Not here to beg, it is our right: Farooq on statehood demand
At a public meeting, organised by the Forum for Human Rights in J&K, in Delhi, Abdullah, who is also the NC president, said, 'Whether it is Article 370 or statehood, the basic issue is that the distance between Delhi and Kashmir has never reduced. From the day we became part of India, that distance has only grown. There is no trust — there is no trust in the Muslim.'
On the demand for statehood, he said: 'We are not here to beg. It is our right as Indians. Restore our statehood. What you've done is unconstitutional. The governor himself said he didn't know the law — is this how you dismantle a state?'
'Today, we are looked at through the lens of what language we speak, which religion we belong to. This is not my India. Despite sharing a religious identity with Pakistan, we chose Gandhi. I wish those leaders could rise from their graves to see what India has become…' Abdullah said.
J&K Deputy CM Surinder Choudhary described the region's current status as: 'India calls J&K its head — but that head has suffered a serious injury.' 'I still don't understand under what law a state has been turned into a municipality,' he said.
Referring to the Supreme Court judgment upholding Article 370 abrogation, Congress MP Manish Tewari said, 'The SC said the proper procedure was not followed in removing Article 370, but still upheld it… This is a judgment that needs to be reviewed.'
CPI(M) leader Yusuf Tarigami said, 'What is the condition of our Assembly? On July 13, the CM was locked up. The homes of elected representatives were bolted. Has such a thing ever happened anywhere else?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
13 minutes ago
- India.com
Big setback for Donald Trump as Federal Court strikes down birthright citizenship order across US; how will it affect Indians?
(Image: Reuters) New Delhi: A federal court in America has again stayed President Donald Trump's order which said that if a child's parents are living illegally in America, then that child will not get American citizenship. This is the third time that the court has stopped Trump's order from being implemented. The court also said that the final decision on this matter will be taken by the Supreme Court, but until any order comes from there, this rule of Trump will not be implemented. When was the order passed? Trump had banned Birthright Citizenship by signing an executive order on January 20, the day of his swearing-in. A few days after this, the US Federal Court had stayed President Donald Trump's decision to end the right to birthright citizenship for 14 days. Earlier on June 28, the US Supreme Court had given a decision in favour of President Trump. The Supreme Court had said that the judges of the lower courts cannot stop Trump's birthright citizenship order across the country. They should reconsider their order. What did the US Supreme Court say? The Supreme Court had said with a majority of 6-3 that a federal judge alone cannot decide to stop policies across the country. Now if a case like Trump's order has to be stopped, then many people will have to sue together, not just one state or person. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who wrote the decision, had said – the job of federal courts is not to monitor government orders. Their job is to resolve matters according to the powers given by Parliament. However, the court did not give any immediate decision on Trump's order and also ordered not to allow Trump's order to be implemented for 30 days i.e. till July 28. This means that for now, children born in America will continue to get citizenship, as they used to get earlier. Under which 3 situations citizenship is not granted by Trump's order? The executive order by which Trump abolished the birthright citizenship law is named 'Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship'. This order refuses to grant American citizenship in 3 situations. If the mother of a child born in America is living there illegally. At the time of the child's birth, the mother is a legal but temporary resident of America. The father should not be a US citizen or a legal permanent resident at the time of the child's birth. The 14th Amendment to the US Constitution gives the right to birthright citizenship. Through this, children of immigrants living in the US also get the right to citizenship. What will be the effect on Indians? According to the data of the US Census Bureau till 2024, about 54 lakh Indians live in America. This is about one and a half percent of the US population. Two-thirds of these people are first generation immigrants. That is, they went to America first in the family, but the rest are citizens born in America. If the Supreme Court gives an order in favour of Trump's bill, then it will become difficult for first generation immigrants to get American citizenship. However, if it gives an order against it, then citizenship will remain as before.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mayor calls Kargil martyrs' families ‘true national heroes'
1 2 Lucknow: Mayor Sushma Kharakwal praised the sacrifices of the families of the Kargil martyrs and lauded their immense love for the nation. "I bow with deep respect to the families of those bravehearts who sacrificed everything to protect our nation. Your presence is a matter of great pride for all of us. Your sacrifice cannot be described in words — you are our true national heroes," she said while speaking at the Kargil Smriti Vatika on Kargil Vijay Diwas on Saturday. Remembering the valour of soldiers during the 1999 Kargil conflict, she said: "This day reminds us of the brave sons who defended the integrity and honour of our nation in the world's highest battlefield. Because of their courage and sacrifice, we sleep peacefully today." She praised the Indian Army for defending the nation in all terrains — whether icy mountains, scorching deserts, or dense forests — and said the Kargil episode was a global message that India will not remain silent if provoked. Referring to recent military actions like the surgical strikes, Balakot Air Strike, and Operation Sindoor, she said India now takes bold and decisive steps. "Whether it is Pakistan's bluff or borrowed military equipment, India responds on enemy soil if required. This strength and resolve are unique to Indians." She called on citizens to take inspiration from the bravery of soldiers and live by the motto Nation First. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If You Eat Ginger Everyday for 1 Month This is What Happens Tips and Tricks Undo On the occasion, Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, along with the mayor, honoured the families of Kargil heroes by presenting memorial tokens and ceremonial shawls. Those honoured included Gopi Chandra Pandey, father of Captain Manoj Pandey; Kamla Devi, wife of Lance Naik Kewalanand Dwivedi; Srijana Pradhan, sister of Rifleman Sunil Jung; and SP Sharma, father of Major Ritesh Sharma.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
CM cites HRW report, calls for end to BJP's ‘linguistic terrorism'
1 2 Kolkata: Citing a Human Rights Watch (HRW) report on the expulsion of Bengali migrants, CM Mamata Banerjee on Saturday said that even international human rights organisations had started taking note of the "linguistic terrorism unleashed in India". Calling it a "shame", she said such acts "must stop" at once. Banerjee posted on X: "The internationally reputed and New York-based multi-country NGO Human Rights Watch (HRW) has also now highlighted the issue of harassment, persecution and illegal deportation of Bengali-speaking people of India by the BJP governments in various states." "The human rights organisation has released a report saying what we have been saying: Bengali-speaking Indians (of different castes and communities) are being arbitrarily abused and pushed out in a concerted manner by the BJP establishment," she said, adding: "Elaine Pearson, Asia Director at HRW, has on record said that BJP is fuelling discrimination by arbitrarily expelling Bengalis from the country, including Indian citizens. The authorities' claims that they are managing irregular migration are unconvincing." You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata "HRW reports that this has been happening systematically in the BJP-ruled States of Assam, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Odisha and Delhi, following a directive by the Ministry of Home, Government of India. Shame!! Now, even international human rights organisations have started taking note of the linguistic terrorism unleashed in India. This must stop at once!!" the CM posted. Banerjee has been attacking the BJP-led Centre, saying that the detention of hundreds of Bengali speaking migrant workers across BJP-governed states was "a language war and linguistic terrorism" waged on Bengal and its people.
