&w=3840&q=100)
Can Trump really prosecute Obama over the 2016 Russia probe?
Former US President Barack Obama and US President-elect Donald Trump speak ahead of the state funeral services for former President Jimmy Carter at the National Cathedral on January 9, 2025 in Washington, DC, US. File Image/Pool via Reuters
Is there a possibility of legal action against former United States President Barack Obama and senior officials from his administration by President Donald Trump?
At the centre of this growing controversy is Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic representative who now leads the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).
Gabbard has made extraordinary allegations involving the 2016 US election, characterising the actions of Obama-era intelligence officials as part of a coordinated attempt to undermine the legitimacy of Trump's first election win.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Gabbard's statements have gained traction within pro-Trump circles and prompted direct endorsement from the president himself.
Gabbard accuses Obama of orchestrating a 'years-long coup'
Gabbard has publicly accused Barack Obama and several of his top national security advisers of participating in what she described as a deliberate and illegal effort to discredit Trump after his electoral win in November 2016.
According to her, the effort relied on 'manufactured intelligence' and misrepresented analysis, and was aimed at supporting the idea that Russian interference had handed Trump the presidency.
Donald Trump, left, looks on as Tulsi Gabbard speaks at the National Guard Association of the United States' 146th General Conference, August 26, 2024, in Detroit, US. File Image/AP
In Gabbard's words: 'The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government. Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people.'
'No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again. The American people's faith and trust in our democratic republic and therefore the future of our nation depends on it.'
She claimed that the Obama administration's post-election assessment of Russian interference contradicted the intelligence community's consensus in the months before the election, which had allegedly concluded that Russia was unlikely to interfere or influence the outcome.
Her office has made available a cache of documents including a partially redacted Obama-era intelligence assessment on cyber threats, and internal memos from senior officials such as then-DNI James Clapper.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Among those named by Gabbard were Clapper, former CIA Director John Brennan, former US Secretary of State John Kerry, former National Security Adviser Susan Rice, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and Obama himself.
Gabbard's team also published commentary alongside these documents, alleging that leaks following a December 9, 2016, meeting of Obama's senior national security team were part of a broader disinformation campaign.
The material refers to a memo titled The Russia Hoax, which claimed: 'Deep State officials in the IC [intelligence community] begin leaking blatantly false intelligence to the Washington Post … claiming that Russia used 'cyber means' to influence 'the outcome of the election.''
'Later that evening, another leak to the Washington Post falsely alleges that the CIA 'concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened' in the election to help President Trump.'
The same document states that on January 6, 2017, the Obama administration publicly released a declassified intelligence assessment that referenced 'further information' suggesting Russian President Vladimir Putin directed efforts to aid Trump's campaign.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
According to Gabbard, the additional information cited in the assessment turned out to include the Steele dossier, a compilation of unverified claims, some of which were later discredited.
How Trump responded
Trump has not only endorsed Gabbard's accusations but has taken visible steps to promote the message.
Writing on his Truth Social platform, Trump praised a Fox News appearance by Harrison Fields, a Special Assistant in his administration, stating: 'Great job by young and talented Harrison Fields on Fox News. The Panel was fantastic on prosecuting Obama and the 'thugs' who have just been unequivocally exposed on highest level Election Fraud.'
'Congratulations to Tulsi Gabbard. Keep it coming!!!'
In a separate post on X, Gabbard wrote: 'For months preceding the 2016 election, the Intelligence Community shared a consensus view: Russia lacked the intent and capability to hack US elections. But weeks after President Trump's historic 2016 victory defeating Hillary Clinton, everything changed.'
🧵 Americans will finally learn the truth about how in 2016, intelligence was politicized and weaponized by the most powerful people in the Obama Administration to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President @realDonaldTrump, subverting the… pic.twitter.com/UQKKZ5c4Op — DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) July 18, 2025
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Trump also posted a 45-second AI-generated video depicting Obama being arrested in the Oval Office. The video, which originally circulated on TikTok, was uploaded without commentary to Trump's Truth Social account.
It began with real footage of Obama stating, 'especially the President is above the law,' followed by various prominent Democrats, including Joe Biden, repeating the phrase 'no one is above the law.'
Donald J. Trump Truth Social 07.20.25 06:47 PM EST pic.twitter.com/Xf5LYzkZiI — Fan Donald J. Trump Posts From Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) July 20, 2025
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The scene then shifts to a fabricated depiction of Trump and Obama in the White House, where FBI agents enter and arrest Obama, who later appears in a jail cell wearing an orange jumpsuit.
The soundtrack: 'YMCA' by the Village People, a staple at Trump rallies.
Where the facts stand
Despite the volume of material released by Gabbard and the forcefulness of her claims, multiple previous investigations — both bipartisan and nonpartisan — have offered a more nuanced interpretation of Russia's actions in 2016 and the Obama administration's response.
Democratic lawmakers have called Gabbard's report inaccurate and misleading. Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, labelled the allegations 'baseless.'
