No commitment to scrap two-child benefit cap until funding is clear
Further calls to scrap the controversial policy were made by Labour backbenchers on Tuesday, during a Conservative-led debate focused on retaining the cap.
There were more than 1.6 million children living in households in England, Wales and Scotland affected by the two-child benefit limit in April, according to figures published by the Department for Work and Pensions last week.
Work and pensions minister Alison McGovern said the Child Poverty Task Force will look at 'all the levers across incomes, costs, debt and local support that we can pull to prevent poverty, including social security reform'.
Speaking during the opposition day debate, she added: 'Our universal credit review is considering ways that the system can improve in order to stabilise family finances and provide routes into good work.
'And on the two-child limit, specifically, the consequences, as I've said in my speech, of the Conservative choices made over the past decade and a half are clear for all to see.
'We have rightly said many times we will not commit to any policy without knowing how we are going to pay for it.'
Labour MP for Rochdale, Paul Waugh, said: '59% of families (who) have more than two children, on universal credit, are in work, and that's far from the feckless parent caricature that we've heard today from the Conservatives.
'And more importantly, does she agree with me that actually it's the children (who) should come first, and because the children should come first, we should urgently scrap the two-child cap as quickly as possible?'
Ms McGovern declined to respond directly to Mr Waugh's question, instead arguing that the Conservative Party 'only wants to divide people'.
Labour MP for Alloa and Grangemouth Brian Leishman also said 'the Government should lift it immediately', adding: 'Having a child is a blessing, not a blessing everyone receives, and the two-child cap is an inherently cruel policy that punishes the least advantaged.
'The idea that a third or a fourth or a fifth child is worth less than the first two is beyond wicked.'
Conservative shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately had described the welfare bill as a 'ticking time bomb' as she opened the debate.
She added: 'We have brought forward this debate today on the two-child limit, because somebody has to make the case for fiscal responsibility, for living within our means, for fairness, for making sure work pays, and for keeping the two-child cap.'
MPs rejected the Conservatives' motion that the benefit cap should remain, with 106 voting in favour, 440 against, majority 334.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Former Indonesian Official Says Trade Deal Is On
The Indonesian government is 'very happy' with a trade pact struck with President Trump, a former Indonesian ambassador to the U.S. said, the first sign from Jakarta that the nations have come to an agreement. Trump wrote on social media Tuesday morning that he had agreed to a trade pact with Indonesia but offered no details. Former Ambassador Dino Patti Djalal said Indonesian government officials had expressed support for the deal to him, with more details forthcoming 'in a few hours.' 'Insiders from the Indonesian government said they are very happy with the new deal,' Djalal said a Foreign Policy virtual event, adding that he still expects some U.S. tariffs on Indonesian goods as part of the deal: 'Certainly there will still be tariffs, it's not going to be 0%.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Israel bombs Syrian forces entering Druze city after sectarian clashes
Israel says it has bombed Syrian government forces around Suweida, as they entered the predominantly Druze city following two days of deadly sectarian clashes. At least 200 people have been killed since the fighting between Druze militias and Bedouin tribes erupted on Sunday, UK-based monitoring group the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR), reported. Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he had ordered strikes on forces and weapons in the Suweida area because the government "intended to use [them] against the Druze". Syria has condemned Israel's involvement and said the strikes had resulted in the deaths of members of the armed forces and civilians. This is the first time that Syrian government forces have been deployed to Suweida since Islamist-led rebels overthrew President Bashar al-Assad in December. Many minority communities - including the Druze, whose religion is an offshoot of Shia Islam with its own unique identity and beliefs - are suspicious of interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa's government despite his pledges to protect them. Until now, the province of Suweida had remained largely under the control of Druze militias which resisted calls to join the security forces. Netanyahu has said he is committed to preventing harm to the Druze in Syria because of their deep ties to those living in Israel and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights. Syria's