Trump Doctrine 2.0
According to AI, "Presidential doctrines in US foreign policy are major, overarching policy stances or strategies announced by a president, often shaping the nation's approach to international relations for a significant period. These doctrines are not legally binding but reflect a president's vision for the world and guide their actions on the global stage. They often emerge in response to specific geopolitical situations and can have lasting impacts on U.S. foreign policy."
Major US doctrines proclaimed by various American Presidents like Monroe, Truman, Eisenhower, Carter, Bush, Clinton, Obama, Biden and Trump reflected major policy statements of US administration on foreign policy matters.
How various American presidents after Second World War influenced the world through their doctrines indicated cold war and post-cold war realities. Trump Doctrine 2.0 is a recent phenomenon which was proclaimed in his second term following a set of events like the Russia-Ukraine War, the War in Gaza, and the Indo-Pak armed conflict of May 7-10 and the Israel-Iran war. Trump Doctrine, proclaimed in his first presidency, focused on accomplishing his objective enshrined in 'Make America Great Again', but the doctrine declared in his second term covered a wide range of international issues. After assuming power on January 20, 2025 Trump came up with strange type of ideas like getting hold of Greenland; making Canada the 51st province of America; getting control of Panama Canal; and renaming Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America. He also talked about ending wars starting with the ones in Ukraine and Gaza. But, most of his ideas, part of what is termed his makeshift doctrine, in his first 100 days in power were overshadowed with his tariff war and taking credit for the Indo-Pak ceasefire and ending the Israel-Iran. All that enabled him to claim that he deserves Nobel Peace Prize.
What is Trump Doctrine 2.0? Is it like other doctrines of various American Presidents proclaimed since the Monroe doctrine? Is Trump Doctrine taken seriously by the world given his maverick and unpredictable personality? Is the US capable of proceeding with Trump Doctrine and what are the contradictions which are reflected in American president's policy statements? Some of the doctrines proclaimed by American presidents were announced during State of Union Address by US presidents and others were a reflection of their stance on various foreign policy matters. While the Monroe, Carter, Truman and Bush doctrines were pretty focused, the so-called Trump Doctrine is haphazard.
According to a Reuters piece by Steve Holland and David Brunnstrom titled 'The latest US foray into military action has a name: The Trump Doctrine' dated June 26, 2025, "To some observers, however, the new doctrine sounds like an effort to offer a tidy framework to describe a foreign policy that often looks unpredictable and inconsistent I don't think Trump has a doctrine. I think Trump has only held instincts, [says Middle East analyst Aaron David Miller, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace]."
A report in Politico magazine of June 24, 2025 titled "Vance outlines the 'Trump Doctrine' at political dinner in Ohio" quotes Vice President JD Vance as saying, "What I call the Trump Doctrine is quite simple: Number one, you articulate a clear American interest and that's, in this case, that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon. Number two, you try to aggressively diplomatically solve that problem. And number three, when you can't solve it diplomatically, you use overwhelming military power to solve it and then you get the hell out of there before it ever becomes a protracted conflict."
Trump is known for making U-turns in his policy statements. On the eve of the Indo-Pak military confrontation on May 7, he and his vice president made it clear that the US had nothing to do with that conflict, only to take credit for the ceasefire later. When Israel attacked Iran on June 13 and Iran retaliated Trump made it clear that America was not behind Israel in its attack on Iran but within hours he began to actively support the Jewish state. Furthermore, he stated that in two weeks' time he would decide about whether or not to attack Iran, but within 24 hours his B-2 bombers attacked Iranian nuclear installations. Such U-turns reflect incoherence and inconsistency of Trump's mindset. He hailed the Iran-Israel ceasefire and used offensive words condemning violation of the ceasefire by both Israel and Iran.
Trump Doctrine is a fallacy because of three main reasons.
First, instead of acting like a statesman and a strategist, the US president is behaving like a person vying for gaining undue popularity without articulating his vision on foreign policy objectives. Once overshadowed with other foreign policy challenges like the Russia-Ukraine war, the conflict in Gaza and the Israel-Iran war, Trump's earlier pronouncements like annexing Greenland, taking control of Panama canal, making Canada America's 51st state and renaming Gulf of Mexico as Gulf of America slipped into background. It means a doctrine which is a set of brief policy statement is not reflected in Trump's speeches or in his State of Union address. In his address spanning one hour and forty minutes before the Joint Session of US Congress on March 4, 2025, Trump stated, "Six weeks ago I stood beneath the dome of this capitol and proclaimed the dawn of the golden age of America. From that moment on it has been nothing but swift and unrelenting action to usher in the greatest and most successful era in the history of our country. We have accomplished more in 43 days than most administrations accomplished in four years or eight years, and we are just getting started."
