Israel Targets Palestinians Heading to Aid Distribution Site
The Israeli military on Tuesday opened fire on Palestinians while they were trying to reach an aid distribution site in southern Gaza, for the third time in three days.
Meanwhile, the UN has called for an independent investigation into the targeting of Palestinians near the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) aid distribution site in Gaza's southern city of Rafah. Killing Aid Seekers
On early Tuesday, June 3, 2025, the Israeli military killed at least 27 people, including two women and three children, and injured others while they were heading to the GHF's aid distribution site, the Associated Press (AP) reported citing the head of Gaza's Health Ministry's records department, Zaher al-Waheidi. This marked the third incident in three days.
According to the AP, all the shooting incidents took place at the Flag Roundabout, located one kilometer away from one of the GHF's distribution sites in the southern city of Rafah, an area that has been turned into an Israeli military zone. Israeli Denial
The Israeli military said that its troops opened fire at several suspects who did not adhere to the designated access routes, according to CNN. It said that its forces do not prevent Gazan civilians from reaching the humanitarian aid distribution sites.
'The troops carried out warning fire, and after the suspects failed to retreat, additional shots were directed near a few individual suspects who advanced toward the troops,' the Israeli military said in a statement, adding it was looking into reports of casualties. Multiple Incidents
The Tuesday shooting occurred near the same location where previous shooting incidents took place over the past two days. On Monday morning, Israeli troops killed three Palestinians and injured dozens while they were on their way to the GHF aid distribution site in Rafah, according to Palestinian and hospital officials.
Similarly, the Israeli military shot dead dozens of Palestinians in the same area on Sunday, according to Palestinian officials and eyewitnesses. The Palestinian officials said that the incident claimed the lives of 31 people and wounded dozens. However, the Israeli military denied firing 'within or near' the aid distribution site. GHF Response
On its part, the GHF denied any violence in or around its site. In a statement, it said that aid distribution occurred 'safely and without incident.' It added that the Israeli military was investigating whether civilians were injured 'after moving beyond the designated safe corridor and into a closed military zone.'
'This was an area well beyond our secure distribution site and operations area. We recognize the difficult nature of the situation and advise all civilians to remain in the safe corridor when traveling to our distribution sites,' the statement noted. Aid Delivery Mechanism
The GHF is an Israeli and US-backed organization which operates a new aid distribution mechanism. It involves establishing a number of distribution hubs in southern and central Gaza, where Palestinian civilians will head once a week to receive one aid package per family. The GHF cooperates with private American contractors to secure aid trucks until their arrival at the distribution sites.
However, the GHF has faced mounting criticism from the UN and other humanitarian organizations, which refused to work with the organization amid fears that its distribution model will force the displacement of Palestinians. Moreover, the GHF head resigned, citing concerns over 'humanitarian principles,' including neutrality and independence. UN Calls for Investigation
After the Sunday shooting incident, the UN called for an independent investigation. The UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, expressed concern over the reports of shooting Gazan civilians seeking aid.
'I am appalled by the reports of Palestinians killed and injured while seeking aid in Gaza yesterday,' he said in a statement on Monday. 'I call for an immediate and independent investigation into these events and for perpetrators to be held accountable,' the UN head said. Dehumanization of Gazans
On the same day, the UN human rights chief, Volker Türk, sharply criticized the current aid delivery mechanism as 'unacceptable' and 'dehumanizing.' In an interview with the BBC, he said: 'It's heartbreaking. I cannot believe that humanitarian aid is delivered in such circumstances. It's unacceptable, it's dehumanizing and I really hope there is a rethinking of the whole absolute need to get humanitarian aid in quickly and not through the current system.'
'I think what it shows is utter disregard for civilians. Can you imagine people that have been absolutely desperate for food, for medicine, for almost three months and then they have to run for it or try to get it in the most desperate circumstances? It does show a huge dehumanization of the people who are desperately in need,' he noted.
