Federal appeal court rules in favour of Cold Lake in fighter base tax dispute
For more than 10 years, Cold Lake has contended that the federal government has been undervaluing 4 Wing Cold Lake, effectively shorting the city's tax bill by $1.1 million to $1.8 million annually.
The city said from 2013 to 2021, short payments totalled almost $14 million, and the community's taxpayers have had to cover the difference.
Last week, the Federal Court of Appeal issued a judgment in favour of Cold Lake. The court has now directed that the minister of Public Services and Procurement Canada reconsider the earlier position in light of the court's interpretation of the Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) Act.
"It's been an interesting journey," said Mayor Craig Copeland told CBC about the appeal ruling, which was made on July 23 and found the minister's decision unreasonable.
"I really appreciate council [and] administration sticking to their guns over the years and every new council that came on board, we've championed this, that we feel that it's not right."
Valuation
Multiple ministers handled the PILT dispute with Cold Lake, including Anita Anand and Helena Jaczek. The program sees the government make a payment in lieu of tax as set out by the PILT Act. It is supposed to be the same as what would've been paid in property tax, had the federal property been taxable
In February 2022, the Cold Lake PILT matter went before a dispute advisory panel, which was tasked with providing advice to the minister regarding the valuations and payments at issue.
Differing advice emerged from the panel.
A majority of the panel put forward a recommendation that the valuation of the base exclude water and sewer mains, while a minority advised that the valuation should not ignore any positive impact on the value of the land from the water and sewer mains.
The minister at the time, who was Jaczek, issued a decision in November 2022 that agreed with the majority opinion of the panel, that the water and sewer mains should be excluded for all purposes.
This is the decision the Federal Court of Appeal found was unreasonable. It noted that the minister failed to meaningfully account for the central concerns raised by the city, and disregarded an earlier panel that concluded the opposite.
National implications
The Federation of Canadian Municipalities, which represents municipalities across Canada, intervened at the Federal Court of Appeal on the side of the City of Cold Lake.
The federation would not comment when asked by CBC, further stating, "We recognize the importance of this decision and are taking the time to evaluate it thoroughly before commenting."
Copeland said the decision has significant implications for municipalities across Canada.
"This has huge implications to communities like Edmonton. Like all you gotta do is sort of look at a community and the federal properties in your community. So certainly in Ottawa, Halifax, Montreal, it's huge," Copeland said.
"The federal government owns a lot of property, which is great, they need to contribute to the tax base, like every person does, and we shouldn't be making special carve outs, and we just want everybody to contribute to running a municipality in a fair, equitable way and I think that's what the judges saw here in this case."
University of Alberta Prof. Andy Knight specializes in researching Canadian defence and foreign policy and said it's is an important case given 4 Wing is Canada's busiest fighter base.
"For the city of Cold Lake, where nearly one-third of the land falls on the federal ownership, I think this is really a game changer for the city," Knight said.
"[The base] isn't just a strategically important area of Canada, but it's also an economic anchor for the region, and I think to properly assess what the valuation of that property is, this goes a long way in making sure that there's accountability by the federal government for treating that area fairly. And the court simply reaffirmed that principle."
Public Services and Procurement Canada said it is reviewing the court's ruling and is unable to comment at this time.
