logo
Mastercard and Visa face backlash after hundreds of adult games removed from online stores Steam and Itch.io

Mastercard and Visa face backlash after hundreds of adult games removed from online stores Steam and Itch.io

The Guardian4 days ago
Payment companies such as Visa, Mastercard and Stripe are facing public backlash, including from billionaire Elon Musk, for pressuring online gaming platforms to remove hundreds of games in response to a campaign from an Australian anti-porn lobby group.
Itch.io, an independent gaming platform, last week removed all adult or not-safe-for-work (NSFW) games from appearing in its library in a hasty move to prevent payments for games being blocked across its entire service.
Itch.io said that it was bowing to demands from payment providers 'to ensure we can continue to operate and provide a marketplace for all developers'.
The move came after an open letter organised by Collective Shout, an Australian-based group that fights the sexualisation of woman and girls. On 14 July, it called on payment providers to cease providing services to gaming platforms Steam and Itch.io, claiming that hundreds of their games contained content including rape, sexual violence and incest.
Itch.io's swift compliance, however, meant removing not just the content in Collective Shout's claim but all NSFW adult content from browsing and search – at least temporarily. Some games were also removed entirely.
'This is a time critical moment for itch.io. The situation developed rapidly, and we had to act urgently to protect the platform's core payment infrastructure,' they said.
'Unfortunately, this meant it was not realistic to provide creators with advance notice before making this change. We know this is not ideal, and we apologise for the abruptness of this change.'
Some users reported they were unable to play games removed from sale that they had already paid for, which Itch.io has denied.
Collective Shout, a small but vocal lobby group, has long called for a mandatory internet filter that would prevent access to adult content for everyone in Australia. Its director, Melinda Tankard Reist, was recently appointed to the stakeholder advisory board for the government's age assurance technology trial before the under-16s social media ban comes into effect in Australia in December.
Collective Shout routinely focuses its campaigns on underwear advertising and video games in Australia. It has recently campaigned for Elon Musk's X to ban adult content, but the success of its recent campaign against gaming platforms has brought them the most international attention.
In the two weeks since announcing the letters sent to major payment providers including PayPal, Mastercard and Visa, video game marketplaces Itch.io and Steam have announced policy changes.
Steam, which has an estimated 132 million active monthly users, earlier this month removed an estimated hundreds of titles in response to pressure from payments processors.
Tankard Reist said she and her team had been bombarded with 'abuse, harassment, rape and death threats' since the campaign launch, which the team was compiling to report to the eSafety commissioner and the police.
By Monday, a Change.org petition calling for payment processors to 'stop controlling what we can watch, read, or play' has garnered more than 147,000 signatures.
'Nobody is forced to engage with content they find offensive – but they have no right to dictate what others are allowed to enjoy, especially when it's within the bounds of the law,' it said.
Elon Musk posted 'bravo' in response to an X user's post about the petition, and – in another reply to criticism of a payments processor forcing the removal of content – said he wanted to get his own X payments platform 'going soon'.
While Collective Shout solely targeted games it said violated policies held by payment platforms, Itch.io's move to temporarily remove all NSFW videos resulted in games with LGBTQ+ content being removed.
One petition signer who is a member of the LGBTQ+ community said they were concerned that banning sexual-based games would be the start of cracking down on LGBTQ+ content.
'Banning sexual content never stops there, it always include non-sexual things. As such the fight to protect peoples' right to sexual expression is vital for protecting my right to exist,' they wrote.
Tankard Reist said the blanket removal of NSFW games was not the objective of the campaign, noting that Itch.io has said it would introduce compliance measures for NSFW pages to allow games as long as they abided by the policies of the payment processor linked to their account.
'It is likely many games will be restored to the platform after Itch.io's review,' she said. 'Payment processors have a right to determine what services they will provide … according to their CSR [corporate social responsibility], mission and values.'
Asked whether the incoming Online Safety Act codes, which restrict access to content refused classification in Australia and bring in age verification for adult content, would have been a better place for the concerns raised by her group, Tankard Reist said the issue did not affect Australia alone.
'The internet has no borders. Women and girls everywhere are impacted by male violence against women and misogyny in general which we believed these games perpetuated,' she said. Collective Shout could not afford to wait to see if the codes and age verification would be effective, she added.
Mastercard and Visa were contacted for comment. Steam did not respond to a request for comment.
A spokesperson for PayPal said it could not comment on individual customers. 'PayPal is committed to maintaining a safe platform for its customers. We have a zero-tolerance policy towards any illegal activity. Any accounts found to be associated with illegal activity will be closed.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's super PAC has ballooned to $200M thanks to Musk and other Silicon Valley heavyweights
Trump's super PAC has ballooned to $200M thanks to Musk and other Silicon Valley heavyweights

The Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump's super PAC has ballooned to $200M thanks to Musk and other Silicon Valley heavyweights

President Donald Trump's super PAC holds nearly $200 million after donations from Elon Musk and other Silicon Valley heavyweights. The funds may be spent to take on rivals in both the Democratic and Republican parties. During the first half of this year, the Trump group MAGA Inc. gathered about $177m in total from Musk, TikTok investor Jeffrey Yass, Silicon Valley executives Ben Horowitz and Marc Andreessen, and others, a Thursday filing with the Federal Election Commission states. Trump has held several fundraisers this year, costing as much as seven figures a seat, The New York Times noted. The dinners, which have often been held at one of the president's properties, have allowed lobbyists and executives to make their case to Trump about their business interests. The filing states that the super PAC has $196.1m in cash on hand. Politicians haven't previously been so meticulous about raising money when they don't have a campaign in the future. Comparatively, a group backing term-limited former President Barack Obama raised $356,000 in the first half of 2013. That June, it had $3.4 million in cash on hand. MAGA Inc. has collected almost double the money as the Republican National Committee. But the RNC is restricted by contribution limits. Yass donated $16m to MAGA Inc. while Horowitz and Andreessen jointly contributed $6m. Trump has boosted the crypto industry from which his group collected several seven-figure donations. The group also received a $5m donation from a crypto entity co-founded by Sam Altman, the chief of OpenAI. Some Republicans have grown confused as to why Trump has been raising so much money for the group. Some of the president's top supporters have pushed for him to run for an unconstitutional third term. Trump aides have said it would be unwise not to take money that is essentially up for the taking. The funds can be used to attack the president's enemies. With such a sizable money pot, MAGA Inc. is set to play a significant role in Republican primaries, boosting the value of an endorsement from Trump. Some conservatives have grown worried about the amount of money collected by the Super PAC, with the group likely to be a bigger spender in the 2026 midterm elections than groups connected to the Republican leadership in Congress. As of June 30, the Congressional and Senate Leadership Funds held $32.7m and $29.7m. Filings show that a super PAC supported by the crypto industry, Fairshake, had $140m on hand, according to filings. Musk at first said he would spend roughly $100m on Trump's political operation, but in the end, he spent only $5m. Musk and Trump's close relationship has since come to an apparent end. Musk also contributed $5m each to the Senate and Congressional Leadership Funds some weeks after his public feud with the president. But soon after, following the passage of Trump's budget bill, Musk said he would leave the Republican Party to start his own party.

Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay $243 million in fatal Autopilot crash
Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay $243 million in fatal Autopilot crash

Reuters

time15 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay $243 million in fatal Autopilot crash

Aug 1 (Reuters) - A Florida jury on Friday found Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab liable in the 2019 fatal crash of an Autopilot-equipped Model S and ordered Elon Musk's automaker to pay $243 million to the family of a deceased woman and an injured survivor. Jurors in Miami federal court awarded the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon and her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo $129 million in compensatory damages, of which Tesla is responsible for 33%, plus $200 million in punitive damages, according to a verdict sheet. Lawyers for the plaintiffs said the trial was the first involving the wrongful death of a third party resulting from Autopilot. The plaintiffs had sought $345 million. Tesla has faced many similar lawsuits over its vehicles' self-driving capabilities, but they have been resolved or dismissed without getting to trial. A judge rejected Tesla's efforts to dismiss the case earlier in the summer, and experts said this may encourage other litigants against the EV maker. 'I think it's a big deal," said Alex Lemann, a professor at Marquette University Law School, who said this may make future settlements more expensive for Tesla. "This is the first time that Tesla has been hit with a judgment in one of the many, many fatalities that have happened as a result of its auto-pilot technology." Friday's verdict could impede efforts by Musk, the world's richest person, to convince investors that Tesla can become a leader in so-called autonomous driving for private vehicles as well as robotaxis it plans to start producing next year. Shares fell 1.8% on Friday. Tesla plans to appeal, according to published reports. The Austin, Texas-based company and its lawyers did not immediately respond to several requests for comment. The trial concerned an April 25, 2019 incident where George McGee drove his 2019 Model S at about 62 mph (100 kph) through an intersection into the victims' parked Chevrolet Tahoe as they were standing beside it on a shoulder. McGee had reached down to pick up a cellphone he dropped on his car's floorboard and allegedly received no alerts as he ran a stop sign and stop light before hitting the victims' SUV. "We have a driver who was acting less than perfectly, and yet the jury still found Tesla contributed to the crash," said Philip Koopman, a Carnegie Mellon University engineering professor and expert in autonomous technology. "The only way the jury could have possibly ruled against Tesla was by finding a defect with the Autopilot software. That's a big deal." Benavides Leon was allegedly thrown 75 feet to her death, while Angulo suffered serious injuries. "Tesla designed Autopilot only for controlled-access highways yet deliberately chose not to restrict drivers from using it elsewhere, alongside Elon Musk telling the world Autopilot drove better than humans," Brett Schreiber, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. "Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries," he added. Last month, Tesla posted its biggest quarterly sales decline in more than a decade, and profit fell short of Wall Street forecasts.

