FDA and RFK Jr. aim to remove fluoride supplements used to protect kids' teeth
The Food and Drug Administration said it will conduct a scientific review of the products by late October with the aim of removing them from the market. It was not immediately clear whether the agency planned to formally ban the supplements or simply request that companies withdraw them.
The products targeted by the FDA are sometimes recommended for children and teens who are at increased risk of tooth decay or cavities because of low fluoride in their local drinking water. They usually require a prescription from a pediatrician or dentist. Fluoride-based tablets and lozenges are designed to be chewed or swallowed. Companies also sell drops for babies and infants.
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said the products pose a risk when swallowed by children because they may interfere with healthy gut bacteria that are critical to digestion, immunity and other key bodily functions. He also referenced studies showing possible associations between excess fluoride intake and other problems, including decreased IQ.
Previous reviews by public health experts and dental professionals have not shown any serious health risks with the products.
As state and local governments begin removing fluoride from their water, the need for supplemental fluoride is expected to grow.
Officials in Utah — the first U.S. state to ban fluoride from drinking water — recently made fluoride supplements available without a prescription.
Fluoride strengthens teeth and reduces cavities by replacing minerals lost during normal wear and tear, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 1962, the agency set guidelines for how much should be added to water.
Kennedy, a former environmental lawyer, has called fluoride a 'dangerous neurotoxin' tied to a range of health dangers. Last month, he announced a task force to scrutinize fluoride's use, while at the same time saying he would order the CDC to stop recommending it.
A report last year by the federal government's National Toxicology Program concluded that drinking water with more than twice the CDC's recommended level was associated with lower IQs in kids. The study was based on research conducted in Canada, China, India, Iran, Pakistan and Mexico.
'Ending the use of ingestible fluoride is long overdue,' Kennedy said in a statement Tuesday. "This decision brings us one step closer to delivering on President Trump's promise to Make America Healthy Again.'
An influential government health panel recommends fluoride supplements for children between the ages of six months and 5 years if they live in areas with low fluoridation levels. The U.S. Preventative Services Task Forces judged the recommendation to have 'high certainty' of benefit, based on the available evidence.
A 2010 paper from the American Dental Association recommended supplemental fluoride for children up to 16 years old who are at high risk of cavities. The recommendation was based on a review of studies across different age groups. The most common side effect associated with the products is spotting or discoloration of the teeth, caused by extra fluoride.
The FDA regulates most dental products, including fluoride-containing toothpastes, supplements, mouthwashes and rinses.
In recent weeks those products have increasingly been targeted with lawsuits and legal actions.
Last week, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced an investigation into the marketing of fluoride toothpastes by Colgate-Palmolive and Proctor and Gamble. A press release from his office described the companies' promotions as 'misleading, deceptive and dangerous.'
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Walking just 14 more steps per minute could protect against rising chronic conditions
Walking just 14 more steps a minute could boost your health and protect against deadly diseases, a study suggests. Researchers at the University of Chicago tracked 102 frail adults — weaker individuals who are exhausted by little exercise — in their late 70s who were asked to do a 45-minute walking session three times a week. Over the four-month study, half were asked to continue walking at a 'relaxed and comfortable pace' during the exercise sessions. But the rest were told to walk 'as fast as they safely could'. Participants in the 'fast-walking' group walked 14 more steps every minute on average by the study end, and about 100 steps per minute — equivalent to the average among adults. The fast-walking group achieved a ten percent improvement in their six-minute walking distance, indicating enhanced endurance and cardiovascular health. This improvement also suggested increased muscle mass and a lower risk of falls, the leading cause of injury-related death in adults over 65, as well as improved aerobic fitness, a key predictor for longevity and sustained independence in older age. For comparison, those who walked at a relaxed pace saw no improvement in either measure during the study. Dr Daniel Rubin, an anesthesiologist who led the study, and others wrote: 'We demonstrated that an increase of 14 steps per minute during the intervention sessions increased the odds of an improvement in [endurance]. 'Older adults can increase their [steps per minute] and [steps per minute] can serve as a surrogate measure of activity intensity during walking interventions.' Average adults walk about 100 to 130 steps per minute, according to estimates, while older and frail individuals walk about 82 steps per minute on average. The average American also walks about 5,100 steps per day, well below the recommendation of 10,000 every 24 hours. In the paper, published in PLOS One, researchers recruited adults from 14 retirement homes near the university. The study defined a frail adult as an individual with weight loss, slowness, weakness, exhaustion and someone who undertook little physical activity. Of the participants, only 35 percent were able to walk unaided with the remainder requiring a cane, walker, scooter or wheelchair at times. They were divided into two equal groups for walking sessions, the fast group or the relaxed group, with each led by a trained research assistant. Over the first three sessions, adults were asked to