Trump Extends Deadline for TikTok Sale by 90 Days
"I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025)," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, putting off the ban for the third time.
A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Trump's January inauguration.
The Republican, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media, has previously said he is fond of the video-sharing app.
"I have a little warm spot in my heart for TikTok," Trump said in an NBC News interview in early May. "If it needs an extension, I would be willing to give it an extension."
TikTok on Thursday welcomed Trump's decision.
"We are grateful for President Trump's leadership and support in ensuring that TikTok continues to be available for more than 170 million American users," the platform said in a statement.
Digital Cold War?
Motivated by a belief in Washington that TikTok is controlled by the Chinese government, the ban took effect on January 19, one day before Trump's inauguration, with ByteDance having made no attempt to find a suitor.
TikTok "has become a symbol of the US-China tech rivalry; a flashpoint in the new Cold War for digital control," said Shweta Singh, an assistant professor of information systems at Warwick Business School in Britain.
Trump had long supported a ban or divestment, but reversed his position and vowed to defend the platform -- which boasts almost two billion global users -- after coming to believe it helped him win young voters' support in the November election.
The president announced an initial 75-day delay of the ban upon taking office. A second extension pushed the deadline to June 19.
He said in May that a group of purchasers was ready to pay TikTok owner ByteDance "a lot of money" for the video-clip-sharing sensation's US operations.
Trump knows that TikTok is "wildly popular" in the United States, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday, when asked about the latest extension.
"He also wants to protect Americans' data and privacy concerns on this app, and he believes we can do both things at the same time."
The president is "just not motivated to do anything about TikTok," said independent analyst Rob Enderle. "Unless they get on his bad side, TikTok is probably going to be in pretty good shape."
Tariff turmoil
Trump said in April that China would have agreed to a deal on the sale of TikTok if it were not for a dispute over his tariffs on Beijing.
ByteDance has confirmed talks with the US government, saying key matters needed to be resolved and that any deal would be "subject to approval under Chinese law."
Possible solutions reportedly include seeing existing US investors in ByteDance roll over their stakes into a new independent global TikTok company.
Additional US investors, including Oracle and private equity firm Blackstone, would be brought on to reduce ByteDance's share in the new TikTok.
Much of TikTok's US activity is already housed on Oracle servers, and the company's chairman, Larry Ellison, is a longtime Trump ally.
Uncertainty remains, particularly over what would happen to TikTok's valuable algorithm.
"TikTok without its algorithm is like Harry Potter without his wand -- it's simply not as powerful," said Kelsey Chickering, principal analyst at Forrester.
Despite the turmoil, TikTok has been continuing with business as usual.
The platform on Monday introduced a new "Symphony" suite of generative artificial intelligence tools for advertisers to turn words or photos into video snippets for the platform.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
35 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Independent Dan Osborn Launches New US Senate Bid to Challenge Nebraska Republican Pete Ricketts
A former labor union boss who drew national headlines last year as an independent candidate challenging Nebraska Republican US Sen. Deb Fischer is again entering the political arena–this time to challenge Nebraska's junior senator, Republican Pete Ricketts, in 2026. 'I'm running for Senate because Congress shouldn't just be a playground for the rich,' Dan Osborn said in a video released Tuesday to announce his candidacy. He criticized Ricketts, a former two-term Nebraska governor and multimillionaire who is the son of billionaire TD Ameritrade founder Joe Ricketts, as a lawmaker who bought his Senate seat. Ricketts' campaign responded by touting his voting record to secure the border and cut taxes for Nebraska workers and painted Osborn as beholden to Democrats. 