foreign ministry said in a statement on Tuesday that Israel holds full responsibility for the latest attacks on southern Syria and the consequences. The Trump administration has now asked Israel to cease its strikes on Syrian military forces, US news outlet Axios reported, citing a US official. Israel reportedly said it would stop the attacks on Tuesday evening. Earlier on Tuesday, Syria's defence minister announced a ceasefire in Suweida, saying an agreement had been reached with local dignitaries for security forces to deploy there. However, one Druze spiritual leader urged local fighters to resist. Following the deployment of Syrian forces, SOHR accused government forces and their allies of the summary executions of at least 19 Druze civilians, including 12 at a family guest house. The SOHR further said members of the ministry of defence had carried out "systematic acts of vandalism targeting civilian homes and property" including "stealing the contents of homes, smashing doors and windows, and then setting fire to some of them". Men in military uniform were seen burning and looting homes and shops, Reuters news agency reported. Syrian authorities did not immediately responded to the allegations. A Suweida resident told BBC Arabic the situation in Suweida was "catastrophic", with indiscriminate shooting prompting people to "flee towards the countryside" despite a curfew declared by Syrian authorities. Dozens killed in clashes between Druze and Bedouin in southern Syria Deadly clashes in Syria's Druze areas raise fears of widening unrest 'We're not safe here anymore' - Syria's Christians fear for future after devastating church attack The fighting between Bedouin tribes and Druze militias in Suweida was reportedly sparked by the robbery and abduction of a Druze merchant on the highway to Damascus last Friday. On Sunday, armed Druze fighters reportedly encircled and later seized the city's al-Maqwas neighbourhood, which is inhabited by Bedouin. The clashes soon spread into other parts of Suweida province, with tribesmen reportedly launching attacks on Druze towns and villages on the city's outskirts. As the death toll reached 30, Syria's interior ministry announced that its forces and those of the defence ministry would intervene and impose order, saying the "dangerous escalation comes in light of the absence of relevant official institutions". There was a brief period of calm on Sunday night, after mediation between Bedouin and Druze leaders resulted in the release of people kidnapped by both sides, according to activist-run news outlet Suwayda 24. But on Monday, it said the fighting had resumed in the countryside west of the city after drones attacked villages at the same time as government forces deployed in nearby areas of eastern Deraa province. Later, Suwayda 24 reported that villages in the area were also hit by mortar fire and that dozens of dead and wounded had been brought to local hospitals. Meanwhile, the Israeli military said it had struck several government tanks to prevent them advancing towards Suweida city. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said the strikes were a "clear warning to the Syrian regime". Among those killed in the fighting are children, Druze, Bedouin and Syrian security forces personnel, according to the SOHR. The BBC has been unable to independently verify casualty figures. On Tuesday morning, the Druze spiritual leadership said they had agreed to allow government forces to enter Suweida province in order to end the bloodshed and called on all armed groups there to co-operate and hand over their weapons. But hours later, influential Druze Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajri posted a video calling on Druze fighters to "resis[t] this brutal campaign by all available means", accusing government forces of bombarding Suweida city in violation of a ceasefire agreement. As security forces entered the city, Defence Minister Maj Gen Murhaf Abu Qasra announced a "complete ceasefire", saying an agreement had been reached with "notables and dignitaries". "Suweida neighbourhoods will be under the control of Internal Security Forces as soon as combing operations are completed in order to control the chaos, secure return of residents to their houses," he added. Early on Tuesday afternoon, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Israel Katz said they had directed the Israeli military to immediately attack Syrian forces and weaponry sent to the Suweida area "that the regime intended to use against the Druze". They accused the Syrian government of contravening "the demilitarisation policy they decided on" and of endangering Israel by deploying forces there. The Syrian Observatory shared a video that it said showed at least one member of the security forces who was killed in an Israeli strike on a convoy. There was no immediate response from the Syrian government. Earlier this year, Netanyahu warned that he would not "tolerate any threat" to Syria's Druze and demanded the complete demilitarisation of Suweida and two other southern provinces. He said Israel saw interim President Sharaa's Sunni Islamist group, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), as a threat. HTS is a former al-Qaeda affiliate that is still designated as a terrorist organisation by the UN and UK, but no longer the US. The Israeli military has already carried out hundreds of strikes across Syria to destroy the country's military assets since the fall of the Assad regime. And it has sent troops into the UN-monitored demilitarised buffer zone between the occupied Golan Heights and Syria, as well as several adjoining areas and the summit of Mount Hermon.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