walk 45 minutes at a comfortable pace. In the next eight sessions, participants were asked to walk 40 minutes, and start and end each session with five minutes of stair tapping — stepping and quickly tapping the toes of each foot on the edge of a step. During the walking, those in the fast-walking group were also asked to increase their intensity until they reached 70 percent of their heart rate maximum. The heart rate maximum is the highest number of times the heart can beat in one minute during strenuous physical activity. It is calculated using the formula of 220 minus someone's age. For those in the study, their maximum heart rate would be around 147 beats per minute and 70 percent of this would be 103 beats per minute. Over the remaining sessions, participants were asked to walk for 35 minutes but begin each session with a 10-minute warm up. But those in the exercise group were asked to incrementally increase their speed during the walking sessions to 'as fast as they safely could.' Participants' walking was tracked using an activPAL tracker that was strapped onto their thigh, which measured steps and speed. They were able to stop to rest during the exercises, but this stopped the timer, which would not restart until they began to walk again. Researchers found that among those in the relaxed group, their steps decreased during the study from 82 to 77 steps per minute. For comparison, those in the exercise group saw this rise from 86 to 100 steps per minute on average. Participants were asked to complete the six-minute walk test at the start and end of the study to measure their endurance. In the relaxed group, participants saw a slight improvement, with the distance they walked increasing from 836 to 869 feet. For comparison, however, those in the exercise group saw the distance they walked increase from 843 to 1,033 feet per session - a 10 percent rise. For comparison, the average American adult can walk around 2,100 feet in six minutes. The team concluded: 'The overall exercise dose (frequency, duration, and intensity) between the two groups only differed with respect to the intensity component as frequency and duration were kept constant between the two groups. 'Thus, prefrail and frail older adults engaged in walking interventions can derive further improvement in their functional outcomes by increasing [steps per minute] during a fixed volume of walking exercise.' The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Aging.
The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
The great debate: Cane sugar vs. corn syrup
President Donald Trump — who reportedly drinks up to 12 cans of Diet Coke a day — said Wednesday that beverage giant Coca-Cola had agreed to use real cane sugar in its regular Coke. 'This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!' Trump wrote in a Wednesday post on his Truth Social platform. The company said in a statement that it had appreciated the president's enthusiasm for the brand and that more details on 'new innovative offerings within [the] Coca‑Cola product range [would] be shared soon.' Coca-Cola is the best-selling carbonated soft drink in the U.S. Right now, Coke in the U.S. is made with high-fructose corn syrup to give it its sweet, fizzy taste. The sweetener is made from corn starch. Cane sugar is made from sugarcane, the tall, bamboo-like stalks known for their high sucrose content, and is used as the sweetener in Coke in most countries. But, is one healthier than the other? Here's what to know... Experts say cane sugar is not necessarily healthier The experts say it likely won't matter which sweetener is in Coke. Corn syrup has slightly more fructose than table sugar, or glucose. Fructose doesn't prompt the body to produce insulin, which triggers a hormone that helps us to feel full. 'Our bodies aren't going to know if that's cane sugar or high-fructose corn syrup. We just know that it is sugar and we need to break that down,' Caroline Susie, a registered dietitian nutritionist and a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, told Health. Consuming an excessive amount of any refined sugar can lead to a higher risk of weight gain and associated chronic conditions, such as type 2 diabetes and heart disease. 'Both high-fructose corn syrup and cane sugar are about 50 percent fructose, 50 percent glucose, and have identical metabolic effects,' Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, a cardiologist and director of the Food is Medicine Institute at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, told NBC News. Soda is soda America has a sugar habit — and a penchant for ultra-processed foods — that it needs to kick, according to Mozaffarian. Soda has more than the daily recommended limit for added sugars for teens and children. Added sugar refers to sugars and syrups that are added to foods and beverages during processing and production. 'It's always better to cut down on soda, no matter what the form of sugar is,' Dr. Melanie Jay, a professor of medicine and population health at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine and director of the NYU Langone Comprehensive Program on Obesity Research, told NBC News. There's pushback Coke sold in the U.S. has been made with high fructose corn syrup since the mid-1980s. Corn was a cheaper option than cane sugar: the U.S. has a lot of corn farmers and the government has long supported the industry. Other countries, including Mexico and Australia, still use cane sugar. The company has imported glass bottles of Mexican Coke to the U.S. since 2005. Corn is the nation's number one crop, and the Corn Refiners Association President and CEO John Bode said in a statement that replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar 'doesn't make sense.' 'President Trump stands for American manufacturing jobs, American farmers, and reducing the trade deficit,' he said. 'Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar would cost thousands of American food manufacturing jobs, depress farm income, and boost imports of foreign sugar, all with no nutritional benefit.' He told The Washington Post that it would be more economical to introduce a product with cane sugar than to abandon the cheap and popular high-fructose corn syrup.
