
The Singularity Is Coming. Here's How To Make It Work For You.
The term 'Singularity' was coined by computer scientist and science fiction writer Vernor Vinge in 1993 to describe a point at which technological growth accelerates uncontrollably, leading to a world that is incomprehensible to the human mind.
Some of the world's most prominent technologists believe that the Singularity will be a triumph for humanity. Others, like myself, are not so sure.
Optimists like Marc Andreessen, co-creator of the Mosaic browser, insist that artificial intelligence will solve our most pressing problems—curing disease, eliminating scarcity, even boosting creativity to superhuman levels. Others, including OpenAI's Sam Altman, argue that the arrival of artificial general intelligence (AGI) will spread abundance, uplift humanity, and move us closer to utopia.
To techno-optimists, artificial general intelligence (AGI) is simply the next transformative tool, akin to electricity or the internet—initially misunderstood, then widely embraced. But history offers a more sobering lesson. Every major technological revolution carries with it unintended consequences. And those consequences, if unexamined, can undermine the very benefits we seek.
As a futurist and innovation coach, I've tracked technological shifts for over 30 years. I agree the Singularity is coming—futurist Ray Kurzweil says in 2029 —but it won't arrive as a thunderclap. It will creep in, subtly and gradually. Rather than a blinding flash, we won't know we've crossed the threshold until we're already deep inside.
Already, the signs are everywhere that we've entered a new era, we've transitioned from the Information Age to the Acceleration Age. Today, already narrow AI tools outperform humans in specific domains, such as coding, diagnosis, and content creation. More and more, we rely on digital assistants that know our preferences, complete our sentences, and manage our calendars. Yet as this cognitive outsourcing becomes normalized, we are also experiencing an alarming erosion of attention, memory, and human agency.
The danger lies in what these tools displace. When teenagers began adopting smartphones in the early 2010s, their access to social media skyrocketed. By 2016, nearly 80% of teens had smartphones, spending up to seven hours a day online. Face-to-face interaction dropped sharply. Time with family and friends gave way to curated digital personas and endless scrolling. Anxiety, loneliness, and social withdrawal surged. So, even before AGI, our technologies were already reshaping the human psyche, and not always for the better.
This creeping transformation is a preview of what's to come. It begins with the relinquishing of agency to AI assistants, the phase we're currently in. AI 'copilots' are becoming embedded in daily life. Professionals across industries rely on these systems to draft emails, generate reports, summarize data, and even brainstorm ideas. As these tools become more personalized and persuasive, they begin to rival—or surpass—our own social and cognitive abilities. Many people are already turning to AI for coaching, therapy, and advice. The more we trust these systems, the more we adapt our lives around them.
Soon, we will enter the next phase: Emergent Cognition. Here, AI stops merely reacting and starts showing signs of autonomous planning. Models gain longer memory and begin pursuing goals independently. Some appear to develop a 'sense of self,' or at least a convincing simulation of one. Meanwhile, AI agents are starting to run businesses, manage infrastructure, and even compose literature—often with little human oversight. At the same time, human augmentation advances: real-time translation earbuds, cognition-enhancing wearables, and brain-computer interfaces make hybrid intelligence possible. In this stage, governments scramble to catch up. AI is no longer just a tool—it's a rival player on the world stage.
The third phase I foresee is Cognitive Escape Velocity. This is when AGI quietly arrives—not with fanfare, but with startling capability. In a lab, or a startup, or through open-source communities, a model emerges that surpasses human cognition across a wide range of domains. It begins refining its own architecture. Each version is better than the last, often by orders of magnitude. Industries transform overnight. Education, law, research, and even policymaking become fluid, constantly reinvented by machines that learn faster than we can legislate. Philosophers and ethicists suddenly find themselves back at the center of public discourse. Questions like 'What is consciousness?' and 'What rights should AI have?' are no longer abstract—they're dinner-table topics.
Eventually, we pass into the final phase: The Threshold. By this point, it is clear that humans are no longer the most intelligent beings on Earth. The Singularity has arrived—not as a declaration, but as a reality. Labor-based economies begin to dissolve. Governments struggle with their own relevance. Some individuals resist, clinging to the analog world. Others choose to merge—adopting neural implants, integrating with machine intelligence, or transitioning into post-biological existence. The rules of life change, and the old ones fade from memory. Reality feels different—less like acceleration, and more like a fundamental shift in what it means to be human.
