Trump Extends Deadline for TikTok Sale by 90 Days
"I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025)," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, putting off the ban for the third time.
A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Trump's January inauguration.
The Republican, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media, has previously said he is fond of the video-sharing app.
"I have a little warm spot in my heart for TikTok," Trump said in an NBC News interview in early May. "If it needs an extension, I would be willing to give it an extension."
TikTok on Thursday welcomed Trump's decision.
"We are grateful for President Trump's leadership and support in ensuring that TikTok continues to be available for more than 170 million American users," the platform said in a statement.
Digital Cold War?
Motivated by a belief in Washington that TikTok is controlled by the Chinese government, the ban took effect on January 19, one day before Trump's inauguration, with ByteDance having made no attempt to find a suitor.
TikTok "has become a symbol of the US-China tech rivalry; a flashpoint in the new Cold War for digital control," said Shweta Singh, an assistant professor of information systems at Warwick Business School in Britain.
Trump had long supported a ban or divestment, but reversed his position and vowed to defend the platform -- which boasts almost two billion global users -- after coming to believe it helped him win young voters' support in the November election.
The president announced an initial 75-day delay of the ban upon taking office. A second extension pushed the deadline to June 19.
He said in May that a group of purchasers was ready to pay TikTok owner ByteDance "a lot of money" for the video-clip-sharing sensation's US operations.
Trump knows that TikTok is "wildly popular" in the United States, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told reporters Thursday, when asked about the latest extension.
"He also wants to protect Americans' data and privacy concerns on this app, and he believes we can do both things at the same time."
The president is "just not motivated to do anything about TikTok," said independent analyst Rob Enderle. "Unless they get on his bad side, TikTok is probably going to be in pretty good shape."
Tariff turmoil
Trump said in April that China would have agreed to a deal on the sale of TikTok if it were not for a dispute over his tariffs on Beijing.
ByteDance has confirmed talks with the US government, saying key matters needed to be resolved and that any deal would be "subject to approval under Chinese law."
Possible solutions reportedly include seeing existing US investors in ByteDance roll over their stakes into a new independent global TikTok company.
Additional US investors, including Oracle and private equity firm Blackstone, would be brought on to reduce ByteDance's share in the new TikTok.
Much of TikTok's US activity is already housed on Oracle servers, and the company's chairman, Larry Ellison, is a longtime Trump ally.
Uncertainty remains, particularly over what would happen to TikTok's valuable algorithm.
"TikTok without its algorithm is like Harry Potter without his wand -- it's simply not as powerful," said Kelsey Chickering, principal analyst at Forrester.
Despite the turmoil, TikTok has been continuing with business as usual.
The platform on Monday introduced a new "Symphony" suite of generative artificial intelligence tools for advertisers to turn words or photos into video snippets for the platform.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
21 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Trial of professors protecting pro-Palestinian students from Trump deportations begins
Groups representing US university professors seeking to protect international students and faculty who engage in pro-Palestinian advocacy from being deported are set to do what no other litigants challenging the Trump administration's hardline immigration agenda have done so far: Take it to trial. A two-week non-jury trial in the professors' case scheduled to kick off on Monday in Boston marks a rarity in the hundreds of lawsuits that have been filed nationally challenging Republican President Donald Trump's efforts to carry out mass deportations, slash spending and reshape the federal government. In many of those cases, judges have issued quick rulings early on in the proceedings without any witnesses being called to testify. But US District Judge William Young in keeping with his long-standing practice instead ordered a trial in the professors' case, saying it was the 'best way to get at truth.' The lawsuit was filed in March after immigration authorities arrested recent Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil, the first target of Trump's effort to deport non-citizen students with pro-Palestinian or anti-Israel