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Hidden clue reveals how long you'll live as scientists warn of 'serious problems' lurking in your body
Carrying extra fat around your belly, even if you are not overweight, can quietly take away your strength and shorten your life without warning, scientists warns. A recent study found that people with thicker waists compared to their height or hips are more likely to struggle with movement as they age, and face a higher risk of premature death. Researchers said it is not how much you weigh, it's about where you carry it. And belly fat is a major red flag for your body. A team of Italian scientists tested 10,690 adults over six years using a simple sit–and–stand test performed five times from a chair. Dr Elena Levati, the lead researcher and surgeon at Agostino Gemelli University Hospital Foundation in Italy, wrote: 'This can help identify people at risk before more serious problems show up.' The study found that people were 28 percent more likely to have trouble moving if their waist was wide compared to their hips, and 32 percent more likely if their waist was too large for their height, regardless of their weight or age. According to a report of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 40.3 percent of adults in the US classify as obese, which is more than 100 million people. The CDC says that the belly fat, especially the kind that builds up around organs, raises the risk of heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and early death. The study published in Aging focused on two numbers, the waist to hip ration (WHR) and the waist to height ratio (WHtR). Experts note that WHR and WHtR have been used in clinical trials for years to identify risks for heart disease and diabetes. The recent study, however, explored WHtR's link to age-related muscle decline, testing how quickly patient's muscle function deteriorates with aging. Researchers collected participants' waist and hip measurements, had them complete questionnaires about their diet and exercise, and took blood samples to check cholesterol and glucose levels. They discovered that about 71 percent of men and 53 percent of women had risky waist-to-height ratios. For waist-to-hip ratios, 61 percent of men and 39 percent of women had unhealthy scores. During the test, participants were timed as they stood up and sat down from a chair five times. On average, women took 7.9 seconds to complete it, while men took 7.6 seconds, both within the normal range for their age groups. However, the study found that people with larger WHR or WHtR ratios consistently performed worse on this test. Even after adjusting for weight, age, and other factors, these participants were more likely to show signs of declining physical ability. Although a duration longer than 10.8 seconds is typically regarded as a warning sign for frailty or disability, the researchers found that slower performance in individuals with higher belly fat ratios indicates that their muscular function may be compromised, even if they have not yet crossed that danger threshold. Another study published by National Institutes of Health (NIH) found that older adults, with abdominal obesity and low handgrip strength, face twice the risk of death from any cause. This combination highlights accelerated aging and increased vulnerability to weakness, disability, and premature death. Researchers said the root cause of this issue might be the visceral fat, a type of body fat stored deep within the abdominal area, surrounding vital organs like the liver, intestines, and stomach. Since visceral fat wraps around the organs, it has been linked to inflammation, poor muscle quality, and sarcopenia, a condition where muscle strength declines with age. Nearly 50 percent of American adults have unhealthy waist sizes linked to excess abdominal fat, based on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. This kind of fat buildup can quietly affect your balance, endurance, and even how your heart and lungs work during exercise, according to the experts. They added that unlike body weight or body to mass index (BMI), which sometimes can be misleading, these waist ratios give a clear picture as someone with normal BMI still can carry dangerous belly fat. The study also found that waist–to–height ratio was a better predictor than waist–to–hip ratio. It was more accurate for both men and women, and worked better regardless of age. In fact, just measuring your waist and comparing it to your height may be the simplest way to know if your future mobility is at risk. The waist–to–height test has another advantage, it is quick, cheap, and does not require a lab or doctor's visit. While the study focused on physical performance, the implications go beyond that. Poor mobility has been tied to higher death rates, hospitalizations, and reduced quality of life. A study published in NIH in 2023 found that older adults with high waist circumference were significantly more likely to develop a disability within five years, even when their overall weight stayed stable.
