Idaho murder victim families frustrated at not being consulted in Kohberger plea deal
Gonvalves, along with the other four families, was enraged that they were not consulted on the terms of the plea deal that would sentence Kohberger to a lifetime in prison. He claimed that the prosecuting attorney did not give "the common courtesy to negotiate with [the families]".
Bryan Kohberger appeared in court on Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025, to plead guilty to killing four Idaho college students in December 2022.
Speaking to the press outside the courthouse, Mr. Gonvalves said, "We didn't agree to this. We didn't agree on any of it."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
22 minutes ago
- ITV News
Mother of Joanne Tulip calls for tougher restrictions on violent offenders after release from prison
The mother of a young woman who was brutally murdered in Northumberland almost 30 years ago is calling for changes to better protect the families of victims. On Christmas Day 1997, 29-year-old Joanne Tulip was raped and stabbed 60 times by Steven Ling. The violent attack happened at Ling's home in Stamfordham, Northumberland. He was jailed for life. After serving 27 years, Ling was recommended for release from prison. Joanne's mother Doreen Soulsby called on the Parole Board to reconsider, but the request was rejected and Ling was released in January 2025. Now, Doreen would like tougher restrictions for violent offenders once they're out of prison, including where they can go. Ms Soulsby met Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood on Tuesday to discuss tougher restrictions. Speaking on Good Morning Britain on Wednesday (16 July) Ms Soulsby said Justice Secretary "listened attentively" and had looked in great detail at the document sent by Ms Soulsby ahead of the meeting. Among the changes to the parole system she's campaigning for are a change to the restraining orders placed on offenders. Soulsby would like to see exclusion zones (which prevent a perpetrator from entering an area where their victims live) replaced with inclusion zones (which instead restrict the movements of perpetrators to a set perimeter). This would mean victims would be free to roam the country in the knowledge their aggressor is contained in a single zone. "At the minute with an exclusion zone, he's got the freedom of the rest of the country, whereas if there was an inclusion zone, we would have the freedom, because the victims haven't done anything wrong." She also called for victims to be able to access more information on perpetrators progress in prison. Soulsby told ITV's Good Morning Britain: "once an offender goes into prison a brick wall goes up. You get nothing back. "I just want to know what he's doing, has he shown any remorse? What work is he doing? What courses? "All we get on an annual basis is what category of prison he's in." Soulsby confirmed the justice secretary had committed to looking into what more information could be given to victims. Following his fifth parole hearing, Ling was recommended for release into the community, subject to conditions including informing authorities of any relationships he might develop; being subject to monitoring and a curfew, and remaining outside an exclusion zone to avoid contact with his victim's family. The Justice Secretary and Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood asked the Parole Board to reconsider the recommendation to release him on the basis that it was 'legally irrational'. However, on the Parole Board confirmed this application had been rejected and its original decision had been upheld, meaning the killer would be released. A spokesperson for the Parole Board said: 'A Judge at the Parole Board considered the application for reconsideration and has decided, based on the evidence, that it will be refused. "Decisions of the Parole Board are solely focused on what risk a prisoner could represent to the public and whether that risk is manageable in the community. "When assessing the reconsideration application, the Judge recognised the very significant gravity of the case and the profound ongoing impact on the victim's family."
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump turns on MAGA members demanding more information about Epstein
President Donald Trump rolled out his toughest attacks yet on members of his own MAGA movement who are demanding more information about Jeffrey Epstein. Trump referred repeatedly to the 'Epstein hoax' when asked about the disgraced late sexual offender, and called out Republicans he said were being 'duped' by pursuing the matter further. 'I know it's a hoax. It's started by Democrats. It's been run by the Democrats for four years,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office while meeting with the Crown Prince of Bahrain. Trump brought up some of his favorite nemesis – the Russia probe he calls 'Russia, Russia, Russia' and former FBI Director James Comey – accusing Republicans demanding the release of Epstein files of participating in a partisan errand. 'Some stupid Republicans and foolish Republicans fall into that net, so they try and do the Democrats' work,' Trump said. Trump defended his AG Pam Bondi, and gave her verbal permission to release certain materials. 'Whatever is credible she can release. If a document is credible, if a document's there that is credible, she can release,' Trump said. 'He's dead. He's gone,' Trump said of Epstein, who Trump knew socially in Palm beach during the 90s before suffering a break. 'All it is the Republicans – certain Republicans – got duped by the Democrats. And they're following a Democrat playbook,' Trump said. Although Trump backed up Bondi, he didn't do the same for FBI Director Kash Patel, who like his deputy Dan Bongino helped fuel the Esptein controversy before joining the administration. 'I can't speak about him, but I can say that Pam Bondi, I really think that she's done very good,' Trump said. His comments are the latest effort to shut down the issue, amid a bubbling MAGA civil war over the topic, amid splits over his attack on Iran and sudden U-turn on arming Ukraine. Trump hasn't been able to make his most fervent supporters forget about his administration's Jeffrey Epstein files failure – no matter how hard he tries. The president insists Democrats are to blame for stoking conspiracies about the disgraced financier and convicted child sexual offender – even though his MAGA base is the most vocal in their claims about Epstein's suspicious death and the existence of a list of co-conspirators. Trump on Wednesday again begged his supporters to move on and said those giving into the 'Epstein hoax' are part of a group of his 'past supporters.' 