Action to tackle 'unacceptable' empty homes in Scotland announced
The move comes as Scotland is currently facing a housing crisis after a national emergency was declared in the Scottish Parliament over a year ago.
Last year, The Herald launched a seven-point 'charter for change' to help end Scotland's housing emergency including a call to change the law so thousands of Scots found to be at risk of homelessness every year get support earlier to stay in their homes.
The Charter for Change also called for the conversion of empty and void properties into affordable, settled homes to be sped up to move people out of temporary accommodation quickly.
Last year, council tax data published by the Scottish government showed that 43,538 properties in Scotland were lying empty, and 73% of these homes were empty for over a year.
The new posts are being supported as part of a £2 million Scottish Government investment through the Scottish Empty Homes Partnership in 2025-26.
The Scottish Government says this funding they have announced will see staff take a "more proactive and targeted approach" to tackling local housing issues.
READ MORE:
'Incompetent' ScotGov 'failings' on affordable homes pledge laid bare
'It's time John Swinney got his hard hat on to build more homes'
FM faces backlash over 'disappointing' plans on affordable homes
Scotland housing charities urge Swinney commit to homebuilding pledge
Funding will also be used to train and induct new staff, grow services and ensure empty homes are utilised, including by increasing support for Local Authorities to make compulsory purchase orders.
Ms McAllan said: 'Bringing homes back into use is a vital part of our plan to tackle the housing emergency – when too many families are struggling to find somewhere to live, it is unacceptable to me that so many houses are lying empty for long periods.
'It's vital to help councils to step up measures to turn privately-owned empty properties into much-needed homes and it's encouraging that local authorities have already come forward to make use of this support.
'As the First Minister has set out, this government is determined to eradicate child poverty – and tackling the housing emergency by making sure families have access to a home is a crucial part of that.'
In a sit-down interview with The Herald, the new housing secretary also pledged to not roll back on house building targets.
In 2021, the SNP promised to deliver 110,000 affordable homes by 2032.
However, their critics in parliament and the Scottish Federation of Housing Associations have said they will fail to meet this commitment.
Asked by The Herald if the target is still credible, Ms McAllan said: 'I think it is. I think that it will require us to step up. It's challenging for a number of reasons not least costs.'
The Cabinet Secretary cited inflationary costs that have been 'bearing down' on construction since Covid as well as rising demand for housing.
She added: 'These are challenging targets but I think the public expect their governments to challenge themselves.
"I'm absolutely not intending to roll back on any of that.'
Ms McAllan said the 'core' of action to tackle house building should be the Affordable Housing Supply Programme in which the government is investing £768 million this year in which the secretary says will translate into 8,000 affordable homes.
However, she said this is "not enough" and that is why she is exploring "what levers can be pulled to bring empty homes into use" to "turn around social voids".
Ms McAllan also said the Additional Dwelling Supplement is also "potentially helping" with the issue of second homes issues.
Nine local authorities have so far agreed to employ the additional empty homes officers.
Scottish Empty Homes Partnership National Manager Tahmina Nizam said: 'Every home matters as we work together to end Scotland's housing emergency.
'In councils across the country Empty Homes Officers are delivering results, with over 11,000 homes having brought back into use since 2010. The additional posts supported by this funding will expand on that vital work. New Empty Homes Officers are already in post at City of Edinburgh Council, while recruitment is underway in several other local authorities.
'Homes weren't built to sit empty; every empty home has the potential to transform a family or individual's life, but collectively they have an enormous role to play in reducing housing need and tackling the housing emergency.
