
Democrats who championed Biden's reelection bid seek atonement
'I know that he is ready for this campaign,' he said. 'I have seen how effective he has been up close and personal.' But five months into 2025, Murphy is on the leading edge of top Democrats aiming to Etch A Sketch away their past endorsements of Biden's acuity. Murphy told Politico this week that he had 'no doubt' Biden suffered cognitive decline while in office.
Murphy, who declined to be interviewed for this article, is not alone in trying to reposition himself from a top Biden surrogate who sat on the campaign's national advisory board to a truth-teller about what really happened in the 2024 campaign. His pivot is illustrative of a wide swath of the party that is hoping to atone for having fallen lockstep behind Biden.
Rep Ro Khanna, D-Calif, another Biden advisory board member who travelled the country as a surrogate to progressives, said this week that it was 'obvious now' that Biden 'was not in a condition to run for reelection.' Khanna had vouched for Biden up until the president ended his campaign. A speech in Detroit that proved to be Biden's last as a candidate 'broke through' the political noise, Khanna said five days before Biden dropped out.
Khanna on Friday acknowledged, 'Our party made a mistake, including the dozens of us who campaigned for him for reelection.' But he said that he 'was a surrogate based on information that the president gave' and that he had no reason to apologise for his actions in that role.
As the Democratic Party faces record low approval ratings, many party strategists and officials believe it must rebuild trust in its brand. That process, some argue, must begin with confronting how the party handled the 2024 race.
For most of Biden's term, many Democrats lived a bifurcated political life. In public, they remained staunchly behind the president, lauding him as sharp and fit to serve. But in private conversations, they fretted about his shaky gait, rambling speech and tendency to forget key details, such as the names of foreign leaders.
As recently as a year ago, Democrats saw publicly vouching for Biden and dismissing concerns about his age as the best path to holding the White House and safeguarding their own political futures. The power of incumbency, Democratic officials argued, outweighed well-documented concerns from their voters about his fitness for the job.
In a poll from The New York Times and Siena College published in March 2024, for example, a majority of voters who supported him in 2020 said he was too old to lead the country effectively.
Now, as Democrats jostle for influence in a demoralised party, their incentives have changed. And those who were closest to Biden appear to be in the trickiest position.
Pete Buttigieg, who served as the transportation secretary in the Biden administration, told reporters in Iowa this week that 'maybe' Democrats could have done better without Biden at the top of the ticket. Few Democrats were more forceful in vouching for Biden than Buttigieg, who four years earlier had run a primary campaign against him arguing the party needed generational change.
And Pennsylvania Gov Josh Shapiro now says that he began warning Biden directly about his standing in his home state shortly after Shapiro was elected as governor in 2022.
'I was very clear with the president privately about some of the risks that I saw in Pennsylvania,' Shapiro said. 'I communicated that to him and to his staff. And they made the judgment that they made to continue on with their campaign.' Still, some of the country's most prominent Democratic governors, many of whom are said to be considering their own presidential runs, refused to engage in the round of second-guessing.
'I was busy working,' Michigan Gov Gretchen Whitmer, who was a co-chair of Biden's campaign, said on CNN. 'I didn't see the president frequently. I can't speak to that directly.' Govs JB Pritzker of Illinois, Andy Beshear of Kentucky and Tim Walz of Minnesota have largely dodged questions about the former president's fitness, saying in interviews only that Biden should have dropped out before the primaries began.
'If we'd have had more time, could we have had a better shot? Yeah, I think probably,' Walz, whom former Vice President Kamala Harris eventually chose as her running mate, said in a recent interview. 'I don't think we'd have been in a worse spot, that's for sure.' Many Democratic officials have complained that the White House aides kept Biden cloistered as his condition worsened. A book set to be released next week, 'Original Sin,' details those efforts.
Biden's spokesperson declined to comment for this article.
Rep Jim Himes, D-Conn., one of the first lawmakers to call for Biden to step aside as the Democratic nominee after his disastrous debate performance in June 2024, said lawmakers had not fully known Biden's mental and physical state.
But, he said, Democrats must now openly admit that Biden was unfit for a second term and should not have run.
'If you don't say it, you don't self-reflect,' Himes said at an event hosted by Politico this week. 'Why is it hard for us to be more honest?' And then there are the Democrats who think fingers are being pointed in the wrong direction. Biden himself said on 'The View' that most Democrats wanted him to stay in the race, an assertion that runs counter to reality.
Former Rep Max Rose, D-N Y, said the focus on Biden's condition was misplaced. After all, he said, it was Harris who ultimately lost the election.
'People seem to be forgetting that the Harris campaign are the ones that lost,' Rose said on Friday. 'There are people involved in doing this who are trying to implicitly send the message that if Vice President Harris had another three months, she would have won, which is patently false.' Some Democrats are already warning that this issue could emerge as a dividing line in the 2028 presidential primary, as candidates try to distinguish themselves in what strategists widely expect to be a crowded contest.
On Wednesday, former Rep Joe Cunningham, D-S C, offered a bit of 'unsolicited advice' to Democrats aspiring to become their party's next presidential nominee.
'Before attending the BBQs, Lowcountry boils and picnics, cleanse yourself of any culpability you may have had when you stayed silent while so much was at stake,' Cunningham, who first suggested that Biden should not seek reelection in 2022, wrote in an opinion essay.
He added, 'As my mother would say: Wash your hands before you come to the meal.' — The New York Times.
