Royal fury over fake German prince who has met Prince Charles after using legal loophole to gain access to high society
His Serene Highness Dr Donatus, Prince of Hohenzollern, has spent the better part of two decades schmoozing with Britain's elite.
But Donatus, who is really a 64-year-old music teacher called Markus Hänsel, was only able to do this after paying to be adopted by a minor German royal in the House of Hohenzollern at the age of 42.
The real Prince of Hohenzollern, Karl Friedrich, the head of the House of Hohenzollern, has hit out at Donatus for using his family's name.
He told The Sun: 'It makes me angry and frustrated, it leaves a very bitter taste in my mouth.
'Donatus is not my blood, he is not a member of the German royal family, he is simply a non-royal name bearer.
'He certainly cannot use the moniker of Serene Highness.'
Donatus is connected to several music organisations and charities, alongside King Charles and Prince Edward, the Duke of Kent.
He is the Chairman of the Friends of the English Chamber Orchestra and is also ambassador of The Purcell School for Young Musicians, in Bushey, Hertfordshire, both of which are organisations that King Charles is a patron of.
Donatus is also a member of the International Board of Governors of the London Philharmonic Orchestra, of which the Duke of Kent is patron, and and Creative Benefactor of the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra.
On top of this, he was previously a Principal Supporter of London's Royal College of Music, and a founding patron of the Royal College of Music Prince Consort Orchestra.
In one clip taken from his Surrey home, a photo of him and King Charles was seen on the side.
Prince Karl told the Sun that he confronted Donatus over his claim to his family's name, and it was revealed that Katharina Feodora, Princess of Hohenzollern, adopted him in around 2003.
'I wrote to Donatus and said I know all the members of my family but I hadn't heard of him. He wrote back and said, 'yes I have been adopted by your aunt Katharina'.
'I then spoke to my aunt and she told me, 'yes well, he offered me such an amount of money I couldn't resist'. She was always short of money.
'There's nothing we as a family can do.'
Three years after he was adopted, he married Dr Viola Hallman, heiress of the Theis steel business, who later became Dr Viola Christa, Princess of Hohenzollern.
They lived in a castle in Haelen, the Netherlands. Viola died of cancer in 2012.
Donatus told The Sun in an emailed statement, written in the third person: 'Donatus has the same legal rank and rights represented in Germany's family law as Karl Friedrich of Hohenzollern, who does not have the authority to speak on behalf of all the members of the family.'
He also says he 'financially supports' his 'mother' Katharina.
Prince Karl said he is now seeking legal advice on the matter: 'We don't like somebody bringing the family name into a bad light.
'It's obvious he doesn't know me and the history of the Swabian branch of the Hohenzollerns. He's an uninformed man.
'He is not a member of the royal house of Hohenzollern.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: How Meghan Markle's 'warm, friendly, hug-everyone approach' caused tension in the 'rather awkward' royal household
Once upon a time, the so-called 'fab four' - comprising Prince Harry, Meghan, Prince William and Kate - were the Royal Family 's dream team. Indeed when Harry and Meghan started dating, Kate and William reportedly found the former actress 'delightful' - with the young royals appearing at a number of engagements together. Fast forward to the present and, while the so-called 'peace summit' in July 2025 suggests that relations between the Sussexes and the Prince and Princess of Wales could be thawing, both camps appear to be a long way from a reconciliation. It has been widely established that Meghan was at the centre of the tension between Harry and William in particular. But one royal author has claimed the falling out was to do with how the Duchess of Sussex acted, not what she said. Meghan's 'warm, friendly, hug-everyone approach' ruffled feathers, according to Tom Quinn's history of royal servants, titled Yes, Ma'am. He wrote: 'It made William uncomfortable because [Meghan] hugged him virtually every time they bumped into each other.' The prince's opposition to the displays of affection was not due to a dislike of Meghan but concern for what courtiers might think. 'The hugging and cheek kissing fuelled gossip among the staff that Meghan was flirting with William, which she was obviously not. But the tense atmosphere caused by all the touchy-feeliness (and the resultant gossip) deepened the rift between the brothers,' Quinn said. Likewise, Meghan clashed with William's 'rather awkward, even inhibited personality' - which she reportedly found 'baffling'. Quinn wrote: 'A member of staff recalled Meghan asking, "Why do William and Charles sound so serious all the time?" 