logo
Why waiting for the ‘right time' to divorce may not be a good idea

Why waiting for the ‘right time' to divorce may not be a good idea

We should stay together for the kids
The Australian Institute of Family Studies reports that while 82 per cent of children aged under a year live in 'intact' families, this figure drops to 64 per cent for 14-year-olds. Divorce is most common for families with middle primary school-age children, at eight to 10 years old. This means that in any Australian classroom, up to half of students may be experiencing separation or divorce at home.
'We know children do best in low-conflict homes where parents are happy and content,' says Carol Markie-Dadds, international country director with parenting program Triple P.
'The key determinant of how children fare is how well parents manage the transition to separation and divorce, rather than when it happens.'
Children's understanding of divorce will depend on their age, but that doesn't mean they'll cope better when they're older.
Loading
'Regardless of when it happens, have age-appropriate, open and honest conversations that let children know that the separation is not their fault, both parents love and care for them, and that your family is resilient and will bounce back,' Markie-Dadds says.
I can't afford to get divorced
With lawyers charging upwards of $350 an hour and barristers more than $1500 a day, divorce in Australia can be expensive. A 'standard' divorce is estimated to cost between $10,000 and $20,000. According to Money Magazine, if your matter ends up in court, the average cost is between $50,000 and $100,000 (and it can take up to three years).
'This is a worry we hear often,' Russell says. 'The fear is real, but often inflated by media portrayals of divorce as an expensive, combative legal battle. The truth is, it doesn't have to be that way, and there are plenty of professionals who are committed to reducing the stress and expense of this process.'
Markie-Dadds says: 'Financial worries are a common concern but shouldn't be the sole reason to remain together.'
I want to wait for financial reasons
When actors Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise married in 2012, their prenuptial agreement ensured she would receive $US3 million for every year of marriage, up to a maximum of $US33 million. If their marriage had lasted 11 years or more, the prenup would have been off the table, and Holmes would have been entitled to half of Cruise's assets – estimated today at US$600 million ($932 million). Holmes called time after five years.
'It really depends on the individual circumstances,' Russell says. 'For some, delaying separation might seem financially strategic, if you're waiting for superannuation to stabilise or for property values to shift, for example.
'But I always caution against staying stuck in limbo. Life doesn't wait. Redundancies, new relationships, children or health issues can shift the landscape quickly and add complexity to any future agreement.'
My family will freak out
It's easy to assume that your family will have your back when it comes to a divorce. But sometimes that's not the case. In certain dynamics or perhaps for cultural reasons, immediate family members – parents, siblings – might struggle to support someone's decision to leave.
'Family and friends often have strong opinions about your process, but ultimately, this is your life,' Russell says. 'We encourage people to manage these conversations by 'setting the reaction'. That means calmly communicating your decision and setting clear boundaries around what kind of support you need.'
Divorcees may experience family opinions that splits are 'not fair' on the children, especially where older family members have fixed ideas on the traditional family unit.
'The most important thing is that your child feels loved and safe and is shielded from conflict,' Markie-Dadds says.
I feel bad because someone is sick
There's nothing like illness to bring clarity to a relationship. When Grey's Anatomy star Eric Dane was diagnosed with a form of MND earlier this year, his wife, Rebecca Gayheart, dismissed the divorce petition she had lodged in 2018.
It doesn't have to be a spouse's health issues that affect a decision; any illness in an ex-partner's family is typically a reason to rally together.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No-one noticed when most expensive painting in Australia was stolen
No-one noticed when most expensive painting in Australia was stolen

9 News

timea day ago

  • 9 News

No-one noticed when most expensive painting in Australia was stolen

6 of 9 Attribution: Public Domain After clinging to wreckage, the survivors managed to paddle to a small island. Kennedy, at great personal risk, braved shark infested waters and the risk of being detected by Japanese ships, by swimming out to sea to try and flag down passing American vessels. Eventually after help from local native people and an Australian intelligence officer, they were rescued by a US Navy ship. The future US president, shown standing on the far right, was awarded the Navy and Marine Corps Medal for his brave actions.