The Canadian government is now tasked with making a new decision based on the finding of the Federal Court of Appeal or make an application to the Supreme Court of Canada.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
30 minutes ago
- National Post
Everything you need to know about Ontario's bike-lane ruling
Article content With that, individual cyclists and an organization that advocates for cyclists in Toronto filed a lawsuit in January 2025, claiming that this amendment is a violation of Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms because it would infringe the right to life and security of the person by putting cyclists at greater risk of injury and death. They also argued that restoring the lanes for motor vehicles will not alleviate traffic congestion, which was the provincial government's stated purpose with its legislative changes. Article content The government said that if the applicant's position was found correct, it would make all traffic decisions subject to Charter scrutiny. The Ontario government also argued that if bike lanes were removed, it would help solve traffic issues in Toronto. Article content In April 2025, Schabas granted an injunction, which prevented the government from removing the bike lanes until a decision had been reached. Article content In June 2025, the amendments announced in November 2024 were changed by the government. Now, instead of requiring that the bike lanes be removed, the amendment stated that it would 'restore a lane for motor vehicle traffic … by reconfiguring the bicycle lanes.' With that, the provincial government said the lawsuit was no longer relevant, as the amendment was differently worded. Article content Article content (The court only found out a month after the changes were enacted.) Article content However, according to Schabas, the new changes made no meaningful change to the law or the dispute between the parties. Article content After reviewing the evidence from both parties, Schabas said that evidence shows that restoring lanes for cars will not result in less congestion, as it will induce more people to use cars and any reduction in congestion would only be over a short distance and, eventually, will lead to more congestion. The evidence provided by cyclists also showed that bike lanes can actually help alleviate traffic congestion, as it offers another safe option of transportation in the city. Article content 'The evidence presented by the (Ontario government) consists of weak anecdotal evidence and expert opinion which is unsupported,' said Schabas in his decision. Article content According to Schabas, the government has the right to make decisions about roads and traffic infrastructure, but if it puts people at risk, its actions can be restricted by the Charter. Article content Article content That has been one of the main criticisms of the ruling. However, Bruce Ryder, a professor emeritus of law at Osgoode Hall Law School, says that's not quite accurate. Article content 'We don't have a right to bike lanes … but we do have a right to not have governments taking actions, including the removal of bike lanes, that put lives and safety at risk,' said Ryder. Article content Ryder said that if there was evidence showing that removing bike lanes actually helped improve traffic flow, there would be no issue with having them removed. But because that is not the case, the government cannot prove that the decision achieves its goals. Article content 'If they (the government) did have evidence that removing the bike lanes would improve traffic flow, and if they did take steps to ensure that there were alternative routes that would protect people's safety, there would be no problem. There would be no constitutional issue,' said Ryder. Article content Schabas also said that the cyclists are not asking for the whole bill to be changed or for more bike lanes to be built, but just that these specific bike lanes are kept in the way they are. Article content When did Toronto build these bike lanes? Article content Since 2016, the city of Toronto has been expanding bike lanes in the city. In a 2024 report, the city outlined the investment for bike lanes and bike share, and said that by having that, Toronto would be a more successful city by giving people more choices to get around. Article content Since the bike lanes project started, there has been a decrease in traffic accidents involving cyclists, and an increase in the number of people using bikes to get around, according to the evidence presented in court. Article content The bike lane on Bloor Street. was completed in late 2016. The bike lanes on both University Avenue and Yonge Street. were first installed through ActiveTO, a project created by the city during the COVID-19 pandemic. About $27 million was spent to install these target bike lanes in three of the main roads of Toronto. Article content What were the reactions to the plan to remove the bike lanes in Toronto? Article content In statements, comments and open letters, Ontario Traffic Control, Ontario Professional Planners Institute, 120 physicians and researchers from the University of Toronto, Ontario Society of Professional Engineers and Toronto Parking Authority were all concerned about the bike lanes removal, claiming it would actually make traffic worse and give less transportation options to citizens. Article content The City of Toronto released reports showing why bike lanes are important and how there was nowhere to put them in the city without redesigning the road system. Mayor Olivia Chow also asked the provincial government to respect the local government's decision making around cycling infrastructure. Article content At the request of the provincial government, CIMA, an engineering company, provided a report on the matter. In the report, they said that while restoring a lane of motor vehicle traffic may seem to reduce traffic over a short distance, over a longer distance the benefits of it could not even be noticed due to other factors that influence traffic, like on-street parking, transit stops, bridges, and delays at intersections. Article content Schabas noted that just like internal advice before Bill 212 was passed, the CIMA report was only produced by the government when required in this court application and not before the bill was passed. Article content At the same time, the provincial government provided evidence explaining how the restoration of a lane for motor vehicles would help fix traffic in Toronto. However, Schabas said in his decision that the statements of Prabmeet Singh Sarkaria, the minister of transportation, and Premier Doug Ford are not supported by any data or internal analysis or advice. Article content Article content The government also claimed that only 1.2 per cent of trips are made by bicycle, which is inconsistent with the data the government had at the time. Just in June 2024, there were more than 760,000 trips made with bike share in the city. Article content The counsel for the provincial government argued that the experts consulted by the cyclists in this case are cycling advocates and that would make them biased. However, all the claims made by the experts in the case were made based on research, Schabas concluded. Article content What it might mean for other provinces/cities with similar plans Article content Following in Ontario's footsteps, the Alberta government is looking into making some changes in bike lanes in both Calgary and Edmonton. Article content Despite the recent developments in Ontario, Devin Dreeshen, Alberta's transportation minister, said that it's not ruling out the removal of bike lanes. The minister had a meeting with Calgary's mayor, Jyoti Gondek, to discuss the future of bike lanes in the city. Differently from Ontario, the two seemed to keep the conversation open to finding a solution for it.
