
Former pilot flew high in UK politics as Thatcherite
Never one to shy away from voicing divisive opinions, Tebbit forged a reputation as a gritty right-winger and was known to his critics, somewhat unflatteringly, as "the Chingford skinhead" (he was also once described as "the great political street-fighter of his generation"). He was made UK employment secretary in 1981 at a time when more than 2.5 million people were jobless, with claims that 6,000 were joining the dole queue daily. Trade unions organised marches to call attention to the issue and, in reference to some of those rallies turning ugly, Tebbit countered with the famous quote about his grandfather: 'He didn't riot. He got on his bike and looked for work."
He incurred more flak with his proposed "cricket test", a scheme to determine how well an immigrant or their descendants had been assimilated on account of which national cricket team they supported – whether it was England or their 'heritage team' – which could then serve as a barometer of Britishness. Tebbit expanded on the idea, saying: 'A large proportion of Britain's Asian population fail to pass the cricket test. Which side do they cheer for? It's an interesting test. Are you still harking back to where you came from or where you are?" The much-ridiculed cricket test never got off the ground.
Only months after the Brexit referendum in 2016, Tebbit wrote in the Daily Telegraph that UK law was facing challenges from a 'rival legal system with its own courts, such as that now represented by the network of Sharia', and that 'Islam challenges our way of life in our own country'. It was difficult to grasp precisely what he was referring to, as the unofficial Sharia councils in Britain had no legal power. But Tebbit was peddling a myth widely held within Conservative circles, to the extent that the prime minister at the time, Theresa May, set up an inquiry into Sharia in Britain.
Tebbit's hopeless misunderstanding of Islam became apparent through several crass public comments. Not content with describing the veil as a means of shying away from the rest of the community and "thoroughly rejecting our culture", he also claimed the religion had been "so unreformed since it was created that nowhere in the Muslim world has there been any real advance in science, or art or literature, or technology in the last 500 years".
Norman Beresford Tebbit was born on March 29, 1931, in Enfield, north London. His working-class childhood was suffused with a strong academic performance, earning him a place at Edmonton Grammar School. Tebbit was a pilot in the military and the commercial sector, and was also a trade union official. But it was in politics that he was to make his name. In 1970, he was elected to represent Epping then, four years later, Chingford, the Essex seat he would hold for more than 20 years.
I am one of those who have it on my conscience that I allowed Mr Blair to become Prime Minister
Despite, or perhaps because of, his grounding, Tebbit, with Thatcher 's guidance, sought with the 1982 Trade Union Act to further diminish union power. In days when strikes were rife, the legislation made unions liable for damages stemming from what was deemed illegal protest action. The role of trade and industry secretary beckoned for Tebbit, and subsidies to already struggling industries were cut.
Tebbit was nearly killed by the IRA bomb, an attack on numerous Conservative members staying in The Grand Hotel on the Brighton seafront for the 1984 party conference. The horror of his brush with death was captured by photographers and the appalling image of Tebbit in his pyjamas being carried from the scene on a stretcher is an enduring one.
He recovered well, however, becoming Conservative Party chairman and chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster. But reports circulated that relations with Thatcher, to whom he had been very close, had started to fray, not least because he was identified in some quarters as her potential successor as prime minister. These suspicions were scotched, though. Having helped to orchestrate another general election victory in 1987, Tebbit quit the government on a promise to his wife that he would earn enough money from businesses outside the political sphere to help pay for her care, a pledge he duly honoured.
The Thatcher-Tebbit fulcrum became evident once more when she offered him the post of education secretary, which he rejected. Still, in 1990, Tebbit showed undaunted support for his prime minister as she faced a leadership challenge, which he refrained from joining, although he later apparently aligned himself with her successor, John Major.
Tebbit left the House of Commons for the Lords in 1992, where he was guided by the hidden hand of Thatcher once more, the pair this time reunited in their objection to the Maastricht Treaty that established the EU, the ratification of which they saw as 'treason'. Beginning to voice more and more scepticism of Major, Tebbit hinted he had not pursued the party leadership because he mistakenly believed Major espoused right-wing values – he once said Major had "the mulishness of a weak man with stupidity". The party sank gradually and Tony Blair's "New" Labour took office in 1997. Tebbit's own decision-making subsequently appeared to rankle, as he later explained: "When I look at what happened to the party, I tell myself that perhaps I failed in a duty. I suppose I am one of those who have it on my conscience that I allowed Mr Blair to become prime minister."
