Degrees for Sale: The scam killing education
Image: Elly/Pixabay
IN Sean O'Casey's scathing definition, universities have ignominiously become 'places where they polish pebbles and dim diamonds'.
Thomas Jefferson, one of history's most persuasive and poetic writers, left an enduring vision for higher education. His words, inscribed on the Jefferson Memorial in Washington, DC, remain resonant: 'If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilisation, it expects what never was and never will be.'
Jefferson's ideas were revolutionary, not just in curriculum or architectural design, but in his belief that universities should enshrine 'the illimitable freedom of the human mind… for here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it.' He imagined institutions that extended beyond classrooms, embracing museums, galleries, and gardens open to the public.
Though his views carried the elitism of his era, Jefferson's core ideals — education as vital to democracy, universities as communities of inquiry — still challenge us today. As S Aronowitz argued in The Knowledge Factory, higher education should cultivate 'knowledge of the broadest possible kind,' making learning 'a way of life that is first pleasurable, then rigorously critical.' Universities, he insisted, must be places where 'teachers gladly teach and students gladly learn'.
Yet this vision is increasingly distant from reality. Economist Paul Heyne, in his lecture Researchers and Degree Purchasers, observed that most students now enrolled not to learn, but to 'purchase a degree'. Universities, he contended, have become transactional spaces: faculty prioritise research in exchange for minimal teaching demands, while students seek credentials, not knowledge.
Globally, Jefferson's ideals have suffered irreparable damage. The rise of degree mills, fake institutions selling counterfeit credentials, has corrupted the value of legitimate education. Alan Contreras and George Gollin, in The Real and the Fake Degree and Diploma Mills, exposed how thousands bought degrees from sham operations like St Regis 'University'.
These mills flood the market with fraudulent qualifications, undermining trust in genuine degrees. Worse, some accredited universities now 'launder' degrees through partnerships with disreputable foreign providers.
South Africa is not immune. A disturbing undercurrent flows through its higher education system: whispers of postgraduate degrees being 'bought', not earned. At one KwaZulu-Natal university, allegations suggest a shadow industry where ghostwriters — sometimes faculty — craft dissertations for students who merely pay. The University of Zululand's past scandals pale beside this sophisticated fraud, which operates under the veneer of legitimacy.
The consequences are dire. When knowledge production becomes commodified, universities cease to be centres of learning — they become credential mills. Public trust erodes, and the value of legitimate qualifications is hollowed out.
The crisis extends beyond academia. With PhD graduates outpacing academic job openings, many face unemployment while fraudulent degree-holders infiltrate institutions. Cláudia Sarrico, Portugal's Secretary of State for Higher Education, warns that doctoral education must adapt to societal needs — or risk irrelevance.
This is not mere institutional decay; it is a regression to an era where credentials are meaningless, and the cost of pretence is incalculable. Without urgent reform, we risk a future where diamonds remain dimmed—and pebbles pass as gold.
* Dr Vusi Shongwe works in the Department of Sport, Arts, and Culture in KwaZulu-Natal and writes in his personal capacity.