views. Since then, the administration has canceled the visas of hundreds of other students and scholars and ordered the arrest of some, including Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University student who was taken into custody by masked and plainclothes agents after co-writing an opinion piece criticizing her school's response to Israel's war in Gaza. In their cases and others, judges have ordered the release of students detained by immigration authorities after they argued the administration retaliated against them for their pro-Palestinian advocacy in violation of the free speech guarantees of the US Constitution's First Amendment. Their arrests form the basis of the case before Young, which was filed by the American Association of University Professors and its chapters at Harvard, Rutgers and New York University, and the Middle East Studies Association. They allege the State Department and Department of Homeland Security adopted a policy of revoking visas for non-citizen students and faculty who engaged in pro-Palestinian advocacy and arresting, detaining and deporting them as well. That policy, they say, was adopted after Trump signed executive orders in January directing the agencies to protect Americans from non-citizens who 'espouse hateful ideology' and to 'vigorously' combat anti-Semitism. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in late March said he had revoked more than 300 visas and warned that the Trump administration was looking every day for 'these lunatics.' The goal, the plaintiffs say, has been to suppress the types of protests that have roiled college campuses after Israel launched its war in Gaza. Trump administration officials have frequently spoken about the efforts to target student protesters for visa revocations. Yet in court, the administration has defended itself by arguing the plaintiffs are challenging a deportation policy that does not exist and cannot point to any statute, rule, regulation or directive codifying it. 'We don't deport people based on ideology,' Homeland Security Department spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem 'has made it clear that anyone who thinks they can come to America and hide behind the First Amendment to advocate for anti-American and anti-Semitic violence and terrorism - think again. You are not welcome here,' McLaughlin said. The trial will determine whether the administration has violated the plaintiffs' First Amendment free speech rights. If Young concludes it has, he will determine a remedy in a second phase of the case. Young has described the lawsuit as 'an important free speech case' and said that as alleged in the plaintiffs' complaint, 'it is hard to imagine a policy more focused on intimidating its targets from practicing protected political speech.' The case is the second Trump-era legal challenge so far that has gone to trial before Young, an 84-year-old appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan. While other Trump-era cases have been resolved through motions and arguments in court, the veteran jurist has long espoused the value of trials and in a recent order lamented the 'virtual abandonment by the federal judiciary of any sense that its fact-finding processes are exceptional. Young last month after another non-jury trial delivered civil rights advocates and Democratic-led states a win by ordering the reinstatement of hundreds of National Institutes of Health research grants that were unlawfully terminated because of their perceived promotion of diversity, equity and inclusion.
Asharq Al-Awsat
21 minutes ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Tesla Shares Fall as Musk's 'America Party' Riles Investors
Tesla shares fell over 3% on Monday, under pressure from investor concerns about the focus of boss Elon Musk after he announced he would form a new US political party, marking a new escalation in his feud with President Donald Trump. Tesla stock fell over 3% in Frankfurt, pointing to another decline once premarket trading gets underway following the three-day weekend for Independence Day, Reuters said. Veteran tech analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush said Musk was Tesla's "biggest asset" and his decision to dive deeper into politics would likely put the company's shares under pressure. "Tesla needs Musk as CEO and its biggest asset and not heading down the political route yet at the same time getting on Trump's bad side," Ives said in a note on Sunday. "It would also not shock us if the Tesla board gets involved at some point given the political nature of this endeavor depending on how far Musk takes it." Trump on Sunday called Musk's plans to form the "America Partyridiculous," launching new barbs at the tech billionaire and saying the Musk ally he once named to lead NASA would have presented a conflict of interest given Musk's business interests in space.