Short link :
Post Views: 50
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Tehran remains committed to diplomacy, but ‘peace by force is not peace,' Iran's ambassador to Japan tells Arab News Japan
TOKYO: From the only country ever targeted by atomic bombs, a senior Iranian diplomat has called for a return to diplomacy over destruction amid simmering nuclear tensions in the Middle East. Peiman Seadat, Tehran's ambassador to Japan, says his country remains open to dialogue but cautions that 'peace by force is not peace' following recent attacks on its nuclear sites and failed negotiations. In an exclusive interview with Arab News on Saturday, Seadat described genuine diplomacy as requiring 'mutual respect, even on points of disagreement, equal footing, and a willingness to achieve a satisfactory outcome for parties involved.' Iranian authorities are 'now assessing the situation' and weighing options for resuming negotiations, he said. Seadat's remarks come amid simmering tensions following a 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel, which ended with a ceasefire on June 24. Accusing both the US and Israel of choosing aggression over diplomacy, he said the attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities were carried out two days before planned talks with the US, and thus have deepened a 'legacy of distrust.' 'Rather than condemning the party that disrupted the negotiations, the Americans sided with the aggressor,' he said. 'They, therefore, betrayed the very negotiation to which they were a party. 'Accordingly, the conclusion is that they were complicit in the aggression, a fact they further proved when they launched attacks against our peaceful nuclear sites, thus joining the Israelis in gross violation of every tenet of international law.' In his first public remarks after the truce, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei declared victory, claiming Iran 'slapped America in the face' by striking the Al-Udeid base in Qatar in retaliation for the US bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities. Warning that any future attacks would prompt further strikes on American targets, he asserted Iran's regional capabilities and rejected calls for concessions. Khamenei also downplayed the impact of the strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, claiming that the US acted mainly to protect Israel after Iranian missiles penetrated Israeli defenses. US President Donald Trump ridiculed Khamenei's victory claims, insisting Iran had been 'decimated' and its nuclear sites 'obliterated' during the conflict. Trump said he had considered but ultimately rejected plans to assassinate Khamenei, claiming he 'saved him from a very ugly and ignominious death' by stopping direct attacks from the US or Israel. He also said he halted plans to lift sanctions on Iran following Khamenei's 'blatant and foolish' statements and warned he would 'absolutely' consider bombing Iran again if Tehran resumed nuclear enrichment at threatening levels. Trump further claimed to have pressured Israel to avoid delivering a 'final knockout' blow, suggesting Israeli strikes could have targeted Tehran directly if not for US intervention. On Saturday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi condemned Trump's comments, saying a potential nuclear deal hinges on the US ending its 'disrespectful tone' toward the supreme leader. 'If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt supporters,' Araghchi posted on the social platform X. Seadat said that Iran remained committed to diplomacy, citing his country's continued adherence to the 2015 nuclear deal and participation in talks until Israeli strikes derailed the process. 'Iran has always been a party to genuine diplomacy, but peace by force is not peace; it is, rather, coercion,' he said. 'What we wanted was a cessation of aggression, and we achieved it at this stage, with resolve. So, while we remain highly vigilant, we will see how the situation unfolds.' As diplomatic strains persist, Israeli officials have signaled a readiness to escalate. On June 26, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz told local media that Israel has a 'green light' from Trump to strike Iran again if it appears to be advancing its nuclear program. He added that Israel would not have needed US permission to target Khamenei directly. That same day, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed victory and framed the conflict as a strategic opportunity to expand diplomatic ties with Arab states. 'We have fought with determination against Iran and achieved a great victory. This victory opens the path to dramatically enlarge the peace accords,' Netanyahu said in a video address, referencing the Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab countries in 2020. However, Gulf states have condemned both Iran's missile strike on Qatar and Israel's attacks on Iranian facilities, citing concerns over regional stability and national sovereignty. In a joint statement on June 16, Arab countries rejected and condemned Israel's military aggression against Iran, calling instead for a return to negotiations. Seadat insisted that Iran's nuclear program remains peaceful and said Iran's parliament moved to limit cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) only after repeated, ignored reassurances from Tehran. 'Up to the moment our sites were attacked in contravention of the NPT rules, the IAEA Statute, and two resolutions by its General Conference that prohibit any attack on IAEA-safeguarded peaceful nuclear sites, 130 IAEA inspectors were in place, meaning one-fifth of all inspections conducted by the IAEA in the world,' Seadat said. He added: 'Regardless of disagreements, the IAEA continued its most robust verification regime in the world in Iran.' Even after the attacks, Seadat said, both the IAEA and US intelligence confirmed there were no signs of nuclear weapons activity — despite early claims, which he attributed to a 'very irresponsible' IAEA report. He said the 2015 nuclear agreement created 'a balance: a cap on our peaceful nuclear program in return for full removal of sanctions.' That arrangement, he added, was especially reassuring as it was backed by UN Security Council Resolution 2231. 'This is a model that Japan and some others have. They also enrich uranium for peaceful purposes. I do not know what to say, unless the meaning of reassuring has changed, perhaps because of the aggressions by the Israeli regime and the Americans on Iran,' Seadat said. Tensions had started escalating after a May 31 IAEA report revealed that Iran had increased uranium enrichment to 60 percent — the only non-nuclear weapons state to do so — and expanded its stockpile of near-weapons-grade material by 50 percent in three months. Iran dismissed the report as 'politically motivated' and 'baseless accusations.' On Wednesday, Rafael Grossi, IAEA director general, said his top priority is resuming inspections in Iran to determine the impact of the recent strikes. The extent of any damage remains unclear. While Grossi suggested Iran may have relocated parts of its stockpile ahead of the attacks, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Thursday he had seen no intelligence supporting that claim. Looking ahead, Seadat noted that Japan could play a significant diplomatic role, referencing its unique moral standing as the only country to have experienced atomic bombings. 'The Hibakusha, the first generation of survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, still walk among us in Japan,' he said. 'Because of this, Japan possesses a profound moral authority, having known the depths of suffering like few others.' He added that Japan is well-positioned to support peace through 'inclusive' regional development, particularly efforts that enhance energy security for all. Seadat also said there is growing alignment between Iran and Arab and Islamic states, which he described as a 'positive and constructive path' toward regional peace. However, he cautioned that maintaining momentum would require active, sustained support from all sides. Although East Asia lies far from Iran, Seadat emphasized cultural similarities and the potential for cooperation — especially through Japan's technological expertise and diplomatic engagement. 'We need this new paradigm in our region, and I believe Japan, through the dynamism of its diplomacy, can contribute to it,' he said.
