George H.W. Bush to serve on the Base Closure and Realignment (BRAC) Commission, which coordinated changes and closures for military bases after the Cold War.
Tom Slater, who worked on the campaigns of both Beverly and her husband and who served for many years on the Frederick County Democratic Central Committee, said Beverly was 'very feisty' up until the end of her life.
The Frederick County Democratic Central Committee in 2023 established the Beverly B. Byron award to honor women or women-led organizations for their support of Democratic women running for political office, Slater said.
April McClain Delaney, a Democrat who was sworn in as the 6th District representative last month, remembered Beverly in a post on Twitter for her 'piercing intellect, dry humor, dogged persistence, long public service and her big heart.'
'I am the first woman in the 30 years following her tenure to represent Maryland's 6th District and have been privileged to come to know her incredible spirit and learn from her life experiences,' McClain Delaney wrote. 'At 92, she still kept abreast of every political development, was seemingly sharper than most half her age and even up to two weeks ago was calling me with sage insights. God bless you, Bev, for a life well lived in purpose and community, and a light for all to see.'
In a statement on Monday, Maryland Democratic Party Chair Ken Ulman called Byron 'a trailblazer whose service to Maryland and the nation will leave a lasting legacy.'
Former Maryland Sen. Barbara Mikulski, a Democrat who served in Congress with Byron, called the late congresswoman 'a great advocate for our state and a real champion for the United States military.'
'I worked very closely with Congresswoman Byron to bring resources to Western Maryland, jobs and opportunity for the region and support for men and women in the military,' Mikulski wrote in a statement.
'She was outdoorsy and I was indoorsy — we made a perfect combination,' the statement continued.
In a statement on Monday, Sen. Chris Van Hollen said Beverly was a 'true American patriot and great Marylander' and 'a proponent for a strong national defense and American leadership around the world.'
Mollie Byron, Byron's first grandchild, works as Gov. Wes Moore's senior adviser and director of intergovernmental affairs. In an interview on Monday, she said her grandmother shaped her interest in politics and public service.
'I could always call her and she would give me good advice. That was huge, and very rare and special that I got to have that,' Mollie said, adding that Byron had particular insight into the balance between being a mother and being active in politics.
Byron is survived by her children Goodloe Edgar Byron Jr., Barton Kimball Byron, and Mary Byron Kunst; her daughters-in-law Jane Byron and Hannah Byron; and several grandchildren, including Mollie.
Byron was preceded in death by B. Kirk Walsh, her second husband who died in 2019.
A visitation for Byron will be held at Keeney and Basford Funeral Homes in Frederick on Feb. 24 from 3 to 6 p.m. A memorial service will be held on February 25 at St. Ignatius of Loyola in Ijamsville at 11 a.m.
In lieu of flowers, Byron's family is requesting contributions be made to the American Heart Association and the Catoctin Land Trust.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
9 minutes ago
- Newsweek
New Poll Shows Top 2028 Presidential Candidates in Swing State
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new poll by Emerson College Polling released on Friday shows potential 2028 Republican and Democratic presidential contenders picked by North Carolina primary voters. Why It Matters Early polls in crucial swing states like North Carolina have gained significance as potential contenders for the 2028 presidential election begin to emerge. Even with the election still a few years away, polling can offer insight into candidate viability, voter sentiment, and evolving party dynamics, particularly after the pivotal 2024 election cycle. North Carolina, often considered determinative in recent presidential contests, could offer a bellwether for national trends as both major parties consider their direction and platform for 2028. What To Know In the Emerson College survey conducted from July 28 to 30, of 1,000 North Carolina registered voters, Vice President JD Vance is leading the Republican nomination with 53 percent among likely Republican primary voters—well ahead of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis with 7 percent and Secretary of State Marco Rubio with 5 percent. Vance jumped 7 points from a previous survey taken in June by Emerson. In the Democratic field, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg was the top choice among likely primary voters at 17 percent, followed by former Vice President Kamala Harris at 12 percent and California Governor Gavin Newsom at 10 percent. The survey shows 24 percent are undecided. The poll has a margin of error of 3 percentage points, with separate credibility intervals for primary subgroups. Harris, meanwhile, announced this week that she is not running for California governor in the next cycle, fueling speculation she is considering another presidential run. In an interview on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert on Thursday, the former vice president said she thinks the political system is "broken" and does not want to be in it right now. She added she would always "be part of the fight" though. Friday's poll also shows that 40 percent of the swing state voters say their family's finances are worse off than one year prior, 32 percent say they are about the same and 28 percent say they are better off now. Former Vice President Kamala Harris and then Vice President-elect, JD Vance can be seen departing the White House ahead of the Inauguration of then President-elect Donald Trump on January 20 in Washington, D.C. Former Vice President Kamala Harris and then Vice President-elect, JD Vance can be seen departing the White House ahead of the Inauguration of then President-elect Donald Trump on January 20 in Washington, D.C. Photo byWhat People Are Saying Political science professor at Columbia University Robert Y. Shapiro to Newsweek via email Friday: "The Democratic primary polling is much too early and all we are seeing is name recognition for past presidential candidates and ones in the news lately in a visible way. On the Republican side, DeSantis and Rubio are damaged goods as past losers in the past Republican primaries in 2016 and 2024. Vance is on the rise by virtue of being Vice President and visible when he echoes or advocates more strongly Trump's MAGA positions and what Trump—and he—have done. He has not been defeated in any past major election so untarnished in that respect." What Happens Next Major candidates are not expected to announce their 2028 campaigns until after the 2026 midterm elections, in keeping with recent electoral cycles. However, the field of likely contenders is potentially taking shape as politicians such as Buttigieg, Newsom, and others make public appearances and pursue national media opportunities. Vance's strong polling position places him at the forefront of Republican prospects.

