
Letters: Democrats would be wise to take a commonsense approach to immigration
Instead of calling it 'comprehensive immigration reform,' it would make more sense, and likely have a better chance of acceptance by the Republican majorities in Congress, if they tackled one or two issues such as temporary visas for seasonal workers or how to handle the 'Dreamers' issue.
Immigration is a complicated issue, but some commonsense proposals should be acceptable to all parties.I and millions of other Americans are jubilantly happy to see President Donald Trump deporting immigrants in the country illegally, despite what the Tribune's opinion writers and editors think of his policies.
My great-grandparents all applied for citizenship to come here, as did so many other citizens now living here. Anyone here illegally should be thrown out for breaking our laws.I remember watching the hearings involving the Army and U.S. Sen. Joseph McCarthy on TV, now 71 years ago. The national audience saw Army lawyer Joseph Welch look at McCarthy and say those now iconic words, 'Have you no decency, sir?' That sentiment matched the mood of much of the nation, and it helped lead to the downfall of this cruel demagogue.
Today, we are experiencing another cruel demagogue who sits in the Oval Office of the White House. Executive order after executive order has attacked our large immigrant community with mass deportation; decimated the federal government, forcing thousands of employees to lose their jobs without cause; cut into needed health care; targeted the president's so-called enemies; knocked out our critically needed foreign aid; shaken down our universities and major law firms; shut down funding for much-needed research in medicine and many other fields; and threatened schools and libraries that seek to offer unbiased education. And much more.
The cruelty and inhumanity of these actions have no match in American history. Monumental damage has already been done, and much of the nation lives with the question: 'Who will be next?' It is time that we ask of all of the president's ardent supporters, our fellow citizens: 'Have you no decency, people?Finally. With its front-page story 'Letters tell children to leave the country' (July 20) the Tribune at long last puts the spotlight on immigration matters. Certainly, this heart-wrenching account deserves its prominent place in the paper. But what of the many other highly disturbing developments in the ever-expanding saga of President Donald Trump's pursuit to make good on his promise to deport millions of immigrants?
I've been scouring the recent issues of the Tribune but have found scant coverage of our country's seeming descent into what more and more resembles a fascist state, one that sanctions Gestapo-like raids to target immigrants at their workplaces, their schools and their places of worship or takes aim at law-abiding individuals as they just go about their daily lives.
Government claims that 'only criminals' will be or have been caught up in the Immigration and Customs Enforcement dragnet are countered by the facts. Statistics and unsettling reports uncovered by reputable news outlets tell a different story.
Where is the Tribune's megaphone about the Department of Homeland Security's abrupt ending of Temporary Protected Status for tens of thousands of Hondurans and Nicaraguans? These people have been given only 60 days to leave the U.S. Similarly, the Donald Trump administration has moved to revoke TPS for as many as 900,000 individuals from Haiti, Venezuela, Afghanistan, Cameroon and Nepal who are living here. Until now, successive administrations have regularly renewed such TPS status, deeming these neighbors worthy of prolonged help.
Or what of the recent memo from the acting director of Immigrations and Custom Enforcement, Todd Lyons, which directed officers to hold immigrants in ICE custody 'for the duration of their removal proceedings' and not be granted the bond hearings that previously had allowed most people without criminal records to be released on parole until final removal proceedings? This policy shift could significantly swell the numbers of those held in immigration detention facilities, detentions which could last for months or even years.
The billions of dollars just allocated in the bill passed by Congress will ensure more and more such facilities will be built, likely by private contractors. Consider the vile conditions reported at the recently built 'Alligator Alcatraz' in the Florida swamp.
We all need to raise our voices about such injustices. Shame on us for just going about our normal lives as these travesties are being committed in our name. And shame on the news media for abdicating their responsibility to amplify the truth.Thank you for the lengthy and enlightening article in the Sunday Tribune. The information in 'Letters tell children to leave the country' left me shaken and in tears that President Donald Trump is using his powers to authorize the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to send letters to children who have settled in the United States, many with family members, while waiting for their immigration cases to be heard.