Second, the so-called Trump Doctrine of 2025 will be followed by other doctrines in coming years which will contradict his earlier policy statements. One can expect chaos and dwindling of American power in view of inconsistent and incoherent position of Trump administration in the days to come.
Finally, Trump's rash and maverick temperament will plunge the US in internal chaos and renewed conflict with China and NATO allies. It will also give an opportunity to other powers to effectively challenge American tutelage in global affairs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
PM, military leadership played key role in brokering Iran-Israel ceasefire: Naqvi
Listen to article Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi stated that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and the military leadership played a pivotal role in the Iran-Israel conflict and the subsequent ceasefire between the two countries. 'Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif played a crucial role in the ceasefire between Israel and Iran, and the military also played a significant role in this regard. I don't want to go into further details, but the way PM negotiated with world leaders is something we must be proud of,' he said. The 12-day war, which began with unprovoked Israeli military strikes in Iran on June 13, resulted in 610 deaths, including senior nuclear scientists and high-ranking military commanders. In retaliation, strikes from Iran killed 28 in Israel. The US joined the conflict on June 22 with bunker-buster bombings on Iran's nuclear facilities in Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan. A US-brokered ceasefire was reached on June 24, shortly after Iran launched missiles at the largest US airbase in the Middle East, located in Qatar. وفاقی وزیر داخلہ محسن نقوی اور وزیر مملکت داخلہ طلال چوہدری سے چئیرمین رویت ہلال کمیٹی مولاناعبدالخبیر آزاد کی سربراہی میں تمام مکاتب فکر کے جید علمائے کرام کی ملاقات محرم الحرام خصوصا عاشورہ کے موقع پر امن وامان اور مذہبی ہم آہنگی یقینی بنانے کے لیے تفصیلی تبادلہ خیال — Ministry of Interior GoP (@MOIofficialGoP) July 3, 2025 Recalling the recent Pakistan-India conflict that ended after US President Trump brokered a ceasefire, he stated that during India's attack, Field Marshal Asim Munir stood firm and strong, and his resolve was that India would have to suffer four times as much. The minister made these remarks during a meeting with religious scholars in Islamabad on Thursday, which focused on maintaining law and order during Muharram. Speaking on the occasion, Naqvi appreciated the role of religious scholars in establishing peace. He suggested that the chairman of the Ruet-e-Hilal Committee adopt a theme of unity among people of different schools of thought, encouraging them to work together without abandoning their own beliefs or interfering with others. Pakistan-India conflict The latest escalation between Pakistan and India began on April 22, when an attack in Pahalgam killed 26 people. India immediately blamed Pakistan for the incident. However, Pakistan categorically rejected the Indian blame. Tensions further escalated in the early hours of May 7, when missile strikes hit six cities in Punjab and Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK), destroying a mosque and killing dozens of civilians, including women, children, and the elderly. Read More: French intelligence official confirms downing of Rafale by Pakistan In a swift military response, Pakistan's armed forces shot down Indian warplanes, including three Rafale jets. The confrontation intensified again in the early hours of May 10, when India targeted several Pakistani airbases with missile strikes. In retaliation, Pakistan launched Operation Bunyanum Marsoos, damaging Indian military installations, including missile storage sites, airbases, and other strategic targets. On May 10, US President Donald Trump announced that a ceasefire had been reached following intense diplomatic efforts overnight. Minutes later, the agreement was confirmed separately by Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and the Indian foreign secretary.
