Energy startup Arbor notches $41M deals amid Trump reversals
Why it matters: The contracts for 116,000 tons of CO2 removal between 2028 and 2030, for buyers working through the Frontier consortium, comprise Arbor's biggest deal yet.
It's one of the "anchor agreements" that will help the 3-year-old startup finance and build its first commercial-scale plant near Lake Charles, Louisiana, CEO Brad Hartwig tells me.
Driving the news: Buyers include Stripe, Google, Shopify, McKinsey, Autodesk, H&M and various others.
The new deal follows a much smaller agreement with Microsoft last year.
How it works: Arbor is a bioenergy with carbon capture (BECCS) startup, using waste biomass that will initially come from forest management.
But it's an evolution of BECCS, with 99% capture and high efficiency, a blog post states.
Its process first gasifies biomass, then burns that gas in a special furnace with pure oxygen ("oxy-combustion"), producing water but also "supercritical" CO2 that drives a turbine.
This simplifies and reduces CO2 capture costs, and the water can be used for irrigation or data center cooling, Arbor and Frontier said.
Reality check: First-of-a-kind hardware systems often don't survive the journey to commercial deployment or scale.
But Hartwig sees Arbor's system among the energy sources that stand to benefit from the AI boom.
"Demand for carbon-free energy is just accelerating at rates that are completely unprecedented, and we have a pretty unique technology stack that can deliver 24/7, carbon-free energy that is cheap and firm," he tells Axios.
What we're watching:"We've gotten a lot of interest from a whole host of folks, from hyperscalers to regulated utilities looking to develop projects for matching supply with load for data centers," Hartwig said.
The intrigue: Asked whether Trump 2.0's reversal of climate policies creates headwinds, he argued the opposite, citing "real interest in baseload power that can add to grid resilience."
He also said behind-the-meter deployments are possible, avoiding the need for transmission or waiting in interconnection queues.
State of play:"Its compact design features an 18 MW turbine about the size of a car engine, allowing for efficient scaling and cost reductions," the announcement states.
Its modular system and oxy-combustion tech don't produce exhaust or pollution, avoiding the cost of adding separate CO2 capture units.
Scaling the technology provides an eventual pathway toward getting under $100/ton of removal, the post states.
The tech also works using natural gas, which would provide power with CO2 capture, but it's not removal without the biomass.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
4 days ago
- Forbes
The UK Just Created A Regulated Market For Carbon Removals
Big Ben with bridge over Thames and flag of England against blue sky in London, England, UK We're used to thinking of carbon markets as a punishment mechanism—a tax in disguise for those who pollute. But what happens when the same system starts to reward the people actively cleaning up the atmosphere? After months of consultation, the UK government has laid out a clear path: greenhouse gas removals—including engineered solutions like direct air capture (DAC) and enhanced weathering—will become part of the country's carbon market by the end of this decade. If you're in the weeds of carbon policy, this is a watershed moment. If you're not, here's why it matters: it means corporations will soon be able to buy carbon removal credits in a regulated market—and carbon removal companies will, for the first time, have a predictable, price-driven demand signal for cleaning up the atmosphere. Until now, carbon removals—like DAC, biochar, or enhanced weathering—have mostly lived in the voluntary market, propped up by early-adopter buyers like Microsoft, Stripe, and Shopify through initiatives like Frontier. But voluntary demand is tiny. Currently the global voluntary carbon market is worth just $2 billion. By contrast, the global compliance carbon market—driven by schemes like the European Union's Emissions Trading System, California's Cap-and-Trade, and now the UK Emissions Trading system (ETS)—was valued at over $800 billion. Right now, the UK ETS covers around 111 million tonnes of carbon emissions annually across the power, industrial, and aviation sectors. The average price of a UK allowance in July 2025 is around $48 per tonne. Even if just 1% of UK ETS obligations are fulfilled through removals, that's a potential $43 million market annually for removals. And here's the key: this isn't a hypothetical. The UK has committed to legislating integration by 2028, with removals entering the market by the end of 2029. That timeline is long enough to allow for standard setting and infrastructure development, but near enough to start attracting real investment now. For