** The views expressed here do not reflect those of the Sunday Independent, IOL, or Independent Media. Get the real story on the go: Follow the Sunday Independent on WhatsApp.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
6 days ago
- IOL News
Allegations of tender rigging in KwaZulu-Natal's National School Nutrition Programme tender process
The National School Nutrition Programme's tender process in KwaZulu-Natal faces serious allegations of rigging and political interference, prompting calls for immediate suspension and an independent investigation. Image: Pixabay THE National School Nutrition Programme (NSNP) tender process in KwaZulu-Natal has come under intense scrutiny, with the service providers' association is calling for its immediate suspension. The NSNP Association has made allegations that the tender has been rigged to benefit allies of KZN Education MEC Sipho Hlomuka. The Association has said it is consulting its legal team and will be reporting the matter to the Public Protector. Asked about the allegations yesterday, KZN Department of Education spokesperson Muzi Mahlambi said the department had only published the 'intention to award', which is one of the stages required in terms of the bidding process. 'Those who have issues may raise them following the procedure as stipulated in the tender documents,' Mahlambi said. 'We are noting the issues as they are raised, and the relevant structures will deal with them accordingly,' he said. The association said the current NSNP tender process had been 'marred by serious allegations of tender rigging and political interference'. It claimed the process had been manipulated to serve the political campaign interests of Hlomuka, with a leaked list of allegedly pre-selected service providers having surfaced weeks before the tender outcome was published. 'That list was confirmed when it was issued on the department's website last Friday,' said the association's spokesperson Thabang Mncwabe. 'This really shows that this process has been flawed. It had political influence.' The association said it is in possession of evidence to support its claims and also alleged that supply chain management procedures were deliberately undermined. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The association has called for the immediate cancellation of the current tender and for an independent investigation by the Special Investigating Unit and National Treasury. It has also urged all service providers who did not receive contracts to lodge appeals with the provincial treasury. 'We are currently in consultation with our legal team for a way forward,' said Mncwabe. 'We have instructed them to write to the Public Protector.' In addition, the association wants investigators to examine connections between awarded companies and the MEC, along with his close political associates and relatives. Mncwabe said names would be made public 'at the right time, at the right platform, through our legal team.' The association said if constitutional and ethical standards continue to be violated, the association would not hesitate to take the matter to court. 'No one is above the law. 'The NSNP is a national programme designed to eliminate hunger, not a political tool to buy votes or consolidate power.' The KZN Premier's Office was also contacted for comment but had not responded by the time of publication. THE MERCURY
IOL News
6 days ago
- IOL News
World's major courts take growing role in climate fight
Almost 3,000 climate cases have been filed up to the end of 2024, in nearly 60 countries, according to the Grantham Research Institute, using data compiled by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Image: ImsoGabriel Stock via Pixabay The world's top court is poised to tell governments what their legal obligations are to tackle global warming, and possibly outline consequences for polluters that cause climate harm to vulnerable countries. Wednesday's highly anticipated advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice comes in the wake of landmark international decisions that experts say together have the potential to significantly shape climate action. How has climate litigation evolved? Andrew Raine, deputy director of the UN Environment Programme's law division, said frustration over the pace of climate action had spurred people, organisations and countries to turn to the courts. "When political systems fall short, the law is increasingly seen as a tool for driving ambition and enforcing commitments that have been made," he told AFP. These have been bolstered by increasingly precise and detailed climate science, including from the UN's IPCC climate expert panel. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Almost 3,000 climate cases have been filed up to the end of 2024, in nearly 60 countries, according to the Grantham Research Institute, using data compiled by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. While not all have been successful -- and some have tried to slow climate progress -- there have been notable cases in recent years that have pushed states to do more. Urgenda, an environmental organisation in the Netherlands, notched a win at the Dutch Supreme Court in 2019, with justices ordering the government to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by the end of the following year. And in 2021, the German Constitutional Court found that the government's failure to sufficiently cut planet-heating pollution placed an unacceptable burden on future generations. Raine