Politico
9 minutes ago
- Politico
Why Trump's newly announced tariffs aren't a done deal
THE LAW ON LIBERATION DAY — On Thursday, Donald Trump announced sweeping new tariffs against U.S. trading partners that will go into effect next week. The announcement came on the same day that an appeals court grappled with the question of whether Trump's tariffs are even legal. Indeed, there is a strong argument that the tariffs are illegal and unconstitutional. The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, which on Thursday held oral argument on two major tariff challenges — one from a group of small businesses and the other from a coalition of twelve states led by Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield — seems like it may ultimately agree. Rayfield was pleased with how it went. 'If you were an outside observer watching the hearing and you had to pick a party to stay in the shoes of, I think you would prefer to be in the state's shoes after Thursday's hearing,' Rayfield said in an interview with POLITICO this afternoon. That seems to be the consensus among close observers. 'Federal appeals court judges on Thursday sharply questioned President Donald Trump's authority,' POLITICO's Kyle Cheney and Doug Palmer wrote. Reuters put it similarly, while the Associated Press reported that the judges 'expressed broad skepticism' toward the government's arguments. The New York Times' account said that Brett Shumate, the lawyer arguing for the government, 'at times faced an icy reception.' This is not that surprising if you have been following this legal saga closely. The Constitution explicitly gives the power to impose tariffs to Congress. Congress has passed several trade laws that provide the president with the power to impose tariffs in certain circumstances, but they do not grant the sweeping and unreviewable power that the Trump administration has claimed — and indeed requires in order to support Trump's tariffs as a legal matter. Meanwhile, the statute that has actually been invoked by the Trump administration — the International Emergency Economic Powers Act — has never been used to impose tariffs over the course of the nearly half-century that it has been on the books, and it makes no mention of tariffs in the text. It was in fact passed to limit the president's emergency economic powers. On top of that, the key case cited by the government in its favor does not actually support their position (usually a bad thing). Thus far, two lower courts have ruled against the administration on this issue — a unanimous three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of International Trade and a federal district court judge in Washington, D.C. Both rulings have been stayed pending appeal. Thursday's argument concerned the first of those rulings and was conducted in the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. If the government loses in the Federal Circuit, it is still possible that the Supreme Court's conservative justices could agree to hear the case and ultimately rule in Trump's favor. On the merits, that outcome would be hard to square with the conservative majority's stated commitment to textualism as a mode of statutory interpretation, as well as the major questions doctrine that was developed in recent years by the conservative justices, who used it in 2023 to strike down much of the Biden administration's student-loan forgiveness effort. In the student-loan forgiveness case, the conservative justices relied crucially on the fact that the program was estimated to cost taxpayers roughly $500 billion, according to a budget model from the University of Pennsylvania. They concluded that this warranted a particularly rigorous and stringent mode of statutory interpretation. The estimated cost to taxpayers in that case pales in comparison to the estimated cost for Americans resulting from Trump's tariffs, according to a model at Yale University. That model currently estimates that Trump's latest tariff framework will result in an average per household income loss of $2,400 this year alone, that it will result in a 0.5 percentage loss in real GDP this year and next year, and that the economy will lose nearly half a million jobs by the end of 2025. None of this has stopped the administration from plowing forward. At this point, the administration may be hoping for a victory at the Supreme Court (assuming they lose at the Federal Circuit) or, perhaps, simply planning to do as much as they can to advance their tariff policy before a day comes when it is definitively thrown out by the courts. They have already been aided in this regard by the Supreme Court, intentionally or otherwise. In mid-June, the two businesses that prevailed in federal district court in Washington asked the Supreme Court to short-circuit the appeals process and take the case up immediately for review. 'In light of the tariffs' massive impact on virtually every business and consumer across the Nation, and the unremitting whiplash caused by the unfettered tariffing power the President claims, challenges to the IEEPA tariffs cannot await the normal appellate process (even on an expedited timeline),' the companies' lawyers wrote. The companies' request was far from crazy, particularly given the fact that the conservative justices have moved quickly in a variety of major court challenges to the Trump administration's actions since Trump's inauguration. Three days later, however, the Supreme Court denied their request, with no explanation. Perhaps not coincidentally, those expedited rulings have favored the Trump administration, while in the case of Trump's tariffs, a critical mass of conservative justices may ultimately be compelled to rule against Trump — if, that is, they actually adhere to the interpretive and constitutional principles that they claim to follow. In the meantime — and as the administration has been struggling in the courts to defend its policy — the Trump administration is evidently moving forward undeterred. Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas at nightly@ Or contact tonight's author at akhardori@ What'd I Miss? — Trump demands firing of BLS chief after soft jobs report: President Donald Trump called for the ouster of the head of the Labor Department's statistical arm this afternoon after the latest monthly jobs report came in well under expectations. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY,' Trump wrote in a social media post. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' Trump reprised prior accusations that the Bureau of Labor Statistics under Commissioner Erika McEntarfer surreptitiously put out overly rosy jobs numbers at the tail end of the Biden administration that were subsequently revised in order to influence the election. Economists have roundly dismissed these claims as a misunderstanding of the agency's revision processes. — Huckabee, Witkoff visit US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation amid global outcry: Senior U.S. officials visited a distribution center for the American-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation today, pledging to report back to President Donald Trump about the foundation's operations and devise a plan to address starvation in the strip amid growing global outcry over the humanitarian crisis. U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee and special envoy Steve Witkoff made a rare trip to Gaza today amid heightened pressure — including from within MAGA circles — to reconsider the administration's support for Israel's war on Hamas and intervene in Gaza's hunger crisis. — Corporation for Public Broadcasting shutting down: The Corporation for Public Broadcasting announced today it was shutting down its operations after President Donald Trump rescinded funding for the nonprofit, which it used to support public radio and TV stations around the country. The CPB — which was established by Congress decades ago as an independent nonprofit — said it will begin 'an orderly wind-down' after Trump signed a measure last month to claw back $1.1 billion in grants appropriated to CPB over the next two fiscal years. — Ghislaine Maxwell transferred to less restrictive prison after DOJ meeting: Days after sitting down with one of the highest-ranking members of the Justice Department, Ghislaine Maxwell has been transferred to a less restrictive minimum security federal prison camp in Texas, her attorney said. Maxwell's attorney David Oscar Markus said today she had been moved to Federal Prison Camp Bryan, a facility for female inmates in Southeast Texas. He declined further comment. Until this week, Maxwell, the onetime girlfriend of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, had been serving a 20-year sentence for her 2021 conviction for sex trafficking crimes in Florida, at FCI Tallahassee, a low-security prison. — Trump, escalating war of words with Russia's Medvedev, mobilizes two nuclear submarines: President Donald Trump said today he mobilized two nuclear submarines 'to be positioned in the appropriate regions' in response to threatening comments by Russia's former president Dmitry Medvedev. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he was taking that action 'just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that. Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' Medvedev on Thursday referenced Russia's nuclear capabilities amid an escalating battle on social media sparked by Trump's latest efforts to increase economic pressure on the Kremlin in hopes of reviving diplomatic efforts to end the war in Ukraine. AROUND THE WORLD RAISING THE BAR — Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni reacted with fury today as the EU's top court raised the threshold for member countries to reject asylum-seekers. The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) said EU nations may only create national lists of safe countries outside the bloc if they fully justify their assessments with public sources. According to the court, a country can only be considered 'safe' for repatriation if 'the entire population' is protected across all regions. Meloni called the court's decision 'surprising' and a power grab by EU judges. 'Once again, the judiciary, this time at the European level, claims spaces that do not belong to it, in the face of responsibilities that are political,' she said. SLOVENIA STEPS OUT— Slovenia became the first EU country to ban all weapons trade with Israel, citing the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The government also prohibited the transit of weapons to or from Israel through Slovenia, the administration in Ljubljana said in a statement Thursday. Slovenia said that it decided to act independently from the EU, as 'due to internal disagreements and disunity,' the bloc is unable to take action against Israel. Though the European Commission proposed partially suspending Israel's association agreement with the EU this week, member countries have yet to agree on it. Nightly Number RADAR SWEEP WEEKEND WARRIORS — Under the threat of Chinese invasion, more and more Taiwanese civilians are signing up for civil defense classes. US intelligence predicts that China will be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027 as China builds up its aircrafts and warships. Armed with airsoft guns that fire plastic pellets, men and women train on the weekends in converted garages and empty warehouses to prepare a civil resilience. Beyond armed defense, officials and private organizations have amped up drills for attacks on critical infrastructure and cyberattacks. Yian Lee reports on the 'soft militarization' of Taiwanese civilians for Bloomberg. Parting Image Jacqueline Munis contributed to this newsletter. Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.


The Hill
34 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Battles Divide Traditional Allies
As a steamy July ended in DC, Capitol Hill saw clashes heat up both within and between parties in the upper chamber of Congress. Disputes ranged from whether Democrats should use legislation to oppose actions by the Trump administration to whether lawmakers should be allowed to buy and sell stocks.