Do men really want more paternity leave?
Reynolds, a father of four, must know that paternity leave take-up in this country is notoriously poor: only 59 per cent of fathers took paternity leave after the birth or adoption of a child, with many citing the low rate of statutory pay (£187.18 per week) as the reason. Nearly two decades after the establishment of paternity leave in this country, research conducted by University College London suggests that the UK has the least generous paternity leave entitlement in Europe. Apparently, as a nation, we have some serious Daddy issues.
But let me flip this on its head for a moment. What if the barriers to paternity leave are not economic? What if fathers don't want to take paternity leave beyond two weeks because they want to preserve traditional gendered roles in a partnership? What if – and this is truly unfashionable to say – fathers want to care for their children from the relatively distant pulpit of the paterfamilias? Can paternal love still take place if a father observes his offspring sleeping peacefully in the evening as he loosens his tie? Must modern paternal love be predicated on a father singing 'Wind the Bobbin Up' at Monkey Music?
Contemporary wisdom holds not, laying 'toxic masculinity', damaged children and depressed fathers at the door of current paternity leave directives. The Guardian reports that 'bad policy' has far-reaching implications, citing a report from Georgetown University that posits that the children of 'traditionalised' couples find it hard to bond with their fathers. For their part, fathers who only take two weeks of paternity leave are at risk of 'poor mental health' according to Elliott Rae, founder of campaign group Parenting Out Loud. If reports are to be believed, fathers who choose to head to the relative safety of work after two weeks of nappy-changing and baby rocking, are going to hell in a handcart, their children total strangers to them.
As ever, allow me to counter this argument with my own experience. After the birth of our first child, my husband took the weekend off before he went back to work, kissing the new and very noisy occupant of our flat goodbye at 6 a.m. Although he was entitled to two weeks of paternity leave, he chose not to take it up, something I am quite sure had nothing to do with the 'stigma' of paternity leave or the back-slapping bravado of Goldman Sachs bankers who congratulate their colleagues who return to the desk straight from the labour ward. Put simply, I think he needed – and wanted – to go back to work. I believe that his much fretted over mental health was better because of it and, by extension, mine.
Did I worry for his future bond with his new daughter? Not a bit of it. We both understood that the equilibrium of the household would be far better if someone got to maintain their sense of 'normal' and furthermore that not all 'Daddy' bonds are established at 3 a.m. in a darkened nursery. Fatherhood, after all, is a long game. The noisy baby is now seven and thinks that Daddy is, quite simply, the best person in the world ever: 'I'm sorry, Mummy, but he's just funnier than you'. Fine; great!
When our second child was born, my husband did take two weeks of paternity leave, partly because I needed someone to do the school run. My memory of this time is rather diffuse, but I recall us eating crisps and watching several disturbing documentaries on Bitcoin and Jimmy Savile while the baby slept in the middle of the day. I did not, as I recall, experience any extreme euphoric uplift in my mental health because he was there and I certainly don't think that the gender revolution or pay gap in the home could have been altered in those two weeks or – heaven forbid – any longer.
