Trump aware, supportive of AUKUS pact, US defense secretary says
"The President is very aware, supportive of AUKUS, recognises the importance of the defense industrial base," Hegseth said in opening remarks of a meeting in Washington with his Australian counterpart Richard Marles, according to a transcript on Saturday.
Under AUKUS, Australia will pay the United States $3 billion to boost the capacity of the U.S. submarine industry, and Washington will sell several Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines to Australia in the early 2030s, while Britain and Australia will later build a new AUKUS-class submarine.
Australia transferred the first $500 million payment after a call between Marles and Hegseth on January 29, Marles said on Friday.
When asked, at the meeting with Marles, if the U.S. would deliver the nuclear submarines to Australia on time, Hegseth said: "We sure hope so".
"Part of what President Trump is committed to doing is cutting red tape, investing in the defence industrial base, ensuring that we stand by our allies and partners," he said.
Marles said Australia was "pleased with the progress that we're seeing in terms of the rate of production, both in terms of construction and sustainment," referring to the Virginia-class submarines.
Marles is the first foreign counterpart hosted by Hegseth since his confirmation in the role. The pair is expected to discuss security in the Indo-Pacific region and the growing U.S. military presence in Australia in addition to talks on AUKUS.
Formed in 2021, AUKUS is aimed at addressing shared worries about China's growing power and designed to allow Australia to acquire the nuclear-powered attack submarines and other advanced weapons such as hypersonic missiles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Kanye West visa cancelled by Australian government
Kanye West visa cancelled by Australian government The 48-year-old rapper - whose wife Bianca Censori has family Down Under - had a "lower-level" visa which has now been revoked Kanye West (Image:for The Recording Academy ) Kanye West's Australian visa has been cancelled over his "offensive comments". The 48-year-old rapper - whose wife Bianca Censori has family Down Under - had a "lower-level" visa which has now been revoked after he release antisemitic song Heil Hitler in May. The country's Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke told ABC: "He's been coming to Australia for a long time. "He's got family here and he's made a lot of offensive comments that my officials looked at again. "Once he released the Heil Hitler song, he no longer has a valid visa in Australia. "It wasn't a visa for the purpose of concerts. It was a lower-level and the officials still looked at the law and said, you're going to have a song and promote that sort of Nazism, we don't need that in Australia." Article continues below Earlier this year, the Stronger rapper came under fire over his controversial behaviour, including praising Adolf Hitler and selling t-shirts emblazoned with a Swastika, a notorious Nazi hate symbol. However, in May he asked for forgiveness and called for peace. He wrote in a series of posts on X: "I am done with antisemitism. I love all people. "God forgive me for the pain I've caused. "I forgive those who have caused me pain. Thank you God. "The earth itself is in Gods Kingdom. "GOD CALLS FOR PEACE. "Share peace. "Share love." Kanye claimed his outlook changed after he enjoyed a video call with his and ex-wife Kim Kardashian's four children, North, 11, Saint, nine, Chicago, seven, and six-year-old Psalm. He wrote: "I simply got a FaceTime from my kids and I wanna save the world again." This isn't the first time Kanye has seemingly had a change of heart as in February, he declared he was "not a Nazi" following "further reflection. Taking to X, he wrote: "After further reflection I've come to the realization that I'm not a Nazi." Kanye had previously declared his anti-Semitic comments to be "90 percent Jew proof", as he went on to explain he meant no one had been able to "stop" him. He wrote: "I will write this more poetically in a bit cause right now I'm finishing my verse for Game's album. "The idea of being Jew proof is "I said all these politically incorrect things and nobody was able to stop me extort me threaten me to change anything Article continues below "And I made 40 million the next day between my different business "There's a lot of Jewish people I know and love and still work with "The point I made and showed is that I am not under Jewish control anymore (sic)"
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
I have spent over £10K on ASOS but have just had my account banned – I'm absolutely fuming & it's discrimination
