logo
Holyrood passes legislation to abolish SQA exams body

Holyrood passes legislation to abolish SQA exams body

Glasgow Times2 days ago

The Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) is set to be scrapped and replaced by a new body called Qualifications Scotland.
The Education (Scotland) Bill was passed by 69 votes to 47 late on Wednesday evening, following two days of debate.
As well as abolishing the SQA, the bill also sets out plans for a new chief inspector of education, who will be tasked with inspecting nurseries, schools and colleges across Scotland.
READ NEXT: Scotland sees 'rare' weather phenomenon as weather set to shift
READ NEXT: Banned driver who left friend in wheelchair for life after crash jailed
The bill states that Qualification Scotland will have to give equal weighting to both British Sign Language (BSL) and the Gaelic language.
It also outlines that the new body must consider the needs of pupils who use BSL or learn in BSL.
The new body is expected to be up and running in the autumn, after this year's exam results are released.
It comes almost five years after the 2020 exams scandal, where marks for more than 124,000 pupils were downgraded after exams had to be scrapped as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Speaking as the legislation was passed, Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth said the bill would "fundamentally create a new and a different type of organisation which works with the teaching profession differently".
Jenny Gilruth And speaking after the vote, Gilruth said: 'The successful passage of this legislation shows this Government is serious about implementing the changes needed to drive improvement across Scotland's education and skills system.
"The creation of a new national qualifications body is about building the right conditions for reform to flourish; the new body will ensure that knowledge and experience of pupils and teachers are at the heart of our national qualifications offering."
Gilruth added that the new chief inspector would have "greater independence and the power to set the frequency and focus of inspections".
'Throughout this process, I have been determined to work with other parties on this vital legislation. I am also grateful to teaching unions and other organisations across civic Scotland who contributed to its development," she continued.
'Taken together our major programme of education and skills reform will bring about the changes needed to meet the needs of future generations of young people."
The bill was backed by the Scottish Greens, who said that the new body "will put the voices of teachers and students at its heart".
The party's education spokesperson, Ross Greer, who has previously campaigned for an overhaul of the exams body, said he was pleased MSPs had voted for "this fresh start in Scottish education".
Ross Greer He said: "Senior leadership at the SQA was given the opportunity to change over many years, but refused to do so.
"Replacing the organisation with one legally required to listen to teachers and students will end this constant cycle of scandals.
"Now we can begin rebuilding the trust which was so completely destroyed over the last decade and put the focus back on supporting students."
But he added that such reform needed to be followed up with "urgent work" to reduce teachers' workload and an overhaul of the "Victorian-era" end of term exams system towards a model of ongoing assessment.
Greer also hit out at Scottish Labour, who voted down the bill on the basis it did not go far enough.
"Labour's vote to protect the scandal-plagued and unaccountable SQA is bizarre," he said.
'How can anyone look at the mistakes of recent years and think it can continue? We need real change for students and teachers, which this bill will deliver."
Both Labour and the Tories voted down the bill on Wednesday.
Pam Duncan-Glancy, Scottish Labour's education spokesperson, said: 'We needed a qualifications system fit for the future, one that respects the efforts of learners, supports the judgment of teachers, and earns the trust of employers and universities.
'We needed a curriculum that is broad and inclusive, we needed an inspectorate that can challenge where necessary but also celebrate excellence. But on reform this is a job unfinished.'
Meanwhile, Scottish Tory education spokesperson Miles Briggs said the new body was "little more than a rebrand of the SQA".
'The SQA needed an overhaul, not a cosmetic makeover, and the changes proposed fall way short of what is required to ensure the organisation can operate effectively and is properly accountable," he added.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As Sir Rod Stewart prepares to play Glasto, the veteran rocker says the country is 'fed up' with Labour and the Tories and should 'give Nigel Farage a chance'
As Sir Rod Stewart prepares to play Glasto, the veteran rocker says the country is 'fed up' with Labour and the Tories and should 'give Nigel Farage a chance'

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

As Sir Rod Stewart prepares to play Glasto, the veteran rocker says the country is 'fed up' with Labour and the Tories and should 'give Nigel Farage a chance'