So, how do you solve a problem like contemporary fatherhood? Maybe we could apply the wind the bobbin up approach: 'wind it back again, wind it back again', and see if the old 'Trad Dad' bobbin was any better. It couldn't, at any rate, be worse than the current bobbin: pulled in so many different directions that it risks unravelling altogether.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
5 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
India trade deal to boost Welsh economy by £80 million
This agreement, part of the 'Plan for Change', aims to benefit Welsh sectors such as renewable energy, creative industries, and food and drink. Welsh lamb is set to enter the Indian market duty-free, eliminating a 33 per cent tariff. The trade deal aligns with the UK's Industrial and Trade Strategies, supporting key growth sectors. The Welsh clean energy sector, employing more than 15,000 people, is expected to benefit from lower tariffs. It will also gain access to India's public procurement market. The creative sector, too, will enjoy increased copyright protections. Secretary of state for Wales, Jo Stevens, said: "This is a landmark deal that is set to boost Wales' economy by £80 million annually." Business and trade secretary Jonathan Reynolds added: "The millions brought to Wales each year from the deal we've signed with India today will be keenly felt across local communities, whether that's higher wages for workers, more choice for shoppers, or increased overseas sales for businesses." Welsh workers are set to benefit from a £2.2 billion annual UK wage increase, alongside the prospect of lower prices and a greater variety of clothes, shoes and food products.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Home Office launches probe into asylum seeker gambling as lax rules let migrants use taxpayer handouts at betting shops and casinos
Lax rules that have let asylum seekers use their taxpayer handouts for gambling are 'very concerning', a Cabinet minister has admitted. The Daily Mail revealed this week that there have been thousands of transactions using pre-paid cards meant to fund basics such as food and clothing. The Home Office, which initially said the abuse was impossible, yesterday launched an investigation into the scandal. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds confirmed that the use of the Aspen cards for gambling was not allowed. Asked about the Mail's revelations, he said: 'It's already forbidden. It shouldn't happen. We've seen that story. 'Support for asylum seekers in the UK is, it 's not a lot of money, it's about £7 a day, I think, for essentials. You shouldn't be able to use it for this. So it's very concerning. 'There's an immediate investigation to find out exactly what has gone on here.' Home Office data revealed up to 6,537 asylum seekers have used the government-issued cards at least once for gambling in the past year. The shock figures were released under Freedom of Information laws to the PoliticsHome website. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said it was 'a complete abuse of taxpayers' money' and called for an immediate clampdown. Fellow Tory Ben Obese-Jecty said: 'It is scandalous. I raised the issue of Aspen cards directly with both the Home Secretary and the border security minister earlier this year. 'Their only concern was that 'disclosure could undermine the ability of the Home Office to secure maximum value for money in future contract negotiations'.' Aspen cards are issued to asylum seekers while they wait to have their claims dealt with – a process that can take months or even years. Those in self-catered accommodation receive £49.18 on the card each week, with 80,000 currently issued. Home Office figures do not reveal how many of the attempts to use the cards in amusement arcades and casinos were successful. A spokesman said it had 'begun an investigation' and added: 'The Home Office has a legal obligation to support asylum seekers, including any dependants, who would otherwise be destitute.'
South Wales Guardian
13 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Labour Government ‘deeply committed' to recognising Palestine, Reynolds says
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds stressed that such a move would have to be meaningful and come as part of a 'genuine move towards a two-state solution and a long-term peace settlement' with Israel. The Prime Minister is under increasing pressure to fulfil Labour's promise to recognise Palestine. Mr Reynolds told LBC Radio: 'We are deeply committed to the recognition of Palestine as a state, which was part of our manifesto, but obviously we want that to be meaningful. 'Now, at the minute, there is not a Palestinian state there. There is no political agreement between the two principal Palestinian territories in the West Bank and Gaza. 'We have taken other steps in relation to the intolerable situation in Gaza. We've obviously sanctioned two Israeli cabinet ministers. I myself have ended arms exports to Israel that could be used in the conflict in Gaza. 'We've ended our talks with Israel on a more enhanced trade agreement and trade relationship. So we have taken those immediate steps. 'And we do want to see Palestine recognised. I want that to be meaningful. I want that to be working with partners, other countries around the world.' Labour's London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan has piled pressure on Sir Keir to 'immediately recognise Palestinian statehood'. The UK must immediately recognise Palestinian statehood. There can be no two state solution if there is no viable state left to call Palestine. — Sadiq Khan (@SadiqKhan) July 23, 2025 He said that the UK 'must do far more to pressure the Israeli government to stop this horrific senseless killing', as aid groups have warned of starvation in the Gaza Strip. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey called for the Royal Air Force to carry out airdrops of aid into Gaza. 'Aid delivered by the air is no substitute for the reopening of supply routes by land,' he said. 'But the extent of the humanitarian catastrophe we are now witnessing requires us to leave no stone unturned in our efforts to get aid to Gazans.' More than 100 organisations, including Doctors Without Borders and Save the Children, have put their names to an open letter in which they said they were watching their own colleagues, as well as the Palestinians they serve, 'waste away'. It comes as the Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell, labelled the situation in Gaza 'a stain on the conscience of the international community'. He said: 'With each passing day in Gaza, the violence, starvation and dehumanisation being inflicted on the civilian population by the government of Israel becomes more depraved and unconscionable.' Hamas-led militants based in Gaza abducted 251 people in the October 7 attack in 2023 that triggered the war and killed around 1,200 people. Fewer than half of the 50 hostages still in Gaza are believed to be alive.