Read on to see why ASOS is banning accounts ASO-RE SPOT I have spent over £10K on ASOS but have just had my account banned – I'm absolutely fuming & it's discrimination Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A WOMAN has been left fuming after getting her ASOS account banned despite spending over £10,000 on the site. Tskenya-Sarah Frazer, 31, has been a regular ASOS shopper since she was a teenager because of its range of plus-sized and tall offerings. 3 Tskenya-Sarah Frazer was devastated to be banned from the site for life Credit: SWNS 3 The 31-year-old had spent over £10,000 on the website before being removed Credit: SWNS 3 Like many, she says it's unfair to be kicked off when sizing isn't consistent Credit: Reuters The plus-sized tall woman had her ASOS account banned due to their new returns policy that has sparked outrage. Tskenya-Sarah checked her email on June 19 she checked her emails to find her account with the online retailer had been blocked for life - due to breaching their "Fair Use Policy" because of the returns she has made. ASOS cracked down last year on shoppers over-returning by charging £3.95 for returns if shoppers keep less than £40 of the order. The decision was met with criticism from shoppers who argued that as there aren't in-person shops to try on items, greater returns should be expected. And in ASOS's latest act it appears shoppers' return habits are again coming under fire. Tskenya, who is a broadcaster and inclusion consultant, said her first thought was, 'where am I going to shop now?'. Due to her size 18 and 5ft 9in frame, she said she had only made returns when she had bought multiple sizes due to being unsure which would fit. This is something she says she always needs to do, because she falls outside the 'standard' sizing range and the tall and plus sections can be even more varied than the regular ranges. She previously considered herself a "loyal customer" - even defending ASOS if people told her they didn't like it - and reckons she has spent over £10k on the site over the past decade. But Tskenya now feels the brand is "punching down" on certain groups - such as people who don't fit regular sizing, as well as people who aren't able to visit in-person shops due to disabilities or location. I got a cute ASOS dress for Xmas but it's a huge fail, I look like an adult baby Tskenya, from Hackney, East London, said: "I've always been tall and plus-sized - I also have a larger foot size. "It's always been hard to find clothes that fit me - and when I discovered ASOS as a teen it became my safe haven and my go-to because they had such a range of sizes. "So when I woke up and got this cold email that my account had been permanently blocked, I couldn't believe it. "I had such loyalty to ASOS - I never shopped anywhere else - and now I'm banned for life, it's egregious. Three things that might lead to your ASOS account being banned include: Return fraud (returning items that mismatch with original condition - e.g. should be unused with tags and in original packaging) High return frequency Suspicious return patterns "This is more than clothes. This is an impact on people, and punching down on people of different heights, weights, abilities and classes. "I feel so disillusioned - I don't know if I could shop with them again, even if they gave me my account back." Tskenya is one of many young women who noticed their ASOS accounts were randomly closed last month - with many of them sharing their disbelief online. Tskenya's email, received on June 19, read: "After reviewing your recent returns again, you remain part of a small group of customers whose shopping behaviour consistently breaches our Fair Use Policy. "As a result, we've decided to close your account with immediate effect. "For your information, this decision also applies to any other accounts you currently have or may attempt to open in the future." The Fair Use Policy on ASOS's website states: "If we suspect fraudulent activity and/or notice any unusual or suspicious activity with your account, we may refuse to issue a refund and suspend and/or close your account and any associated accounts." They list examples such as complaints relating to unreceived orders, missing items, ordering and returning large quantities, and unusual patterns of returns activity. The retailers need to take some responsibility - if clothing sizes were standardised, we wouldn't need to order two sizes or lengths. Tskenya-Sarah Frazer Tskenya recalled being shocked - as she said she hadn't considered her orders or returns to be out of the ordinary. She said she does a big shop of around £2,000 four times a year for each season and returns around 50% of the order each time. She would often order two or three sizes of a garment to ensure she got a size that fitted - and paid a yearly fee for ASOS Premier for unlimited free next-day delivery. She said: "The retailers need to take some responsibility - if clothing sizes were standardised, we wouldn't need to order two sizes or lengths. "I spoke to other people - some said they were disabled or chronically ill and couldn't return in person, or some lived remotely with no high streets. "I think this is bigger than ASOS - it's an endemic issue with online retailers - punching down on people." Tskenya feels let down by