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Trump to speak with Putin today, possible Zelenskiy call Friday
According to the Financial Times, Trump and Zelenskiy are expected to discuss the recent halt in key US weapons deliveries to Kyiv. PHOTO:FILE Listen to article S President Donald Trump said he will speak with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday, while a Ukrainian source told Reuters that Trump may speak with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday. "Will be speaking to President Putin of Russia at 10:00 A.M. Thank you!" Trump wrote on his social media platform. He did not disclose the topics of discussion. According to the Financial Times, Trump and Zelenskiy are expected to discuss the recent halt in key US weapons deliveries to Kyiv. Zelenskiy is likely to raise the issue of future arms sales during the call, which may be rescheduled, the newspaper said, citing sources familiar with the planning. The White House did not respond to a Reuters request for comment on the reported Zelenskiy call. The US has paused shipments of some critical weapons to Ukraine due to low stockpiles, sources previously told Reuters. This prompted Ukraine to summon the acting US envoy in Kyiv on Wednesday to stress the importance of continued US military support. Ukrainian officials warned that reduced assistance would weaken their ability to defend against increased Russian airstrikes and advances on the battlefield. Reuters reported on Wednesday that the Pentagon's decision has led to a cut in deliveries of Patriot air defence missiles, which Ukraine relies on to intercept fast-moving ballistic threats.
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Trump close to victory on flagship tax bill
WASHINGTON: US lawmakers teed up a final vote on Donald Trump's marquee tax and spending bill for Thursday morning after bruising Republican infighting nearly derailed the centerpiece of the president's domestic agenda. Almost 24 hours after debate began, Trump appeared close to victory as Congress edged towards passing his 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' despite misgivings in his party over a text that would balloon the national debt while launching a historic assault on the social safety net. The bill would be a major landmark in Trump's political life, sealing his vision of US domestic policy into law – and coming after he scored recent wins including in the Supreme Court and with US strikes that led to a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Speaker Mike Johnson struggled through the night to corral his rank-and-file Republican members after the package scraped through a series of 'test' votes in the House of Representatives that laid bare deep divisions in the party. It was on course for a final vote that would put it on Trump's desk to be signed into law after passing its last procedural hurdle in the early hours of Thursday. 'We feel very good about where we are and we're moving forward,' an upbeat Johnson told reporters at the Capitol. 'So we're going to deliver the Big, Beautiful Bill – the president's 'America First' agenda – and we're going to do right by the American people.' Funds for mass deportation The timetable could slip however as Democratic minority leader Hakeem Jeffries continued a long speech opposing the bill that delayed proceedings by several hours. Trump tax-cut plan returns to US House, Republicans divided on bill Originally approved by the House in May, Trump's sprawling legislation squeezed through the Senate on Tuesday but had to return to the lower chamber for a rubber stamp of the senators' revisions. The package honors many of Trump's campaign promises, boosting military spending, funding a mass migrant deportation drive and committing $4.5 trillion to extend his first-term tax relief. But it is expected to pile an extra $3.4 trillion over a decade onto the country's fast-growing deficits, while shrinking the federal food stamps program and forcing through the largest cuts to the Medicaid health insurance scheme for low-income Americans since its 1960s launch. While Republican moderates in the House are anxious that the cuts will damage their prospects of reelection, fiscal hawks chafed over savings that they say fall far short of what was promised. Johnson has to negotiate tight margins, and can likely only lose three lawmakers in the final vote, among more than two dozen who had declared themselves open to rejecting Trump's bill. 'Abomination' The 869-page text only passed in the Senate after a flurry of tweaks that pulled the House-passed version further to the right. It offsets its tax relief with around $1 trillion in health care cuts, and some estimates put the total number of recipients set to lose their insurance coverage under the bill at 17 million. Scores of rural hospitals are expected to close. Johnson had been clear that he was banking on Trump leaning on waverers, as the president has in the past to turn around contentious House votes that were headed for failure. The Republican leader has spent weeks hitting the phones and hosting White House meetings to cajole lawmakers torn between angering welfare recipients at home and incurring his wrath. 'FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE. RIDICULOUS!!!' Trump, 79, thundered in one of multiple posts to his Truth Social platform as Wednesday's marathon voting session spilled into Thursday. The bill would underline Trump's total dominance of the Republican Party in his second term, and comes as he relishes a major Supreme Court victory last week that curbed lone judges from blocking his radical policies. But House Democrats have signaled that they plan to campaign on the bill to flip the chamber in the 2026 midterm elections, pointing to data showing that it represents a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest Americans to the richest. Jeffries held the floor for his Democrats for more than four hours ahead of the final vote, as he told the stories of everyday Americans whom he argued would be harmed by Trump's legislation. 'This bill, this one big, ugly bill – this reckless Republican budget, this disgusting abomination – is not about improving the quality of life of the American people,' he said.