'Dan Osborn is bought and paid for by his liberal out-of-state coastal donors,' Ricketts' campaign spokesman Will Coup said in a written statement. That was a reference to the nearly $20 million Osborn received last year from political action committees, including those that tend to support Democratic candidates. As he insisted last year, Osborn said he would serve as an independent if elected and has no plans to caucus with either Democrats or Republicans. He pointed to Ricketts' vote for Republicans' massive tax cut and spending bill last week that contains $4.5 trillion in tax cuts and cuts Medicaid and food stamps by $1.2 trillion. 'Congress spends their time bickering about how much we should cut taxes for billionaires and multinational corporations. We're just an afterthought,' Osborn said. 'My kids and yours deserve an American dream, too.' It's a familiar refrain from Osborn, who centered his campaign last year on representing working families he says are being steamrolled by an ever-growing wealth gap and policies that favor the rich over the middle class. Osborn was known in labor union circles as the Omaha industrial mechanic who successfully led a labor strike at Kellogg's cereal plants in 2021, winning higher wages and other benefits. He was a political newcomer when he challenged Fischer, outraising her by more than $1 million and coming within 6 percent of the two-term senator, who was used to winning by wide margins. Osborn acknowledged that it would be difficult to pose a campaign finance threat to Ricketts, one of the richest members of the US Senate. Federal campaign finance reports show Ricketts' campaign had more than $800,000 cash on hand at the end of March. But Osborn believes his populist message appeals more to Nebraska voters than campaign war chests. 'I think if you throw $100 million of your own money into Nebraska, I don't know that that moves the needle any more than $30 does,' he said. 'I think we're going to win this the old school way: Go out to where people are. Just hold town hall after town hall and talk with the good people in Nebraska.' Ricketts is seeking reelection next year after winning a special election last year to finish out the term of former Sen. Ben Sasse, who resigned in 2022. Ricketts was appointed to the seat by his successor, fellow Republican Gov. Jim Pillen, to fill the vacancy–a move widely panned as having the appearance of backroom dealing, as Ricketts had heavily supported and donated more than $1 million to help elect Pillen.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
US envoy Barrack: Trump fiercely supports Lebanon, but won't wait forever
US envoy Tom Barrack urged Lebanon on Tuesday to act swiftly on reforms and disarm Hezbollah, warning that while US President Donald Trump is committed to Lebanon, his patience is not unlimited. 'I don't think there's ever been a president since Dwight Eisenhower who came out with such ferocity for Lebanon, on his own,' Barrack said. 'He has the courage, he has the dedication, he has the ability. What he doesn't have is patience.' He added: 'So, if Lebanon wants to just keep kicking this can down the road, they can... but we're not going to be here in May having this discussion.' Barrack, who also serves as Washington's ambassador to Turkey and Trump's special envoy for Syria, spoke from Beirut during his second visit in less than a month. On Monday, he praised Lebanon's initial response to a proposed roadmap that calls for sweeping reforms and a clear timeline to disarm Hezbollah and other non-state militias in exchange for international economic and political support. Some reports have suggested Lebanese officials are stalling, hoping to delay implementation until next May's parliamentary elections. 'The Lebanese political culture is deny, detour and deflect. This is the way it has been for 60 years. It has to change,' Barrack said, while expressing his feeling that the president, prime minister and parliament speaker were all being candid in their talks. Barrack reaffirmed the US stance on Hezbollah, calling it a 'foreign terrorist organization,' and stressing: 'This is a Lebanese problem, not a world problem.' He also delivered a direct warning during his interview aired on LBCI: 'If they mess with us anywhere… they're going to have a problem with us. They don't want to have a problem with us.' In response to recent remarks by Hezbollah's secretary-general that the group would never give up its weapons, Barrack said: 'It's a typical Lebanese negotiation. We go to the bazaar, it's the same thing; it's a negotiation until everybody is ready to really make a deal.' Barrack said Washington would assist in Lebanon's border demarcation issues with Syria and Israel but emphasized urgency. 'The timeframe… this is an opportunity. If anybody doesn't see what's happening around us, they're mistaken. We're here… we're just here to usher the speed of that opportunity. But we're not going to influence. We can't.'
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
What will the world look like in November 2026?
