Murdoch v Trump: Why the flawed media titan could be the final protector of press freedom
More than two decades later, is the crisis in the US media, one in which everything seems about to be lost, motivating Murdoch to take on the most powerful man in the world? It is as good a reason as many of those given over the past week for the fact that the billionaire whose Fox News channel has acted as a Trump cheerleader throughout is now, alone among US media titans, preparing to do battle in the courts.
Trump's onslaught on the US media – withdrawing federal funds, banning reporters and launching multi-billion-dollar lawsuits – has led once-renowned defenders of media freedom such as the Washington Post, ABC News and CBS to crumple, either changing their editorial policies or agreeing to apparently frivolous settlements.
Yet ranting calls to both the WSJ editor, Emma Tucker, and his old frenemy Rupert failed to prevent the publication of a story suggesting he had sent a hand-drawn picture of a naked woman to the sex offender Jeffrey Epstein with the words: 'Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.'
Last week, he launched a bn lawsuit over this 'fake'. After the WSJ doubled down with stories saying Trump had been told he was in the Epstein files, sources close to Murdoch report that, at 94, he refuses to be 'intimidated'.
Damascene conversion?
He is also enhancing his reputation as the most mercurial media titan. Media veteran Tina Brown asked how the world had come to depend on 'the Darth Vader of media' to stand up for press freedom, while a thoughtful friend asked: 'Suppose Murdoch had a Damascene conversion and sought to atone for his many sins – would we welcome him as an ally?'
Can a man whose companies have paid out more than a billion pounds for either knowingly broadcasting lies or for hacking phones be preparing to die as the Severus Snape of the media world, the final protector of press freedom?
Two years ago, when Murdoch announced he was standing down (sort of), he told staff to 'make the most of this great opportunity to improve the world we live in', a line that seemed ridiculous to me at the time. Is his battle with this madman in the White House really his final chance at leaving the world a better place?
President Donald Trump's (pictured) ranting calls to both the WSJ editor, Emma Tucker, and his old frenemy Rupert Murdoch failed to prevent the publication of a story suggesting he had sent a hand-drawn picture of a naked woman to the sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. File photo: AP/Alex Brandon
Before Murdoch watchers get carried away, there are of course a number of rational and personal reasons for Murdoch's decision not to kowtow to Trump.
Throughout his long career at the nexus of media and power, one thing that has been consistent is Murdoch's desire to pick the winning side. Trump's friendship with Epstein is the only issue currently close to dividing him from a Maga power base that also forms the heart of the Fox News audience.
And Murdoch's enthusiasm for the former real estate mogul has never been wholehearted. After the January 6 attack on the US Capitol in 2021 he sent an email to a former executive, saying: 'We want to make Trump a nonperson.'
Spreading his bets
Despite this, the support of his Fox News channel helped elect a man he has little respect for.
Not only is he spreading his bets on the Epstein fallout, Murdoch is also riding two horses by allowing his respected financial news organisation to defend its reporting, while Fox continues to downplay the story over Trump's card.
A newsman at his core, Murdoch is just as likely to give his editors stories as ask for them to be spiked. But Murdoch is also known to have kept a particularly respectful distance from the Journal's editorials since buying it in 2007; one called Trump's tariff plans 'the dumbest trade war in history'.
Besides, defending its journalism is good for business in a landscape in which the owners of CBS cancel a hit show critical of Trump and pay millions to his presidential library just days before receiving a government blessing for a huge deal.
As always with Murdoch, there is also the psychodrama of an old man whose life is closer to Shakespearean than most. Michael Wolff, responsible for several of the many books on both men, tells me that Murdoch's support for his journalists is an 'old man's revenge' after the Fox fallout divided his family and prompted an inheritance battle still playing out in the family courts.
Besides, says Wolff, Murdoch wants revenge on Trump simply for winning when Murdoch did 'everything to make sure [he] didn't'.
Trump's behaviour in his second term – using his powers to further any whim or grievance, and approaching absolutism – could also have revealed to Murdoch the end result of a truly free market. What is to stop Emperor Trump from stripping his commercial empire of the protection of the rule of law once the old man is gone, for example?