The letters are threatening. The letters are written to instill fear. The letters do not provide information regarding due process, resources or representation. Children receiving these letters are left with the threat 'the federal government will find you.' Children and family members are left with the feeling that they will be separated, again.
Since the absolutely disastrous immigration policy of President Dwight Eisenhower, no other president has authorized and implemented such a disruptive, destructive, demonstrably illegal deportation program as we currently are experiencing in the U.S.
What led to the downfall of Eisenhower's plan to deport legal and invited people of Mexican heritage, many of them U.S. citizens, was the egregious racism. But only after countless lives were disrupted, factories lost employees and farmers lost workers who had been legally invited to this country.
What will it take to stop this illegal 'we don't need a warrant' deportation policy led by Trump? What will it take to allow children living in this country under presidentially given authorization to live freely, attend school without fear and become citizens of these United States? What will it take to stop this madness?Instead of anguishing about the existence of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tribune writers should take time to familiarize themselves with some of America's border and immigration laws.
Let's start with our Constitution. Article IV speaks of Congress' responsibility to protect our borders. In 2001, the Twin Towers in New York and the Pentagon were attacked by terrorists from within America. Thousands of Americans were killed. As a result, the Homeland Security Act of 2002 was passed by a majority in the House. Ninety senators voted 'yea,' including Dick Durbin and Peter Fitzgerald of Illinois. And along with that bill was the birth of ICE.
Then there is the long-standing Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965. Let's not forget the Secure Fence Act of 2006. U.S. Sens. Barack Obama of Illinois and Chuck Schumer of New York voted 'yea' on that one.
If the protesters took time to familiarize themselves with immigration and border laws of our land, they may comprehend the existence of ICE.
If that doesn't work, protest Congress, which passes the laws. That same Congress has the power to repeal laws, including all of the above.
A redirect is necessary.I can't pretend the reasons we originally created public broadcasting still hold water today. PBS and NPR were born in a time when media access was limited, when a few networks controlled the narrative and when 'public interest' meant filling a gap that no one else could.
That gap doesn't exist anymore. Anyone with an internet connection now has access to a massive range of educational content, news and entertainment. YouTube can teach your kids math. Podcasts cover every niche you can think of. Emergency alerts come from phones, local TV, social media and apps, not just a radio tower in the middle of nowhere.
The idea that taxpayer money still needs to subsidize a system built for the 1970s isn't sacred; it's outdated. If PBS and NPR provide value, they should survive the same way everyone else does: with quality content, community support and trust. If they can't, maybe that says something.
Letting go of old institutions isn't cruel. It's recognizing that the world has moved on and the tools we need have changed.Each day, I think that things cannot get worse, yet they do. Law firms (even big, powerful ones) capitulate to President Donald Trump's bullying. Universities are forced to cancel curriculum and research. Media outlets (Paramount and Disney) cave under the intimidation tactics of this corrupt administration. Birthright citizenship is threatened. Medicaid is being cut, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits may be denied and workers are deported without due process.
It sounds like a doomsday fictional novel, but sadly, these are facts. We, the average citizens, feel angry and helpless. After all, how can we stop Qatar from donating a $400 million jet to Trump? What strings are attached? What power do we possess to stop the submission of many to the capricious and vindictive will of our president?
Well, this is what I'm doing. I sent my donations to NPR, PBS, the Greater Chicago Food Depository, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Democratic National Committee. Let's march in protest rallies, write to our local newspapers and boycott the media outlets (and their sponsors) that have succumbed to the pressure.
Let's complain to our elected officials and donate our time and funds to worthy institutions. It is never acceptable to accept bullying, to quietly watch our democracy disintegrate. We must stand up, shout and fight these injustices.