Several reviews, including those by the US intelligence community and the Senate Intelligence Committee, have concluded that while Russian actors attempted to access voter registration data in states like Illinois and Arizona, there was no evidence that vote tallies were altered.
Intelligence reports also consistently stated that Russia's primary effort was focused on influence operations — shaping American public opinion through disinformation, fake social media accounts, and leaked Democratic emails, rather than changing the actual results.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A Republican-led Senate report also endorsed the assessment that Moscow's efforts were aimed at damaging Hillary Clinton and benefiting Donald Trump.
Among the Republicans on that committee was Florida Senator Marco Rubio, who now serves as US Secretary of State in the Trump administration.
A recent CIA review acknowledged concerns about how quickly the Obama-era assessment had been compiled, reported The New York Times.
In its wake, the agency referred John Brennan to the FBI for investigation regarding how he managed the preparation of the intelligence conclusions. However, no charges have been brought.
One email cited in Gabbard's documentation indicated that Obama requested a comprehensive assessment of Russian interference methods before leaving office, fearing that an incoming Trump administration might suppress or ignore the intelligence findings.
US Senator Mark Warner of Virginia responded to the Gabbard report by stating: 'This is one more example of the director of national intelligence trying to cook the books. We're talking about apples and oranges. The Russians were not successful at manipulating our election infrastructure, nor did we say they were.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Warner also pointed out that recent intelligence assessments under Gabbard's leadership still acknowledge that Russia continues to engage in influence operations targeting the United States.
A March intelligence report concluded that: 'Moscow probably believes information operations efforts to influence U.S. elections are advantageous,' and that these activities are part of a long-term strategy to undermine confidence in American democracy.
The big question: Can Trump legally prosecute Obama?
The question of whether Trump can direct federal prosecutors to pursue criminal cases against Obama or his former officials rests not on legal prohibition, but on political precedent.
Since US President Richard Nixon resigned amid the Watergate scandal in 1974, successive administrations have generally refrained from overtly influencing prosecutorial decisions at the Department of Justice (DOJ).
However, these boundaries are guided more by custom than law.
Within the US system, both the Attorney General and FBI Director are appointed by the President and serve within the executive branch.
Trump, in his first term, dismissed FBI Director James Comey in 2017 and again replaced Christopher Wray in his second term, putting Kash Patel at the head of the FBI.
Legal experts note that if Trump installs loyalists in key roles — including US attorneys and assistant attorneys general — he could wield substantial influence over federal investigations and prosecutions.
Critics warn that this may enable Trump to direct legal action against political rivals, including by reopening unsubstantiated allegations or launching new inquiries into figures like Obama, Biden, or former officials involved in the Russia investigation.
While the law does not explicitly bar a sitting president from seeking investigations into a predecessor, doing so would test long-standing institutional norms designed to keep politics separate from law enforcement.
Also Watch:
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- Indian Express
Who is Gita Gopinath, Indian-origin economist who quit top IMF post to rejoin Harvard?
Indian-American economist Gita Gopinath, who is serving as the first deputy managing director at the International Monetary Fund (IMF), announced that she is stepping down from her position and returning to her academic career. In a social media post, Gopinath said that she is rejoining Harvard University as an economics professor. 'After nearly 7 amazing years at the IMF, I have decided to return to my academic roots,' Gopinath, the first female chief economist in IMF history, said in a post on X. The Indian-origin economist will step down from her position at IMF in August, and rejoin the Harvard Economics Department on September 1 as the inaugural Gregory and Ania Coffey Professor of Economics. Gita Gopinath is an Indian-American economist, currently serving as the the first deputy managing director at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) since January 21, 2022. Gopinath was born in Kolkata in 1971. She holds an economics degree from the Delhi School of Economics and also from Delhi University. She then moved to the United States to pursue her MA degree from the University of Washington. She later earned her PhD from Princeton University. Gopinath joined the IMF in January 2019 as chief economist and was promoted to the post of first deputy managing director in January 2022. Prior to joining the IMF, Gopinath was the John Zwaanstra Professor of International Studies and of Economics at Harvard University's economics department from 2005 to 2022. Before joining Harvard, she was an assistant professor of economics at the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business from 2001 to 2005. IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva described Gopinath as an 'outstanding colleague—an exceptional intellectual leader, dedicated to the mission and members of the Fund, and a fabulous manager, always showing genuine care for the professional standing and wellbeing of our staff.' Gopinath also co-authored the 'Pandemic Plan' on how to end the COVID-19 crisis, a contribution which has widely been hailed as filling an important global gap by setting targets to vaccinate the world at feasible cost, Georgieva said. (With inputs from PTI)
Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- Indian Express
‘Joe Biden was taking sleep medication Ambien before debate with Trump,' says son Hunter Biden
