
Indian Army receives three Apache helicopters from Boeing
The AH-64 Apache, which is one of the most advanced multi-role combat helicopter in the world, is currently flown by the US Army.
In an X post, the Indian Army said, 'Milestone moment for Indian Army as the first batch of Apache helicopters for Army Aviation arrive today in India. These state-of-the-art platforms will bolster the operational capabilities of the Indian Army significantly.'
#Apache for Indian Army
Milestone moment for Indian Army as the first batch of Apache helicopters for Army Aviation arrive today in India.
These state-of-the-art platforms will bolster the operational capabilities of the #IndianArmy significantly.#YearofTechAbsorption… pic.twitter.com/phtlQ4SWc8
— ADG PI – INDIAN ARMY (@adgpi) July 22, 2025
In 2020, Boeing completed delivery of 22 E-model Apaches to the Indian Air Force (IAF) and signed a contract to supply six AH-64Es for the Indian Army.
The US government and Boeing signed a multi-billion dollar contract with the Indian Air Force in September 2015 for 22 Apache helicopters. As part of the contract, the delivery of the Apaches was scheduled to commence in 2024.
Additionally, the Defence Ministry in 2017 approved the procurement of six Apache helicopters along with weapons systems from Boeing at a cost of Rs 4,168 crore for the Army.
The AH-64E is the most recent configuration of the Apache and is ready to act in Multi-Domain Operations (MDO) carried out by the military. The attack chopper contains a network-centric, fully integrated weapon system specifically built to dominate in highly contested and complex battle space.
(With inputs from PTI)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Cabbies threaten to boycott Uber app from today, fares may surge
Pune: Cab rides in the city, Mumbai and Nagpur may be dearer because the Maharashtra Kamgar Sabha, a wing of the Indian Gig Workers' Front, has threatened to boycott the Uber platform from Friday. "Uber approached the Bombay high court against the ongoing protest and strike of cab drivers, following which the court restrained protesting unions and their members from stopping or blocking Uber cabs. Ola and Rapido didn't approach the court like Uber. While we are looking for legal options, cabbies will boycott the Uber application," Keshav Kshirsagar, the president of the Indian Gig Workers' Front, said, after a meeting between the the senior office-bearers of the union and representatives of Pune, Mumbai and Nagpur RTOs at the transport commissioner's office in Mumbai. A majority of cabbies tend to use the Uber application in Pune, a source said. "Cabbies can work on all three applications. With Uber being boycotted, there will definitely be surge pricing," Kshirsagar said. You Can Also Check: Pune AQI | Weather in Pune | Bank Holidays in Pune | Public Holidays in Pune TOI sent a message to the Uber spokesperson seeking the firm's stand on the app boycott plan of the cabbies. A reply was awaited till going to press. Commuters are worried over the cabbie's plan to boycott the Uber app. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "Each day, we are being hassled by the cabbies. The fares have shot up. A majority of cabbies opt for the Regional Transport Authority (RTA)-approved fares, not what reflects on the applications. Why doesn't the Pune RTO take any action against them is beyond my understanding," said Koregaon Park's Rajesh Shinde. In Pune, the RTA-approved rate for cabs is Rs75 for the first 3km and Rs25 for every subsequent km. Kshirsagar, the president of the Indian Gig Workers' Front, said nothing concrete came out in Thursday's meeting. "The aggregators had assured in Wednesday's meeting that they would give a letter mentioning the date from when the RTA-approved fares would reflect in their applications. But no such letter has been provided by any of the companies, following which the meeting was convened on Thursday. The officials said RTAs, headed by district collectors, decide these matters. We cannot go on a strike because the high court has prevented us from doing the same. But cabbies can boycott the Uber application," he added.