Leaders
an hour ago
- Leaders
BRICS Pushes Back against US Policies, Trump Threatens Bloc with 10% Tariff
The US President, Donald Trump, issued a warning to countries aligned with what he called 'Anti-American policies' of the BRICS group, threatening them with a 10% tariff. His remarks followed a joint declaration for BRICS leaders, condemning the increase of tariffs and other policies, in what seemed as a criticism directed at Trump, although it did not mention him or the US. Implicit Criticism of US Policies Under the theme 'Strengthening Global South Cooperation for a More Inclusive and Sustainable Governance,' Brazil is hosting the 17th BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro from July 6-7, 2025. In their joint declaration, the group's leaders voiced concern over the rise of tariffs and criticized unilateral economic sanctions, in what appeared to be an indirect criticism of the US policies under Trump. 'The proliferation of trade-restrictive actions, whether in the form of indiscriminate rising of tariffs and non-tariff measures, or protectionism under the guise of environmental objectives, threatens to further reduce global trade, disrupt global supply chains, and introduce uncertainty into international economic and trade activities, potentially exacerbating existing economic disparities and affecting prospects for global economic development,' the statement said. 'We voice serious concerns about the rise of unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures which distort trade and are inconsistent with (World Trade Organization) WTO rules,' the BRICS leaders noted, reiterating support for the 'rules-based, open, transparent, fair, inclusive, equitable, non-discriminatory, consensus-based multilateral trading system with the WTO at its core.' The BRICS statement also slammed unilateral economic sanctions, calling them 'unlawful measures, which undermine international law and the principles and purposes of the UN Charter.' A Threat to BRICS Early on Monday, Trump threatened countries that side with the policies of BRICS with an additional 10% tariff. In a post on Truth Social, the US President wrote: 'Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy.' Trump did not clarify what policies he was referring to, but the US President previously threatened to impose a sweeping 100% tariffs on BRICS countries if they acted against the US dollar. After winning the presidential election, Trump warned in November 2024 against creating a BRICS currency that could undermine the dominance of the US dollar. 'We require a commitment from these Countries that they will neither create a new BRICS Currency, nor back any other Currency to replace the mighty US Dollar or, they will face 100% Tariffs, and should expect to say goodbye to selling into the wonderful US Economy,' he wrote on Truth Social at the time. Trump's Tariffs On April 2, Trump sparked a trade war by announcing stiff tariffs on all imports to the US. Trump's move sparked fear across the world of an economic recession and higher inflation. As a result, Trump later suspended most of the tariffs for 90 days, set to expire on July 9. The US President ruled out extending the pause beyond that date, saying that that his administration would notify countries of trade penalties unless they reach an agreement with the US. Early on Monday, Trump confirmed that dozens of countries would start receiving letters from Monday, warning them that they would face higher tariffs on August 1, 2025. 'I am pleased to announce that the UNITED STATES TARIFF Letters, and/or Deals, with various Countries from around the World, will be delivered starting 12:00 P.M. (Eastern), Monday, July 7th. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' he posted on Truth Social. BRICS Summit The BRICS group originally comprised Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa in a united bloc that promotes a multipolar economic world order and supports the growth and development of the Global South. The group has expanded to include Iran, Egypt, the UAE, Ethiopia and Indonesia. The BRICS also has 10 strategic partner countries, including Belarus, Cuba, Vietnam, Nigeria and Thailand. Saudi Arabia has also received an invitation to the bloc, but has yet to confirm its membership. The BRICS summit in Brazil saw the absence of China's President, Xi Jinping, and the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, who delivered his speech through videoconference. Moreover, the Iranian President, Masoud Pezeshkian, and the Egyptian President, Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi, were absent. Concerns over Iran and Gaza The summit's joint declaration harshly criticized the recent attacks against Iran, voicing deep concern over the targeting of civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities in Iran. 'We condemn the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025, which constitute a violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations, and express grave concern over the subsequent escalation of the security situation in the Middle East,' the statement said. The BRICS leaders also reiterated their grave concern over the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, amid the ongoing Israeli strikes on Gaza and the blockade of humanitarian aid. 'We also condemn attempts to politicize or militarize humanitarian assistance,' they said. 'We exhort the parties to engage in good faith in further negotiations to achieve an immediate, permanent and unconditional ceasefire, the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip and all other parts of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the release of all hostages and detainees held in violation of international law, and sustained and unhindered access and delivery of humanitarian aid,' the statement added. Short link : Post Views: 43
