
Diddy Trial: Jury Asks For Clarity On Racketeering Charge As Deliberations Continue
The jury in the criminal case against Diddy began deliberating Monday. (Photo by Amy Sussman/Getty ... More Images for MRC) Getty Images for MRC
The jury asked Judge Arun Subramanian late Monday afternoon, the first day of deliberations, for clarity on whether it is considered drug distribution if a person who is asked for controlled substances provides them to that person, CNN reported.
Drug distribution is one of the alleged acts jurors are being asked to consider when deciding whether Combs is guilty of the racketeering charge, alongside bribery, forced labor, kidnapping, arson and sex trafficking, according to the jury's verdict sheet.
Subramanian said Tuesday morning he would refer the jury to language in its instructions about drug distribution: 'The word 'distribution' means actual, constructive, or attempted transfer. To distribute simply means to deliver, to pass over, or to hand over something to another person, or to cause it to be delivered, passed on, or handed over to another. Distribution does not require a sale.'
The jury will return to deliberations Tuesday, after it deliberated for more than five hours on Monday.
Quickly after deliberations began Monday, the jury gave Subramanian a note that said: 'We have a juror, No. 25, who we are concerned cannot follow your honor's instructions.' Subramanian returned a note to the jury reminding 'every juror of their duty to deliberate and their obligation to follow my instruction on the law,' urging them to continue deliberating. Mark Zauderer, a veteran trial and appellate lawyer, told Forbes jury questions are not uncommon and that the problem may blow over if the jury moves on and does not request any more intervention from the judge. When Could The Jury Return A Verdict—and Will Diddy Be Convicted?
It's unclear, as the jury will deliberate as long as it needs to reach a verdict. Subramanian has previously said he wanted to wrap up the trial, which began in May, by the July 4 weekend. Legal analysts previously told Forbes the prosecution presented a strong case against Combs, but it is impossible to know what a jury will decide. Zauderer said he believes Combs is more likely to be convicted than acquitted, but noted such a verdict may depend on whether the jury believes prosecutors sufficiently proved Combs ran a 'criminal enterprise,' which would satisfy the racketeering charge. Former federal prosecutor Mark Chutkow also said the prosecution made a 'very compelling case,' noting the prosecution's emphasis on surveillance video depicting Combs attacking his ex-girlfriend and a key witness in the case, Cassie Ventura, in a Los Angeles hotel. Chutkow said, however, a jury may feel the video depicts domestic violence, which he is not charged with, instead of sex trafficking or racketeering. Chutkow also said it is possible the trial could end with a hung jury, meaning not all jurors agree on a verdict.
Combs faces five federal charges: two counts of sex trafficking, two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution and one count of racketeering conspiracy. He pleaded not guilty to all charges. Throughout the trial, the government has called high-profile victims to testify, including Ventura, considered a key witness for both the racketeering and sex trafficking charges. She testified Combs coerced her into 'freak-off' sex performances throughout their decade-long relationship, which she said his employees assisted in producing, which some legal experts said could be evidence of Combs operating a criminal enterprise. Rapper Kid Cudi also testified Combs broke into his home and said he believed Combs was involved with setting his car on fire after he discovered Kid Cudi and Ventura were dating. Other alleged sex trafficking victims central to the prosecution's case testified under the pseudonyms 'Jane' and 'Mia.'
Judge Orders Diddy Jury To 'Continue Deliberating' After Concerns Over Juror No. 25 (Forbes)
Jury Begins Deliberating Criminal Case Against Diddy: Here's Why A Verdict Is So Unpredictable (Forbes)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sean "Diddy" Combs acquitted of sex trafficking, convicted on lesser charges
Sean "Diddy" Combs was found guilty Wednesday of transportation to engage in prostitution in his federal trial in New York, but the music mogul was acquitted of the more severe charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. Combs was convicted of two counts of the prostitution-related charge. Each count carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. When the verdict was announced, Combs turned around, kneeled down on the ground, put his hands on his chair and prayed. He and his family erupted in loud applause, cheering loudly and whistling. Following the decision, Combs' lawyers argued for him to be released from custody immediately and be able to return to his Miami home, emphasizing that this was his first conviction. Prosecutors opposed the defense's request. The judge asked both the prosecution and defense to submit letters as to why Combs should be released Wednesday or remain detained. Court was expected to resume at 1 p.m. Eastern time. The developments come after jurors said Tuesday they'd agreed on four of the five counts against Combs but disagreed on racketeering conspiracy. They reached a verdict on all five counts Wednesday morning. Jurors began deliberating in U.S. District Court in lower Manhattan on Monday. They said they'd reached a partial verdict Tuesday, but Judge Arun Subramanian sent them back to continue deliberating on the remaining count. What are the charges against Sean "Diddy" Combs? The grand jury indictment against the 55-year-old Combs, unsealed in September 2024, initially charged the hip-hop mogul with three counts following his arrest at a Manhattan hotel. In April, before the trial began, prosecutors filed additional charges, bringing the total number of counts against him to