'We look forward to welcoming more new Empty Homes Officers as they come into post and supporting their efforts to bring more homes back into use.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Every Labour U-turn after PM reverses welfare cuts
Sir Keir Starmer has announced his latest U-turn: a £5bn change of course over his flagship welfare bill. With just minutes to go before MPs were set to vote on an already watered down welfare bill, he confirmed plans abandon a key plank of the reforms in order to get them through parliament and avoid a mass rebellion from his own MPs. The U-turn left the prime minister's authority battered and left the chancellor with a gaping hole in the public finances. As Sir Keir marks one year in office, The Independent looks at all the times he has U-turned on his promises or let voters down. Sir Keir suffered the biggest blow to his leadership since coming into power a year ago after he was forced to abandon a key plank of his controversial benefit cuts in order to get them through parliament. Just 90 minutes before voting began, ministers announced that plans to restrict eligibility for personal independence payments (PIP) – which had been the central pillar of the government's reforms – were being dropped. Sir Keir had already been forced into a U-turn the week before when more than 130 Labour MPs signed an amendment that would have effectively killed the bill off. Among the concessions announced then was a plan to impose tougher eligibility rules only on future PIP claimants, leaving existing recipients unaffected. Winter fuel payments In July, the chancellor announced that pensioners not in receipt of pension credits or other means-tested benefits would no longer receive winter fuel payments - a £300 payment to help with energy costs in the colder months. After spending months ruling out a U-turn, the prime minister in May told MPs he now wants to ensure more pensioners are eligible for the payment – something he claimed has come as a result of an improving economic picture. After weeks of speculation over what the changes would look like, it has now been confirmed that 9 million pensioners will be eligible for the payment - a huge uplift from the 1.5 million pensioners who received the payment in winter 2024-25. Grooming gangs Sir Keir spent months brushing off calls for a national inquiry with statutory powers into grooming gangs as unnecessary. As Elon Musk launched himself headlong into the debate, calling for a fresh probe into the scandal, Labour's refusal looked increasingly unlikely to hold. But Sir Keir stood firm, and even accused those calling for an inquiry, including Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, of ' jumping on the bandwagon of the far-Right '. But in yet another screeching U-turn, after months of holding out, Sir Keir in June accepted the recommendation of Baroness Casey to hold an inquiry. In a 2022 interview, Sir Keir said: 'All your working life you've got in mind the date on which you can retire and get your pension, and just as you get towards it, the goalposts are moved and you don't get it, and it's a real injustice. 'We need to do something about it. That wasn't the basis on which you paid in or the basis on which you were working.' But, in a familiar change of tune since becoming prime minister, Sir Keir last year sent his work and pensions secretary out to tell Women Against State Pension Inequality, Waspi women, they would not be getting any compensation. National insurance Labour's pre-election manifesto promised not to increase national insurance. It stated: 'Labour will not increase taxes on working people, which is why we will not increase National Insurance, the basic, higher, or additional rates of Income Tax, or VAT.' But, Sir Keir and Chancellor Ms Reeves used the ambiguity around whether they meant employer or employee national insurance contributions to steamroll the pledge at Labour's first Budget in power. The pair argue that they only promised to keep employee contributions frozen and instead landed firms with a 2 per cent increase to employer national insurance contributions. Tractor tax Farmers have also said they feel betrayed by the PM, after a 2023 National Farmers Union (NFU) speech in which he promised to have 'a new relationship with the countryside and farmers'. Sir Keir claimed to be concerned that 'each day brings a new existential risk to British farming. He added: 'Losing a farm is not like losing any other business, it can't come back.' Going even further, then shadow environment secretary Steve Reed said it was 'desperate nonsense' to suggest he would scrap tax breaks for farmers, just weeks before the July 4 poll. But, in another hugely unpopular Budget bombshell, Sir Keir slashed agricultural property relief, meaning previously exempt farms will be his with a 20 per cent levy on farming assets worth more than £1m. Critics have said it will see family farmers forced to sell up, ripping the heart out of countryside communities. And other times the PM has rowed back on his words... Two-child benefit cap Promising in 2020 to create a social security system fit for the 21st century, Sir Keir said: 'We must scrap the inhuman Work Capability Assessments and private provision of disability assessments... scrap punitive sanctions, two-child limit and benefits cap.' But before the election, Sir Keir said Labour was 'not changing' the Tory policy if Labour were to win power. He has stuck to his guns, even suspending seven Labour MPs for rebelling against his King's Speech in a bid to have the policy scrapped. And now, it looks like the prime minister is gearing up to row back on the position. While nothing has been announced, the prime minister is privately said to be in favour of lifting the cap. He has refused to commit to anything until the child poverty strategy is published in the autumn but has insisted he is 'absolutely determined' to 'drive down' child poverty and has repeatedly sidestepped questions on the issue when pressed on it. £28bn green investment pledge As shadow chancellor, Rachel Reeves announced the party's plans for an extra £28bn a year in green investment at Labour's conference in September 2021. But before the election, Sir Keir ditched the £28bn a year target and said instead that he would spend a far smaller sum on Great British Energy, a national wealth fund for clean investment and pledges on energy efficiency. Bankers' bonuses Strict regulations on bonuses, which limit annual payouts to twice a banker's salary, were introduced by the EU in 2014 in a bid to avoid excessive risk-taking after the 2008 financial crisis. Former prime minister Liz Truss and chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng scrapped the cap in 2022, in a bid to encourage more investment in the UK. Sir Keir had previously vowed to reinstate the cap, saying in 2022 that lifting it 'shows the Tories are absolutely tone deaf to what so many people are going through'. But in another major U-turn, Ms Reeves announced before the election that the party 'does not have any intention of bringing that back'.