a sector that's often lived off philanthropic capital and early adopter corporate buyers, this is oxygen. What does this mean in practice? A few things. First, only removals that take place on UK soil will be eligible—this ensures that the benefits of investment (jobs, infrastructure, MRV capabilities) stay local. Second, removal credits will be awarded after the carbon has been verified to be sequestered, not in advance. That's important. It signals a clear move away from the 'pay-now-promise-later' dynamic that has plagued lower-integrity offset markets. Perhaps most importantly, only removals that can demonstrate carbon will be stored for at least 200 years will qualify. That threshold effectively draws a line in the sand: no reforestation credits that could reverse in a few decades. The UK is saying, if you want an allowance, your removal better last two centuries. That's a powerful signal to companies focused on permanence—those relying on mineralization, geologic storage, or stable biochar. The government has also indicated it is 'minded to differentiate' between these new removal credits and existing allowances—potentially creating a dual-credit system. In other words, a tonne of avoided emissions and a tonne of removed carbon might be priced and treated differently. That opens up the potential for two carbon markets to exist side-by-side: one punishing emitters, the other incentivizing removers. It's a nuanced idea, but if done well, it could provide flexibility while preserving environmental integrity. There will be auctions to facilitate a route to market—helping removal operators sell their credits into a structured and transparent system, rather than relying solely on opaque bilateral deals. The government will also maintain the existing 'gross cap'—that is, the total amount of allowances won't increase to accommodate removals. This ensures that carbon removals don't create space for additional emissions. It's not a license to pollute—it's a tool to neutralize emissions that can't be cut. Some of this might sound arcane, but it reflects a growing maturity in how we think about removals. Climate science is clear: reaching net zero means both cutting emissions and removing what we can't avoid. The UK is the first country to bake that second half of the equation into its compliance market architecture. This decision is also a direct boost to the UK's emerging carbon removal ecosystem. Take UNDO, a recent XPRIZE winner, which spreads finely crushed basalt on farmlands to accelerate natural weathering processes—permanently storing carbon in soils. Or Mission Zero Technologies, a direct air capture startup developing modular electrochemical systems that capture CO₂ from ambient air and store it underground. Both are UK-based, and both could now see a real, regulated path to monetizing their impact—not through donations or hype cycles, but through policy-anchored carbon demand. And this matters beyond the UK. Globally, the carbon removal sector must grow from removing tens of thousands of tonnes of CO₂ per year to billions by 2050. That means turning niche science projects into bankable infrastructure. It means shifting from tech demonstrations to projects that institutional investors, insurers, and utilities can underwrite. None of that happens without real markets—and until now, those have been missing. The UK's move is not perfect, and it won't be fast. But it's a milestone: the first major economy to say, explicitly, that carbon removal belongs in the same market as pollution—and that removing carbon deserves the same financial seriousness as cutting it.
Motor 1
4 days ago
- Motor 1
Nissan planea cerrar otra fábrica de la Frontier en Latinoamérica
En marzo pasado, cuando Nissan anunció que cerrará su producción industrial en la Argentina, la marca japonesa informó que la fabricación de la pick-up Frontier/Navara para toda Latinoamérica se concentraría en México: en la histórica Planta Civac de Morelos ( ver comunicado ). Sin embargo, la Planta Civac ahora también quedó en la mira de una nueva serie de recortes a nivel mundial, que está encarando la automotriz japonesa para salir de su crisis global. Según informó Automotive News , esta fábrica de México cerrará sus puertas a comienzos de 2027. El plan de bajar las persianas de la Planta Civac es todo un símbolo que grafica el grado de dificultades que atraviesa la empresa: en 1966, esta fábrica de México fue la primera que Nissan abrió afuera de Japón. En casi 60 años de historia se convirtió en un emblema de la expansión mundial de la compañía. Hoy la Planta Civac opera con dos líneas de producción. En la Línea 1 se fabrica la pick-up Frontier/Navara para toda Latinoamérica. Es la camioneta más vendida de México y buena parte de Centroamérica. En la Línea 2 se produce en la actualidad el Versa . Sin embargo, ya se