Why young Aussies are walking out of high-paying jobs
Why young Aussies are walking out of high-paying jobs

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Why young Aussies are walking out of high-paying jobs

By Young Australians are less interested in having a long, stressful career as houses become increasingly unaffordable for average-income earners. Australia's median capital city house price is now above $1million, meaning only dual-income couples or individuals on high salaries can buy a home with a backyard. But rather than work harder in a career role to afford a house, Australia's younger workers are less inclined to do stressful corporate jobs, long-term, if there isn't a meaningful reward or a work-life balance, despite there being a cost-of-living crisis. Jin, 23, is graduating at the end of this year from the University of Sydney with a Bachelor of Science majoring in data science and accounting. He will start a full-time graduate role in January next year and is bracing for the occasional weekend shifts as he helps prepare financial reports for big firms during the twice-yearly earnings seasons. But he is aspiring for some work-life balance in his twenties, including some travel. 'I do think a balance is necessary - if we don't have the correct amount of sleep or just the correct amount of breaks to take our minds off things, it's just very hard for us to stay focused,' he told Daily Mail. 'I do want to explore the world outside of Australia. I want to see and experience different cultures.' He is also hoping to work reasonable hours so he has time for family and a social life. 'I think I have a nice balance right now, where I spend my time with my family and my partner,' he said. 'Once or twice a year, I strive to take a one-week holiday or go on a break with my family or my partner.' Jamie MacLennan, the Asia-Pacific managing director of TELUS Health, said younger workers were less inclined to take on stressful roles, despite needing higher pay to cope with the cost of living crisis. 'People are trying to rebalance and balance the work-life component in a world where we're essentially on 24/7,' he said. 'Somewhere along the line, people have got to earn a living, but then the question is - "What's the cost of making that living?" - that's where people are rebalancing. 'You can't quit completely or at scale - there's always going to be an element of people who do that. 'Whether they take the traditional career paths, whether they aspire to those, creates a bigger dislocation.' Mr MacLennan said the mental health effects of Covid on younger people would create succession planning issues for companies in coming years, as fewer of them aspired to be in senior roles. 'We haven't recovered from Covid - our brains have been rewired. There continues to be a mental health crisis - crisis is not an overstated term in Australian society and it's most acute in that younger generation coming through,' he said. 'People have that sense of missing out - they're in a situation where they can't afford to get what they want or they can't afford to live in the environment that they want.' Stress is now a deal breaker for staff, with recruitment agency Randstad revealing 60 per cent of workers would rather have less stress than more pay. Unbearable demands had seen 40 per cent of workers switch to a lower-paid role. Amelia O'Carrigan, Randstad's director of public sector and business support, said employers couldn't ask staff to work five days in the office without incentives. 'It's not a complete pull back on flexibility and expect that workers will agree to that. In fact, to completely say - "You need to be back into the office five days" I would say would be a risky strategy,' she said. 'As job confidence starts to return, you'd be at risk of employees looking elsewhere.' The Randstad survey of 5,250 workers in Australia, Germany , Italy , Japan , Poland , the UK and the United States found stress to be a major issue. Financial concerns are the biggest driver of personal stress in Australia, with 44 per cent nominating it as a problem, a survey of 1,000 people by TELUS Health found. Unaffordable housing was also cited as a driver, with 18 per cent nominating their housing or living situation as a source of personal stress. While many young people are reconsidering taking on stressful roles, Jin said he would be willing to make sacrifices to one day establish a data-oriented start-up for small businesses, that could use AI to audit their finances in real time. 'If I were to want to live comfortably, or think about having a better life, I would try to branch off into a different industry,' he said. 'If the corporate ladder doesn't work, I'll try my hand with something I like within data science, because I sacrificed it away for stability - I'll try to think about doing a start-up project on the side. 'Earning more money comes with more responsibilities so naturally you come with more stress - probably personally, I think I have pretty good stress management.' 'My goal, before I hit 30, I'll try to get a car that I like, I like sports cars, I want to work towards that. We need goals in life or what are we working for? If we're just working for a living - it's not hard, it would just be very boring.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store