Murdoch is undoubtedly a flawed hero. And there is a chance after all that the drawing is a hoax, as Trump insists, despite the Journal's robust defence. Murdoch's papers have been tricked before.
But for now, he is the closest thing journalism has to a Trojan horse, invited into the inner sanctum yet still apparently ready to do battle.
Jane Martinson is professor of financial journalism at City St George's and a member of the board of the Scott Trust, which owns the Guardian Media Group.
Syndicated from the Guardian
Read More
Donald Trump's name reported to feature in US justice department files about Jeffrey Epstein
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Donald Trump makes bizarre gesture and yells 'nuclear missiles' at White House
Donald Trump made a peculiar gesture whilst taking a stroll on the White House roof - moments after seemingly declaring his intention to position nuclear missiles there. Journalists assembled on the White House lawn called out questions to the President, who had been conducting an inspection of the building's rooftop. He's plotting major refurbishments to the legendary residence and administrative headquarters. His initial alteration involved concreting over the renowned Rose Garden - a move that has provoked outrage amongst detractors. The subsequent scheme he's revealed involves adding an enormous ballroom to the East Wing's exterior - blueprints bearing striking resemblance to the ballroom at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, reports the Mirror. On this occasion, he answered enquiries about his future construction plans by seemingly yelling "missiles. Nuclear missiles." President Donald Trump talks to the press as he surveys the White House grounds from the roof on Tuesday. (Image: AP) He gestured towards the White House roof below him, then executed a rigid-armed motion, repeating it twice. It appears probable that the President was simply mimicking a missile launch. However, following the controversy surrounding a comparable gesture Elon Musk made at a celebration for his inauguration, his opponents will likely highlight the movement's resemblance to a Nazi salute. Trump seemed to be surveying multiple locations including the press briefing room roof and the Rose Garden. Dressed in a suit paired with a crimson tie, Trump toured the space alongside several companions, whilst someone amongst them captured photographs. Trump might have been casting an eye over the ongoing refurbishments and building works at the White House. He's made a comeback to the Oval Office with ambitious plans to transform the premises, including proposals to concrete over the Rose Garden and erect an opulent ballroom. After surveying the scene from atop the White House, Trump meandered to a spot above the press briefing room, where he exchanged a few words with the journalists assembled beneath him. When quizzed about his rooftop venture, Trump remarked he was "taking a little walk" and dropped a hint about the "ballroom on the other side." In the previous month, it was publicised by the White House that come September, work would commence on a grandiose new $200 million ballroom – marking the first major architectural addition to the Executive Mansion since the Truman balcony in 1948. Amongst the entourage accompanying him was a figure believed to be James McCrery, the architect spearheading the project. "Just another way to spend my money for this country," Trump quipped. "Anything I do is financed by me." Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Rwanda agrees to take deportees from the US after migrant deal with UK collapsed
Rwanda on Tuesday became the third African nation to agree to accept deportees from the United States under the Trump administration's plans to send migrants to countries they have no ties with to get them off American soil. Rwandan government spokeswoman Yolande Makolo told The Associated Press in a statement that the East African country would accept up to 250 deportees from the US, with 'the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement' under the agreement. Ms Makolo did not provide a timeline for any deportees to arrive in Rwanda or say if they would arrive at once or in several batches. She said details were still being worked out. The US sent 13 men it described as dangerous criminals who were in the US illegally to South Sudan and Eswatini in Africa last month and has said it is seeking more agreements with African nations. It said those deportees' home countries refused to take them back. Those approved (for resettlement in Rwanda) will be provided with workforce training, healthcare and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade The US has also deported hundreds of Venezuelans and others to Costa Rica, El Salvador and Panama under President Donald Trump's plans to expel people who he says entered the US illegally and are 'the worst of the worst'. Rwanda attracted international attention and some outrage when it struck a deal in 2022 with the UK to accept migrants who had arrived in the UK to seek asylum. Under that proposed deal, their claims would have been processed in Rwanda and, if successful, they would have stayed there. The contentious agreement was criticised by rights groups and others as being unethical and unworkable and was