CBC
31 minutes ago
- CBC
Take a look inside the Elmira Produce Auction with Jasmine Mangalaseril
Horse and buggies, vans, and trucks sit outside the Elmira Produce Auction Co-operative, just north of the town's centre. Inside the grey building, the atmosphere revs up for business as dozens of buyers inspect the day's lots of fruits and vegetables that sit on dollies. Behind the flower and plant section, buyers and sellers chat at tables by the canteen in the back corner as the kitchen turns out hearty, fresh-cooked breakfasts. At 9 a.m., all eyes and ears are on auctioneer Bill Horst. On this particular Wednesday, his auction chant — a blisteringly fast patter combining the current bid and the next highest bid — lasts about three hours as he makes his way throughout the auction grounds. Many lots sell within 45 seconds. "I try and be fair to everybody. The grower has to make money or they're not going to bring the product, and the buyer has to retail it and make money," said Horst. "I have to stay in control. I respect my buyers, they respect me, and everything goes great." The crowd follows Horst and other auction staff, as they progress through rows of dollies. Hours earlier, bushels of tomatoes, giant cartons of cabbages, sacks of carrots, crates of corn, bundles of green onions neatly laid in boxes were set up in the building while flats of late strawberries sat in the fields. Winnings are loaded into waiting trucks and vans. They'll go on to stock stores, on-farm markets and professional kitchens from Sault Ste. Marie to Simcoe. "It's very local food that's coming in," explained Mervin Martin, a grower and co-operative board member. "A great percentage of that produce would have been picked that very morning to be at the [Monday] auction at 1:00 in the afternoon, would actually end up on the consumer's table by suppertime." Bringing sellers and buyers together The Elmira Produce Auction Co-operative was established 21 years ago out of the mad cow crisis that wreaked havoc on Canadian dairy and beef farmers whose herds were impacted by the disease bovine spongiform encephalopathy. While insurance helped other producers defray losses, Mennonite farmers faced devastation. "They were looking for different options of generating some income," said Martin. "A way of creating an outlet for local co-farmers to market their produce." It can be difficult for buyers and small growers to find each other, but the co-operative brings both together under one roof. They have roughly 300 growers today, coming from Waterloo region, Wellington County and beyond. The number of auction days varies throughout the year but during the growing season, there are three sales per week. Tom Pate of Brantford's Brantwood Farms attends the auction to sell his produce and buy for his farm market. "We're all sort of like independent retailers or green grocers or people that have farm markets. That's the crowd that's up there," Pate said. "Farmers that are doing the buying and the selling and small retailers." Buyers also include distributors supplying professional kitchens. Along with sellers who now bring trailer loads of vegetables versus the truckloads from 20 years ago, there's also greater variety of products on the sales floor. Over 15 years, Pate said he's seen produce such as grape tomatoes, sweet potatoes, and kohlrabi go mainstream. Laurie Neubrand is a buyer and seller from West Perth and the Stratford and District Agricultural Society's board president. She said the increased variety also includes previously unfamiliar produce grown by and for newcomers. "We're starting to see some vegetables they've been growing from their mother countries," said Neubrand. "Some of them are old standards, like okra. I saw … tomatillos today. We don't see too much of that." Unlike the Ontario Food Terminal, which is Canada's largest wholesale fruit and vegetable distributor, Martin said the Elmira Produce Auction Co-operative is open to the public and "nobody gets chased out." Buyers must register with the office. To create a fair playing field with re-sellers, a 20 per cent surcharge is levied on those buying for home use. Packages, such as one bushel or bag, cannot be split up.
