Safari park welcomes two newly hatched penguin chicks
Blair Drummond Safari Park in Stirling said the Humboldt penguins hatched in April, after a 40-day incubation period, and are now being cared for by park keepers and their parents.
They are living inside specially made nest boxes, meaning park visitors will not yet be able to see them, but park officials said they are growing quickly and are in good health.
The first chick hatched on April 25 to parents Penny and Izzy, with the second just a few days later on April 29 to parents Pete and Bertie.
Humboldt penguins are native to South America and are classed as vulnerable, with around 24,000 mature penguins left in the wild.
Penguin chicks can weigh as little as 80 grams and teams regularly check their weight to ensure they are developing at the appropriate speed.
Once they moult their grey baby feathers, they begin to venture outside and join the rest of the colony.
Jen Carpenter, penguin team leader at Blair Drummond Safari Park, said: 'We're absolutely thrilled to welcome this year's chicks.
'It's always a joy to see the hard work of our penguin pairs pay off, and these little ones are getting the very best start to life.
'Every successful hatch is a step forward for the species, and we're proud to play our part.
'We can't wait to share their journey as they grow and eventually waddle out to meet the rest of the colony.'
Humboldt penguins are classed as vulnerable in the wild, with populations declining due to habitat loss, overfishing, and climate change.
The chicks have not been named yet, but followers can keep an eye on the Park's social media channels for the big name reveal, plus plenty of behind-the-scenes updates and milestones.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman forbidden from removing bat infestation from her home
A woman has been forced to sleep in her car after discovering hundreds of bats roosting in her home - and being told there is nothing she can do to remove them. Anne-Marie Murchie says she is "living in fear every day" after discovering a colony of more than 500 of the protected animals in the walls and roof of her house in Aberdeen. She first heard flapping noises in the walls and later discovered a bat hiding in her toilet roll holder. She has since found more in the living room and kitchen. The NatureScot agency says it cannot remove bats from homes and has advised Ms Murchie that the animals will leave of their own accord at the end of the "maternity season" in August or September. That has been of no comfort to Ms Murchie, who says her anxiety is "through the roof" from the sound of the bats' constant movement. She told BBC Scotland News: "They're above the spotlights in the kitchen and they've popped them out a few times as well. "I'm scared to come in the house. Sometimes I actually sleep outside in the car. I'm just petrified. "The noise is horrendous, it's like running water. But I think it's all the wings going together, like flapping. "It never stops. They get louder at about five or six at night and then when they come in at five in the morning. But they're constantly making noise. I wonder if they sleep." The bats colonising Ms Murchie's home are soprano pipistrelles, which are among the most common and widespread of British bat species. They are known to form colonies well in excess of 200 adult animals - plus their offspring. NatureScot said these bats are usually seasonal visitors to houses and are present for four or five months of the year. They form maternity colonies in May and June and leave in August and early September, once the young bats are independent. NatureScot's bat workers can collect information and advise homeowners on problems they have with the animals. But it says they "cannot carry out any works to your building or exclude/take away the bats". The agency's Kevin Giles told BBC Scotland News: ''With regard to what you can do with them, actually nothing, because they are a protected species under European protection laws and Scottish and UK laws. "So the bats themselves can't be touched, nor can the roosts.'' Ms Murchie first became concerned about a constant noise in her house a few months ago and believed it must be down to a wasps' nest. But a pest control officer told her it was actually bats after looking at doorbell camera footage and seeing them outside. "We found out they were protected so we went through the proper channels and called Nature Scotland," Ms Murchie said. "They then came out with thermal cameras and that gave them an idea of how many bats there are and all the entry points in the house. "It was about 500 bats at least and about 200 to 300 babies. But now we've found another site so they're coming back next week to see how many are there. "It's absolutely awful. I actually moved out because I couldn't bear to live in the house. You can't come in or out at certain times because there's hundreds of them." Ms Murchie returned to her house after a few weeks in the hope that the