In the House of Lords, Tebbit, who was made a life peer, remained an entrenched supporter of Thatcherism and disavowed some of the centrist policies of the party with David Cameron at the helm. Tebbit's politics can be rather well summed up by his assertion: 'It is certainly safe, in view of the movement to the right of intellectuals and political thinkers, to pronounce the brain death of socialism.' He retired from the Lords in March 2022.
He spent much of his time caring for his wife who, as a wheelchair user, was a vigorous campaigner for access for disabled people. He condensed their highs and lows into an entertaining memoir Upwardly Mobile, in which he expressed deep admiration for his wife and the fortitude she had shown following the Brighton blast, after which she spent two years in hospital. A tiresome theme of Tebbit's book, however, was his bleating about the penury that marred his working life. Tebbit could hardly be said to have been short of money, yet by his own measure apparently he was. He went on to write several more books, with varied success. Margaret Tebbit died in December 2020. The couple had three children, William, John and Alison, all of whom survive their parents.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
8 hours ago
- The National
Macron begins state visit to UK amid migrant crisis
A state visit by French President Emmanuel Macron got under way outside London on Tuesday, as British royals joined their visitors for the countries' national anthems in the sunlit grounds of Windsor Castle. Artillery fired a 41-gun salute when Mr Macron arrived in Windsor and the President and king later chatted enthusiastically as Household Cavalry made their way down the road and the open-top carriages arrived. Charles led Mr Macron into the landau and chuckled as they chatted while taking their seats. Mr Macron will address parliament and attend a state dinner before the political side of the three-day visit comes to the fore. In his meetings with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the relationship between the countries will be boosted if there is a deal to tackle migrant crossings over the Channel. A British government spokesman said the UK's 'joint work with the French is stronger than it has ever been'. The state visit, hosted by Charles and Queen Camilla, is the first French state visit to the UK in 17 years, when the now disgraced former French leader Nicolas Sarkozy arrived in 2008. Mr Macron's trip marks the first ceremonial visit to the UK by an EU head of state since Brexit and the first to be staged at Windsor Castle in 11 years. 'That relationship is key to a number of issues and we expect to make good progress on a wide range of priorities, including migration, growth, defence and security, which will deliver on the interests of both the British and the French public," a Downing Street spokesman said. 'We are the first government to have secured agreement from the French to review their maritime tactics so their border enforcement teams can intervene in shallow waters. This is operationally and legally complex, but we're working closely with the French. We expect this to be operationalised soon.' Mr Starmer will host Mr Macron in Downing Street on Wednesday and Thursday. The UK leader will focus on efforts to tackle migration, enhance defence and security co-operation, and boost trade and investment between the countries. Mr Starmer and Mr Macron will be joined by senior government ministers for the 37th UK-France Summit, to be held on Thursday. The leaders will also join an online meeting to discuss increasing support for Ukraine and measures to increase pressure on Russia.


Middle East Eye
8 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
It's time to decolonise the Palestinian economic system
Israel's recent move to cancel the waiver enabling cooperation between Israeli and Palestinian banks is not merely a bureaucratic measure. It is a calculated manoeuvre that strikes at the economic foundation of the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the occupied territories as a whole. This policy shift must be seen as part of a broader campaign to erode what remains of Palestinian institutional autonomy. It is also a punitive response to international censure, including UK-led sanctions on ministers inciting settler violence. Since October 2023, Israel had already banned cash inflows to banks in Gaza, most of which have suspended their services. The cancellation of the indemnity framework further deepens this financial blockade. Only two Israeli banks, Hapoalim and Discount, maintain correspondent banking ties with Palestinian banks. The waiver enables these Israeli banks to indemnify foreign banks that process payments on behalf of Palestinian institutions; its removal effectively severs the Palestinian banking system from global financial networks. The centrality of Israeli financial institutions in the architecture of Palestinian economic life is not incidental. Under the 1994 Paris Protocol, a sub-agreement of the Oslo Accords, the Palestinian economy is tethered to the Israeli shekel, with Israel acting as both gatekeeper and bottleneck for trade, tax revenues and monetary transactions. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The banking waiver is essential for maintaining liquidity in the occupied Palestinian territories, particularly through transferring shekels accumulated by Palestinian banks via local commerce back to Israel. The suspension of this waiver would freeze vital financial flows, risking systemic instability within the Palestinian banking sector. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich's policy shift followed the UK's decision to impose sanctions on him and Itamar Ben Gvir, another extremist Israeli minister involved in stoking violence across the occupied West Bank. Rather than distancing itself from these figures, the Israeli government's response has been to escalate its economic warfare against the Palestinian people. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Smotrich's ideological project is to dismantle the PA incrementally while advancing ambitions for annexation and settlement expansion, often under the guise of regulatory measures. The recent announcement by some Hebron sheikhs to abandon the PA and seek incorporation into the Abraham Accords reflects the Palestinian leadership's growing legitimacy crisis. As financial containment deepens, political alternatives to Oslo are being forged - not through diplomacy, but from the ground up. The sheikhs' economic offer and embrace of joint enterprise with Israel underscores how fiscal paralysis is catalysing secessionist currents within the occupied West Bank. Acute pressure The consequences of the banking decision will be profound if it is not quashed amid external pressure. Without the ability to repatriate shekel surpluses to Israeli clearing houses, Palestinian banks risk exceeding their liquidity thresholds. Such an overflow would disrupt the operations of domestic banks and constrain their capacity to issue loans, pay salaries or conduct cross-border payments for imports. Although the Palestinian Monetary Authority (PMA) has publicly rejected rumours of an imminent banking collapse, its own statements acknowledge the acute pressure facing the sector. The current crisis underscores the structural impossibility of Palestinian financial sovereignty under Oslo's asymmetric framework Already, many Palestinians are reporting their struggles to access dollars and make withdrawals from local banks, creating a black market for the currency as scarcity increases. The current crisis intensifies this dollar liquidity shortage, deepening dependence on Israeli regulatory discretion. The shekel surplus is not a new crisis. Rather, it is a chronic symptom of a distorted economic arrangement, wherein the PA cannot issue its own currency, lacks sovereign control over its borders, and is dependent on an adversarial occupying power for financial operations. The current predicament underscores the structural impossibility of Palestinian financial sovereignty under Oslo's asymmetric framework. Decades of aid dependency and fiscal containment have created a distorted political economy that rewards stability over sovereignty. The illusion of economic governance under occupation has served to insulate Israel against political blowback, while outsourcing service provision to a donor-financed authority with no real fiscal sovereignty. The PMA's reassurances, while institutionally understandable to prevent a run on the banks, do little to mask the core reality. Palestinian banks operate within a financial regime designed to be permanently precarious. They are not immune to coercive shifts in Israeli policy, nor are they buffered by an international community willing to enforce economic and financial protections for a stateless people. The international response thus far remains tepid. While the UK's sanctions on violent ministers are a symbolic step, they fail to address the material levers through which Israeli policy subjugates the Palestinian economy. Legal mechanisms exist to challenge these practices, particularly through frameworks that prohibit economic coercion and collective punishment under international humanitarian law. But such instruments remain politically under-utilised. The shift by the UK and France from pursuing immediate recognition of Palestinian statehood to merely demanding a credible path towards that goal represents a retreat in political boldness. Yet it still constitutes a diplomatic counterweight to the financial containment strategy advanced by Smotrich. Financial recalibration A planned conference in New York (initially set for June but later postponed indefinitely), whose agenda explicitly links recognition to institutional reforms within the PA and other measures, could challenge the Israeli economic coercion campaign by reframing recognition as both a political and financial recalibration. Such an initiative could embed statehood within a framework of international guarantees and structural PA transformation, offering a possible alternative to the Oslo-derived dependency model. Dedollarisation could insulate the Palestinian economy from foreign exchange shocks and external regulatory pressures But preconditions include dismantling parallel Hamas governance. Hamas has rejected disarmament, and neither the US nor Israel has committed to a Palestinian state, raising questions about the likelihood of such efforts succeeding. If the recognition agenda gains traction, it could provide scaffolding for a new financial architecture, supported by regional and European actors, that challenges Israel's monopoly over the Palestinian financial system. Brics members, including China and Russia, could also help with their emerging financial systems. Dedollarisation, as advocated by the PMA and other economic actors, represents one such strategy to reduce vulnerability. By lowering reliance on dollar liquidity and promoting local digital payment systems and trade in national currencies, dedollarisation could insulate the Palestinian economy from foreign exchange shocks and external regulatory pressures. But this would require robust international backing in order to establish alternative clearing arrangements, secure regional buy-in, and develop interoperable digital finance infrastructure. What is needed now is not merely crisis management, but a fundamental rethinking of Palestinian economic and financial strategy. This entails moving beyond the hollow language of 'resilience' and addressing the structural impediments to sovereignty by reasserting the Palestinian right to monetary policy, exploring alternatives to Israeli shekel dependency, and building regional and international alliances that can provide alternative financial conduits. The recent move by Smotrich may have unintended consequences. In attempting to punish the PA and retaliate against European sanctions, Israel might have inadvertently catalysed a broader reassessment of the Oslo economic regime. The technocratic consensus that once held Oslo's financial architecture together is fraying. It is now incumbent on Palestinian policymakers, civil society, and diaspora networks to articulate a coherent economic and financial vision rooted in decolonisation rather than dependency. The current banking crisis is not a sudden shock, but the logical outcome of a prolonged process of economic containment. Each financial rupture, whether in clearance revenues, banking regulations or trade flows, is a reminder that economic governance under occupation cannot be neutral or technocratic. It is an arena of power, one where control over money functions as control over Palestinian life. To break this cycle requires more than technical fixes. It demands a political break with the Oslo economic paradigm, and the assertion of a strategy that reclaims the Palestinian right to define the terms of its own economy and financial system. New technologies and financial propositions in the global economy today offer potential avenues for exploration. The stakes are no longer about growth or reform. They are about liberation and survival. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.