By Reid J Epstein and Lisa Lerer
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
What does it take to make your embassy? In India, not much
NEW DELHI — There are more than 100 diplomatic missions based in India's capital, New Delhi. What does it take to set up your own? Not much, if you ask Harshvardhan Jain, aka 'Baron H.V. Jain.' Rent a bungalow, hoist some flags, park a few luxury cars on the curb, photoshop yourself into pictures with world leaders, and — voilà! — you have your own embassy. Until you are caught, that is. Indian police arrested Jain, 47, on Tuesday for running a fake embassy in a rented residential building in Ghaziabad, a city just outside New Delhi. This house, police said, alternately acted as the diplomatic mission for Westarctica or the Principality of Seborga or Poulbia Lodonia — depending on the day or the need, or the hour. These entities, technically, are 'micronations' — self-proclaimed sovereign states that lack a legal basis for their existence, as they are not recognized by other countries. For the better part of a decade, such legal inconveniences did little to undermine Jain's operation. Police said his building in Ghaziabad, with all its pomp and regalia, was the address for a range of criminal activities, from defrauding people of money by promising employment abroad to running a multinational hawala network — an informal system of transferring money that is illegal in India. Police officials suggested that Jain had been running his racket since at least 2017, when he declared himself the representative of Westarctica. His ambitions kept expanding from there. The micronation of Westarctica, in a statement on its website, said, 'Mr. Jain was an authorized representative engaging in unauthorized activities.' He had been made an 'honorary Consul to India' after he made a 'generous donation' to Westarctica, the statement said. The entity's website says it was set up in 2001 by Travis McHenry, an American citizen, while he was serving in the U.S. Navy. He refers to himself as Grand Duke Travis. In a statement on Westarctica's Instagram page, Grand Duke Travis said 'Baron H.V. Jain' had been removed from the micronation's 'roster of diplomatic representatives.' In an email to The New York Times, he added that Jain had had diplomatic number plates, passports, and many other items bearing the seal of Westarctica, none of which he had been authorized to produce. For almost eight years, Jain had created for himself the 'aura' of an important man, said Sushil Ghule, a senior superintendent of police involved in the investigation. 'An undiscerning layman will believe what he sees and cannot tell that it's all fraudulent,' he said. In the fake embassy, the police recovered 12 counterfeit passports representing different countries, 20 diplomatic license plates that had been obtained without authorization, stamps of government departments and agencies, forged documents, and foreign currencies — all used to keep up Jain's persona of a well-connected diplomat. Police said that Jain had a master's from a university in London and that he was well-traveled, having established dubious companies in several countries before returning to India. The son of an industrialist, he was booked by police in 2012 for owning a satellite phone, which is prohibited for use in India without a license. Ghule said police were still looking into the extent of Jain's activity from the fake embassy. Have they reached out to Westarctica for help with the investigation? 'No,' Ghule said. This article originally appeared in


Muscat Daily
4 days ago
- Muscat Daily
Trump accuses Obama of 'treason', without providing evidence
Washington, D.C., US – US President Donald Trump accused former President Barack Obama of 'treason' on Tuesday without providing evidence. Trump cited his intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard, who on Friday declassified documents that allegedly showed how the Obama administration laid the groundwork for an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. What did Trump say about Obama? 'It's there, he's guilty. This was treason,' Trump said in the Oval Office on Tuesday. 'They tried to steal the election, they tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever imagined, even in other countries,' Trump claimed, without offering any proof. Trump's remarks came as he deflected questions from journalists about the Justice Department's decision to interview Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted of helping the financier sexually abuse underage girls and is now serving a lengthy prison sentence. Obama's office slams allegations The office of the former president later hit back with a statement saying Trump's 'bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction'. 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,' said Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush. 'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one.' Did Russia interfere with election? A 2017 assessment by the US intelligence community concluded that Russia used social media disinformation, hacking and bot farms to damage Democrat Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and bolster Trump. But the same assessment determined that the impact was likely limited and there was no evidence that Russia's efforts altered the election outcome. In 2020, a bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee – spearheaded by then acting chairman Marco Rubio, now Trump's secretary of state – found that the Trump campaign sought to 'maximise the impact' of leaks of Democratic documents stolen by Russian military intelligence. DW


Times of Oman
18-07-2025
- Times of Oman
Trump requests release of documents related to Epstein case
Washington: US President Donald Trump on Friday called for the release of grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein's case, callling it a 'scam' allegedly perpetuated by the Democrats. Taking to his social media platform Truth Social, Trump said, "Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval. This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end right now." The remarks came after a collection of letters gifted to Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003 included a note bearing Donald Trump's name and an outline of a naked woman, according to a Wall Street Journal report published on Thursday (local time), as per CNN. The report, which cites documents reviewed by the newspaper, comes amid continued public interest in Epstein's past connections with powerful individuals. Epstein died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of child sex trafficking. Trump has denied writing the letter and accused the media of running a coordinated smear campaign, according to CNN. Trump also threatened to sue The Wall Street Journal, News Corp., and Rupert Murdoch for the Jeffrey Epstein story they published on the Epstein files. "The Wall Street Journal, and Rupert Murdoch, personally, were warned directly by President Donald J. Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein was a FAKE and, if they print it, they will be sued. Mr. Murdoch stated that he would take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so. The Editor of The Wall Street Journal, Emma Tucker, was told directly by Karoline Leavitt, and by President Trump, that the letter was a FAKE, but Emma Tucker didn't want to hear that. Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway. President Trump will be suing The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Mr. Murdoch, shortly. The Press has to learn to be truthful, and not rely on sources that probably don't even exist," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also issued a strong statement on X (formerly Twitter), accusing the Journal of publishing unverified claims. "The Wall Street Journal published a hatchet job article with a FAKE 'birthday letter' that is supposedly from 2003," she wrote. "This is like the Steele Dossier that kickstarted 'the Russia, Russia, Russia' Hoax all over again. The WSJ refused to show us the letter and conceded they don't even have it in their possession when we asked them to verify the alleged document they're basing their ENTIRE fake story on," she said.