Equalities watchdog to consider enforcement powers after NHS Fife exchange
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) had earlier sought to remind the health board of its 'obligations' under equalities legislation.
It said assessments of new policies and practices which affect equalities legislation must be published.
The intervention came amid a high-profile employment tribunal brought against NHS Fife by nurse Sandie Peggie – who was suspended after she complained about having to share a changing room with transgender medic Dr Beth Upton at the hospital where they both worked.
Chaired by Baroness Kishwer Falkner, the EHRC has powers to carry out investigations and apply for interdicts in the Scottish courts, if it believes organisations are not complying with equalities law.
The Daily Telegraph reported an exchange of letters between the EHRC and NHS Fife.
One of these was a March 27 letter from NHS Fife chief executive Carol Potter to EHRC chief executive John Kirkpatrick.
She said: 'We recognise the significant media attention and public discussion this issue has generated.
'However, as with any complex legal and organisational matter, not all facts or considerations may be fully reflected in external reporting.'
She said the health board recognises its responsibilities under the Equalities Act 2010, saying that the current legal process must conclude before any potential changes to practices can be considered.
NHS Fife is 'committed to fostering a safe, inclusive, and non-discriminatory environment for all staff and patients', the chief executive said.
Ms Potter also said NHS Fife is also awaiting the publication of a national 'gender transitioning guide' from NHS Scotland which will inform policy.
A spokesperson for the EHRC told the PA news agency: 'The policies and practices of all Scottish health boards must comply with the Equality Act 2010, as it relates to the provision of single-sex services and spaces.
'We wrote to NHS Fife to remind them of their obligations under the Public Sector Equality Duty, and request that they provide information relevant to the provision of changing facilities for their staff and the rights of different groups in the application of these policies.
'We are currently reviewing the response NHS Fife provided and will be writing to them again shortly.
'As Britain's equality regulator, we will consider any appropriate next steps, including the use of our enforcement powers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
30 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
'New cotton bud'. Plastic hygiene product should be banned
A group of 20 organisations, including campaigns, charities and businesses, has issued the letter urging the Scottish Government to ban them. Flossers join a long list of personal hygiene and other products that have littered Scotland's coastlines, including not only cotton buds, but wipes, plastic cutlery, sanitary towels, pharmaceutical blister packs, Covid masks, interdental brushes and straws. Some, like cotton buds and straws, have been banned. But others continue to make their way into waterways, landfill and sewage systems, contributing to the rising deluge of global plastic pollution that is showing no signs of slowing. The call comes in the run up to the final round of talks for the UN global plastics treaty, which is looking at how to tackle both plastic waste and plastic at source. This new form of waste is just one element in the rising tide of pollution driven by production levels are set to triple by 2060. 'The dental flosser may be a small, innocuous-looking item,' the letter observes, 'but single use dental flossers are being sold in multi-packs by most supermarkets and pharmacies, and they are littering our streets, parks and beaches. We have collated photo evidence of these items across Scotland, from the pristine beach of the island of Colonsay, to the city streets of Edinburgh and Glasgow, to the east coast by St Abbs." A move like this, the authors point out, would align with the [[Scottish Government]]'s forthcoming Circular Economy Strategy, which has targets to reduce plastic production and waste, as well as the New Plastics [[Economy]] Global Commitment, which the [[Scottish Government]] signed in 2018. A dental flosser found on the Isle of Colonsay (Image: Rachael Revesz) Concerned signatories include campaigner and social media influencer Laura Young, also known as 'Less Waste Laura', who led the campaign against disposable electric vapes and Don MacNeish, a founder of the Community of Arran Seabed Trust (COAST), one of the voices in David Attenborough's recent Ocean documentary. Some of the signatories are clean up groups who have noticed the rise in dental flossers in litter picks. Marion Montgomery of Paws on Plastic said: 'They are something that our members find regularly on walks, in parks, on streets. Not only are they an example of unnecessary single use plastic but they also pose a potential risk to animals and an environmental hazard for generations.' Waste from Arrochar litter sink (Image: The GRAB Trust) Beach cleaners from Scottish Coastal Clean Up observed that the flossers tended to be found "wherever we find wipes". The letter points out that while dental flossers, also called, 'dental harps', 'may be more accessible for some people to maintain dental hygiene', there are alternative products. Even so-called 'eco flossers', it notes, are problematic since they are made from 'equally harmful bioplastics'. 