Who is Mira Murati? Former OpenAI CTO who rejected Mark Zuckerberg's $1 billion offer to join Meta AI
Mark Zuckerberg
. As the former CTO of
OpenAI
and now the founder of the AI startup Thinking Machines Lab, Murati has become one of the most influential figures in the global AI race.
Her team's unanimous rejection of Meta's massive offer speaks volumes about their confidence in her leadership and their belief in the startup's long-term vision.
Mira Murati: The mind behind
ChatGPT
and beyond
Before launching Thinking Machines Lab, Mira Murati served as the chief technology officer at OpenAI, one of the most influential positions in the modern AI world. During her tenure, she played a pivotal role in leading the development of groundbreaking technologies such as ChatGPT, DALL·E, and Codex—systems that have since transformed the way people interact with artificial intelligence.
Her work helped bring generative AI into the mainstream, sparking a global wave of innovation across industries from education and healthcare to design and coding.
Murati wasn't just a technical leader—she was a strategic visionary. At OpenAI, she emphasized the importance of safety, alignment, and responsible development, pushing the organization to think deeply about the societal impact of powerful AI systems.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now
Tips and Tricks
Undo
Internally, she earned the reputation of being the 'AI brain' behind OpenAI's most ambitious projects, praised for her calm, focused demeanor and her ability to guide multidisciplinary teams through intense periods of innovation.
Her combination of engineering precision and human-centered thinking set the stage for her next bold move: founding her own AI company.
Thinking Machines Lab: a startup with billion-dollar belief
Founded in early 2025, Thinking Machines Lab has rapidly emerged as one of the most-watched AI startups.
Despite not launching a single product yet, the company recently raised a stunning $2 billion seed round at a valuation nearing $12 billion, led by Andreessen Horowitz. The startup's goal: to create customizable, interpretable, and widely accessible AI systems that could redefine the AI landscape.
Why Murati's team said no to Meta
According to a Wired report, Zuckerberg's Meta offered some of Murati's team members compensation packages ranging from $200 million to $1 billion to join its newly launched Superintelligence Lab.
But every single offer was turned down. Sources say the Thinking Machines Lab team believes their equity in the startup has the potential to be worth far more—and more importantly, they value their independence and Murati's vision over big-tech paychecks.
In a tech industry where massive paydays often drive decisions, the loyalty displayed by Murati's team stands out. The rejection of Meta's lucrative offers highlights their belief in the startup's mission and long-term potential.
Many observers also note that the chance to help shape AI's future from the ground up, without the constraints of a corporate giant, is a rare and meaningful opportunity—one Murati has worked hard to create.
A name to watch in AI's future
Mira Murati's leadership has already been recognized worldwide—she was featured in Time's 100 Most Influential People in AI (2024) and Fortune's 100 Most Powerful Women in Business (2023). With Thinking Machines Lab gaining momentum and Meta's billion-dollar offers rebuffed, Murati has solidified her place not just as a builder of AI—but as a shaper of its future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
9 minutes ago
- First Post
US imports from Russia surge 23% in 2025, India calls out Trump for hypocrisy amid tariff threats
Even as Donald Trump threatens India with tariffs over its oil imports from Russia, fresh data shows the US itself has quietly ramped up trade with Moscow, importing key commodities like uranium, fertilisers, and palladium despite earlier sanctions. read more Even as US President Donald Trump attempts to dictate tariff terms and impose penalties on India for importing oil from Russia, Washington's own trade with Moscow is quietly on the rise, even as it chastises New Delhi over its energy and defence ties. According to a report from The Indian Express, between January and May 2025, American imports from Russia rose by 23 per cent year-on-year to $2.1 billion, driven largely by uranium, palladium, and fertilisers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This surge comes despite earlier heavy US sanctions on Moscow. Following the outbreak of the Ukraine war in 2022, US imports from Russia plummeted from $30 billion in 2021 to just $3 billion by 2024. Crude oil, once the top US import from Russia, valued at over $17 billion in 2021, has virtually disappeared. Yet essential commodities such as fertilisers, uranium, and palladium continue to enter the US in significant volumes. According to data from the US International Trade Commission cited in the report, America imported $806 million worth of Russian fertilisers in the first five months of 2025, a 21 per cent increase from last year and 60 per cent higher than the same period in 2021. Uranium imports surged 28 per cent year-on-year to $596 million, nearly 150 per cent higher than in 2021. Although the US formally banned enriched uranium imports from Russia in 2024, companies are allowed to apply for waivers until 2028, a key reason behind the continuing flow. Palladium, primarily used in catalytic converters to reduce vehicle emissions, also remains a significant import. In 2024, the US imported $878 million worth of the metal from Russia. This growing trade has drawn scrutiny after President Donald Trump threatened steep new tariffs on Indian goods, accusing New Delhi of taking advantage of discounted Russian crude. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India hit back sharply. 'The US continues to import uranium, palladium, and fertilisers from Russia even as it criticises us,' the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said on Monday. 'India's oil imports are based on economic necessity, not political preference.' The MEA had earlier criticised the US and European nations for what it called blatant hypocrisy. In 2024, the EU traded goods worth €67.5 billion and services worth €17.2 billion with Russia far surpassing India's total trade. European imports of Russian LNG also hit a record 16.5 million tonnes that year, higher than pre-war levels. 'Unlike India, whose trade is driven by national need, many Western countries continue their commerce with Russia by choice,' the MEA said.
Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- Indian Express
China price war, lack of clarity on US ‘penalty': What Indian exporters are discussing in tariff talks with American importers
Amid a sudden escalation of trade tensions between India and the US, with American President Donald Trump threatening to impose tariffs 'substantially' higher than the 25 per cent announced earlier, Indian exporters face a two-pronged challenge in maintaining access to their largest export market — the US. On the one hand, China has begun aggressively undercutting prices to outcompete other countries; on the other hand, the undefined 'penalty' over and above the 25 per cent reciprocal tariffs has complicated negotiations between US importers and Indian exporters, especially in low-margin products such as apparel and footwear. The uncertainty over the 'penalty' on India for purchasing Russian oil has come at a time when Indian exporters typically receive bulk summer orders, including for cotton garments, lightweight footwear, and linen clothing. Normally, exporters and importers share the burden of additional tariffs, but exporters said contracts have stalled due to the unknown penalty amount. 'A lot of exporters, particularly from the apparel and footwear sectors, are facing uncertainty because summer season orders are set to be placed very shortly. They are in touch with buyers, and some of them have even visited the US. But neither the buyer nor the seller is in a position to state what they are willing to negotiate, as the 'penalty' amount is unknown,' Ajay Sahai, director general & CEO of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO), told The Indian Express. US retailers and apparel companies typically begin shipping merchandise from global suppliers at least two to three months before the summer season starts in April. Traders, typically, begin negotiating contracts much earlier. 'China has become a little more aggressive because they are outpriced by 5 per cent, and they are looking at the extent to which they can reduce the price. That's also a challenge. It may not be entirely possible for the exporter to absorb the duty, and therefore they are requesting that the government should chip in for a limited period only, as we hope that a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) will be concluded by September or October,' Sahai added. However, after Trump threatened to raise tariffs on Indian goods over its purchase of Russian oil, New Delhi on Monday said the targeting of India was 'unjustified and unreasonable', and that the country would take 'all necessary measures' to safeguard its 'national interests and economic security'. 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian oil, they are then, for much of the oil purchased, selling it on the open market for big profits… They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian war machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the tariff paid by India to the USA,' Trump said in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social. Rating agency ICRA said that the higher-than-expected US tariffs on India — and the potential penalty linked to India's crude and defence purchases from Russia — are likely to pose a headwind to India's GDP growth in the current fiscal. 'We have lowered our growth forecast for India for FY2026 by 20 basis points to 6.0 per cent; the extent of the said penalties could result in a further downside,' the agency said. Simon J Evenett, Professor of Geopolitics and Strategy at the International Institute for Management Development (IMD), an independent academic institute in Switzerland, said in a LinkedIn post that tariff threats against India have 'nothing to do with economics'. He said that the United States has now antagonised all five of the original BRICS nations, home to more than 3.2 billion people. 'I struggle to see a coherent grand strategy here — other than to take on every possible pole of alternative power. None of the BRICS have the defence dependence on the USA that the EU, Korea, Japan, and the UK have — and that probably played the greater part in the latter's acquiescence to recent US tariff threats. So what is the US offering to the BRICS?' Evenett said. 'Access to the US market isn't a compelling answer. Take India. Its largest export to the USA is smartphones — does anyone else on the planet buy smartphones? Next biggest export is a variant of diamonds — there are other buyers for these too. Medicines are third on the list — same argument. Light oil next — you get the picture. Only one-sixth of Indian goods exports go to the USA. Big deal,' he added. As Trump has threatened several countries with additional tariffs over the re-routing of goods to the US, Deborah Elms, a trade and economic policy expert with the Hinrich Foundation, said in a LinkedIn post that one key complaint from the business community is the lack of clarity on what the US currently means by 'transshipment'. 'Given that tariffs are about to be 40 per cent on anything deemed to be transshipped, definitions are critically important. Typically, firms are required to 'substantially transform' products. In other words, you aren't allowed to simply take a box, slap a new label on it saying 'from country X', but must take raw materials, parts, and components to create something transformed. The amount of transformation is critically important. In a free trade agreement, officials spend months or years wrangling over these rules. Is there a value threshold that needs to be crossed? Is it a change in tariff heading? Subheading? Unfortunately, with new tariffs coming on August 7, we have no guidance at all on these rules,' Elms said. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
9 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump's war against the world comes at America's expense
Trump seems to visualise that what is good for the globe is not good for the US. AFP President Donald Trump has unleashed an economic war against the rest of the world from the very inception of his second administration. American people, American companies and the entire political class of the United States are not with President Trump's economic policies—domestic or foreign. However, the principal difficulty lies in the fact that not many within the United States who oppose Trump's tariff tantrums are able to counter, resist or confront an administration that is vindictive against the opponents and resorts to retribution or revenge. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD President Trump does not spare anyone who makes statements or brings out reports on issues that run counter to his policies. The latest example is the quick removal of the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, Erika McEntarfar, after the bureau released the job statistics showing that the US labour market is not as resilient as expected. The latest job report indicated that Trump's tariff war and other economic policies have begun to demonstrate the negative consequences of Trump policy. American consumers are yet to feel the adverse impact of high tariffs on imports, partly because some of the US' importers bought foreign goods in bulk and put them in stores before the new tariff would kick in, and partly because some of the import duties are yet to be systematically implemented, as many countries are still in the process of negotiating with the officials of the Trump Administration. The price pressure on consumers will certainly pose a serious political challenge to President Trump. But in order to deal with that possible outcome, the Trump supporters can come up with false data and build an untruthful narrative. Unfortunately, the Democratic Party also appears to be a bystander and unable to counter Trump effectively. The big American companies that contribute to election campaign financing are also mute spectators for fear of becoming the target of Trump's wrath. President Trump's dislike for foreigners is clearly vindicated in his harsh treatment of the immigrants. His aversion for foreign countries is reflected in his call to American companies to return and base their manufacturing activities at home. But this Trumpian drive would harm US companies that have invested around the world, taking advantage of cheap land and labour, by implication, making America richer than other countries. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's anxiety about a rising China that would ferociously compete economically with the US is explicable. But when the Apple company sought to exit from China and enter the Indian market, Trump threatened high duties on the products of the company! It gives the impression that his main goal is not to allow India to grow, even if it is in American interest. Indian economic performance is viewed by President Trump as a 'dead economy', not because he lacks basic knowledge about India but because he would not like to see an India that would question his false statements or assert itself as a country that stands by its policy of strategic autonomy. Trump seems persuaded that his vision of 'America First' would be good for his country. Actually, his America First policy would benefit him and his supporters but harm the United States and the world. He wrongly assumes that in a globalised world with complex interdependence among countries, the US economy can thrive all by itself. He seems to visualise that what is good for the globe is not good for America. Otherwise, he would not have embarked upon a journey that would make the US allies suffer, make the strategic partners reassess the value of partnering with the US and induce the competitors to resolve to stand up to the US. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD By his decision to withdraw the US membership from global institutions and initiatives, such as the World Health Organisation, the Paris Climate Accord, Unesco and the disrespect for the World Trade Organisation, Trump seeks to make America a bolted island country in a deeply interconnected world. Can such an America protect itself against the next pandemic? Can the Americans breathe safe air when the world gets progressively polluted along with rising earth temperature? Can it sustain a durable trading relationship by browbeating countries to accept its policies and diktats through bilateral networks? So far Trump has been in the commanding position for a little above six months. He has a distance to go before he is supposed to step down in January 2029. His recent contemplation for an unconstitutional third term in the White House appears to have been abandoned for the time being. Yet, whether there will be a peaceful transfer of power after the 2028 presidential election in Washington, DC, cannot be predicted now. He pardoned many who were convicted and sentenced to jail due to their involvement in the insurrection of January 6, 2021. Will there be another insurrection? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A lot will depend on how the political scene unfolds within the United States. There is an opportunity for the American voters to send Trump a message in the November 2026 congressional election. There are still openings for Corporate America to press upon him to abandon his damaging tariff policies and other economic measures. The think tanks and the American universities, where academia plays a constructive role in the policymaking ecosystem, are struggling hard to make compromises with the Trump Administration to ensure restoration of federal funding. But still, the American academia can elucidate whether the proverbial emperor is without clothes. But how the international community responds will also determine if the current American imperial presidency is a passing phenomenon. The European allies have been left high and dry by Trump and are clamped with a 15 per cent tariff, which is much higher than the 2.5 per cent tariff that was imposed earlier. The Nato member countries have been bulldozed into spending 5 per cent of their GDP on defence when they are undergoing economic downturn and energy shortages. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Japan and South Korea are forced to pay more to keep the alliance structure alive. India was one of the first countries in 2025 to start negotiations with the Trump team on bilateral trade. After months of negotiations, the Trump Administration keeps pressuring India to open its agricultural sector, which would surely hurt the millions of Indian farmers. This pressure is compounded by its insistence on India to stop buying Russian energy resources, which would again grievously affect India's energy security. China stood firm and responded by restricting rare earth materials. It pinched the US, and Trump promptly relaxed its restrictions on technology and chip trade. But China's export controls hurt many other countries, including India. As the world is facing Trump's tariff war, it remains utterly divided. There were some whispers about the EU, China, Japan and many others coming together to confer on how to manage the uncertainties in international trade and overall political economy. But whispers have not given way to any concrete steps. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The international community rightly thinks that Trump is not America. Numerous countries around the world seem to be interested in waiting him out. But the big question is whether Trumpism will survive Donald Trump. All major countries look prepared to work for a truce with Trump. However, the truce should not be at the cost of the stability of the international trade ecosystem. Trump's economic war against the world will not end soon unless there are countermeasures against Trumpian unilateralism. The author is founding chairperson, Kalinga Institute of Indo-Pacific Studies, and editor, India Quarterly. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