What are your suggestions for nonviolent protest and positive action?I feel shame. I did what I could. I wrote emails, I called — even those who were not my senators. But the big, bad bill passed. Senators and representatives had to be coerced or threatened to vote for it. That is a very big sign that something is wrong. This bill will not decrease the national debt that so many said they were concerned about, and it will negatively impact health care for people and communities and create conditions for children to go hungry. This is a very unkind bill.
Why do I feel shame? My country, so vast and so rich, in people, places, talents and needs, has people in leadership who decided that there are many people and places that don't matter. That only those with loads of wealth and power matter. Because they have the power, they can decide what they want and take it. Poor people with no money will go without. Those with no power will have to just figure it out.
This country that cares so much for fetuses will not support health care and tests for the bodies that carry the fetus. If the fetus makes it through a birth, good luck with health care, food and housing, or making it through what used to be called childhood diseases and now will be childhood killers.
America used to be generous. Now it feels scary, distrustful, angry, cruel and small.
The small is in the thinking. With our wealth, vast in so many ways, we can't seem to come up with a truly fair tax system, which allows us to cover everyone with health care and cover basic needs. We cannot seem to figure out affordable housing and help with day care, both for children and adults. We are bewildered with taking action regarding energy and climate change, even though suggestions and answers have been available for over 50 years. As a nation, we have destroyed our trust and goodwill in the world. Trust is fragile and so difficult to earn.
Our economy will probably collapse with the very high level of debt, and then everyone will feel pain. The wheels are in motion and just keep rolling downhill, causing so much unnecessary destruction.
Going backward is painful. Most people prefer to move forward and want answers to the real problems in their lives.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
2 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Disgraced former US Rep. George Santos to begin serving his 7-year fraud sentence
NEW YORK — Disgraced former U.S. Rep. George Santos is expected to begin serving a seven-year prison sentence on Friday for the fraud charges that got him ousted from Congress. The New York Republican pleaded guilty last summer to federal wire fraud and aggravated identity theft charges for deceiving donors and stealing people's identities in order to fund his congressional campaign. He must report to federal prison before 2 p.m. It's unclear where he'll serve his time, though a federal judge has recommended that Santos be housed in a facility in the Northeast. Santos and his lawyers repeatedly declined to comment to The Associated Press, and the federal Bureau of Prisons said it doesn't discuss the status of inmates until they're officially in custody. In a Thursday interview with Al Arabiya, a Saudi state-owned news organization, Santos said he'll serve his sentence in a minimum-security prison 'camp' that he described as a 'big upgrade' from the medium-security lockup he was initially assigned to. The ever-online Santos, who turned 37 on Tuesday, also hosted a farewell party for himself on the social media platform X on Thursday night. 'Well, darlings…The curtain falls, the spotlight dims, and the rhinestones are packed,' he wrote in a post afterwards. 'From the halls of Congress to the chaos of cable news what a ride it's been! Was it messy? Always. Glamorous? Occasionally. Honest? I tried… most days.' In April, a federal judge declined to give Santos a lighter two-year sentence that he sought, saying she was unconvinced he was truly remorseful. In the weeks before his sentencing, Santos said he was 'profoundly sorry' for his crimes, but he also complained frequently that he was a victim of a political witch hunt and prosecutorial overreach. Santos was elected in 2022, flipping a wealthy district representing parts of Queens and Long Island for the GOP. But he served for less than a year and became just the sixth member of the House to be ousted by colleagues after it was revealed he had fabricated much of his life story. During his winning campaign, Santos painted himself as a successful business owner who worked at prestigious Wall Street firms when, in reality, he was struggling financially. He also falsely claimed to have been a volleyball star at a college he never attended and referred to himself as 'a proud American Jew' before insisting he meant that he was 'Jew-ish' because his Brazilian mother's family had a Jewish background. The cascade of lies eventually led to congressional and criminal inquiries into how Santos funded his campaign and, ultimately, his political downfall. Since his ouster from Congress, Santos has been making a living hosting a podcast called 'Pants on Fire with George Santos' and hawking personalized video messages on Cameo. He has also been holding out hope that his unwavering support for President Donald Trump might help him win a last-minute reprieve. The White House said this week that it 'will not comment on the existence or nonexistence' of any clemency request. In media appearances this month, the former lawmaker wasn't shy about sharing his morbid fears about life behind bars. 'I'm not trying to be overdramatic here. I'm just being honest with you. I look at this as practically a death sentence,' Santos told Tucker Carlson during an interview. 'I'm not built for this.' On social media, his recent musings have sometimes taken a dark turn. 'I'm heading to prison, folks and I need you to hear this loud and clear: I'm not suicidal. I'm not depressed. I have no intentions of harming myself, and I will not willingly engage in any sexual activity while I'm in there,' he said on X. 'If anything comes out suggesting otherwise, consider it a lie … full stop.'