ultimately scrapped when Britain's new Labour government took over. Britain's Supreme Court ruled in 2023 that the deal was unlawful because Rwanda was not a safe third country for migrants. The Trump administration has come under scrutiny for the African countries it has entered into secretive deals with to take deportees. It sent eight men from South Sudan, Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar and Vietnam to South Sudan in early July after a US Supreme Court ruling cleared the way for their deportations. They were held for weeks in a converted shipping container at an American military base in Djibouti as the legal battle over their deportations played out. South Sudan, which is tipping towards civil war, has declined to say where the men are being held or what their fate is. The US also deported five men who are citizens of Vietnam, Jamaica, Cuba, Yemen and Laos to the southern African kingdom of Eswatini, where the government said they will be held in solitary confinement in prison for an undetermined period of time. A human rights lawyer in Eswatini said the men are being denied access to legal representation there and has taken authorities to court. Eswatini is Africa's last absolute monarchy. The king rules over government and political parties are effectively banned. Both South Sudan and Eswatini have declined to give details of their agreements with the US. Rwanda, a country of some 15 million people, has long stood out on the continent for its recovery from a genocide that killed more than 800,000 people in 1994. It has promoted itself under long-time President Paul Kagame as an example of stability and development, but human rights groups allege there are also deadly crackdowns on any perceived dissent against Mr Kagame, who has been president for 25 years. This agreement enhances Rwanda's strategic interest of having good relationships with the Trump administration Government spokesperson Ms Makolo said the agreement with the US was Rwanda doing its part to help with international migration issues because 'our societal values are founded on reintegration and rehabilitation'. 'Those approved (for resettlement in Rwanda) will be provided with workforce training, healthcare and accommodation support to jumpstart their lives in Rwanda, giving them the opportunity to contribute to one of the fastest-growing economies in the world over the last decade,' she said. There were no details about whether Rwanda had received anything in return for taking the deportees. Gonzaga Muganwa, a Rwandan political analyst, said 'appeasing President Trump pays'. 'This agreement enhances Rwanda's strategic interest of having good relationships with the Trump administration,' he said.
Irish Independent
5 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Trump flags new pharma tariff to come next week, and says EU deal gave him $600bn ‘to invest in anything I want'
Today at 10:28 US president Donald Trump said US tariffs on pharmaceutical imports and on semiconductors would be announced 'within the next week or so', as the administration prepares to target key economic sectors in its effort to remake global trade. The EU says its 15pc tariff deal with the US means drugs are already covered. 'We'll be putting an initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year, one and a half years maximum, it's going to go to 150pc and then it's going to go to 250pc because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country,' Mr Trump said yesterday in an interview on CNBC. He name-checked China and Ireland as countries where drugs are currently made for the US market. In an on-air interview by phone, President Trump outlined details of the framework trade deal with the EU that was struck just over a week ago, but has yet to produce a final joint-statement signed off by both the EU and United States setting out the practicalities. Mr Trump said a commitment by the EU side to invest $600bn in the US was 'not a loan'. 'They gave me $600bn and that's a gift, that is not a loan,' he said. 'They gave us the $600bn that we can invest in anything we want. I can do anything I want with it.' If the EU does not pay then it will face tariffs of 30pc, he said. Mr Trump has threatened debilitating tariffs on the drug industry in an effort to force manufacturing back to the US. He recently demanded major suppliers of medicines drastically cut costs or face additional, unspecified penalties. The sectoral tariffs on pharmaceuticals, metals and other industries stem from trade investigations that can last about nine months and are imposed on national security grounds under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. ADVERTISEMENT It is seen as stronger legal footing than the emergency powers Trump used for his country-specific levies, which face court challenges. Those so-called reciprocal tariffs are slated to go into effect tomorrow. The European Commission insists any new global tariff on pharma will not be added to the 15pc it has agreed as an across-the-board tariff The commission says the 15pc ceiling will also apply to any potential future tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, including those based on Section 232. 'We're going to be announcing on semiconductors and chips, which is a separate category,' Mr Trump added.
