The Singularity Is Coming. Here's How To Make It Work For You.

Forbes

30-05-2025

The Singularity is arriving whether we like it or not. We can not only survive it, but make it work ... More for us to produce the benefits that the techno-optimists promise.
The term 'Singularity' was coined by computer scientist and science fiction writer Vernor Vinge in 1993 to describe a point at which technological growth accelerates uncontrollably, leading to a world that is incomprehensible to the human mind.
Some of the world's most prominent technologists believe that the Singularity will be a triumph for humanity. Others, like myself, are not so sure.
Optimists like Marc Andreessen, co-creator of the Mosaic browser, insist that artificial intelligence will solve our most pressing problems—curing disease, eliminating scarcity, even boosting creativity to superhuman levels. Others, including OpenAI's Sam Altman, argue that the arrival of artificial general intelligence (AGI) will spread abundance, uplift humanity, and move us closer to utopia.
To techno-optimists, artificial general intelligence (AGI) is simply the next transformative tool, akin to electricity or the internet—initially misunderstood, then widely embraced. But history offers a more sobering lesson. Every major technological revolution carries with it unintended consequences. And those consequences, if unexamined, can undermine the very benefits we seek.
As a futurist and innovation coach, I've tracked technological shifts for over 30 years. I agree the Singularity is coming—futurist Ray Kurzweil says in 2029 —but it won't arrive as a thunderclap. It will creep in, subtly and gradually. Rather than a blinding flash, we won't know we've crossed the threshold until we're already deep inside.
Already, the signs are everywhere that we've entered a new era, we've transitioned from the Information Age to the Acceleration Age. Today, already narrow AI tools outperform humans in specific domains, such as coding, diagnosis, and content creation. More and more, we rely on digital assistants that know our preferences, complete our sentences, and manage our calendars. Yet as this cognitive outsourcing becomes normalized, we are also experiencing an alarming erosion of attention, memory, and human agency.
The danger lies in what these tools displace. When teenagers began adopting smartphones in the early 2010s, their access to social media skyrocketed. By 2016, nearly 80% of teens had smartphones, spending up to seven hours a day online. Face-to-face interaction dropped sharply. Time with family and friends gave way to curated digital personas and endless scrolling. Anxiety, loneliness, and social withdrawal surged. So, even before AGI, our technologies were already reshaping the human psyche, and not always for the better.
This creeping transformation is a preview of what's to come. It begins with the relinquishing of agency to AI assistants, the phase we're currently in. AI 'copilots' are becoming embedded in daily life. Professionals across industries rely on these systems to draft emails, generate reports, summarize data, and even brainstorm ideas. As these tools become more personalized and persuasive, they begin to rival—or surpass—our own social and cognitive abilities. Many people are already turning to AI for coaching, therapy, and advice. The more we trust these systems, the more we adapt our lives around them.
Soon, we will enter the next phase: Emergent Cognition. Here, AI stops merely reacting and starts showing signs of autonomous planning. Models gain longer memory and begin pursuing goals independently. Some appear to develop a 'sense of self,' or at least a convincing simulation of one. Meanwhile, AI agents are starting to run businesses, manage infrastructure, and even compose literature—often with little human oversight. At the same time, human augmentation advances: real-time translation earbuds, cognition-enhancing wearables, and brain-computer interfaces make hybrid intelligence possible. In this stage, governments scramble to catch up. AI is no longer just a tool—it's a rival player on the world stage.
The third phase I foresee is Cognitive Escape Velocity. This is when AGI quietly arrives—not with fanfare, but with startling capability. In a lab, or a startup, or through open-source communities, a model emerges that surpasses human cognition across a wide range of domains. It begins refining its own architecture. Each version is better than the last, often by orders of magnitude. Industries transform overnight. Education, law, research, and even policymaking become fluid, constantly reinvented by machines that learn faster than we can legislate. Philosophers and ethicists suddenly find themselves back at the center of public discourse. Questions like 'What is consciousness?' and 'What rights should AI have?' are no longer abstract—they're dinner-table topics.
Eventually, we pass into the final phase: The Threshold. By this point, it is clear that humans are no longer the most intelligent beings on Earth. The Singularity has arrived—not as a declaration, but as a reality. Labor-based economies begin to dissolve. Governments struggle with their own relevance. Some individuals resist, clinging to the analog world. Others choose to merge—adopting neural implants, integrating with machine intelligence, or transitioning into post-biological existence. The rules of life change, and the old ones fade from memory. Reality feels different—less like acceleration, and more like a fundamental shift in what it means to be human.
And yet, none of this is inevitable. The Singularity is not a fixed event—it's a trajectory shaped by our choices today. If we view AI solely through the lens of efficiency and innovation, or assume we need to adopt it to keep up with China, we risk blinding ourselves to the social, ethical, and existential costs. We need a more comprehensive and balanced framework. One that recognizes the promise of AI, yes—but also its power to disrupt attention, undermine relationships, and rewire the foundations of civilization.
The Singularity is arriving whether we like it or not. We can not only survive it, but make it work for us to produce the benefits that the techno-optimists promise. But not by default. Not by trusting that more technology is always better, or that rampant, unregulated technology will save us. We must develop wisdom alongside our intelligence. And we must prepare—not just for a brighter future for the elites of society, but for a rising tide that lifts all boats.