NHS keeps public away as patients seen as ‘inconvenience', new boss says
In his first interview since his appointment as chief executive of NHSE, Sir Jim Mackey told the newspaper the health service has retained too many 'fossilised' ways of working, some of which have barely moved on since its creation in 1948.
His statement comes as he prepares to implement a 10-year health plan to be published by the Government next week.
Sir Jim, who was knighted in 2019 for services to healthcare, told The Telegraph: 'We've made it really hard, and we've probably all been on the end of it.
'You've got a relative in hospital, so you're ringing a number on a ward that no-one ever answers.
'The ward clerk only works nine to five or they're busy doing other stuff; the GP practice scramble every morning.
'It feels like we've built mechanisms to keep the public away because it's an inconvenience.'
Sir Jim warned the disconnect between NHS services and the public could result in the loss of the public health service altogether.
'The big worry is, if we don't grab that, and we don't deal with it with pace, we'll lose the population,' he told the Telegraph.
'If we lose the population, we've lost the NHS.
'For me, it's straightforward. The two things are completely dependent on each other.'
The Government's 10-year health plan will aim at improving NHS services through relocating patient care from hospitals to community-based health centres, a greater use of digital tools, and preventive care.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting said on Wednesday the plan will also aim to 'address one of the starkest health inequalities', which he claims is the unequal access to information and choice when it comes to healthcare.
Sir Jim told the Telegraph: 'We've got to somehow re-orientate it; think about how do we find people who need us, how do we stop thinking 'it's going to be a pain in the arse if you turn up because I'm quite busy' and instead think about how do we find out what you need and get it sorted.'
Sir Jim added his concerns are driven by his own traumatic experience of NHS services, when his father died in a hospital locally known for its poor standards of care.
He told the paper: 'My dad died in a hospital where the local folklore was terrible about the hospital, but the hospital was deaf to it and didn't know what was actually being said.
'I wasn't long into the NHS, it was a long time ago now, and I felt really powerless.
'I found out too late that the clinical community knew the guy who looked after him wasn't as good as I would have wanted him to be.
'I'll carry that for the rest of my life.'
In an effort to take pressure off hospitals and cut down waiting lists, the Government previously announced that 85 new mental health emergency departments will be built across England.
The 85 units will be funded by £120 million secured in the Spending Review, the Department of Health and Social Care said.
Open 24 hours a day, seven days a week, they will be staffed by specialist nurses and doctors.
Patients who need help will be able to walk in, or will be able to be referred by their GP.
Under the new plans, mental health patients will also be able to self-refer for talking therapies using the NHS App
The new measures could also pave the way for AI-driven virtual support, according to the Department of Health and Social Care.
Mr Streeting also unveiled plans to divert more than £2 billion in NHS spending to working class communities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
9 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Elderly forced out of Gwynedd communities amid care stand-off
Kevin Edwards, managing director at the Meddyg Care Group, claimed a health board is refusing to cover the 'true cost' of services provided at his care homes in Porthmadog and Criccieth, meaning people are going to homes further afield. However, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (BCUHB) has insisted that it is 'committed' to providing care for people across North Wales 'as close to home as is clinically safe'. It also argued that it provides many care packages 'well beyond' its core funding rates based on clinical need. Mr Edwards claimed: 'Because we won't accept their base cost, they are not recommending our homes to Gwynedd families.' He claimed this meant some were ending up in homes far from their communities, and the support of their friends and relatives. The health board has responded by saying it is not legally allowed to recommend which homes people choose. He pointed to the difference between what care homes in rural Gwynedd needed, and the fee the health board was willing to pay, was between £40 and £80 per week per resident. 'NHS care should be free to people who need it in their local area, but people are being forced out of the area because homes in rural Gwynedd will not accept the basic fee BCUHB is prepared to pay,' he said. He added that his home provided care through the medium of Welsh but added if people go further afield that may not be the case. 'BCUHB do the costings on their fee, in my view, on the back of a fag packet,' he said and urged the board to adopt a toolkit used to set care funding fees, called CareCubed. 'How can our costs in a rural setting be the same as a home in an urban setting, somewhere in the middle of Rhyl, Llandudno, or Wrexham for instance?' He added. Mario Kreft MBE, chair of social care champions Care Forum Wales, said: 'One of the most important things for families is the location of the home where their loved ones will be living. 'The vast majority of people choose a care home in a community where they want to be in, it's so important. 'This issue highlights what we are facing in North Wales, and that's a health board which has been promising methodology for more than a decade. 'They should be meeting government guidance on this, it's outrageous that they are not.' He added it caused 'further anxiety' to future residents and families, delaying hospital discharges, and saw people taken to parts of the country they don't want to be in, and highlighted a north-south divide over fees. Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board's Chief Operating Officer Tehmeena Ajmal said: 'We are committed to providing care for people across North Wales as close to home as is clinically safe. 'We understand that these are challenging times for everyone, and we must ensure that our resources are used fairly and appropriately for all. 'For people who are eligible for NHS Continuing Healthcare (CHC), each person receives an individual assessment. Many people are supported with care packages that go well beyond our published core funding rate, based on their clinical needs. 'It's important to note that we are not legally allowed to recommend which care home families should choose. We must remain fair and cannot show preference for one independent provider over another. 'We continue to admit patients into all nursing care homes in Gwynedd. Currently, there are only very small numbers of people in hospitals waiting for placements in EMI (Elderly Mentally Infirm) nursing care homes. 'We are fully committed to making sure people can receive care in the Welsh language, and—where possible—stay close to their communities, families, and friends. 'These are all important factors when we agree on care placements and funding. 'As a region, we have reviewed a number of fee-setting tools, including CareCubed, which several local authorities have started using. 'We are working closely with them to review and assess this approach.'