Leaders
5 hours ago
- Leaders
Trump Says He Would 'Absolutely' Consider Bombing Iran Again
Speaking at a press conference at the White House on Friday, US President Donald Trump said he would 'absolutely' consider bombing Iran again, according to BBC. Trump also stated that if intelligence emphasized that Iran could enrich uranium to concerning levels, he would 'without question' attack the country. US Involvement in Conflict On June 22, the US became directly involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran after launching airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan. 'The United States showed that they have no respect to United Nations Charter. They have no respect to international law. They crossed a very big red line by attacking nuclear facilities,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said. No Gains In his first public statement since the announcement of the ceasefire, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday that the US intervention in the war was basically driven by its feeling 'that if it did not intervene, the Zionist regime would be utterly destroyed.' However, the US had not achieved any gains from this war, he added. On Friday, Trump also repeated his claim that the country's nuclear sites had been 'obliterated'. After the outbreak of the war on June 13, Khamenei took shelter in a secret location and was not seen in public. Trump said on Friday that he knew 'EXACTLY' where the Ayatollah had been sheltering and that he had personally prevented Israeli and US armed forces from targeting him. Khamenei also declared victory over Israel that targeted Iran's nuclear facilities on June 13, according to The Associated Press. He stated that Iran has 'delivered a hand slap to America's face' by attacking an American air base in Qatar on June 23. In a response, Trump said, 'Why would the so-called 'Supreme Leader' Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, of the war-torn country of Iran, say so blatantly and foolishly that he won the war with Israel, when he knows his statement is a lie.' Israel-Iran War On June 13, Israel launched a wave of airstrikes on Iran under the name of Operation Rising Lion. The military campaign targeted Iran's nuclear facilities and killed top military commanders and nuclear scientists. As a response, Iran launched a retaliatory wave of missiles against Israel and targeted Tel Aviv. Israel also killed several Iranian nuclear scientists in line with its goal to eliminate Iran's nuclear program. Related Topics: Trump Ends Trade Talks with Canada Hours after Sealing China Deal US-Iran Talks to Take Place Next Week: Trump 'Nobody Knows': Trump on US Striking Iran Short link : Post Views: 119
Saudi Gazette
10 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Iran holds state funeral for slain military commanders and scientists
TEHRAN — Iran held a state funeral on Saturday for dozens of senior military commanders, nuclear scientists, and civilians killed during the 12-day war with Israel, which ended earlier this week in a US-brokered ceasefire. Thousands of mourners gathered near Tehran's Enghelab Square, where coffins draped in Iranian flags and adorned with portraits of the dead were paraded through the crowd. Authorities said 60 individuals, including top military and scientific figures, were buried. Government offices were closed, and free transportation was offered to encourage public attendance. Among the dead was Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, Iran's highest-ranking military officer and chief of staff of the armed forces. He was laid to rest alongside his wife and daughter, who were killed in an Israeli prominent figures buried included Hossein Salami, commander-in-chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi, head of Azad University in authorities said the overall death toll inside Iran reached 627 during the conflict, while Israeli officials reported 28 deaths following missile attacks launched by funeral was attended by Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Rear Admiral Ali Shamkhani, an advisor to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Shamkhani sustained injuries in an earlier Israeli war, which saw U.S. forces intervene with strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, has left diplomatic tensions at a boiling point.U.S. President Donald Trump said he would 'absolutely' consider future military action against Iran if intelligence suggested Tehran was enriching uranium to dangerous at the White House on Friday, Trump claimed he had been considering sanctions relief but abruptly abandoned the effort following what he called 'hostile' comments by Khamenei.'I saved him from a very ugly and ignominious death,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, 'and he does not have to say, 'thank-you, president Trump!''Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi issued a sharp response, warning Trump to refrain from 'disrespectful' language toward Iran's supreme insisted that while Iranian nuclear sites suffered 'serious damage,' the strikes had 'achieved nothing significant.'The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Rafael Grossi, noted that the full extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear program remains stressed that preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon 'will not be solved militarily,' and emphasized the need for diplomacy.