He didn't quite say he'd found a Reason To Believe in Nigel Farage. But when Sir Rod Stewart steps on to Glastonbury 's Pyramid Stage tomorrow afternoon, fans may ponder his plea to 'give Farage a chance'. The 80-year-old singer's teatime set comes the day after he claimed the country was 'fed up' with the Tories and that Labour was trying to ditch Brexit. He accused Prime Minister Keir Starmer of giving Scottish fishing rights 'back to the EU', although the Government insists it has simply renewed an existing deal for European boats. His views represent a second volte-face given that he appeared to support Labour at last year's election – despite previously backing the Conservatives. Asked where Britain's political future now lay, he told The Times: 'It's hard for me because I'm extremely wealthy, and I deserve to be, so a lot of it doesn't really touch me. 'But that doesn't mean I'm out of touch. For instance, I've read about Starmer cutting off the fishing in Scotland and giving it back to the EU. That hasn't made him popular. 'We're fed up with the Tories. We've got to give Farage a chance. He's coming across well. What options have we got? I know some of his family, I know his brother, and I quite like him.' Asked what Mr Farage stands for aside from Brexit, tighter immigration and controversial economic promises he replied: 'Yeah, yeah. But Starmer's all about getting us out of Brexit and I don't know how he's going to do that. 'Still, the country will survive. It could be worse. We could be in the Gaza Strip.' Sir Rod also seemed unconvinced that Sir Keir was going to fully address one of his personal pet hates. Three years ago, the singer donned a hi-vis jacket and rang around friends asking for help filling in potholes outside his Essex house. 'I took me Ferrari out. Nearly lost the f***ing wheel,' he said. 'And before I did in the Ferrari, I saw an ambulance that couldn't move, the wheel stuck right in there. 'So I took me mates out, and we knew what to do because I had builders in the house. 'We filled in a considerable length of the road, actually.' He added that potholes were still present 'all over Britain' in contrast to Europe.

EXCLUSIVE Two profoundly deaf children refused access to vital help by Labour-run local authority because they are privately educated... their outraged mother calls the move 'divisive' and 'discriminatory'
EXCLUSIVE Two profoundly deaf children refused access to vital help by Labour-run local authority because they are privately educated... their outraged mother calls the move 'divisive' and 'discriminatory'

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Two profoundly deaf children refused access to vital help by Labour-run local authority because they are privately educated... their outraged mother calls the move 'divisive' and 'discriminatory'

An outraged mother has revealed how her two profoundly deaf children have been refused access to vital help because they are privately educated. She was astonished to be told by her local council who fund specialist help for deaf children that private schoolchildren had 'opted out' of it because of their choice of school. The Labour-run council even went on to admit it would also refuse services to blind children if they went to private schools. The mum from Edinburgh was later told her daughters could only receive help if she paid £120 an hour for it or if their school funded it. She said both children needed extra support from a teacher of the deaf because otherwise 'general development and academic progress really suffers'. This was provided free to her first daughter, now 8, when she was at her current private school's nursery but, two years later, when her second daughter started the same nursery, the support was denied. At the same time Edinburgh City Council, who the family pay council tax to, also refused to continue the service on their eldest daughter as she moved into primary. Complaining to the council last summer and asking them why their policy had clearly changed, the mother was told by the council Head of Education (Inclusion) Lynne Binnie, in an email seen by The Mail on Sunday, that the council's service was now only provided to children in state schools. Ms Binnie said: 'Essentially, when a parent makes a decision to educate their child in an independent school, they opt out of central education resources such as the Deaf Support Team.' She also admitted the council would not provide services for blind and visually impaired children or children who needed educational psychology services if they went to private schools. The mum told the Mail on Sunday: 'Obviously, a child has a right to receive appropriate interventions irrespective of which school they are at! To be told this is not the case is shocking. 'It felt very discriminatory to direct resources to a specific subset of the overall population of children while withdrawing it entirely for the other group.' The mum says she was later tipped off that even the option to pay for the service had only been opened up because of 'parental pressure'. 'I was told it would cost £120 an hour which is outrageous.' The mum said she expected her children to have ongoing support with school as well as technical support with their cochlear implants, all of which she had been told by the NHS would be provided by the council's deaf service. She added: 'It makes me so angry that that is the situation. I hate the divisive behaviour that is going on where councils can withdraw services that children need. It is just not fair.' Criticising the council's policy as discriminatory, Lorraine Davidson from the Scottish Council of Independent Schools said: 'Support for deaf children should be a universal service and there should be no discrimination based on a child's school.' Craig Hoy MSP called for 'this shocking discrimination to be urgently addressed by the Scottish Government', adding: 'If councils will not provide these essential lifeline services to all children who need them then ministers must step in to ensure every child, regardless of where they are educated, gets the support they need.' But Councillor James Dalgleish, Education, Children and Families Convener said: 'Independent schools have a responsibility to comply with the Equality Act 2010 and the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 which includes provision of specialist support to children and young people enrolled at their school who require it.' The Mail on Sunday's previous revelations that the same council refused free hospital tuition to sick children on cancer wards if they went to private schools sparked political outrage and ongoing calls to scrap the policy. And last week, the Principal of George Watson's College in Edinburgh, one of the UK's largest private schools, said the city council saved millions a year because so many school children were educated privately. Lisa Kerr, formerly Head of Gordonstoun, famously attended by King Charles, said: 'By educating nearly 2500 pupils in 2024, our school saved the public purse a staggering £18.9m with £15.7m of this directly relating to savings made by City of Edinburgh Council from us educating pupils in this area.'