More houses, more trees pose urban challenge
More houses, more trees pose urban challenge

The Age

time3 days ago

  • The Age

More houses, more trees pose urban challenge

To submit a letter to The Age, email letters@ Please include your home address and telephone number below your letter. No attachments. See here for our rules and tips on getting your letter published. CLIMATE ACTION Suburban trees are an ongoing conundrum (' They bought a knockdown-rebuild and got a fight over Thornbury's tallest trees ', 30/7). We need as much urban shade and carbon storage as we can get, but we're short of houses. The more we build on the total block to maximise the urban amenity the more we deny replenishment of the water table sustaining these trees. And the more hostile the climate becomes to more the likelihood of these trees become dangerous to from falling limbs. One solution could be to grant those who harbour such sylvan giants a rate exemption for their upkeep. It may even encourage some imaginative architecture other than the boring masonry piles being erected all over Melbourne. John Mosig, Kew The right to bear elms Great to save trees but what about also saving houses? In the US, the right of the people to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right. Nowadays, most of us here think this is 'crazy' and not a good idea. In Australia, it seems people think it is their right to buy and demolish houses. This house in question might perhaps be beyond repair, but often people pull down perfectly habitable houses, ones which fit in with the character of the suburb. This is 'crazy' and not a good idea. Replacing an existing house with another does not increase housing stock. But it does use labour and resources (such as timber). Then many Australians travel to Europe to admire their beautiful street scapes and buildings, not appreciating that in Europe there are strong protections for existing buildings and strong requirements for demolition permits. We need to introduce much stronger protection of buildings here. Elspeth McCracken-Hewson, Camberwell Go bold on climate action Chair of the Climate Change Authority, Matt Kean has said any Australian target should be 'ambitious, responsible and achievable' (' Carbon tax call as PM told to 'go big' on climate ', 30/7). After decades of government denial and procrastination, the climate challenge is now immense. JFK didn't set the USA the goal of landing on the moon before the '60s ended by targeting what is 'ambitious, responsible and achievable'; he said 'we do these things not because they are easy but because they are hard'. We need a JFK to take our reins right now. Chris Young, Surrey Hills Joyce's illogical arguments Further to your contributors' comments on Barnaby Joyce (Letters, 30/7), of which I couldn't agree more strongly with, let's remember that this is the man who opposed the HPV vaccine program in 2006. At the time, he concocted all sorts of illogical arguments about it increasing teenage promiscuity and claimed community sentiment in support. He lost this argument because he was so blatantly wrong on that subject, as he is about global warming and climate change. Andrew Barnes, Ringwood Dilemmas of a third party Apropos ″⁣ Their founder now calls them unlikeable and authoritarian. Can the Greens change their spots? ″⁣(31/7). 'They wanted action on building more houses', columnist Shaun Carney writes, 'Labor's prescription might not have been ideal, but it did offer action while the Greens ... delivered inaction and boasted about it.' What were the Greens supposed to do? Simply support 'Labor's prescription' and forget about twisting its arm for more? And thereby invite voters to wonder what was the point of voting for them? Carney's article fails to take seriously the dilemmas of a third party in a balance of power. Indeed, it simply repeats Labor's own self-serving argument. Colin Smith, Glen Waverley THE FORUM Peris' language Former Olympian and former Labor senator Nova Peris is well known as an outspoken and very active supporter of Israel. She has recently been elected as a director of Hockey Australia, only weeks after sharing a stridently Islamophobic post on social media which calls Muslims 'Satan worshipping cockroaches that need to be eradicated″⁣ (The Age 28/7 and 31/7). Another of her re-posts claims 'Islam should be banned in the West'. While Hockey Australia's website claims the organisation is inclusive and embraces diversity, it apparently sees no problem with Peris's Islamophobic rhetoric. It reportedly said its 'various stakeholders have their own views which do not always reflect the views of the organisation and the Hokey Australian board'. The Australian Sports Commission which granted Hockey Australia $9.5 million in 2024-25 is similarly nonchalant, claiming 'this is a matter for Hockey Australia'. Doubtless, had these posts been antisemitic in nature the backlash would be deafening. Whatever her sporting achievements, Peris' conduct is not suitable to lead a government-funded national sporting body. Jody Ellis, Thornbury What drives division You would think that if a former ALP senator was revealed to have shared social media posts describing a section of the Australian community as vermin ″⁣that need to be eradicated″⁣ and not welcome to worship in this country mere weeks after the release of a major anti-racism plan, the Albanese government would have made some comment, or even criticism of the former senator. Together with the apparent abandonment of the special envoy for social cohesion, it feels as though the Albanese government lacks the courage to adequately address some of the matters that drive division in our community. Wil Wallace, Wangaratta

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store