the brand - which she had been loyal to as she felt she shared their values. She said: "They were a brand that spoke on diversity, and had these great campaigns and activations for LGBT+ folk and black history month. "If I ever heard someone complain about ASOS, like their delivery or something, I would defend them, saying they're trying their best. "I always said ASOS was a company I'd love to collab with - I'd heard they treat their employees well. "And they're trying to be good with diversity and sustainability. "I thought we shared the same values - but clearly we don't." Tskenya said she has attempted to speak to ASOS on chat and by calling head office but has had no success. Now she isn't confident she'd shop with them again even if her account was restored - but said the problem doesn't stop there. She said: "It's easy for people to brush off 'oh here we go, Diversity Equality and Inclusion again', but it's bigger even than that. "This will affect all retailers if they aren't held to account and aren't transparent about things." ASOS has been contacted for comment.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Penny Wong calls out Nat Barr on live TV in heated discussion about AUKUS: 'That's not accurate'
Penny Wong has hit back at Nat Barr in a live interview from Washington after the Sunrise host questioned whether the AUKUS deal was safe. The Foreign Minister is in the United States for a Quad meeting between the US, Australia, India and Japan, and has held talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. 'Did you manage to score the PM an invite to the Oval Office?' Barr asked Wong on Wednesday, referencing the fact Anthony Albanese is yet to meet with President Donald Trump since his re-election. Wong replied that Rubio had 'expressed regret' the US had to reschedule a meeting with the Prime Minister because Trump had to leave the G7. Barr continued: 'We note the issue of defence spending has been large between the two countries. Did the Secretary of State raise that in your meeting? Was that pressure applied?' Wong said she and Rubio had a 'long discussion about all the work we do together to ensure strategic stability in the Indo-Pacific'. 'The Secretary of State did not raise Australia's defence budget with me,' she said. 'We did have a good conversation about the positive benefits of AUKUS for all three countries. 'It's a good deal for Australia, it's a good deal for the United States, and obviously a good deal for the United Kingdom as well.' But Barr wanted to know about the Trump administration's review of AUKUS and whether it meant the deal was in doubt. 'America is investigating or doing a review of it, because we may not end up with any subs. Did he give you an update on how that review is going?' she asked. Wong responded: 'I don't think that's an accurate assessment of the review, Nat. 'It's a new administration wanting to look at a policy or partnership that is of great importance and that will go over many decades. 'We understand that. The UK also had a review when there was a change of administration or change of government. 'We think AUKUS is a very important partnership for all countries - for the United States, for Australia, and the United Kingdom. We talked about that today. 'We will continue to work with the United States through this review and beyond.' The foreign minister added it was 'important to remember' that the AUKUS deal would be managed and secured over decades and multiple governments. It comes amid speculation Albanese will finally meet Trump at a Quad meeting in India in September. 'I'd be prepared, of course, to meet with President Trump when a suitable time can be organised,' the PM told the ABC on Monday. 'We also have the Quad meeting coming up that we are finalising as well. 'So these things are being organised, and I look forward to having a meeting and continuing the constructive dialogue that I've had with President Trump up to now.' The September event now offers the best chance for their long overdue meeting. That month, Albanese will also travel to New York for the UN leader's week, and may also be able to meet Trump there, or make a trip to Washington. Sticking points in the US-Australia relationship which are crying out to be addressed include the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, which is currently under review by the Trump administration, and punishing tariffs imposed by the US on Aussie imports, including a 50 per cent levy on steel and aluminium. The prime minister has been accused of dragging his feet in meeting with the leader of Australia's most important security ally. Since Trump was inaugurated in January, the pair have spoken on the phone three times. He missed an opportunity to meet the US president at the G7 Summit in Canada earlier this month when Trump left the Summit early to deal with the Israel-Iran conflict. He also did not attend last week's NATO Summit, where political observers had hoped he would have a second chance to meet with Trump.