Chicago Tribune
2 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump wants to play global peacemaker. Derailed Gaza ceasefire shows how daunting that ambition is
WASHINGTON — The United States cutting short Gaza ceasefire talks this week plunges one of President Donald Trump's pushes to solve global conflicts into new uncertainty. The derailing of talks to solve the 21-month Israel-Hamas war is the latest blow to Trump as several of his efforts to broker agreements for fraught conflicts and complex global threats have stalled. Though the Republican president has only been back in office for six months, he has sought to be known as a peacemaker. In some cases, he has set ambitious goals that have fallen short, like a promise to end the still-ongoing war in Ukraine before he took office. Trump has said he's seeking the deals to stop destruction and loss of life. But he has also been open about his ambition to be awarded a Nobel Peace Prize, prompting some of those seeking to cultivate favor with Trump to nominate him for the prestigious recognition. Here's a look at where some of Trump's efforts to strike peace and security deals stand. STATUS: No major breakthroughs in recent talks. THE BACKSTORY: Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff said Thursday that the U.S. was bringing home its negotiating team from Qatar, where talks were ongoing, to assess its next steps. Witkoff said the move was made because Hamas was not showing 'good faith' toward reaching a ceasefire, but U.S. officials did not offer specifics. No major breakthroughs have occurred despite weeks of talks in Qatar, along with a visit early this month to the White House by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Witkoff said the U.S. would 'consider alternative options to bring the hostages home,' but U.S. officials did not answer questions about what those options could include. When asked about next steps on Friday, Trump told reporters that Hamas didn't want to make a deal and said, 'I think what's going to happen is they're going to be hunted down.' STATUS: War still going on. THE BACKSTORY: Before he returned to office, Trump repeatedly said he would solve the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours — and even before he was sworn in as president. That didn't happen, and both sides remain far apart on reaching an agreement. Trump has become increasingly critical of President Vladimir Putin in recent months and is losing patience with his continued offensive in Ukraine. But Trump has resisted backing a bipartisan U.S. bill to impose steep sanctions on Russia, instead giving Russia 50 days to accept a peace deal or face sanctions on its energy exports. The delay has given Russia a window to continue a stepped-up offensive in Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy this week reiterated his willingness to meet face-to-face with Putin to end the conflict. Russia has rejected the offer, saying the countries are too far apart. Lower-level Ukrainian and Russian officials met Wednesday for talks in Istanbul, but no breakthroughs were announced. Putin has said any peace deal should include Ukraine withdrawing from the four regions that Russia illegally annexed in September 2022 but did not fully capture. He also wants Ukraine to renounce its bid to join NATO and accept limits on its military. Ukraine and its Western allies have rejected those terms. STATUS: Open conflict ended for the moment. Many unanswered questions remain. THE BACKSTORY: Trump was able to broker a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran after the U.S. joined Israel in launching strikes on Iran's nuclear program. But the status of Iran's nuclear program is another unanswered question for the Trump administration. While the recent U.S. and Israeli strikes dealt a blow to Iran's nuclear capacities, the United States has still not struck an agreement with Iran over its nuclear program. An Iranian diplomat said Wednesday that his country was ready to engage in talks on its nuclear program with the United States, but only after Washington takes meaningful steps to rebuild trust. Meanwhile, Iran has opened the door to a separate yet related negotiation track with Britain, France and Germany, three of the remaining members of a 2015 nuclear deal, which Trump withdrew the United States from in his first term. Foreign ministers from the four countries met in Istanbul on Friday to discuss European threats to reimpose sanctions on Iran if there is no progress on a deal to limit its nuclear program by August. While deals in some of the most pressing conflicts have remained elusive to Trump, he has helped to broker agreements in the months he's been back in office. RWANDA-DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO: In June, he invited leaders from Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo to the White House to sign an agreement seen as a major step toward peace after decades of conflict. The U.S.