bats had left. "I thought, they're definitely not in the house," she said "but then I got up one night and went to the loo. "Half asleep, I grabbed the toilet roll holder and one came out and held on to my hand. I just flipped." She added: "I phoned Nature Scotland and they came straight out. She (the bat expert) took her outside and put it back up beside the roost so she could go back up to her home." Ms Murchie, who is a taxi driver, says she now spends as much time as possible working in her car to get away from the sights, sounds and smells in her house. "The smell comes through the fan. It's like a musty, dirty smell. "It's sad that you can't do anything about it in your own home. "I feel like the rules should change a bit. Surely someone can come in that's licensed and take them away to somewhere humanely?" Licence to seal NatureScot has told Ms Murchie an officer will return to her house next week to update the situation. She said: "Once they've checked that the bats are gone, I can get a special licence and it's confirmation that I can seal up all the potential entry points. So that when they come back next year they won't be able to get in." NatureScot says people affected can call its Bats in Houses helpline on 01463 725 165 or email batsinhouses@ Anyone who finds a grounded bat in their property can also call either the Bat Conservation Trust Bat Helpline (0345 1300 228) or the SSPCA Animal Helpline (03000 999 999) for advice on how to best handle and remove the bat.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Endangered amur leopard cubs take first steps outdoors at Yorkshire Wildlife Park
Doncaster, United Kingdom – July 17, 2025 – Two 12-week-old Amur leopard cubs made their outdoor debut. The rare cubs, one male and one female, were born at Yorkshire Wildlife Park in spring 2025. This marks a key step in their development under the care of mother Kristen and park staff.
Forbes
12 hours ago
- Forbes
Peated Scotch Whisky At Risk Of Ban Within Five Years, Expert Warns
Are your favourite smoky whiskies living on borrowed time? Mark Littler LTD "Peated whisky is absolutely at risk of being banned. There's a significant risk within the next five years, and a high risk within ten years. As climate pressures intensify, politicians may see peat use for flavoring alcohol as an easy target," said Alastair Collier from A Healthier Earth. It's a bold statement. But the numbers speak for themselves. Peat in the UK stores the equivalent of 20 years of all UK CO2 emissions. To put peatlands in context of other more traditional carbon sinks, the peatland in the UK stores the same amount of carbon as the forests of the UK, France, and Germany combined . These figures have led the UK government to ban peat usage in other industries. So why is it still being used to flavour a drink? Peat has been a part of scotch whisky heritage since the birth of the industry. It is used to dry the malted barley, and in doing so adds depth of flavour to one of the world's favourite spirits. It's not just a few minor whiskies either; Johnnie Walker, the biggest internationally sold whisky in the world, is renowned for its layers of sweetness and smoke. Up until the recent bans the scotch whisky industry has accounted for just 1% of peat usage in the UK. But that figure is expected to rise to around 40% over the next three years as further bans are introduced in other industries. Scotch's usage won't increase, but its share of total usage will grow significantly. Peat smoke is used to dry the malted barley. It gives the whisky a distinctive smoky flavour. getty "Burning peat is horrendous. It should be considered a climate crime because of the carbon emissions and impact on the ecosystems where the peat is harvested from' said Alastair Collier, Chief R&D Officer at A Healthier Earth, a company that builds and delivers large-scale sustainability solutions. In an interview with me to discuss the use of peat (and potential alternatives) his opinions on the use of peat in the whisky industry were clear: We ran some calculations, and burning peat for whisky creates around six to ten kilograms of CO₂ per bottle—that's the equivalent of 15 minutes of a short-haul flight every time you open a bottle. Alastair Collier, Chief R&D Officer at A Healthier Earth Alastair went on to point out that while the quantity of the CO2 released isn't huge it comes from a storage that has developed over millennia, isn't renewable and has untold damage on ecosystems reducing biodiversity and negatively impacting water cycles. It's pretty crazy when you hear those kinds of numbers. And it's not hard to imagine how this could become political very quickly. Picture a future where Glasgow hits 40°C in March, private motorists face heavy taxes for driving petrol or diesel cars, and the pressure to cut emissions is coming from every direction. In that kind of climate—literally and politically—the idea of burning a critical carbon sink just to flavour a drink starts to look