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
America's changing stages of capitalism impacted the world — Donald Trump now wants to disrupt the old economic order: Jonathan Levy
Jonathan Levy is Professor of History at Sciences Po, Paris. Speaking to Srijana Mitra Das, he discusses capitalism shifting shape in America — and new directions under Donald Trump: Q. What is the core of your research?A. I'm a historian and my focus is the history of the United States. I'm also a historian of capitalism across the American past and in the relationship between the US and the world. Q. How do you characterise what you call the 'main ages of American capitalism'?A. The origins of American capitalism can be found in the history of the British Empire — for political reasons, it promoted the expansion of commerce in the Atlantic world, throughout Asia and the Northern American colonies. So, I define the first age of American capitalism as the Age of Commerce, where the dominant question was to what degree the state would expand this. The next stage, the Age of Capital, beginning after the abolition of slavery, had two defining characteristics — first, industrialisation and the shift of capital away from agriculture towards industry. By the end of the 19th century, the United States had displaced Britain as the largest industrial power in the world. But this age also had financial and monetary dynamics which were as intrinsic to capitalism as industry — those culminated in 1929's crash and the Great Depression. That begins what I call the Age of Control, with the New Deal which fundamentally changed America's political economy. After World War II, the US became a global economic, industrial, commercial and financial hegemon. The last stage is the Age of Chaos after 1980, linked to the increasing prominence of finance in the US. I also discuss new disruptive information technologies from places like Silicon Valley, this age characterised by the chaotic nature of both finance and new tech. Q. Which age of American capitalism are we seeing now? A. I think a new stage is being born — but transitions of this magnitude take decades. When 2008's financial crisis occurred, people thought that, like 1929, a new age of capitalism would emerge — that did not happen. Instead, the Obama administration cobbled back a version of the capitalism that existed before 2008 — so, what America saw instead was a slow social and political crisis that followed 2008. That became visible with Donald Trump's first election in 2016 and the way Trump broke away in his criticisms, whether of immigration or trade, from the ruling philosophies of both the Democratic and Republican parties. Trump changed the rhetoric on trade and international economic relationships, especially pointing to what he said was the risk of China to an America-led world later saw Joe Biden make more attempts at transformation with a new industrial strategy and promoting parts of US manufacturing, alongside concern about Donald Trump is clearly a disruptive agent, both in terms of his politics and policies. He very much wants to break apart the old economic order — I don't see him or the political movement behind him as having the potential to create a new order but he does have the potential to destroy the old one. We're in a waiting phase to see what happens next. Q. What are the implications of this for the rest of the world? A. After WWII, there was an assumption the United States would have a hegemonic relationship with the world — it would create rules it would benefit from but those would also offer advantages to others, whether through the use of the dollar or the openness of the American market. Hence, some economies sought to industrialise by exporting to America, such as Germany and Japan after World War II. More recently, this was true of China. It hasn't been as true of India, although, in recent decades, India has integrated more with the US via services.I think both the Trump and Biden administrations, in their own ways, began to question whether these relationships do work in the interests of the United States. Hence, we've seen an emphasis on national security, the China issue and the need to revamp US industry — such initiatives are important but I doubt they'll amount to wholescale transformation. Q. What forms of wealth or assets define American capitalism today? A. At the heart of capitalism is capital, a form of wealth valued in light of its capacity to earn a future profit or returns. During the Age of Control, the US political economy was structured with what I call a 'politics of income' — the welfare state and other measures sought to make the distribution of labour incomes more equitable. Now, since the 1980s, wealth and the ownership of assets, especially financial assets, has become more important than labour incomes — when that happens, you see greater inequality and debt. That's been a central feature of American capitalism over the last 20 to 30 need to ask if there should be an effort now to increase the ownership of assets and wealth, to make this less inequitable, or to restore an emphasis on incomes and away from wealth? This is an inescapable question today. Q. We're seeing breath-taking levels of American fiscal debt now — how does that coexist with capitalism? A. First, public debt isn't intrinsically bad — it depends on what it goes to. The US has a persistent budget imbalance which leads to rising debt. But the investments being made through the fiscal mechanism are not necessarily great — America has not been able to move its fiscal apparatus towards doing the things that should be done in the present to lead towards a better fiscal future. The US solved child poverty during Covid — and then decided to unsolve it by tax cuts and cutting successful social spending programs. Similarly, under Biden, the US began making some investments in a green energy transition — now, they're being undone by Trump. So, the US state is overly indebted — but it isn't doing the things it should quite rightly do. Views expressed are personal


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Yogi govt hikes minimum wage to ₹252 for agricultural workers
Lucknow: In a landmark decision aimed at empowering agricultural workers, the Yogi govt has significantly revised the minimum wage rates, fixing them at Rs 252 per day across the state. The move is intended to ensure that adult labourers engaged in agricultural activities in all districts earn at least Rs 6,552 per month. The revised wage structure is set to benefit lakhs of workers involved not only in traditional farming but also in allied sectors such as animal husbandry, beekeeping, and poultry farming. "By guaranteeing fair compensation, the government aims to provide greater financial security and a more dignified standard of living for rural labourers," said principal secretary, labour and employment department, MK Shanmuga Sundaram. "The revised minimum wage will apply to all types of farming activities across Uttar Pradesh. This includes traditional farming, mushroom cultivation, and labour involved in transporting crops to markets. It also covers allied sectors like dairy farming, animal husbandry, beekeeping, poultry farming, and all related support work," he added. The Yogi government has also clarified that wages may now be paid in cash, partly in cash, in kind (such as farm produce), or through digital modes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top 15 Most Beautiful Women in the World Undo However, in every case, the total wage must not be less than the newly set minimum rate. This step is expected to promote digital transactions in rural areas and improve transparency in wage payments. To protect short-term workers, the hourly wage rate must not be less than one-sixth of the daily wage. The govt has also stated that if a worker is already being paid more than the new minimum wage, the higher amount will continue to be paid and will be treated as their new personal minimum wage. An official spokesperson said Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has consistently emphasised that protecting workers' rights is a top priority for his govt. The spokesperson noted, "Previously, the state registered crores of unorganised workers through the e-Shram portal and connected them to government welfare schemes. This new wage notification is another important step in that direction. By encouraging fair wages and digital payments, this move aims to make Uttar Pradesh not only a top agricultural producer but also a welfare-driven state for agricultural labourers. "