Sky News
16 minutes ago
- Sky News
Plans unveiled for NHS funding to be linked to patient feedback
NHS funding could be linked to patient feedback under new plans, with poorly performing services that "don't listen" penalised with less money. As part of the "10 Year Health Plan" to be unveiled next week, a new scheme will be trialled that will see patients asked to rate the service they received - and if they feel it should get a funding boost or not. It will be introduced first for services that have a track record of very poor performance and where there is evidence of patients "not being listened to", the government said. This will create a "powerful incentive for services to listen to feedback and improve patients' experience", it added. Sky News understands that it will not mean bonuses or pay increases for the best performing staff. NHS payment mechanisms will also be reformed to reward services that keep patients out of hospital as part of a new 'Year of Care Payments' initiative and the government's wider plan for change. 2:04 Speaking to The Times, chief executive of the NHS Confederation Matthew Taylor expressed concerns about the trial. He told the newspaper: "Patient experience is determined by far more than their individual interaction with the clinician and so, unless this is very carefully designed and evaluated, there is a risk that providers could be penalised for more systemic issues, such as constraints around staffing or estates, that are beyond their immediate control to fix." He said that NHS leaders would be keen to "understand more about the proposal", because elements were "concerning". Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: "We will reward great patient care, so patient experience and clinical excellence are met with extra cash. These reforms are key to keeping people healthy and out of hospital, and to making the NHS sustainable for the long-term as part of the Plan for Change." In the raft of announcements in the 10 Year Health Plan, the government has said 201 bodies responsible for overseeing and running parts of the NHS in England will be scrapped. These include Healthwatch England, set up in 2012 to speak out on behalf of NHS and social care patients, the National Guardian's Office, created in 2015 to support NHS whistleblowers, and the Health Services Safety Investigations Body (HSSIB). Elsewhere, the new head of NHS England Sir Jim Mackey said key parts of the NHS appear "built to keep the public away because it's an inconvenience". "We've made it really hard, and we've probably all been on the end of it," he told the Daily Telegraph.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Cervical cancer has affected generations of my family - NHS changes mean women like me could be missed out'
A woman whose grandmother and mother both had cervical cancer has called for the reversal of recent changes lengthening the intervals between life-saving screenings. Gemma Barley, 34, had to undergo a biopsy in January 2022 after her regular three-year check-up found abnormal cells in her cervix - despite her previous screening being completely clear. She fears that if she had been subject to new NHS England rules - which have lengthened the time between check-ups to five years - the outcome could have been worse. 'After a regular smear check-up in 2022 I got a letter to say we've found something abnormal in your smear and told I needed a biopsy,' the mother-of-one said. 'It was like my full life had flashed before my eyes. I thought my son was going to be left without a mum. It was horrifying.' Cervical cancer has affected Ms Barley's family for generations. She lost her grandmother to the disease aged 54, just three months after being diagnosed in 2004. Her mother was also diagnosed with cervical cancer in 2018 and had to undergo a hysterectomy to mitigate the risks of the disease. Ms Barley waited four weeks for her results - which said the cells were not cancerous. But the psychology graduate said the experience proves how quickly things can change, and fears recent changes to screenings for cervical cancer could 'put women's lives at risk'. Women aged 25 to 49 who test negative for human papillomavirus (HPV) will now be invited to cervical screening every five years instead of every three, under new NHS guidelines. According to Cancer UK, nearly all cases of cervical cancer are caused by HPV. Most of the time HPV is cleared from the body by itself, but some types can cause cancer if they stay in the body for a long time so require extra monitoring. After seeing the planned changes, Ms Barley started a petition to have them reversed and said: 'I was really angry when I saw the changes. Because of my first-hand experience, it petrified me. 'My first smear was fine, and I'd seen no significant changes in my life since then. But then my second smear found abnormalities. That's how quickly that could change - and yet they're happy to extend it by a further two years.' The change, set to take effect next month in England, follows recommendations from the UK National Screening Committee. According to analysis from King's College London, extending the screening interval to five years for HPV-negative women is just as safe as the current three-year interval, with a similar rate of cancer detection. An NHS England spokesperson said: 'We recognise that changes to cervical screening can seem worrying but want to reassure everyone that this new approach is based on robust scientific evidence and an expert recommendation from the UK National Screening Committee. 'The NHS cervical screening programme tests for HPV and uses a better and more accurate test than before. This means if you test negative for HPV, you don't need to be screened as often as your risk of developing cervical cancer is very low. If you test positive for HPV, we'll monitor you more closely with additional tests and follow-up appointments. 'This personalised approach ensures everyone receives the right level of screening based on their individual risk factors, providing better protection while reducing unnecessary procedures.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'These changes are based on robust scientific evidence and an expert recommendation from the UK National Screening Committee. 'The NHS cervical screening programme tests for HPV which is a more accurate test than the old cytology (smear) test, therefore intervals for those not at high risk can be safely extended from three to five years. 'If you test positive for HPV, you can be assured you will be monitored closely with additional tests and follow-up appointments.'