like an easy target. Laphroaig's iconic smoky profile depends on peat, but sustainable alternatives like biochar could help preserve its character. Mark Littler LTD A Luxury Target In the argument against banning peat there is a potential consideration for heritage, and for economic importance. The Scotch Whisky Association reported that in 2024 scotch whisky exports were worth $7.25 billion (£5.4 billion) and were 2% of all UK goods exports. Those are numbers that need to be respected. Which is fine, because there is an alternative. There are already carbon neutral alternatives to peat for other uses, and Alastair Collier is confident that one could be created to replicate the compounds that give whisky its smokey/peaty flavours. "With intent, investment, and around one to two years of trials, a food-grade biochar, which is a form of captured carbon, could be developed to replicate peat's flavor profile in whisky production. It would allow the same smoky character while moving from a carbon-intensive process to a carbon-neutral one." Alastair Collier, Chief R&D Officer at A Healthier Earth Any government looking to ban peat in whisky is likely to see push back; whisky makes money and also people love it. Even Alastair Collier, knowing the issues, enjoys the result: "I drink whisky and really love the medicinal notes that peated expressions like Talisker. But at the same time, I'm fully aware of the environmental cost of using peat." Personally, I believe that much like ivory in the antiques trade, peat will become a target because it is a high-profile, high-emission luxury. Because luxury will always be first in line for regulation when emissions cuts need to look visible. The Future Of the World's Favourite Whisky Let's be clear; I don't want peated whisky to disappear, but I do think that it's a big elephant in the room. When you have the likes of Diageo, one of the world's largest premium alcohol drinks companies, developing the lightest glass bottle in the world to save transport costs and carbon, but also owning what is soon to be the largest peat extraction site in Scotland, it begs the question of when tradition fades into outdated? I reached out to Diageo for comment on the use of peat and potential alternatives in whisky. They declined to comment directly, insisting it was an industry topic better suited to the Scotch Whisky Association and I should contact them. I'm inclined to disagree given their peat extraction activities. However, when they're actively working on the world's lightest bottle, whilst also pushing the boundaries of whisky making at their new distillery at Port Ellen, I would be astounded if they are not also aware of the potential social and political pressure on their peat usage. Some distilleries are already making the switch away from peat. In 2024 Glenturret, the oldest distillery in Scotland announced that they would be stopping the use of peat in their whisky making in 2025, although their reasoning behind this wasn't purely environmental. 'Our decision to step away from peat in the core range was part of a deliberate move to refine and focus our signature house style here at The Glenturret. It's not a rejection of peat, rather, it's about clarity of direction,' said Ian Renwick, Distillery Director at Glenturret, over an email with me about Glenturret's use of peat. 'Peated Scotch whisky holds a special place in the world of single malts. It offers distinctive character, deep complexity, and emotional connection for many whisky lovers,' added Renwick. 'There will always be a place for peat in scotch, especially when it's used with intention and skill. It may evolve in how it's produced or sourced, but its role in the whisky world is far from over.' The important question remains, would large scotch brands like Glenturret consider an alternative to peat if it existed? 'We're always open to innovation, especially where it supports quality and sustainability. If a credible, environmentally responsible way to create a peat-style profile emerged, we would certainly explore it with curiosity.' Just as Coca-Cola survived the cocaine ban in 1922, and the antiques industry survived the banning of ivory, scotch whisky can adapt to a life beyond peat. A few weeks ago the EU announced plans to cut carbon emissions 90% by 2040, and last month it was announced the world may hit the symbolic 1.5oC global warming in as little as three years—the time it will take this year's batch of whisky to be legally classed as scotch. As climate pressure and challenging targets continue to emerge, the pressure will shift to focus on emissions that even three years ago may have appeared too small to bother with. Smart brands will lead the change. Whether it's now or in three years time—in my opinion it's when not if—the question distillers need to ask themselves is simple: can we adapt. The risk of doing nothing remains to get legislated out and no one wants to see their favourite whisky brands disappear from the shelves.