'We urge policy makers to turn the tide against our throw-away culture by banning the sale of an item that is barely used for a few seconds before it spends decades, if not centuries, in landfill," the letter said. In recent years Scotland has banned plastic straws, drink stirrers and polystyrene food containers. "We've charged a fee on plastic bags," says the letter, "and we've banned single use vapes. These have been bold moves, and they've had a remarkable impact. READ MORE: Scottish scientists discover new threat to marine life: sunscreen meeting plastic 'The beach crunched': Scotland's extreme beach cleans Less than 10% of plastic produced globally comes from recycled materials – study The problem, Ms Young pointed out, is that the flosser is just one of many single-use items contributing to wider plastic pollution, with ever more new items entering the market. 'Plastic dental flossers are yet another example of unnecessary single-use waste polluting our environment. I've seen them in towns and cities, littering streets and clogging gutters, and on our beaches, alongside other toiletry-related waste like plastic cotton buds, tampon applicators, and wet wipes.' Progress, she noted, has already been made on some items, with bans like plastic cotton buds and straws. 'But the rest? Still polluting our environment and wasting resources.' "It's frustrating that we continue to act only after these plastics become a visible problem. We need upstream solutions, not piecemeal bans. The United Nations Global Plastics Treaty meeting this month is a chance for us collectively to go beyond voluntary pledges and weak commitments. We need binding global action that holds corporations accountable, enforces plastic reduction targets, and redesigns the systems driving overconsumption. "Individuals can choose better, businesses must do better, and governments must act faster and smarter. The planet can't wait." Kat Jones, director of Action to Protect Rural Scotland, said that the ban would be a "start" but that laws are needed "to encourage and incentivise producers make responsible products." "Producers are constantly inventing new types of throw-away item while persuading us that we can't live without them. The one-use flosser is an absolute prime example. "Until producers can turn their skills in innovation and technical knowhow to the service of sustainability, rather than thinking of the next throw-away gimmick, we are always going to be battling waste, litter and the pollution of our seas item by item." Personal hygiene litter collected by beach clean artist Lil Vischer (Image: Vicky Allan) The letter is also not the only one to be issued as the UN Global Plastic Treaty talks begin in Geneva, calling for action and commitment from the Scottish Government. Another open letter to the first minister, from 18 groups including Friends of the Earth Scotland and Stop Climate Chaos Scotland, has outline the damage created by plastic, and called for the Scottish Government to act now to prevent further harm. Kim Pratt, circular economy campaigner for Friends of the Earth Scotland said: 'We all want a future free from plastic pollution, but the Scottish Government is failing to take the actions needed to protect people and nature from the growing harms of the plastics crisis. "Promises at an international level will only be meaningful if they are backed up with action at a local level. Industry-backed solutions, such as recycling, do not address the underlying cause of the plastics crisis – that there is too much plastic to begin with and more is being made every day. 'It doesn't have to be this way. The Global Plastics Treaty is an incredible opportunity internationally, and a chance for the Scottish Government to reset the way plastics are used in Scotland too. 'There are practical steps the Scottish Government should be taking today to halt the plastics crisis. These include immediately banning the burning of plastic waste, forcing companies to be responsible for cleaning the products they sell, and investing in reuse services.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Scotland was the first part of the UK to implement a ban on some of the most problematic single-use plastic products and we continue to work with our partners to reduce many sources of plastic pollution as possible and also to support the removal of rubbish from our seas and coastline. 'In addition, the Circular Economy (Scotland) Act 2024 increases the powers available to the Government to take action on waste in Scotland, and we are also progressing with international efforts to address major pollution sources such as plastic pellets, as well as supporting the removal of rubbish from our seas and beaches.'