CBC
31 minutes ago
- CBC
Digging deeper: Saskatchewan producers look for greener way to mine lithium
Saskatchewan is home to large lithium deposits and a handful of the province's mining companies are betting on a green approach to take them global. Lithium is the main element in batteries, powering everything from smartphones to electric vehicles (EVs), which made up 17 per cent of all new cars sold in Canada in 2024. According to the United States Geological Survey, the global demand for lithium was up by nearly 18 per cent last year. "Demand is expected to continue to grow and that's coming mainly in the form of EVs," said Paul Schubach, chief operating officer for EMP Metals Corporation. He said there's a strong international interest in lithium, of which nearly 95 per cent of the metal comes from countries like Australia, Chile, China and Argentina. The majority of the mineral is then processed in China, which dominates the manufacturing of electric vehicle batteries. Schubach said Canada is far behind when it comes to producing lithium. " There's a lot of attention right now on North America and the EV boom that was expected to be there just hasn't quite taken off yet," he said. Environmental concerns around mining lithium There are many ways that lithium can be mined, but not all of them are environmentally safe. For instance, in South America, lithium is mined through expansive salt pools that hold salty water containing metals and minerals. In places like Chile, Bolivia and Argentina, the salty water is pumped to the surface, where it sits in massive pools to naturally evaporate, separating lithium from the other minerals. However, the extraction of brine has been found to reduce water levels in these areas, which can contaminate water sources with dangerous materials, becoming a danger to humans and animals who depend on it. The other common way of getting lithium is strip mining, or open pit mining, where lithium is removed by digging into hard rock below the ground. This can cause groundwater to dry up in nearby lakes, rivers and streams. There's also toxic chemicals used that can leak into water sources if not properly managed. With so many risks, some experts say that while extracting lithium is important, it shouldn't be thought of as a magic solution to climate change just because it powers the EV industry. What does that mean for Saskatchewan? It's no secret to Saskatchewan producers that lithium production can pose a harm to the environment. That's why a handful of companies in the province are looking to change that by pioneering a new way of getting the mineral out of the ground. Benjamin Sparrow, CEO of Saltworks Technologies, said instead of using traditional methods like hard rock mining or strip mining, more producers are now using direct lithium extraction (DLE), which takes it right out of the ground, separates out the lithium and recycles the groundwater. "It's underway and specifically underway in Canada," Sparrow said. He said DLE has the smallest environmental footprint and a "very small" land footprint for wells, electricity and water. Evaporation ponds are often not using a freshwater resource. Instead, Sparrow said they use a brine that is not intended for farming, drinking or other means because it's low-quality water. "The environmental footprint is largely associated with the ponds themselves, and as long as the ponds and the geotech is done right, there should not be any environmental concerns," he said. Teresa Kramarz, a mining expert at the University of Toronto, cautions this type of technology is still being tested and has yet to be tried on a large commercial scale in Saskatchewan. She said while in theory it uses less water and land, it needs to be studied further. There's not a lot of research to demonstrate whether direct extraction uses less water than the salt ponds in South America, Kramarz said. She said the potential for the technology is promising, but it remains to be seen if it will be cost effective and widely used. What's stopping Saskatchewan's lithium industry from starting commercial production? Sparrow said what stands out about Saskatchewan's resource is there's a high concentration of lithium and it's close to the surface, so it's very cost effective to extract. Areas like Kindersley and Estevan, both have large reserves of an underground brine, or water, that contains lithium. Additionally, Sparrow points to the province's infrastructure and labour available from the oil and gas industry, which isn't the case for other regions. At the same time, the current cost for lithium is $8,000 to $10,000 a ton. Sparrow said while the low cost makes DLE technology not the most economic, that hasn't put a damper on the Saskatchewan mining industry. "Innovation can change the cost equation," Sparrow said. "And that's exactly the work that's underway in Saskatchewan to drive the cost down below today's market price." Saskatchewan mining companies are betting the demand for lithium will quickly outpace supply. Schubach said he is confident that will happen.