'She used to make jokes about Harry not having the same parents as William, as she insisted, "Harry isn't pompous at all. He's chill".' But it was Meghan's treatment of staff while working as a royal that put the most strain on the princes' relationship. Concerns were raised to the Sussexes about their alleged behaviour towards staff as early as 2017, it was reported in Robert Lacey's Battle of Brothers book. Meghan would send emails as early as 5am, leaving staff with a 'barrage' of messages in their inboxes, a Kensington Palace source claimed. The couple reigned over a 'really toxic environment' which saw colleagues shaking before meetings alongside allegations of bullying, they added. There was even a claim the encounters left one employee with PTSD. While Meghan brushed off a complaint about her conduct from a senior aide, claiming 'it's not my job to coddle people', Prince William did not respond so flippantly to the issue. When Jason Knauf – a royal aide who worked with the Sussexes – presented William with a 'dossier of distress' about their behaviour he 'went ballistic' and was left 'astonished' and 'horrified' by what he heard, according to Lacey. William's anger stemmed from the fact that a tradition of treating the staff 'like family' had been broken and that he personally knew many of those named, Lacey wrote. Harry and his brother then allegedly had a testy phone call, in which the Duke of Sussex 'flared up in a fierce defence of his wife'. Lacey added: 'The moment the prince heard the bullying allegations, he got straight on the phone to talk to Harry – and when Harry flared up in furious defence of his wife, the elder brother persisted. 'Harry shut off his phone angrily, so William went straight round to find his brother on the Kensington campus.' As early as 2019, rumours of a falling out between the brothers began circulating. It was first addressed by Harry in the documentary Harry & Meghan: An African Journey, with him saying: 'You have good days, you have bad days.' By 2020, tensions appeared to have deepened when Harry and Meghan announced their plans to step back as senior royals. Harry later claimed in his Netflix series with Meghan that William shouted at him during the Sandringham summit. The brothers were last publicly together at Queen Elizabeth II's funeral in September 2022, though they both attended the private funeral for their uncle Robert Fellowes last summer. The estrangement between the two princes had been 'hard and sad ', Knauf revealed in an Australian documentary this year. He said: 'We have ups and downs in family. Even when you really love someone, you can have times when you don't want to spend that much time with them. 'It's very difficult to have this stuff play out in the public eye, but [William's] chosen to keep his thoughts on it private and I think all of us who know him really have to respect that. 'We should do the same, but I will say of course it's been hard and sad - especially for all of us who know both of them.' Meghan's 'touchy-feely' style does have some fans. Producer Jane Marie, who worked with Harry and Meghan during the development of Archewell Audio projects, insisted to Vanity Fair that Meghan is 'just a lovely, genuine person'. Other staff members have claimed that she would send her employees gifts ranging from dog leashes to skincare products.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Desiree Burch: The Golden Wrath review – uproarious tales of a midlife cataclysm
Desiree Burch is 46. For most comedians, this is the time to deliver your mildly grumpy show about middle age: the bodily decay; the annoying habits of the generation coming up behind you. That all features in The Golden Wrath, but it's ratcheted up to the nth degree. For Burch, middle age isn't a mild development, it's a cataclysm. The perimenopause apparently has 66 separate symptoms, and Burch's mind and body are weathering not a slow decline but an all-out attack. All-out attack is Burch's performance style too, in a show that hurls at us her experience of hormonal female midlife. It's a blast – because our host is a charismatic, bombastic stage presence, and because she textures the comedy of ageing with moral indignation alongside the physical indignity. Burch sets the scene by placing herself generationally, holding up her own gen X experience ('we walked so you could run') against those of the boomers, millennials and gen Z's in the room. This isn't always novel ('Do you guys remember the rotary phone?'), but it's playful and relatable, skilfully softening us up for the onslaught to come. Suffice to say, hers is not a perspective on the perimenopause that will have anyone looking forward to their 40s. She talks about the joints that suddenly stop working, the infuriating sleeplessness, and there's a loud, lurid routine about 'juicy pussies' v vaginal dryness. All those endless symptoms are itemised in a spoof advert for this grim life-stage, which Burch warns can last a decade. Arguably the show overplays its hand, making little allowance for other, milder experiences of female midlife, and overstating the degree to which menopause narratives are unheard. A strand protesting about gender inequalities in medicine, with reference to a connection between menopausal 'brain fog' and her mother's dementia, feels underdeveloped. A subplot about her mum's marriage and Burch's childlessness are imperfectly integrated. But Burch's extreme take on hormonal change remains uproarious, and is supplemented with strong standalone sections on her aversion to brushing her teeth and the contents of women's handbags (AKA 'a miniature bodega in every Louis Vuitton'). The change may be brewing for our host – but her standup skills are undimmed. At Monkey Barrel, Edinburgh, until 10 August. Then touring from 3 October. All our Edinburgh festival reviews
