Blow for judges as minister decides against proposed 17pc increase to personal injury awards
Insurance companies had warned that such a rise would have led to even more premium rises.
The proposal from the Judicial Council needed to be approved by a change in the law to effect it.
Personal injury guidelines are used by the courts and the Injuries Resolution Board when assessing injury claims.
But it is understood that the proposal from the judges will not be voted into law.
A memo prepared by Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan, to be presented to a Cabinet sub-committee on insurance reform, states that he will 'lay the guidelines in the Oireachtas but not move a resolution'.
This effectively means the recommendation of the Judicial Council to increase the guideline award levels will be laid before the Houses of the Oireachtas but not effected by legislative change.
Next week's full Cabinet meeting will be presented with Mr O'Callaghan's memo which effectively says the Government should not move to increase injury award levels.
This is seen as a major blow for the legal fraternity, but a victory for the likes of the Alliance for Insurance Reform, business lobby group ISME, Insurance Ireland, and insurance companies.
All of these groups said lawyers would be the main winners from any hike in the award guideline levels.
And the National Competitiveness and Productivity Council criticised the fact that the judges did not consult the Injuries Resolution Board before proposing higher award levels.
Business and consumer groups claim that higher awards will act as a greater incentive for lawyers to encourage their clients to avoid settlements in the Injuries Board, which does not pay legal costs, and litigate the claims instead.
Lawyers get huge legal fees for litigated cases.
The Central Bank has found that in liability claims the average award assessment of the board and one that is litigated both come in at €24,000.
Legal fees for cases settled through the Injuries Board average €597.
However, litigated cases have average legal costs of €24,786.
A sub-committee of the Cabinet, set up to drive insurance reform, discussed the matter today.
It is understood a memo presented to the sub-committee by Mr O'Callaghan states the also plans to amend the Judicial Council Act that would mandate judges to review award guidelines over a longer period than the current three years.
Judges will be forced to engage with the Injuries Resolution Board when considering changes to recommended award levels.
There is also mention of a commitment to legal reform, in the memo.
However, Minister O'Callaghan is also expected to convey his concerns to the sub-committee on insurance reform on the impact not increasing award levels could have on the Injuries Resolution Board.
There is a risk that the judiciary could start making increased awards outside of the guidelines.
At the same time the Injuries Board will not be permitted to increase its awards as it is obliged to impose the guidelines in place.
There is a risk that this combination could drive claimants back to the courts with a consequent increase in legal costs which will make the claims process more expensive.
This is something the minister is said to be cognisant of and plans to keep under review.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
2 days ago
- The Irish Sun
My sister was killed by abusive ex who hid chilling past – it's too late for us but she'd be proud of legacy for kids
AFTER years of tirelessly campaigning for new domestic abuse legislation to help protect people after the brutal murder of his sister, Jason Poole has finally received the confirmation he has long been waiting for. But Jason - who has been Advertisement 6 Jennifer Poole was killed by her abusive partner 6 Brother Jason has been campaigning for new domestic abuse laws to be introduced For almost four years, Jason has been calling on the It's hoped that the list would help potential victims to identify abusive partners and prevent another family going through the horrific trauma experienced by the Poole Advertisement Jason confirmed that he has met with Justice Minister He told the Irish Sun: 'I met with the Minister last week and it was a very productive meeting. "It was the first time we've had a meeting with the Justice Minister and his officials where everyone was on the same page and the Attorney General was on the same page. 'I was presented with a draft proposal of what Jennie's Law would look like, I've now got to go and meet two barristers to go through that to make sure there aren't any loopholes. 'I just want it to be right from my side, because it's my sister's name. Advertisement 'He has given his commitment that it will be known as Jennie's 'It will involve some sort of public register. Murder victim Jennifer Poole's brother demands 'Jennie's Law' introduced and backs 'Zero Tolerance' domestic violence plan 'And all of that has been given the approval of the Attorney General, so what's happening now is department officials are waiting on me to read the document and respond if there's anything that I'm unhappy with, then meet them again to go through that process with them. 'And then he plans to bring that draft proposal to Cabinet to get their approval to go through the House and the Committee stage.' A petition to bring about Jennie's Law has amassed thousands of signatures, and Jason has promised to keep circulating it until the law is brought in. Advertisement 'CAN'T TAKE FOOT OFF PEDAL' He said: 'The petition is doing well, I'm in "It's important that we still go forward with the petition, it isn't over yet and we don't want to take our foot off the pedal now and for the Attorney General or the 'We still need to know that the public are supporting this. It is going well, it's made greater progress in the past six months than it has in the previous two years. 