said that litigation was increasingly crossing borders, with 24 cases brought before international or regional courts, tribunals or other bodies. "This marks a turning point and it reflects the transboundary and shared nature of the climate crisis," he said. Why have recent cases been deemed historic? Two in particular have been hailed as watershed moments that will help shape how courts, governments and businesses understand and act on their climate responsibilities. Last year, an advisory opinion by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea said carbon emissions can be considered a marine pollutant and that countries have a legal duty to take measures to reduce their effects on oceans. The tribunal made clear that the work of defining countries' obligations is not limited to the Paris climate agreement or the UN body that runs climate change negotiations. Major polluters have argued that the UN framework is sufficient and against courts taking climate decisions. Another major advisory opinion was issued this month, with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights reaffirming the right to a healthy climate system and acknowledging the rights of nature. But perhaps the court's most profound statement was to place protection against irreversible climate harms on the same level as international prohibitions on genocide and torture, said Cesar Rodriguez-Garavito, Professor of Law and Director of the Climate Law Accelerator at New York University. The court said "massive and serious harm to the climate system through emissions, through deforestation and so on, is absolutely forbidden by international law," he said. In his view this made it the strongest statement yet by any international court on states' duty to avoid causing severe ecological destruction. All eyes are now on the ICJ. What could be the impact? Vanuatu, one of many low-lying islands threatened by sea level rise, has asked the ICJ to give its opinion on states' obligations to reduce emissions. But the potentially more controversial request is what -- if any -- legal consequences there might be for major polluters who cause severe climate damages. "These are questions of global justice," said Rodriguez-Garavito, potentially touching on contentious issues of "reparations for climate harms" to those least responsible for emissions. While advisory opinions like the ICJ are not legally enforceable, Raine said they carry significant weight. "They clarify how international law applies to the climate crisis, and that has ripple effects across national courts, legislative processes and public debates," he said. "It doesn't force states to act, but it shows them where the law stands and where they should be headed." AFP
IOL News
19-07-2025
- IOL News
This isn't a Budget it's a burden: Capetonians must rise against DA's punitive tariffs
Faiez Jacobs is slamming the DA-led City Council for turning its back on the very people who built this City. Image: Pixabay I write this not as a politician, but as a son of this city. Cape Town taught me resilience and pride. It raised me in the shadow of Table Mountain, on the proud Cape Flats and with the hope of its people. But today, I write with a heavy heart and a burning conviction because this uncaring DA City of Cape Town council, our home, is turning its back on the very people who built it. Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis says this budget is 'pro-poor.' But the facts, and the pain playing out in homes across this city, tell a very different story. Let's Be Clear: The Poor Are Not Being Carried by the Wealthy The City tells us that wealthy households are now contributing more to uplift the poor. It sounds noble. It sounds just. But it's simply not true. The 7 billion in national allocations from the Treasury , not local council cross-subsidies is what actually funds free basic services and sanitation. in national allocations from the Treasury , is what actually funds free basic services and sanitation. Out of this, the City has only budgeted 7 billion for such services. That means national taxpayers not local generosity are lifting the most vulnerable. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Where is the other monies going? In other words, the 'redistributive' claim is a myth dressed in spin. the poorest in the city are supported by national funds, not by progressive uplifts from affluent households. The working-class, the pensioner, the young professional, and the struggling homeowner you are being made to carry the burden. Homeowners Are Not the Enemy They're the Collateral Damage Cape Town is one of the most unequal cities on Earth. But instead of tackling that with vision and innovation, this budget turns to the easiest target: your home. Your rates and service charges are now tied not to your usage but to your property's market value. It is grossly unfair. By correlating fixed service charges like the new 'cleaning tariff,' water, sewerage, and electricity to property valuations, the City assumes that property value equals income. But in Cape Town, property prices have surged far faster than household incomes. Why because it has become the playground of the rich making it unaffordable to ordinary Capetonians. Real Data shows: Draft budget proposes average property rates hikes of 7.96 %, with values over R3 million facing over 20 % increases . New fixed charges set by valuation: Cleaning tariff: ~R477/month; Sewerage: ~R157/month ;Electricity connection fixed charge: +39 % ; Water connection fixed