Khaleej Times
10 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Even without wins, Musk's party may be threat to Trump, say analysts
Donald Trump has shrugged off Elon Musk's plans for a new political party as "ridiculous" -- but the announcement underscored the threat the disaffected former ally poses to US Republicans defending paper-thin congressional majorities. Musk's weekend launch of the "America Party" came in the wake of Trump signing into law a sprawling domestic policy bill that the tech mogul has slammed over estimates that it will balloon the deficit. Musk has been light on policy detail, but is expected to target a handful of House and Senate seats in next year's midterm elections where the sitting Republican voted for Trump's bill after preaching fiscal responsibility. "Elon Musk's America Party is a wild card that could upend the midterms in 2026, particularly for Republicans," said political analyst Matt Shoemaker, a former Republican congressional candidate and an ex-intelligence officer. "With bare majorities in Congress, the Republicans should be worried." Musk, the world's richest person, had teased the idea of a new party for weeks, running an informal social media poll in June that showed 80 percent support among 5.6 million respondents. Unlike previous third parties, his would have almost limitless resources, and a talisman with a large constituency of young American men who see him as a maverick genius and a superstar. "Musk's brand appeals to disaffected independents and younger, tech-savvy voters who might otherwise break for Republicans in swing districts," Shoemaker told AFP. - 'Balance of power' - With a personal wealth estimated at $405 billion, Musk has already demonstrated that he is willing to spend big on politics, lavishing $277 million on Trump's 2024 campaign. Yet a more recent foray into Wisconsin politics -- he spent $20 million only to see his candidate for the state supreme court lose handily -- has underlined the limits of wealth and celebrity in politics. And then there is the political difficulty of building support in the American heartland, among voters who are not part of Musk's Silicon Valley "tech bro" bubble. Time magazine's 2021 Person of the Year was once liked by a broad cross-section of Americans, but he saw his numbers plunge after joining the Trump administration as the president's costcutter-in-chief. Musk's net favorability in the most recent rating published by Nate Silver, one of the most respected US pollsters, is underwater at -18.1, compared with a slightly less subaquatic -6.6 for Trump. "While you don't want to paint with too broad a brush, the Republican base and MAGA movement are fairly inseparable in today's political climate," said Flavio Hickel, associate professor of political science at Washington College in Maryland. "And their support for Trump has been unwavering despite recent controversies. It's hard to imagine any political project associated with Musk siphoning off votes from individuals who approve of Donald Trump." - 'Fizzled out' - While multiple Republicans and Democrats have switched to independent, wins for third parties have been rare in modern US history. The Conservative Party of New York State in the 1970s and the Farmer–Labor Party in the 1930s are the only minor parties to win Senate seats in the last century. Smaller parties saw more success in the House in the early 20th century but have only won one seat since the 1950s. AFP spoke to multiple analysts who pointed to the many hurdles thrown in front of third-party candidates trying to get onto the ballot in a system designed to favor the status quo. These include minimum signature requirements, filing fees and other onerous state-specific regulations on age, residency and citizenship. "Remember in early 2024 the so-called 'No Labels' party that was going to chart a middle course for the 2024 elections?" said veteran political strategist Matt Klink. "They fizzled out in epic fashion." Analysts agree that winning seats in Congress may be a stretch, but say Musk can inflict pain on Trump by syphoning votes from vulnerable sitting Republicans or throwing cash at primary opponents of the president's preferred candidates. "Elon's party won't win seats, but it could cost Republicans plenty," said Evan Nierman, the founder and CEO of global crisis PR firm Red Banyan. "In tight districts, even a few points siphoned off from the right could flip control."