'We're meeting up, not next week, but the week, after in the 'I'm also meeting with some of the Opposition parties to go through what Jennie's Law is so that they understand when it does when it comes to the stage in the Houses, so that they're also supporting it.' Advertisement VIOLENT PAST HIDDEN Mum-of-two Jennie was stabbed seven times at her Dublin apartment by ex-partner Murphy in April 2021. She had met Murphy, from Ballymun, in May 2020, with the killer moving into her home in Finglas 'reasonably quickly' after their relationship began. But it was only during a sentencing at the Central Criminal Court that Jennie's family learned that Murphy had previously been jailed for attacking a former partner and her mother with a knife in 2015. The calculating beast hid his past as a violent abuser of women from loving mum Jennie. Instead of confessing he had been imprisoned for attacking a previous partner and her mum with a knife, Murphy told carer Jennie that he had been working away in Spain. Advertisement NOT JUST FOR WOMEN However, Jason refuted the idea that the law would only protect female victims of domestic abuse. He said male and female convicted abusers would be named, while men, women, and Jason said: 'There's a misconception out there that this is only for women - and that's baloney. It's a domestic violence register that is for men and women, and I just want for that to be clear so that there's no stupid comments coming up in the Dail. 'As I keep saying, it's great that we're getting there, but every time, it's my sister's name, it's still my sister. 'I said to them I don't want any negativity to be coming toward this at all. Advertisement 'I just want it to be right from my side, because it's my sister's name." Jason Poole 'I want to be clear, it's for men and women. You have to have a conviction, you can't just go on a register because the guards are called to your house and it's a fight. 'This is in cases of domestic violence where the victim has taken a case and it's gone to court, and the judge will decide if the person goes on the register or not. 'That's really what needs to be clear, and I just want that to come across when I meet the Opposition. 'So that's the work for the next couple of weeks. It is positive it's moving forward.' NAME ATTACHED TO IT Jason continued: 'The Minister is adamant, he had three areas that he wanted to focus on, he got two in and this is the third and he's all in favour of it. Advertisement 'The Minister wants to make sure it's done right because there's a family at the other side of it, and that there's a name going to be attached to it. 'I've been very conscious from the very beginning that I want this in my sister's name. So in order for her name to be connected to it I want to make sure it's right, and I think they're making sure that it's right, so that there isn't Jennie's Law thrown out of 'When Jennifer's name is used again, it will be seen in a positive way. 'The legislation will have its own name but it will be known as Jennie's Law. 'In Irish legislation you can't have legislation in somebody's name but it will be known as Jennie's Law.' Advertisement 'VICTIMS' RESPONSE' And Jason said the fight is not over as he hopes the legislation will help not only domestic abuse victims but their children and families as well. Tragic Jennifer left behind two children, who are now aged eight and 11. Jason explained: 'There's still a lot to be done. I'm happy that it has progressed, it's exhausting and time-consuming as a family having to fight a system. 'It is a system, but I want to make sure that the most important people who are happy with it are the victims. 'They're the ones who are going to have to be in court, so we need to be mindful of that and I've spoken to a couple of victims who are happy with Jennie's Law, but it's important that we're protecting them at all costs. Advertisement 'As a family we're happy with it. It isn't over by any means but it's been a massive progress and to have Jim O'Callaghan on board, and with all the knowledge he has, has only added to the support and making sure we've got it right.' CASES ON THE RISE And Jason said the time for action is now after a recent report by In 2024, 44 per cent of women who contacted Gardai about the issue found their response 'unhelpful'. Jason said: 'The launch of the Women's Aid report this year was shocking. "It's time now that action is measured and taken. We can't keep having all of these figures released and nothing happens. Advertisement 'The more we talk about it and the more people continue to be aware of it the better. 'When Jennifer's name is used again, it will be seen in a positive way. Jason Poole 'It's too late for us and too late for our family, but you never know the generation behind us may need it, other people could do with it now. 'I do think it's going to be a game-changing for victims of domestic abuse and assault, assault causing harm. 'I think Jennie would be proud that there's a legacy left behind for her children and for her children to know that their mammy didn't die in vain and was forgotten about. 'We have to take into account all the other women who have lost their lives to domestic violence and they're not going to have legislation in their name, but I hope their families will see the benefit of this and if that legislation had been in when their loved ones were alive they might still be here.' Advertisement TOUGH ON KIDS He added: 'I think Jennifer would be proud. I think she would be happy that we haven't given up, that we didn't just put her into a grave and walk away and forget about her. 'As much as it's difficult, every time you talk about it you're reliving that moment, that day, that week. 'Trying to shield her children from all this is difficult. They don't want to be walking into a supermarket and seeing their mammy on the front page, or turning on the TV and seeing a documentary about their mammy. 'We have to remember that in a lot of these cases there are children, and those children went through a lot and this is for them.' PROGRESS CONFIRMATION The Justice Department confirmed that Minister O'Callaghan met with Jason to move forward with Jennie's Law. Advertisement They said: 'Minister Jim O'Callaghan met with Jason Poole on June 18, 2025, where they had a comprehensive discussion on putting Jennie's Law on a statutory footing. 'Minister O'Callaghan outlined his legislative plans to Mr Poole and it was agreed that the proposals would be finalised as a matter of priority. 'Minister O'Callaghan will continue to engage with Mr Poole as the legislation is progressed." If you have been affected by domestic or gender-based violence or need support, you can contact the Women's Aid 24-hour National Freephone Helpline at 1800 341 900 or the Male Advice Line at 1800 816 588. 6 Jason said he wants the legislation to honour his tragic sister 6 Killer Gavin Murphy hid his abusive past from Jennifer Credit: Collins Advertisement 6 Mum-of-two Jennie was killed in 2021 6 Jim O'Callaghan has confirmed that Jennie's Law is moving forward Credit: Alamy