The Herald Scotland
30 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Baillie: Urgent NHS Fife inquiry needed for Sandie Peggie
Ms Peggie is suing her employer and Dr Beth Upton after the nurse at Victoria Hospital objected to sharing a changing room with the transgender medic on Christmas Eve 2023. She was suspended on January 3, 2024, after Dr Upton submitted a complaint alleging bullying and harassment and two patient safety concerns. Ms Peggie was cleared of all four gross misconduct allegations after NHS Fife ruled there was "insufficient evidence". Speaking exclusively to The Herald, Dame Jackie said the Scottish must "end" it, adding there "absolutely" needs to be an independent investigation into the health board. She said: "I can't help but think of the 800,000 people on waiting lists across Scotland, many of whom are from Fife: the delayed discharges, the cancer waiting lists. Read more: "All of them exert the real pressures on the NHS and yet so much time of NHS Fife's senior management team has been devoted to this case." She added: "Sandra is a nurse and we should value our nurses. NHS Fife's primary responsibility is healthcare and dealing with patients, so why are they pitting staff groups against each other? "I also question the sense of NHS Fife being joint defenders in this action and I question the amount of money that's been spent on this and every day. NHS Fife are not covering themselves in glory." NHS Fife's legal costs reached £258,831 on June 30, 2025, but are likely to have soared since the tribunal resumed in July. Dame Jackie condemned the Scottish Government handling of the failed GRR legislation. (Image: Colin Mearns) In February, Dame Jackie, alongside party leader Anas Sarwar, said they would not vote for the GRR Bill "knowing what we know now". Labour MSPs were whipped to support the legislation in 2022, with Carol Mochan and Claire Baker losing their frontbench roles for opposing it. But Dame Jackie told [[The Herald]] that the party backed the legislation because the [[Scottish Government]] gave "reassurances" that all of the complexities would be discussed with the UK Government. Read more: The Scottish Government lost its Court of Session appeal against the UK Government's decision to block the legislation using a Section 35 of the Scotland Act. The court argued that the Scottish legislation would have a significant impact on equality law across the UK, particularly the Equality Act 2010. The Bill aimed to simplify the process for transgender people to obtain legal recognition of their acquired gender. It would have lowered the age for legal recognition and removed the requirement for a medical diagnosis, while also shortening the waiting time. The Scottish Labour deputy leader said: "There is no way on earth that Scottish ministers - and particularly the health minister - knew nothing about what was going to happen. I don't understand why we are still here. Some people believe it should play out, but to be frank, if I was the Scottish Government, I would have ended this. "The issue now is that Sandie Peggie won't be the only person. There will be other health boards and other public bodies. The government needs to move fast on this. It can't wait until after the election." "Practically, we need to see where there has been institutional capture and fix that," she added. "That's what the Scottish Government should do without waiting. I'm now in a place that says we should be inclusive of everybody in society but there's a way of doing it that safeguards the rights of others." Ms Baillie said she "had assurances on the record" that the Scottish Government would liaise with the UK Government. "Our fault was to believe the reassurances we'd been given that there were negotiations going on with the UK Parliament." A spokesperson for NHS Fife said: 'NHS Fife did not initiate the ongoing legal proceedings and is instead defending an action brought against it. 'While we recognise the significance of the ongoing tribunal, the Health Board has never lost sight of its core purpose, which is to provide the best possible healthcare services for the people of Fife. 'Furthermore, we remain committed to ensuring our working environments are respectful, inclusive, and supportive places for all of our staff, while fulfilling our statutory and legal obligations as an employer.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: "It would be inappropriate to comment further while judicial proceedings in an Employment Tribunal are ongoing. 'This year, we are investing a record £21.7 billion in health and social care including £106 million to help health boards tackle the longest waits and deliver over 300,000 additional appointments."