Former US President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden has said that his father's disastrous debate performance against President Donald Trump in June last year was a result of him taking sleep medication Ambien due to his travel schedule. Joe Biden's debate led to the Democratic leader stepping aside as presidential candidate after rumblings within his own party. During a three-hour interview with YouTube creator Andrew Callaghan which aired on Monday, Hunter raised the issue of ex-President Biden taking sleep medication Ambien which hasn't been previously reported. 'I'll tell you what, I know exactly what happened in that debate,' Hunter said. 'He (Joe Biden) flew around the world, basically the mileage he could have flown around the world three times. He's 81 years old. He's tired as shit,' Hunter said. The former president's son further added 'They give him Ambien to be able to sleep. He gets up on the stage and he looks like he's a deer in the headlights.' Hunter Biden suggests his father was drugged up before the infamous CNN debate: 'He flew around the world. He's 81 years old. He's tired. They give him Ambien to be able to sleep and he gets up on the stage and looks like a deer in the headlights.' — TheBlaze (@theblaze) July 21, 2025 The medication Joe Biden reportedly took was Ambien which is a medicine used for short-term treatment of sleeping problems. The former president's office has not responded to the revelations made by Hunter Biden. Joe Biden prepared for the debate at Camp David with his aides for several days last year, and prior to being at Camp David, the Democrat leader took two European trips and was on the US West Coast for the fund raiser. Biden's live debate performance against Trump was termed as sluggish, with a quiet, raspy voice and meandering answers which took the viewers by surprise and a backlash started within the Democratic Party for Biden to step aside from the presidential race. Hunter Biden also criticised prominent Hollywood donor to Democrats, George Clooney, who in an op-ed in the New York Times last year had urged Joe Biden to withdraw his nomination from the presidential run due to concern over his age and fitness. 'What do you have to do with anything?' said Hunter on Clooney.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a few seconds ago
- Business Standard
Women's labour participation in India far from matching G20 peers: Poll
Indian women's participation in the workforce will take at least two decades to catch up with G20 peers, according to a Reuters poll of economists and policy experts, many of whom said they believed poorly-paid self-employment is inflating an already-low rate. Overall job creation is falling short of the needs of India's mostly young, rapidly-growing working-age population. Women, who make up half of that pool, are largely absent from the workforce and most women with jobs are not formally employed on payrolls. The official female labour force participation rate (FLFPR) rose to 31.7% from 27.8% in the latest 2023-24 Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), but is well short of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 2047 development goal to raise it to 70%, putting it more in line with advanced economies. India is at the bottom of the G20 table, behind Saudi Arabia and Turkey, and lower than even neighbouring Bangladesh and Bhutan, according to World Bank data. The G20 average is around 50%. A majority, 80%, of top independent economists and policy experts surveyed over the past month, 32 of 40, said it would take at least 20 to 30 years for India to reach a rate comparable to other G20 economies, including 18 who said it would take more than three decades. The remaining eight said it would take 10-20 years. "The kind of work women are involved in is not really what we call good jobs or good quality work. It's really just bottom of the ladder, survivalist kind. It's good they're participating but it's not the kind of transformational participation you might imagine," said Ashwini Deshpande, a professor and head of the department of economics at Ashoka University. "The job crisis is much more acute than in countries with similar levels of when jobs are scarce, men get the first priority everywhere," added Deshpande. Only 15.9% of working women are in regular wage or salaried jobs, the kind that come with contracts, steady pay or benefits. While officials have noted the recent rise in female labour force participation as a sign of progress, the latest PLFS survey showed 73.5% of rural working women and over 40% with jobs in urban areas are self-employed. Asked what they make of the official data over 70% of economists surveyed, 32 of 43, said it masked the real picture. " should see household earnings also go up when women are participating and that has not happened, which is a very big marker that this is potentially not the best kind of employment. It's potentially distress-driven," said Rosa Abraham, assistant professor at Azim Premji University. Asked if the recent rise in FLFPR signals real progress, she said: "That level of shift is still nowhere near what you would expect at this level of economic development that we are in and there's still a long way to go." Over 70% of experts said the Indian government's overall unemployment data was inaccurate and masked the severity of joblessness and underemployment. Even when jobs are available, safety concerns and unpaid care work prevent many women from applying. They spend nearly five hours daily on household duties, over three times as much as men, according to the 2025 Time Use Survey. "For women the productive and reproductive age coincide. Hence childcare and lack of suitable facilities serve as a constraint," said Sangeeta Shroff, former professor at the Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics. "To address such issues, it will require aggressive policy intervention which will require considerable time and resources." Asked what the government should prioritise, respondents highlighted expanding childcare, safer workplaces and stronger anti-discrimination measures. Bina Agarwal, professor of development economics and environment at the University of Manchester, said young women need safe hostels in cities and small towns, safe transport to work and enforcement of workplace sexual harassment laws. "These are among many ideas feminist economists in India have been advocating for years. Is anyone listening?" she asked. (Reporting by Devayani Sathyan and Veronica Khongwir; Polling by Pranoy Krishna, Rahul Trivedi and Susobhan Sarkar; Editing by Hari Kishan, Ross Finley, Alexandra Hudson) (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