UK secretly resettled 4,500 Afghans in Britain after huge data breach
Super injunctions are legal mechanisms in Britain that prevent news organizations from publishing a report on a topic or even from referring to the fact that a court order has been granted. In this case, critics said, the government's initially legitimate interest in protecting the safety of Afghans was supplanted over time by a desire to avoid an embarrassing headline during an election year. Advertisement In a statement to Parliament on Tuesday, John Healey, the defense secretary for the current government, which is led by the Labor Party, said, 'I am closing this resettlement route; I'm disclosing the data loss and confirm that the court order was lifted at 12 noon today.' Advertisement Healey described the injunction, to which he was also subjected, as unprecedented, adding that he had been 'deeply concerned about the lack of transparency to Parliament and the public.' The personal data of thousands of Afghans, Healey said, was accidentally disclosed in an email from a defense official that was sent outside authorized channels in 2022. The scale of the breach was only discovered in August 2023, when details of nine individuals surfaced on social media. Alarmed by the disclosure, the Conservative government created a secret resettlement plan, called the Afghan Response Route, which has so far relocated 4,500 Afghans to Britain at a cost of about $537 million. A further 600 people and their immediate families are still to arrive, and the cost could rise to a total of around $1.13 billion. Healey said that after he came to office following last year's election, he commissioned an independent report on the matter, which was published Tuesday. Compiled by a former senior civil servant, Paul Rimmer, the report concluded that there was little evidence that the Taliban were intent on a campaign of retribution or that the exposed spreadsheet would prompt them to act against Afghans who had worked with the British. 'Given the nearly four years since the Taliban takeover,' the report said, 'posing a current threat or resistance to Taliban rule is likely to be a far more persuasive factor in the threat faced by individuals in Afghanistan, rather than former affiliations.' The breach began, Healey said, when an unnamed employee in the Defense Ministry emailed a file about an existing resettlement scheme, known as the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy, which was intended for those who had worked for, or with, British forces in Afghanistan. The email was sent outside authorized systems, and it contained the names and information of those applying mainly to that program, as well as the personal details of some family members. Advertisement 'This official mistakenly believed that they were sending the details of 150 applicants. However, the spreadsheet in fact contained personal information associated to 18,714 Afghans,' Healey said, apologizing for what he called a serious error. The government's decision to seek an injunction was swiftly approved by a High Court judge in September 2023, soon after journalists learned of the data breach. It was upheld in two later rulings, though in a third hearing, Justice Martin Chamberlain ordered it to be lifted because it was likely that the Taliban already had the names of the Afghans. The government appealed his ruling, however, and it was overturned, leaving the super injunction in place. The data disclosure stirred awkward memories of Britain's fraught exit from Afghanistan, which many blamed on the United States. President Trump had negotiated a deal with the Taliban during his first term that set a timetable for pulling out US troops. President Joe Biden then presided over the chaotic, bloodstained withdrawal as Taliban fighters swept into a defenseless Kabul, the capital. But Britain's government was harshly criticized as well. Dominic Raab, then the foreign secretary, lingered on vacation on the Greek island of Crete even as Kabul was falling, contributing to the portrait of an out-of-touch government. The prime minister at the time, Boris Johnson, was accused of favoring pets over people after emails surfaced which suggested that he pushed for the evacuation of cats and dogs by a British animal charity. He denied the accusations. Advertisement This article originally appeared in