'The Radical Left Democrats have hit pay dirt, again!' Trump wrote on Truth Social, likening Epstein conspiracies to their past capitalization on the 2016 election interference investigation and fake claims Hunter Biden 's laptop was a Russian disinformation campaign. The Justice Department and FBI released a memo this month concluding the initial findings that Epstein killed himself in prison are true and that there is no such list of clients who engaged in the child sexual trafficking ring. The MAGAverse immediately was up in arms over the Epstein files review, claiming it was a failure or even a cover-up within the DOJ to protect high profile individuals. Among the latest to turn against Trump is podcaster and comedian Andrew Schulz , who unleashed a viral rant against the president for his 'failed' Epstein promises. Schulz hosted Trump on his podcast in October in the weeks leading to the election, but is now admitting he's disappointed by his second term so far. 'I wanted something different,' he said. 'I was hoping for some sort of change.' In the week-and-a-half since the memo went public, Trump has repeatedly tried to get his supporters to stop demanding more answers about the investigation, claiming the case is closed. He has defended Attorney General Pam Bondi and said Democrats made up the conspiracies, which he now calls the 'Jeffrey Epstein Hoax,' to divide Republicans. 'These Scams and Hoaxes are all the Democrats are good at - It's all they have,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social account on Wednesday. 'Their new scam is what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax, and my past supporters have bought into this '[expletive],' hook, line, and sinker.' Trump claims those who used to support him have been tricked by Democrats into believing Epstein conspiracies and are now working against him. 'Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support anymore!' Trump said. The president's base, including FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino, were among the pro-MAGA voices who pushed conspiracies that Epstein was murdered in jail and that he held a 'client list' that he used as blackmail. The Wednesday post comes after Trump made another lengthy plea on his Truth Social over the weekend for his 'selfish' supporters to move on. 'We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening,' the president lamented in the Saturday post. 'We have a perfect Administration… and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein.' Epstein died in prison on August 10, 2019. Trump said the Epstein 'hoax' was conjured up by Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan. He said it was up to them to release the files.
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Ex-police commissioner sues New York City and Eric Adams over alleged NYPD corruption
A former New York police commissioner is suing the city, Eric Adams, the mayor, and top police officials, accusing them of a 'coordinated criminal enterprise that had taken root at the highest levels of city government'. Tom Donlon, who served for two months last year as New York's top cop, filed the 251-page claim in federal court on Wednesday. In it, among other explosive claims, he says he attempted to establish internal oversight into corruption at the NYPD, and 'uncovered systemic corruption and criminal conduct being perpetrated by the NYPD's leadership', but after he warned Adams he was sidelined. He also claimed that the police department falsely arrested his wife in a 'coordinated humiliation' and then leaked the arrest to the press. 'This lawsuit is not a personal grievance; it is a statement against a corrupt system that betrays the public, silences truth, and punishes integrity,' Donlon said in a statement emailed to the Guardian. Four others lawsuits were filed by former top police officials last week, which made similar claims about Adams's involvement in NYPD corruption. Donlon resigned in 2024 just weeks after taking the job, after his home was searched by federal agents in a separate investigation. A career FBI counter-terror expert who investigated the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, Donlon also served for a time as New York's director of office of homeland security, and then CEO of a private security firm, before he was tapped to lead the NYPD in September 2024. In his brief tenure, Donlon now claims that he discovered Adams and NYPD officials were involved in a wide variety of illegal behavior, including 'wire fraud, mail fraud, honest services fraud, obstruction of justice and retaliation against whistleblowers' and 'engaged in outright malfeasance by using the NYPD to consolidate political power, obstruct justice, and punish dissent'. Donlon claims that his efforts to establish internal NYPD oversight were 'sabotaged'. He gives examples including that his meetings were cancelled, his communications were spied on, he was excluded from decision making, and alleges that his official police commissioner's stamp was used to forge internal documents. The alleged corruption, Donlon claims, was used to promote unqualified, politically connected cops and 'triggered a massive, unlawful transfer of public wealth – millions of dollars in unearned salary increases, overtime eligibility, pension enhancements, and post-retirement benefits'. Donlon says that after he warned Adams of his findings he was sidelined. His wife, he claims, was placed under false arrest and subjected to a full-body and personal effects search. After she was released, a reporter from the New York Post called him for comment – 'a media leak that could only have come from inside the NYPD', the lawsuit claims. Donlon's allegations come as Adams is mounting a campaign as an independent candidate to retain his position as mayor. Adams switched political parties after a series of scandals, including a since-abandoned federal corruption prosecution, and skipped the New York City mayoral democratic primary race last month, which was won by Zohran Mamdani. Last year, Donlon briefly served as interim police commissioner after Edward Caban resigned amid a federal investigation into potential corruption in the NYPD. About two months later Donlon stepped down and was moved to the office of the deputy mayor for public safety – a job that itself came to an end in May of this year when he was pushed out. Earlier this year, four deputy mayors resigned over concerns that Adams had reached a quid pro quo with the Trump administration to get tough on illegal immigration in exchange for getting his federal corruption charges dropped. Barely a week into Donlon's tenure as NYPD police commissioner, his home was raided by the FBI, who seized classified documents that he said had come into his possession 20 years earlier. Very little information was released about the raid or the nature of the documents. 'At a certain point, we all would walk out of the movie theater because the script was just too fantastical, incredulous, and unbelievable for real-life,' Jumaane Williams, the city's public advocate, noted in a social media post at the time. The Guardian has contacted Adams's office for comment.