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
UK pornography taskforce to propose banning ‘barely legal' content after Channel 4 documentary airs
The new pornography taskforce will propose legislation this autumn aimed at banning a type of 'barely legal' content produced by the porn star Bonnie Blue, the Guardian has learned. The proposed action by the independent pornography taskforce, launched last month by the Conservative peer Gabby Bertin, comes in response to the broadcast of the Channel 4 documentary 1000 Men and Me: The Bonnie Blue Story. The programme followed the performer for six months and included her claim to have had sex with 1,057 clients over the course of 12 hours. Visa and Smirnoff are among a number of businesses that have pulled online advertisements from streaming of the documentary, after reviewing the content. The film was condemned by the children's commissioner for England, Dame Rachel de Souza, for 'glamorising and normalising' extreme pornography. The documentary also includes footage of Tia Billinger, whose stage name is Bonnie Blue, in a classroom preparing to film an orgy with a group of models dressed in school uniform; the performers acknowledge that they have been selected because they look very young. Lady Bertin said she planned to lodge amendments to the crime and policing bill in the autumn to make it illegal for online platforms to host any content that could encourage child sexual abuse, including pornography filmed by adults dressed as children. 'This content is pushing at the boundaries. We will be trying to address the 'barely legal' aspect legislatively,' she said. The Online Safety Act charged the regulator Ofcom with monitoring whether pornography sites are protecting UK viewers from encountering illegal material involving child sexual abuse and extreme content, such as portrayals of rape, bestiality and necrophilia. However, other forms of harmful pornography that are regulated offline (in cinemas, for example) are not subject to similar restrictions online. This regulatory anomaly means adults role-playing as children to create pornography that appears close to child sexual abuse imagery is not prohibited online. The Channel 4 documentary only showed preparations for the classroom scene rather than the footage itself. Clips showing Bonnie Blue having sex with more than 1,000 men were pixellated, but the programme has still been widely criticised for promoting her brand and for failing to challenge adequately her assertion that her activity is harmless. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Bertin said the documentary would be on the agenda at the taskforce's next meeting. 'She has become extremely successful; she is an adult and it is consensual, so it may not be harming her, but it has potentially harmful effects on people who think that this is a normal way to behave,' she said. 'We should be asking more about the men who arrive with balaclavas on their head to have sex with her.' De Souza said: 'For years we have been fighting to protect our children from the kind of degrading, violent sex that exists freely on their social media feeds. Now this documentary risks taking us a step back by glamorising, even normalising the things young people tell me are frightening. Bonnie Blue's content showcases violence against women as entertainment and allows sexist ideas that women are 'lesser' than men to go unchecked.' Visa's advertisements were placed by a third-party agency, but the company requested that they be removed from online streaming of the Channel 4 documentary after staff viewed it and judged that the content did not align with its internal guidelines. Staff at the drinks company Diageo are assessing how a Smirnoff advertisement was cleared to appear during online transmission of the show, and have also subsequently pulled their advertising from streaming of the programme. An Ofcom spokesperson said the regulator was assessing the documentary and would decide whether to launch a formal investigation. The policing minister, Diana Johnson, said last week that she would discuss the ease with which children could access the documentary on Channel 4's website with ministerial colleagues. Channel 4 requires users to be 16 to register an account, but there is no age-verification process, so children could lie about their age. A Channel 4 spokesperson said the observational film was designed to provoke debate. 'The film looks at how Bonnie Blue has gained worldwide attention and earned millions of pounds in the last year, exploring changing attitudes to sex, success, porn and feminism in an ever-evolving online world. Director Victoria Silver puts a number of challenges to Bonnie throughout the documentary on the example she sets and how she is perceived, and the film clearly lays bare the tactics and strategies she uses, with the audience purposefully left to form their own opinions.'