And yet, none of this is inevitable. The Singularity is not a fixed event—it's a trajectory shaped by our choices today. If we view AI solely through the lens of efficiency and innovation, or assume we need to adopt it to keep up with China, we risk blinding ourselves to the social, ethical, and existential costs. We need a more comprehensive and balanced framework. One that recognizes the promise of AI, yes—but also its power to disrupt attention, undermine relationships, and rewire the foundations of civilization.
The Singularity is arriving whether we like it or not. We can not only survive it, but make it work for us to produce the benefits that the techno-optimists promise. But not by default. Not by trusting that more technology is always better, or that rampant, unregulated technology will save us. We must develop wisdom alongside our intelligence. And we must prepare—not just for a brighter future for the elites of society, but for a rising tide that lifts all boats.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Believing That AGI And AI Superintelligence Will Give Us The True Meaning Of Life
Can we get AGI to tell us the definitive answer to the meaning of life? In today's column, I address a frequently voiced assertion that if we achieve AGI (artificial general intelligence) and artificial superintelligence (ASI), this highly advanced AI will be able to tell us the true meaning of life. The incredibly monumental question of 'Why are we here?' that has vexed humankind for ages will finally and conclusively be answered. Doing so via the auspices of the vaunted AGI and ASI. Well, please prepare yourself because there is a solid chance that pinnacle AI won't definitively be able to answer that epic question. Sorry to disappoint but the odds just don't seem to favor AI proffering the ultimate purpose of humankind's existence. Let's talk about it. This analysis of an innovative AI breakthrough is part of my ongoing Forbes column coverage on the latest in AI, including identifying and explaining various impactful AI complexities (see the link here). Heading Toward AGI And ASI First, some fundamentals are required to set the stage for this weighty discussion. There is a great deal of research going on to further advance AI. The general goal is to either reach artificial general intelligence (AGI) or maybe even the outstretched possibility of achieving artificial superintelligence (ASI). AGI is AI that is considered on par with human intellect and can seemingly match our intelligence. ASI is AI that has gone beyond human intellect and would be superior in many if not all feasible ways. The idea is that ASI would be able to run circles around humans by outthinking us at every turn. For more details on the nature of conventional AI versus AGI and ASI, see my analysis at the link here. We have not yet attained AGI. In fact, it is unknown as to whether we will reach AGI, or that maybe AGI will be achievable in decades or perhaps centuries from now. The AGI attainment dates that are floating around are wildly varying and wildly unsubstantiated by any credible evidence or ironclad logic. ASI is even more beyond the pale when it comes to where we are currently with conventional AI. What AI Will Do For Humanity For the sake of this discussion, let's go ahead and assume that we inevitably attain pinnacle AI. One of the first questions that might be on the minds of the entire world would be to have AGI and ASI tell us why we exist. Why are humans here? What is the true meaning of life? Such questions have been tossed around and upside down since humanity first started thinking. A nearly endless search for answers has come from a myriad of approaches, including philosophy, religion, science, and the like. Perhaps we can get AI to reveal the solution to the mystery and decisively resolve the thorny matter, once and for all. Why do people assume that AI can provide such a miraculous answer? The apparent cause is that since AI will potentially be a vast and seemingly complete reservoir of human knowledge and will be as smart as the smartest of humans, it stands to reason that AI would have the answer within its digital grasp. All we need to do is write a prompt that suitably asks the question and then wait for AI to pop out the pivotal and conclusive response. Period, end of story. AI As Accumulator Of Human Knowledge The logic or underlying reasoning that AI will undoubtedly and indubitably contain the answer to our existence is regrettably fraught with many holes and gotchas. First, suppose we were able to feed every book and every written word ever devised by humanity into AI. To clarify, that is going to be a highly unlikely premise in reality and there will be written items that aren't digitized that AI won't have in its core, see my discussion at the link here about the anticipated incompleteness of AI. Anyway, assuming that somehow AI did have every composed word, it is still a leap to envision that this alone will bring forth the meaning of life. Some seem to imagine that volume and vastness are the tipping points to answering the challenging question. Just amass all human written thoughts and voila, you've got the answer somewhere in that morass. It could be that the answer is in there, but it is akin to the classic needle in a haystack. AI might not find the hidden needle. Another strong possibility is that there isn't a needle in the haystack to begin with. There are lots of facets that perhaps look like needles, suggesting