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
SNP's 'crucial' step forward to tackle 'cowboy' Botox
However, opposition parties have since questioned why it has taken the SNP so long to commit to any action as they call on the Scottish Government to go further. The Scottish Government is currently aiming to introduce a bill this year to regulate the profession following concerns about botched procedures. This includes requiring licenced professionals to administer certain treatments in regulated settings. At the moment, anyone can carry out non-surgical procedures without formal training in Scotland. Mr McMillan, who has championed for tighter regulations in this area, described the Government proposals as a 'crucial step forward in putting patient safety first'. The [[SNP]] MSP for Greenock and Inverclyde told [[The Herald]]: 'For too long, people have been left exposed to unsafe and unregulated practices in the cosmetic procedures industry. 'Whilst it's important we recognise there are skilled practitioners across Scotland who are appropriately qualified and delivering cosmetic procedures, I've also heard first-hand accounts from patients who've suffered due to a lack of proper oversight. I'm proud that the Scottish Government has consulted with businesses, stakeholders and the public, and is taking decisive action. 'This is a crucial step forward in putting patient safety first. These new proposals will protect vulnerable individuals, raise standards across the board and ensure that those carrying out such procedures are properly trained and accountable." The new measures include introducing a minimum age of 18 for all non-surgical cosmetic procedures and a three tier classification system for treatments based on risk level. READ MORE: What is happening with Botox in Scotland? 'Barbietox' social media trend raises Scottish Botox fears Under the proposals, group one procedures, such as microneedling and non-ablative laser treatments, will require both a premises licence and individual practitioner licences issued by local authorities. Meanwhile, group two procedures, including botox and dermal fillers, must be supervised by a qualified healthcare professional in a setting regulated by Healthcare Improvement Scotland (HIS). Stricter measures will be enforced on group three procedures such as breast and buttock augmentation, which would only be allowed to be performed by a qualified healthcare professional in an HIS-regulated setting. The British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons has said the regulations are a "big step" forward, however, they would like to see more restrictions in place for those administering Botox and other injectables in Scotland. The Scottish Conservatives, have said questions remain as to why it has taken so long to clamp down on 'cowboy practitioners' who risk endangering people's lives as they said they would also like to see the government go further. Scottish Conservative health spokesperson Dr Sandesh Gulhane MSP said: 'Given the prevalence of cowboy practitioners who have operated illegally for years, questions will rightly be raised about why the SNP are only now springing into action. 'This long overdue clampdown will tragically be too late for many patients who have suffered at the hands of rogue practitioners because of the SNP's inaction on this spiralling issue. 'I have seen the devastating consequences of these procedures first-hand which is why SNP must stop dragging their heels and urgently introduce robust legislation to ensure fully registered practitioners are administering safe and licenced products.' The Scottish Greens have welcomed the move from the [[SNP]] and they would like to see cosmetics procedures carried out by those with a medical background. A party spokesperson said: 'Non-surgical cosmetic procedures does not mean they are any less risky or less of a big decision to make. These procedures in many cases have long lasting effects, and often result in permanent changes to someone's physical appearance, that cannot always be fixed by dissolving or waiting for the effects to lessen. 'That is why regulation of the industry is so important, to ensure that these procedures are carried out safely by practitioners with a medical background, who are highly-trained, insured and indemnified, and regulated by a professional medical body. 'Ultimately it is up to individuals if they choose to have these procedures to ensure they do their research beforehand to know the risks, and also to make sure their practitioner is reputable, will carry out consultations and say no if they think it is in your best interest, and are medically trained to help immediately if something goes wrong. 'The Scottish Government has a duty to make people's choices safer by ensuring that the non-surgical cosmetics industry is better regulated for both practitioners and public safety.' Trading Standard leaders have already warned of a 'wild west' of Botox, fillers and Brazilian butt lifts being offered by untrained people in places such as public toilets. The Chartered Trading Standards Institute said there was a need for urgent Government action over unregulated and unlicensed practitioners and treatments, alongside where they can be offered. There is no legislation anywhere in the UK to stop non-healthcare professionals, such as beauticians, from training to use the injectables - although, as a prescription drug, it should not be available to non-prescribers. Training to carry out Botox consists of Level 6 and Level 7 qualifications and these require trainees to observe and then perform Botox procedures under supervision. Labour has said they will continue to scrutinise the proposals as it is "vital" they are robust. Scottish Labour Health spokesperson Jackie Baillie said "Right now it is the Wild West in the world of cosmetic treatments and it is right that action is taken to deal with that vacuum. "It is vital that the SNP gets these regulations right - Ministers must listen to the warnings from experts and ensure its new laws deliver high standards across the industry and protect the health and wellbeing of anyone considering these procedures. "Scottish Labour will continue to scrutinise these changes so we can have confidence that our beauty industry is following the highest standards." Scottish Liberal Democrat health spokesperson Alex Cole-Hamilton MSP said: 'The harms and complications resulting from non-surgical procedures are well-documented, so I am glad that the government are looking at the ways in which these can be addressed. 'If these procedures go wrong, the consequences for peoples' health and wellbeing can be huge, so it is critical that we get regulation in this area right. 'Scottish Liberal Democrats will be considering these proposed measures very carefully. In the meantime, the government must be on the front foot in terms of spelling out the risks and experiences of others, so that people can make informed decisions.'