RTÉ News
2 days ago
- RTÉ News
High Court to rule later on challenge regarding junior ministers at Cabinet
The High Court has reserved its decisions on challenges by two TDs to the attendance of junior ministers at Cabinet meetings. A three-judge division of the court presided over by the High Court president, heard the challenges by Sinn Féin TD Pa Daly and People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy over the course of the week. Mr Justice David Barniville said these were very interesting and difficult cases. He said the judgments would be worked on over the next number of weeks, but it was unlikely they would be ready before the end of the legal term at the end of this month. Both Mr Daly and Mr Murphy in their separate cases say the attendance of what are known as "super junior" ministers at Cabinet meetings is unconstitutional. They say the Constitution limits the Government to the 15 full Cabinet ministers appointed by the President and the participation of others in the Cabinet meetings is not permissible and also breaches the provision on Cabinet confidentiality. In his action, Mr Murphy is seeking injunctions to stop the attendance of the junior ministers at Cabinet. Mr Daly is also challenging the legislation permitting an allowance to be paid to such junior ministers for their attendance. In her closing submissions on behalf of the Government, Senior Counsel Catherine Donnelly said Mr Murphy's case depended on making fine distinctions between matters such as participating in a Cabinet meeting versus providing participants with assistance as well as having political influence versus influence on legislation. She said these distinctions were "unstable" and completely unworkable and had the potential to undermine the very constitutional values Mr Murphy suggested he was attempting to uphold. Ms Donnelly also noted the evidence of former super junior minister Finian McGrath who said he was treated exactly the same as full ministers. She suggested the judges were being asked to make a ruling on the subjectivity of how ministers of state might feel. She said that just because there may be other people attending a meeting of the Cabinet, did not mean the 15 full ministers were not acting with collective authority when they made their decisions. And she said Mr Murphy's side had not explained why Cabinet confidentiality was threatened by the presence of junior ministers but not by others who might be there such as the Secretary General to the Government, the Attorney General or other advisers who could attend. Ms Donnelly told the court she did not accept the characterisation of the case by Mr Murphy's side as a case based on the fundamental rights of citizens to designate their rulers. She said the attendance of ministers of state at Cabinet meetings did not interfere with this and did not dilute the accountability of the Government to the Dáil. 'Clear evidence' Senior Counsel John Rogers for Mr Murphy said his side had put forward the "clear evidence" of former deputy Finian McGrath of his active participation in Government decisions. He said the Government had not disputed that this level of participation by junior ministers was continuing in the present Government. Mr Rogers said it was his case that junior ministers who attended Cabinet were treated in all respects as if they were members of the Government. He said their influence in the Cabinet room was unconstitutional. He said it fractured the collective authority of the Government and breached Cabinet confidentiality. He said there was no legal authority anywhere entitling the junior ministers to be at Cabinet meetings. Mr Rogers said the constitution prescribed a course whereby the people would get their rulers, and that should be protected. He said the Government's case came down to the entitlement of the Taoiseach to invite who he wished to attend and participate in Cabinet meetings on an ongoing basis. Mr Rogers said any participation by outsiders on the basis of equality with ministers was a dilution of collective responsibility and accountability to the Dáil. Senior Counsel Feichin McDonagh who represented Pa Daly said an issue relating to memos which could only be brought to Cabinet by senior ministers was an attempt to rely to try to gloss over the substance of junior ministers' participation in Government decisions. Mr McDonagh also pointed out that all of the lawyers present in court were "assisting the court" and none of them were "taking part in the decision making" of the three judges. The court may give its decision at some stage in the autumn. Legal sources expect the issue eventually to be decided definitively by the Supreme Court.
Irish Independent
2 days ago
- Irish Independent
The Indo Daily: Bringing back the bedsit? Housing Minister James Browne's ‘radical' new apartment plan
Soaring prices, skyrocketing rents and a chronic shortage of supply paints a bleak picture of Ireland's deepening housing crisis. Over the past number of years, the government has floated a series of so-called innovative solutions, which promised bold change but ultimately delivered mixed results. Now, Housing Minister James Browne has unveiled what's being billed as a radical plan to 'revolutionise' the housing sector. The Cabinet signed off on new guidelines for apartment-building this week, aimed at improving the viability of the sector. But as with most things in Irish planning, not everyone is on board. Critics have already taken aim at key aspects of the plan, such as smaller apartments and fewer windows, but is this exactly the kind of radical shift needed to finally boost supply? Today on The Indo Daily, Tessa Fleming is joined by the Irish Independent's Mary Regan and Caroline O'Doherty, along with assistant professor at the School of Architecture, Planning and Environmenta