sabe que la Línea 2 cesará su actividad a fin de año, para trasladar ese sedán a la otra fábrica que Nissan tiene en México: el complejo de Nissan Mexicana A2 de Aguascalientes, que hoy produce los modelos Sentra y Kicks . ¿Y la Frontier/Navara? Todo indica que se mudará a la Planta Compas . Es otro centro industrial que Nissan tiene en Aguascalientes y que está ubicado muy cerca de la Planta A2: se inauguró en julio de 2015 en alianza con Renault y Mercedes-Benz . En la actualidad, la Planta Compas produce los modelos Infiniti QX50, Infiniti QX55 y Mercedes-Benz Clase GLB , pero se encuentra en medio de una reconversión tras el enfriamiento de la alianza entre Renault-Nissan y Mercedes-Benz . En caso de que se libere la capacidad industrial de la Planta Compas, podría comenzar la mudanza de la línea de producción de la Frontier/Navara desde Morelos hacia Aguascalientes. La Planta Civac hoy apera a sólo un tercio de su capacidad industrial, mientras que las dos fábricas de Aguascalientes se encuentran cercanas al 79% de sus posibilidades. Del mismo modo en que ocurrió con la Fábrica Santa Isabel en Córdoba, Nissan padece su propia crisis financiera interna. Pero, además, todavía sufre los coletazos de la fallida alianza con Mercedes-Benz, que que se desencadenó a partir de la cancelación de la pick-up Clase X ( leer historia ). A pesar de ser una fábrica anticuada, la Planta Civac de México podría tener un futuro bajo otra empresa. Automotive News citó a fuentes cercanas con la negociación acerca de una posible compra del establecimiento por parte de marcas chinas como BYD y Saic . El informe completo de Automotive News sobre los planes de cierre de la Planta Civac en México se publica acá abajo. C.C. Galería: Nissan México - Planta Civac 10 Fuente: Motor1 Argentina ADEMÁS En el Twitter de @Motor1Argentina Notas relacionadas Nissan anunció que deja de producir vehículos en Argentina Renault Argentina también confirmó el fin de la pick-up Alaskan Cómo se vive el "día después" de la despedida industrial de Nissan Argentina "Si al país le va bien, vamos seguir teniendo una buena presencia en Argentina" Compartí esta nota Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Enviá tu noticia a novedades@ Ocultar comunicado de prensa Leer comunicado de prensa Nota de Automotive News Nissan shutting Mexico plant that was company's first outside Japan by early 2027 By Urvaksh Karkaria Nissan Motor Co. plans to shrink its industrial footprint in Mexico by ending production at two assembly plants, including a manufacturing joint venture with Mercedes-Benz. According to two people with knowledge of the matter, Nissan is expected to shut down its nearly 60-year-old Civac plant in south-central Mexico no later than March 2027, the end of the Japanese carmaker's business year. Additionally, Nissan is expected to dissolveits COMPAS joint venture with Mercedes after crossover production at the 2.37-million-square-foot factory in Aguascalientes, Mexico, concludes early next year. Nissan will end production of two Infiniti crossovers at the COMPAS plant in late 2025. Mercedes will halt GLB crossover production in the first quarter next year, according to AutoForecast Solutions. Nissan manufactures the Navara and Latin America Frontier pickups at Civac, which was the company's first manufacturing operation outside Japan. According to a source, Nissan will consolidate production from Civac at two company-owned factories in Aguascalientes, about 365 miles northwest. Chinese automotive juggernauts such as BYD and SAIC could be interested in Civac as they seek North American capacity to fuel high-octane growth plans. The factory closures are part of a global manufacturing retrenchment for Nissan as its global sales have plunged nearly 40 percent since before the pandemic. Facing its largest financial loss in a quarter-century, Nissan plans to shutter seven assembly plants and cut capacity by nearly 30 percent to 2.5 million vehicles by the 2027 fiscal year. The company has said sites in Japan, India and Argentina will close, and it's also expected to close factories in Thailand and South Africa. Spokesperson Brian Brockman said Nissan is reviewing the integration and closure of some of its global production sites: 'However, this process has not yet been concluded,' Brockman said. 