
Pheu Thai says no political impasse
Responding to questions about whether the political situation may pave the way for a partnership between the People's Party (PP) and the Bhumjaithai (BJT) Party, Mr Chousak said such a scenario would only be possible if Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra is removed from office.
He said that a petition against Ms Paetongtarn, who is currently suspended from performing duties as the PM, is still under review by the Constitutional Court and no ruling has been issued.
The court suspended Ms Paetongtarn as it reviewed a leaked audio clip of her private conversation with Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen about the Thai-Cambodia border row. Her remarks in the clip sparked ethical questions.
Mr Chousak expressed confidence Ms Paetongtarn would be able to clarify the matter in court while noting that the political climate may be obscuring the facts and legal issues related to the case.
He also dismissed as unlikely the rumours of a political deal between the PP and BJT to back BJT leader Anutin Charnvirakul as a "temporary" prime minister.
"It sounds very strange. Is it possible to propose someone as PM without joining the government? I don't think this will actually happen."
He said Pheu Thai had not considered the possibility of Ms Paetongtarn being removed from office, adding she has the full support of the party as she goes through the court process.
Nan Boonthida Somchai, spokeswoman for BJT, rejected the speculation about Mr Anutin becoming PM, saying the party is now in the opposition and is focused on its role in scrutinising the government's performance and making laws.
The party left the Pheu Thai-led government last month following the leak of the phone conversation between Ms Paetongtarn and Hun Sen.
Ms Nan insisted Mr Anutin has never expressed any interest in taking over the premiership as suggested by some Pheu Thai members and added the political situation has not reached a dead end.
"BJT has never proposed any plan to form a new government. However, the party remains open to cooperating with all political parties to ensure that parliament continues to serve as the key mechanism for resolving political issues."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Bangkok Post
an hour ago
- Bangkok Post
Thailand to withdraw casino bill
The government will withdraw a controversial bill to legalise casinos from parliament following public opposition and a recent political turmoil. A motion to withdraw the so-called 'entertainment complex' bill from the current session of parliament will be raised on Wednesday, a government whip said on Monday. The government had earlier indicated that it would delay the introduction of the bill saying it needed more time to communicate with the public and address their concerns about gambling and money laundering. The move to pull the bill came after the exit of the Bhumjaithai Party, which had opposed the bill, and the suspension of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra for alleged ethical misconduct. Ms Paetongtarn also faces other legal challenges after a leaked phone conversation with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen, in which she was critical of the Thai army's role in an ongoing border standoff with the neighbouring country. Without a clear majority, the government may face challenges in passing controversial or essential bills that have been lined up in the coming months. The move to withdraw the bill is likely to frustrate foreign investors interested in developing casinos in Thailand as part of big entertainment complexes.

Bangkok Post
an hour ago
- Bangkok Post
Gambling push put on hold
The chief government whip has confirmed the highly controversial Entertainment Complex Bill will be withdrawn from parliament tomorrow, so an amnesty bill can proceed. Wisut Chainarun, a Pheu Thai Party MP and chief government whip, said yesterday that the government will officially remove the bill from parliamentary consideration tomorrow. "The bill will definitely be withdrawn on July 9. There is no need for anyone to protest or rally over this matter. Please go home and relax. Discussions have already been held within the party, and I reiterate that the withdrawal is not being made out of fear," Mr Wisut said. He explained that the reason for the withdrawal stems from the need for better public understanding and to allow time for the current wave of intense debate on the issue to subside. "We previously urged everyone to ensure the public fully understood the bill. "Now that the discussion has reached its peak, we believe it is appropriate to withdraw the bill for the time being. There is no loss of face [on Pheu Thai's part]. If anyone still has concerns, the government remains open to listening," he said. When asked whether the bill might be reintroduced in the future, Mr Wisut said that it was too early to say. He cited the example of the Peaceful Society Promotion Bill concerning an amnesty, which faced significant criticism when it was proposed several years ago. "Back then, the amnesty bill was heavily attacked, yet today no one seems to object," he noted. Mr Wisut confirmed that once the Entertainment Complex Bill is officially pulled, four political amnesty bills, including those proposed by coalition parties, will go up for debate instead on July 9, with Pheu Thai hoping the final version of the bill will foster national reconciliation. The bills will definitely be brought forward for parliamentary deliberation, he added. The Pheu Thai Party has drafted its own amnesty bill so political offenders can be pardoned, although it reiterated earlier that the legislation will not include amnesty for those found guilty under Section 112 of the Criminal Code, also known as the lese majeste law. As to the charter amendment plan, Mr Wisut explained that Pheu Thai would wait to read it before deciding whether to go full steam ahead. "If the proposal involves Chapters 1 or 2, we will not support it. We seek to amend the constitution, but we will not touch Chapters 1 and 2," he said. Chapter 1 contains sections that define Thailand as a single, indivisible kingdom with a democratic regime and establish the King as the head of state. Chapter 2, meanwhile, outlines royal prerogatives.

Bangkok Post
2 hours ago
- Bangkok Post
DPM Phumtham says he can dissolve House
Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai dismissed the Council of State's (CoS) opinion about the acting prime minister's power to dissolve the House of Representatives as just one of many legal views. His remarks on Monday followed media reports that the CoS told the July 3 special cabinet meeting that an acting prime minister had no legal authority to dissolve the House. Mr Phumtham, who is currently serving as the acting prime minister, said the CoS' opinion, given by its secretary-general, does not constitute a formal stance and is being treated as one of several legal views being considered after Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra was suspended from duty, pending a court ruling. Ms Paetongtarn is accused of ethical misconduct over the leaked recording of her conversation with Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen about the ongoing border dispute. Questions have now arisen as to whether Mr Phumtham has the power to dissolve the House should Ms Paetongtarn eventually be removed from office by the Constitutional Court. According to Mr Phumtham, his power to dissolve the House is not the issue to focus on at this stage. "What we should focus on is how to work and deliver to fully secure public confidence. We should avoid [creating] uncertainty and speculation," he said. PM's Office Minister Chousak Sirinil said at this week's cabinet meeting, there was discussion on the acting prime minister's scope, but nothing more. Addressing a call by a group of northeastern MPs that cabinet ministers who are list-MPs should give up their MP status to allow those further down the list to move up and take their places, Mr Phumtham said the proposal was worth consideration. The proposal is intended to prevent a lack of quorum that has scuppered a number of House meetings recently, especially after the Bhumjaithai Party exited the coalition and left the government with a slim majority. He added that cabinet ministers whose role in the House is limited should step back to focus fully on ministerial work. "The proposal shouldn't create a problem and should be considered," he said.