The National
26 minutes ago
- The National
I asked Glasgow locals for their verdict on Labour's one year in power
Keir Starmer's party won a huge majority – 411 out of the 650 seats in the Commons – but this was deemed a shallow victory as they managed just 33.7% of the vote. Since then, their fortunes have collapsed, according to polling expert Professor John Curtice, more rapidly than any other UK government in history. READ MORE: Scots back independence as Keir Starmer's popularity at record low – poll An Ipsos poll published to mark the one-year anniversary of Labour entering power found that just 25% of UK voters expect Starmer to win a second term in Downing Street. The most recent polling from YouGov, Find Out Now, More in Common, Opinium, Techne, and BMG Research have all projected that Nigel Farage's Reform UK are set to beat Labour at the next Westminster election. On the streets of Glasgow one year on from Labour's victory, the prevailing feeling among people The National spoke to was one of disappointment. Numerous people said they had voted Labour in the hope of change, only to be let down by the reality. 'They are literally just acting like Tories,' one person said. 'They're doing the same sh**, they're cutting benefits, they are acting horrifically towards disabled people, elderly people, and poor people – the exact demographics who had already been treated horrifically.' Two policy decisions which have marred the Labour Government's first year in office came up time and time again: the cuts to the Winter Fuel Payment, and the cuts to disability benefits. READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: A progressive Scotland can win out. Zohran Mamdani is showing how Of course, Labour have since U-turned on those policies, withdrawing the cuts to disability from their welfare reforms entirely at the last minute, and reinstating Winter Fuel Payments for pension-age people with an annual income below £35,000. However, Starmer's Government have only closed the barn doors long after the horse bolted. The damage – caused by their decision to look to the elderly and the disabled to make 'savings' – has been done. 'They can cut welfare, but they've got billions for the f***ing arms industry,' one Glasgow local said. 'It's f***ing atrocious.' UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has seen his polling fortunes collapseI talked to literally dozens of people on the streets of Scotland's biggest city on Thursday – and not one expressed support for Labour. In a city that saw every one of its constituencies turn red just 12 months ago, that was a genuine surprise. One lady did say: 'I don't think there's any government will get us out of the mess we're in. I don't care who it is … The previous have left too much mess. They're playing catch-up constant.' That was as close as anyone came to expressing even an understanding as to why Labour's first year in Government has not been what many may have hoped. Unless Starmer can inspire a lot more than that, his odds of holding on to power in four years' time seem vanishingly slim.
Daily Record
35 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Councillor call for wider debate on Stirling school mobile phone policies
The current situation allows for individual schools across the region to prepare their own policies on mobile phone usage in classrooms. Mobile phone use in schools could be debated by councillors. Individual schools across the area have their own approach to pupils' phones in their buildings and classrooms. But a rural Stirling councillor has asked when the topic could be brought before elected members for wider discussion. Last year the Scottish Government published guidance that enabled headteachers to limit or ban the use of mobile phones at their schools. But at a recent full meeting of Stirling Council, Forth and Endrick ward Conservative councillor Paul Henke asked just what such bans or limitations existing at each of the area's secondary schools. Children and young people committee convener, Labour councillor Danny Gibson, said: 'The Scottish Government published Mobiles Phones-Guidance for Schools (August 2024). 'The vision of the paper is 'to enable all schools and local authorities to develop an ethos of citizenship that leads to respectful and responsible use of mobile technology. This will encourage schools to positively embrance mobile technology to enhance learning now and in the future, whilst helping them protect staff, children and young people from the possible disruptive and harmful consequences of misuse'. 'All of Stirling Council secondary schools have reviewed their mobile phone policies in line with the national guidance. 'Each school has established a clear and consistent policy on acceptable use of mobile phones, developed in consultation with parents, carers, pupils and staff. 'While each school has tailored their policy to suit the individual context, there are several common themes across all schools.' The themes include: classroom expectations - pupils must deposit their phones in secure storage boxes upon entering the classroom or keep them on silent and stored in their school bags during lessons; use during the school day - mobile devices, including headphones earphones, must not be used during the school day, except before school starts, at break time, and at lunchtime; and responsible use - all mobile devices must be used responsibily and in accordance with the school's policy. Cllr Henke thanked the convener for the response, but further asked him to advise when a council policy covering this could be brought forward to committee for debate. Cllr Gibson said: 'I'll check with officers what the intention is in that regard and I'll advise the councillors directly.'