five. Combs pleaded not guilty to all the charges. The charges against Combs are: Count 1: Rackeering conspiracyCount 2: Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion (Casandra Ventura)Count 3: Transportation to engage in prostitution (Casandra Ventura)Count 4: Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion ("Jane")Count 5: Transportation to engage in prostitution ("Jane") "Jane" is a pseudonym used in court for an ex-girlfriend of Combs who testified against him. What is the Mann Act? The prostitution-related charges allege violations of the Mann Act, a law that makes it a federal crime to transport someone across state lines for prostitution. The charge of racketeering conspiracy requires prosecutors to prove a number of elements: that there was an agreement among two or more people to participate in a pattern of activity that would affect interstate commerce; that the defendant willfully joined it; and that members of the conspiracy committed two or more racketeering acts. The charging document lists a number of alleged racketeering acts, including kidnapping, bribery, sex trafficking and forced labor. Prosecutors alleged that Combs' business empire created a criminal enterprise that he used for years to cover up acts of violence and abuse and to coerce women into fulfilling his sexual desires. Jurors heard from more than 30 witnesses over the course of seven weeks as the prosecution went through its case. Combs denied the accusations but chose not to take the stand to testify in his defense. His attorneys did not call any witnesses during the trial, though they did conduct extensive cross-examinations of the government's witnesses. Combs' lawyers argued the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. "Freak-offs" part of emotional and graphic testimony The high-profile trial, which started in May, included graphic and emotional testimony from two of Combs' former girlfriends. Casandra Ventura, the R&B singer known as Cassie who spent more than a decade with him, testified about drug-fueled sex sessions that Combs allegedly referred to as "freak-offs." Ventura testified that he directed all the encounters, which could last for days, and that she felt forced to participate to make him happy. Ventura testified that Combs controlled every aspect of her life, and that she often did things out of fear, since physical abuse was "frequent." Combs' attorneys argued that the encounters were consensual. During cross-examination, the defense showed the jury a 2009 message from Ventura to Combs that read, "I'm always ready to freak off." Ventura also testified about a 2016 incident which was caught on surveillance video showing Combs beating and kicking her in a California hotel hallway. Combs apologized at the time, saying his behavior was "inexcusable" and that he took "full responsibility" for his actions. Ventura testified that the attack happened as she was trying to leave a "freak-off" that had turned violent. A former hotel security officer testified that Combs offered him cash after the attack, which the officer said he understood to be a bribe. Ventura had filed a civil lawsuit against Combs in 2023, accusing him of physically and sexually abusing her. Combs denied the claims and quickly reached a settlement with her. In his closing argument to the jury Friday, defense attorney Marc Agnifilo said, "If you had to pick a winner in this whole thing, it's hard not to pick Cassie." Another former girlfriend of Combs testified under the pseudonym "Jane" to protect her identity. She told the court she often participated in what she called "hotel nights," which also involved drugs. Jane testified she would have sex with a male escort while Combs watched. She said she told Combs many times that she didn't want to have sex with other men and didn't like the "hotel nights." Combs' lawyers displayed messages showing her setting up "hotel nights." Jane said she felt pressured and that she had grown financially dependent on Combs. In the prosecution's closing arguments, Assistant U.S. Attorney Christy Slavik described Combs as "the leader of a criminal enterprise. He doesn't take no for an answer. And now you know about many crimes he committed with members of his enterprise." She said he used a "small army" of employees to harm women and then cover it up. "He thought that his fame, wealth and power put him above the law," Slavik said. Agnifilo countered by arguing that prosecutors "badly exaggerated" evidence of a swinger lifestyle and threesomes, combining it with recreational drug use and calling it a racketeering conspiracy. "He did not do the things he's charged with. He didn't do racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking," Combs' lawyer said. "Sean Diddy Combs: The Verdict," a one-hour special on the case, will air on CBS News 24/7 at 9 p.m. ET the night of the jury's decision. Download the free CBS News app to watch on your mobile or streaming device, or stream on Paramount+. Split verdict in Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex trafficking and racketeering trial | Special Report General David Petraeus weighs in on global conflict and U.S. strategy Tiny eyelash mites can cause a common eye disease. How can we protect our eyes?


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
10:35 AM ET: Sean 'Diddy' Combs guilty on prostitution charges, acquitted on others - CNN Breaking News Alerts - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
10:35 AM ET: Sean 'Diddy' Combs guilty on prostitution charges, acquitted on others CNN Breaking News Alerts 10:43 AM EDT It's a mixed verdict for Sean "Diddy" Combs. Listen for more details.

Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs Acquitted of Racketeering and Sex Trafficking
Music mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs was found not guilty of racketeering and sex trafficking but convicted of less serious offenses of transportation to engage in prostitution. Photo: Jane Rosenberg/Reuters