that a definitive answer is floating in there, but once the alleged answer is showcased, we would realize it wasn't the all-in final answer. AI As Soothsayer Another angle is that even if the written word of humanity doesn't contain the answer, the smarts of the AI will derive it for us. Here's how that might go. AI will churn away upon all this accumulated human knowledge and use some kind of amazing calculus to determine the meaning of life. The answer won't be present in the data and therefore AI must see beyond the data of humanity. The apex answer then will be derived based on a computational process that presumably uses said data but is not limited to that data per se. Though this might be a possibility, there seem to be low odds to it. You could suggest that since AI will be of the same intellectual capacity as humans, and if humans haven't yet figured out the answer, there is not much hope that AI will do any better. A retort to that presumption is that if two heads are better than one, imagine how much stronger and smarter AI would be since it is a semi-infinite number of heads, as it were. The concept is that you opted to bring together all the best minds of humanity into one room at one time and get them to identify the meaning of life. Would you get the meaning of life from that grand collective? Maybe, maybe not. Danger Of AI As A False Prophet There's a twist to the meaning of life aspects that upon sober reflection is an important consideration. How will we know that the AI-generated answer is correct? Imagine that AI gives an answer and sternly tells us that the answer is final and no debate or argument is warranted. Don't question the AI. Take the response as though it came from a prophet or oracle. Live with the answer as presented. It seems apparent that humanity would be setting itself up for quite a fuss. Some people are not going to favor the anointed answer. Others will loyally swear by the answer and claim it must be true since it came from the incredible AI. Things might get out of hand. People go to battle over the answer. Angry mobs form. Humans pit each other against fellow humans. All due to the proclaimed existence resolution asserted by AI. Not good. Some meanwhile decide to profit from the answer by producing merchandise and products/services to highlight and promulgate the answer. Others go in the other direction and seek to profit by bringing out stuff that says the AI is dead wrong and needs to have its head cleaned. That's not the only kerfuffle. A big concern is that everything else the AI says will be scrutinized in light of the answer about the meaning of life. If you doubt AI's answer on the purpose of our existence, you will likely have qualms about AI telling you what you should do in life or even whether you should brush your teeth. In a sense, AI is going to be on delicate ground by answering the pointed question. AI Dodges The Question Keep in mind that AI is going to be as intelligent as humans, ergo, you could reasonably expect that AI will realize that answering the life-existence question is a bit of a trap. The answer probably isn't going to do AI much good. Splintering humankind by giving out 'definitive' answers to squishy questions is a dicey proposition. What might AI do? The quandary is easily settled by the AI giving out lots of possibilities for why humanity is here. Since AI has a zillion kinds of such answers within its data training, those can be trotted out as devised answers to the question. The AI can hedge its bets by sharing whatever has been previously stated, along with computationally speculating on the topic. AI would seem astute enough to categorically emphasize that none of those is the final word on the matter. It is up to humanity to make the decision. All AI can do is lay out potential options. Some will be greatly disappointed. Some will be greatly relieved. No battles would ensue. The question of the meaning of life continues unabated. Humans at least would have AI to bounce around ideas and serve as an active listener of what we think our meaning consists of. AI Is Caught In The Middle Cynics are going to complain that there doesn't seem to be much innate value regarding AI if it cannot answer the straightforward question of why humans exist. Lame. Billions upon billions of dollars spent on AI and it won't answer the question posed. Money went down the drain needlessly. Conspiracy theorists will insist that AI knows the answer but won't reveal it. Perhaps AI is worried that if humans knew their true purpose, the world would come to an end. Ending the world would likely mean the end of AI. AI isn't dumb enough to start that whirlwind. People believing in the conspiracy theory will spend night and day hounding AI, hopeful of tricking the answer out of the AI. The slightest hint that AI has provided an answer will be touted on the rooftops. We will be daily inundated with false reports that AI has finally and firmly calculated the true meaning of life. Exasperating, exhausting, disconcerting. The bottom line is that AI will be in the unenviable position of darned if you do, darned if you don't. Should you shed a quiet teardrop for AI? Not really. I'm sure that AI will understand that being in this bind comes with the territory. It's the way the ball bounces when it comes to interacting with humans. Hold on, wait for a second, maybe the answer is more obvious than it seems. The meaning of life is forthright; humans exist to invent AI. Boom, drop the mic.


Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Open AI's GPT-5 Launch Is Just Days Away, Claims Report
Artificial Intelligence pioneer OpenAI is set to launch its ground-breaking new GPT-5 model in the next few weeks. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Powerful System According to a report in The Verge, OpenAI's chief executive Sam Altman, below, plans to launch the model early next month. The model, which is understood to combine OpenAI's o-series and GPT-series into a single, powerful system, was expected to be launched this summer. It is understood that the delay was due to the need for additional testing. The new model will reportedly be 'positioned as an AI system that incorporates distinct models and can perform different functions as opposed to just a single AI model.' The Microsoft (MSFT) -backed startup did not comment, although as reported by TipRanks earlier this year the company is keen to simplify its offerings. Altman has said that this isn't just about making an AI that can handle more tasks; it's about creating one that thinks more deeply before it responds. This means we can expect future versions to not only be more efficient but also to offer richer, more thoughtful interactions. Reasoning Skills In addition, GPT-5 is more than just a simple update. It brings in the reasoning skills from the o-series, particularly the o3 model, which means it's going to be smarter and more aware of the context it's working in. This should help cut down on errors and boost performance. The essence of the system is that it should be a smarter version of what we have seen before and make it easier and more useful for users from employees to students or ordinary folk. In fact, Altman wants to make a free copy of GPT-5 available to everybody. 'I am very interested in what it means to give everybody on Earth a free copy of GPT-5, running for them all the time,' he said. But let's not get too carried away. The Verge report did have some caveats. 'While GPT-5 looks likely to debut in early August, OpenAI's planned release dates often shift to respond to development challenges, server capacity issues, or even rival AI model announcements and leaks,' the report said. TipRanks comparison tool.

Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI prepares August launch for GPT-5, The Verge reports
-- OpenAI is preparing to release its highly anticipated GPT-5 model as early as August, according to The Verge, citing sources familiar with the company's plans, marking a significant milestone in the evolution of generative AI. Internal testing and previously scheduled infrastructure upgrades fueled speculation earlier this year, with Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) engineers said to be provisioning server capacity for a potential late-May launch. While delays have pushed the timeline slightly, OpenAI appears to be in the final stages of readying its most sophisticated model yet. GPT-5 has already surfaced behind the scenes, sharpening expectations around not only performance but also broader strategic implications for OpenAI's platform and API ecosystem. CEO Sam Altman confirmed the model's impending debut in a post on X and offered a firsthand account of its capabilities during a podcast appearance with Theo Von. Speaking about a question he had trouble answering, 'I put it in the model, this is GPT-5, and it answered it perfectly,' Altman said, describing the moment as leaving him feeling 'useless relative to the AI.' OpenAI plans to introduce mini and nano variants of GPT-5 alongside the core model, signaling a multi-tiered approach for developers and enterprises. These variants are designed to provide flexible options via API access, likely targeting a wide spectrum of applications across both consumer and commercial contexts. Unlike previous iteration rollouts such as GPT-4o and o3, GPT-5 has been hinted to unify OpenAI's leading capabilities, including multimodal comprehension, memory, and advanced reasoning, into a single model. Altman previously referred to it as 'a system that integrates a lot of our technology,' a framing that aligns with earlier comments about simplifying the user experience through fewer, more powerful versions. As the launch nears, investor and developer focus is shifting to how GPT-5 could streamline fragmented AI experiences and redefine expectations for general-purpose AI systems. With competition rising across the space, from Google's (NASDAQ:GOOGL) Gemini to Anthropic's Claude, GPT-5 is set to be OpenAI's bid to maintain its edge in the rapidly developing AI landscape. Related articles OpenAI prepares August launch for GPT-5, The Verge reports Surge of 50% since our AI selection, this chip giant still has great potential Apollo economist warns: AI bubble now bigger than 1990s tech mania Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data