SNP's ‘student politicians' snub submarine welding centre
SNP's ‘student politicians' snub submarine welding centre

Times

time5 hours ago

  • Times

SNP's ‘student politicians' snub submarine welding centre

Sir Keir Starmer's government is expected to step in to fund an ambitious defence facility on the Clyde after the SNP's 'student union' politicians refused grant funding on ideological grounds. A £2.5 million grant from Scottish Enterprise, the national economic development agency, for a submarine welding centre was withheld due to a party ban on 'munitions' funding. Rolls-Royce, which is ready to support the project by providing £11 million worth of specialist equipment, expressed 'dismay' at the news last week. It said the project had been classified as a 'munitions' scheme solely on the basis that it would 'support the construction of naval vessels'. • SNP ban on 'munitions' funds puts Scottish shipbuilding on the line In a letter seen by The Times, Steve Carlier, president of submarines at Rolls-Royce, warned John Swinney, the first minister, that the project 'cannot continue' without the public funding and was at risk of being formally cancelled within days. The funding, which Scottish Enterprise said had not been formally applied for, is believed to have been rejected as the Scottish government's definition of 'weapons or ammunition' would include a 'military submarine', rather than directly relating to any arms. Rolls-Royce has disputed that it is a 'munitions' company. All UK military submarines are powered by nuclear propulsion, regardless of whether or not they have the capacity to carry nuclear weapons, and Rolls-Royce technology is not used for firing warheads. John Healey, the UK defence secretary, told The Sunday Show, on BBC1 that he could 'hardly believe' a Scottish nationalist government would stand in the way of skills development in Scotland. He said: 'We have a long-term partnership with Rolls-Royce who are central to some of the military equipment that keep us all safe. Rolls-Royce want to set up a new welding skills centre, not just to support its munitions business but also to support Scotland's shipyards [to offer] essential skills, new opportunities for young people. 'If the Scottish SNP government won't step up to support skills and the future of jobs in Scotland then we will. It really strikes me as student union politics. This is not a serious government concerned about the opportunities for young people in the future or the skills base for Scotland, or indeed the industry and innovation for the future.' The SNP also has an ambition to rid Scotland of nuclear weapons, which are based at Faslane naval base on the Clyde. Healey added: 'This is a deterrent that for over 70 years has been our guarantor of security in the UK. It is what Putin fears most and the UK is the only country that commits its nuclear deterrent in full to the defence of our Nato allies. Strong deterrence is required and vital to keep people safe in the future.' • Most Scots want to keep UK's nuclear deterrent, poll shows Britain is also engaged in highly sensitive talks to purchase fighter jets capable of firing tactical nuclear weapons, in a major expansion of the deterrent intended to counter the growing threat posed by Russia. The move would represent the biggest development in the UK's deterrent since the Cold War and a recognition that the world has entered a more dangerous nuclear era. Healey would not reveal where the new fighters would be based but the prospect of nuclear-armed jets being deployed from RAF Lossiemouth, or on manoeuvres at the air force's ancillary training and support bases in Scotland, will incense the SNP and its core anti-nuclear supporters. Mairi Gougeon, the Scottish rural affairs secretary, told the BBC that the welding centre was never eligible for funding thanks to the 'long-standing' policy of the SNP government. She said: 'I think the key difference here between ourselves and the UK government is that when we have principles, we stick to them.' Gougeon said Scottish ministers 'completely understand' the 'really unprecedented threats' the UK faced on the world stage and confirmed the SNP supported the increased defence spending announced by the prime minister. She added: 'That doesn't mean that we can't also still maintain the policy positions that we've had for quite a long time and have been long standing within our party, that we don't support the use of public finance for the manufacture of munitions and neither do we support that for nuclear weapons.' A Scottish government spokesman said: 'We are committed to ensuring Scotland is the home of manufacturing innovation, but the Scottish government's long-standing policy position is that it does not use public money to support the manufacture of munitions. 'We recognise the important role of the aerospace, defence, security and space sectors in the Scottish economy and we regularly engage with a range of companies, alongside ADS Scotland as the industry body. 'We are investing up to £2 million to develop engineering skills in the Glasgow city region, designed by the Clyde Maritime Cluster in partnership with Skills Development Scotland. 'The Scottish government has yet to see the detail of the Defence Spending Review, but we remain firmly opposed to the threat, use and basing of nuclear weapons as a deterrent in Scotland.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store