Listening to the speeches of US President Donald Trump leaves one with the impression that the man is convinced he can change realities he does not like. Theoretically, this conviction could be well-founded. He is the absolute ruler of the most powerful country in the world. I use the word 'absolute' deliberately; over the past few months, since assuming office on Jan. 20, Trump has managed to seize control of institutions through executive orders, marginalized the opposition and personalized the national interest. He has diminished international relations in ways that remind us of the famous phrase 'L'Etat, c'est moi' ('I am the state'), widely attributed to France's Louis XIV, who ruled from 1643 to 1715. Since he came to shape the course of events, everyone (rivals before allies) has acquiesced to playing the role of mere spectator. Among them are the major competing powers: China and Russia, NATO and other countries that have long convinced themselves they are 'friends' of Washington. So far, everyone has engaged with Trump's beliefs, actions and statements depending on their priorities, but the outcome is always the same. To this day, people rightly have the sense that confronting a US president who enjoys a clear and fresh popular mandate is futile. Thanks to that mandate, he has monopolized all the levers of governance: An absolutely loyal inner circle has been appointed to run all the agencies and departments of the executive branch. His party has a majority in Congress that is bolstered by a populist wave. An ideologically conservative judiciary that shares the administration's views and interests. A tamed media, either by owners or outside pressure. Even digital and 'smart' media alternatives and those who are 'too clever for their own good' have been brought to heel. A billionaire elite that find themselves completely unshackled. Indeed, they have been empowered to do whatever serves their interests and to crush any challenge to those interests. Accordingly, unless something wholly unforeseen occurs, this 'adaptation' to Trump will continue, at least until the midterm elections. His trial-and-error approach to both domestic and international issues will persist. And this brings us back to the question of Trump's ability to change the realities that bug him. Are the states' considerations not shifting? Are there not lessons to be learned from a gamble here, a misadventure there and a disappointment somewhere in between? Are there not unforeseen circumstances that have not been accounted for, such as natural disasters? Moreover, the global reach of the Trumpian experiment might well be a double-edged sword. While Washington's policies may be bolstered by the experiences of certain governments (whether in Europe or Latin America), the emergence of 'Make America Great Again' clones and the posturing of those who pretend to belong to the MAGA camp could aggravate contradictions in countries whose societies are less resilient or flexible than the US — societies that might not accept what the US public has been accepting. Whether Trump succeeds or fails between now and the midterm elections scheduled for Nov. 3, 2026, the implications will be global. Raising the stakes (especially in global hot zones like Ukraine, the Middle East, the Indian subcontinent and Taiwan), the American president is a 'dealmaker' who relies more on instinct and public relations than on long-term strategic planning. That is why absolute loyalty, personal friendships and financial partnerships have largely determined his appointments of aides, advisers and Cabinet members. That is a break with the approach of most of his Republican and Democratic predecessors. This has meant that many critical responsibilities have been handed over to figures who are widely seen as controversial or underqualified. In fact, some of them are now beginning to lose the trust of even the hardcore ideological MAGA base, including media figures and activists like Steve Bannon, Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes. The emergence of MAGA clones could aggravate contradictions in countries whose societies are less flexible than the US. Eyad Abu Shakra As for the Middle East, particularly the question of Palestine, Trump's handling of both Iran and Israel has begun to impose itself on political discourse, at least in the media and online. Strikingly, the white Christian right in America has publicly criticized Benjamin Netanyahu's policies. Chief among their complaints is the accusation that both Netanyahu and the American Jewish right are pushing Washington into war with Iran to serve the Likud and Israel's agenda. While they may differ on the details, several European countries, especially the UK, may be entering a phase of reassessment in their party politics. In Britain, where the current Labour government stands unapologetically with Israel, the political left has begun to shake things up. It was last week announced that a new left-wing party is in the pipeline, led by former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and MP Zarah Sultana, both of whom are vocal supporters of the Palestinian cause. This was followed by early signs of a reconfiguration on the political right, with a new far-right party, Restore Britain, emerging. It is even more right-wing than the hard-line, anti-immigrant Reform UK. For this reason, I believe that between now and November 2026, Washington could, given the lack of real solutions to international crises, lay the groundwork for significant transformations outside the US. I believe that the fodder for these shifts will largely be: religious extremism, racial hatred and socioeconomic hardship.