charge: +113 %, Crazy is it not.. Combined, this adds ~R920/month extra for a R4.2 million property regardless of usage. Specifically Bergvliet and Meadowridge, residents report this bill increases. That's nearly R11,000 per year just in extra fixed charges. This is outrageous! Where is the outcry, Capetonians??? Electricity Tariffs: Above and Beyond The City applied to NERSA for a 14.5 % electricity tariff increase, vastly outstripping national average hikes of around 14 %, already high by global standards .Remember, in 2023/24 they implemented 17.6 % almost 2 % above the NERSA-approved 15.1 %. Despite public opposition and legal challenges over these above-inflation increases, the City insists it's simply covering its "cost-to-supply" but we know its daylight robbery and opaque revenue grab. Let's talk about what that really means: A retired couple in Lansdowne , living in a home they paid off 30 years ago, now face nearly R1,000 more every month not because they're using more water or electricity, but because their area's property prices have risen. , living in a home they paid off 30 years ago, now face nearly not because they're using more water or electricity, but because their area's property prices have risen. A young family in Ottery, barely making ends meet, receives a bill increase of 28%, simply because their home was revalued. No extra luxury. No extra income. Just extra pressure. Ons sukkel. Ons kry swaar. This is NOT fairness, equity or redress. It's financial cruelty with a smile. This is not creative budgeting. It's a cynical cash grab from people who cannot afford it. What If Your Parent Lives Alone? Imagine your mother, a widow in Mitchells Plain or Grassy Park, living on a state pension. Her home is modest, but its value has risen over time. Now, her monthly account has doubled yet she still boils one kettle, washes one load, and uses barely any electricity. She's being punished for staying in the home she raised you in. Does that sound like justice to you? 14,000 People Spoke. Will You Be Next? In the recent public comment process, over 14,000 Capetonians wrote in protest. Mayor Hill stop being tone deaf. Residents' associations from across the city from Khayelitsha to Kuilsriver, from Durbanville to Wynberg have all said: this is not right. We don't want handouts. We want fairness. We're not refusing to pay. We're refusing to be exploited. Don't Let Them Tell You This Is About Equity Mayor Hill-Lewis says 'wealthier areas are paying more so poorer areas can get more' and 'Homes above R7 million could see increases over 20 %,' he says, 'to invest in poorer communities.' That's not what the budget shows. In reality: Poorer areas are funded by national government grants , not through municipal ratepayers. , not through municipal ratepayers. The City's budget increases are not tied to actual service usage . New charges appear less redistributive and more like value-based wealth extraction , muffled behind pro‑poor rhetoric . New charges appear less redistributive and more like , muffled behind pro‑poor rhetoric Your ability to pay is not being considered. Only your area and your home value. So, who benefits from this budget? Who gets richer, while you get squeezed? Fair taxation means paying for what you use, not how much your home is worth. It's Time to Draw a Line in the Sand Capetonians, we are a proud people. From Bonteheuwel to Bishop Lavis, from Bo-Kaap to Bishops Court we built this city brick by brick, spirit by spirit. This is not just a fight about budgets. It's a fight for dignity. For fairness. For a city that belongs to all who live in it not just those who can afford to survive it. What Can You Do Now? Speak to your councillor. Demand they reject any budget that punishes residents based on property value alone. don't vote for them if they do not stand for you. Demand they reject any budget that punishes residents based on property value alone. don't vote for them if they do not stand for you. Join your rates and residents' association like SANCO , groups like CTCRA or Bergvliet Meadowridge are submitting collective objections. They're taking legal steps. Add your voice. They're taking legal steps. Add your voice. Spread the word. Share your bill. Talk to your neighbour. Use social media. Attend, arrange public meetings or request virtual participation Share your bill. Talk to your neighbour. Use social media. or request virtual participation Sign the petitions. SAPOA and civil coalitions are mounting challenges support them. SAPOA and civil coalitions are mounting challenges support them. Stay informed. Read the budget. Understand the terms. Don't be fooled by smooth DA spin and smoke and mirrors. demand a phased-in approach to tariff restructuring, volume-based billing, and targeted support for vulnerable households Final Word: Don't Let Them Take Our City From Us This is our city. Not theirs to manage with spreadsheets and spin. We are not ATMs. We are citizens. We are not silent. We are strong. So stand up. Push back. Speak out. Let us fight for a Cape Town that is fair, compassionate, and just not just for the wealthy, but for all who call this place home. We owe it to our parents. We owe it to our children. We owe it to ourselves. You know this , why are you not acting? Let's act now. Before the city we love becomes unlivable for the very people who gave it life. * Faiez Jacobs – Former Member of Parliament | Activist | Public Servant | Citizen of South Africa ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.