'If any decisions are made, we will provide information at the appropriate time.' The 4.4-million-square-foot Civac factory in Jiutepec is outdated and no longer cost-effective to operate, a source told Automotive News. The assembly plant has been a cornerstone of the automaker's global expansion. It opened in 1966 with a single production line that built the Datsun Bluebird. In 1972, Nissan started exporting vehicles from Civac, which has built more than 6 million vehicles and created thousands of jobs in the decades since. According to AutoForecast Solutions, Civac last year produced 80,000 pickups and operated at less than a third of its capacity. This year, Nissan plans to build 57,000 vehicles there, a fraction of the 294,000 units the plant assembled in 2016. In March, Nissan said it would end Frontier production at a Renault-operated factory in Córdoba, Argentina, and consolidate Latin American pickup production at Civac. By year's end, Nissan will reduce the Mexico plant from two assembly lines to one, a source said. In response to President Donald Trump's 25 percent tariff on Mexican-made cars, Nissan has stopped building unprofitable trims of the Sentra and Kicks for the U.S. market, freeing capacity in Aguascalientes to absorb Civac production. It plans to discontinue U.S. sales of the Versa next year, creating additional room in Aguascalientes. AutoForecast Solutions said Nissan's two Aguascalientes factories are operating at 79 percent of their capacity and can absorb the pickups from Civac. While financially troubled Nissan cannot afford to operate an underutilized plant such as Civac, the automaker will be walking away from a hefty investment and a skilled workforce built over decades. Closing Civac also is politically sensitive, given its heritage and economic significance. Last year, Mexico accounted for 20 percent of Nissan's North American sales. A deal with Honda, which reportedly is interested in building a Frontier-based pickup for the U.S. market, could have ramped up Civac's assembly lines, a source said. However, Trump's tariffs on Mexican imports have made that unlikely. AutoForecast Solutions Vice President Sam Fiorani said Civac would present an 'economical first step to local production' for a Chinese automaker. 'A brownfield plant would require an investment in the hundreds of millions of dollars rather than the billions of dollars needed for a greenfield plant,' Fiorani said. 'A ready-and-willing and trained workforce would be a highlight of such an acquisition.'
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Nissan ending production at Japan plant
This story was originally published on Automotive Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Automotive Dive newsletter. Nissan Motor Co. will end vehicle production at its plant in Oppama, Japan, at the end of FY2027, the company announced on July 14. The 18.2 million-square-foot factory began operations in 1961 and has produced 17.8 million vehicles to date. It was also the first plant to produce the Nissan Leaf in 2010, the world's first mass-market electric vehicle. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You The Insurance Savings You Expect Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The move is part of the automaker's fast-track plan to return to profitability by FY2026, which includes consolidating its global vehicle production footprint from 17 to 10 plants by FY2027. The company will transfer the Oppama plant's production to Nissan Motor Kyushu Co. in Fukuoka, a move it says will help it 'significantly reduce manufacturing costs in Japan,' per the release. Nissan's goal is to reduce global production from 3.5 million units (excluding China) to 2.5 million units while maintaining 100% plant utilization. The automaker said it will not conduct additional production actions in Japan. 'Today, Nissan made a tough but necessary decision,' CEO Ivan Espinosa said in the release. 'It wasn't easy—for me or for the company—but I believe it's a vital step toward overcoming our current challenges and building a sustainable future.' While Nissan will stop making vehicles in Oppama, it will maintain other operations in the region, including a research center and crash test facility. The company said the estimated 2,400 workers at the Oppama production plant will remain employed until the end of FY2027. Nissan is still finalizing plans on future work arrangements for the affected workers, according to the release. Meanwhile in the U.S., Nissan is delaying the 2028 production launch of two electric SUVs at its Canton, Mississippi, plant by 10 months as part of a strategic decision and not a specific reaction to policy changes, according to the company. In other production consolidation moves, Nissan in May announced it was consolidating production of the Frontier and Navara pickups to its plant in Morelos, Mexico. Production of those vehicles previously were split between the Mexico facility and another plant in Argentina. Also as part of its effort to reduce its manufacturing footprint, Nissan in March sold its 51% stake in Renault Nissan Automotive Indiana Private to its partner, Renault Group. However, Nissan will continue producing vehicles in India through its partnership with Renault. Recommended Reading Nissan delays EV production start at Mississippi plant Sign in to access your portfolio