-brokered deal emphasizes the two neighboring countries' sovereignty and territorial integrity and includes a commitment to end hostilities and backing of armed groups. The deal also helps the U.S. government and American companies gain access to critical minerals in the region. INDIA-PAKISTAN: In May, when a series of military strikes brought longtime nuclear adversaries India and Pakistan closer to war, Trump's administration intervened. The nations agreed to stop fighting after the U.S.-led talks, and Trump said he would work to provide a 'solution' to the long-running dispute over the Indian-controlled Kashmir region. The ceasefire has held, but it's not clear what progress has been made on any long-term agreement. Last month, Trump had lunch at the White House with Asim Munir, Pakistan's army chief. SYRIA-ISRAEL: Earlier this month, after Israel intervened in fighting between Syrian government forces and rival armed groups, Trump's special envoy to Syria, Tom Barrack, announced a limited ceasefire agreement between Israel and Syria. Barrack, who's also the U.S. ambassador to Turkey, said he met in Paris on Thursday with representatives from both countries to discuss de-escalation. Barrack said on social media that 'we accomplished precisely that' and that both sides committed to continuing the effort. Israel's intervention, however, caught Trump off guard and stymied his administration's push to get both countries to reach a full normalization of diplomatic relations.


Axios
2 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Inside Thune's effort to keep N.C. in GOP's column
Senate Majority Leader John Thune is planning a fall visit to North Carolina to fundraise for Michael Whatley's upcoming Senate campaign, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Senior Republican officials think the North Carolina contest will be among the most expensive Senate races of 2026 — and that every dollar will matter. "It's always the most expensive race in U.S. history. It will be again," retiring North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis said at an Axios Live event on Wednesday. Tillis, a Republican, announced he won't seek reelection after clashing with President Trump over the president's " big, beautiful bill." Behind closed doors: GOP leaders had given Lara Trump, Trump's daughter-in-law and a North Carolina native who had considered running, the right of first refusal. But during a phone call Thune had with Lara Trump and her husband, Eric Trump, this month, Lara Trump indicated she was leaning against entering the race. When it became clear Lara Trump would not run, Thune turned his attention to wooing Whatley, who was North Carolina GOP chair before Trump handpicked him to be the Republican National Committee chair last year. Thune called Whatley last week and encouraged him to run. Then, on July 16, Whatley attended a reception hosted by the Thune-aligned Senate Leadership Fund super PAC. During the gathering, which was attended by about 75 top donors and senators, the Republican leader introduced Whatley as the party's nominee for North Carolina Senate. The intrigue: Trump and Thune called Whatley on Monday and encouraged him to jump into the race quickly. During the call, Thune pledged the party machinery would consolidate around Whatley. The big picture: Whatley is expected to soon step down from his RNC role to enter the race and will have the full backing of Trump and Thune. It is anticipated he will face off against former Gov. Roy Cooper, who is preparing to launch his campaign next week. Between the lines: By lining up behind Whatley, Trump and Republican leaders are hoping to avoid a divisive primary.