Murder victim Helen Gregory's eerie phone call the day before she was killed
The audio comes from a phone call to her bank, made on the evening of January 23, 2024.
It was played to the High Court on Monday, where her daughter Julia DeLuney is charged with her murder. The trial is now in its fourth week.
The court previously heard that DeLuney invested a large sum of money on her mother's behalf into cryptocurrency, which she had been trading in for years.
In an email sent on January 22, two days before her mother's death, DeLuney told her mother her money had made a profit of more than $268,000 – "not a bad investment for six months", she wrote.
ADVERTISEMENT
She recommended they withdraw the profit, and leave the initial investment of $100,000 there to keep growing.
DeLuney then told her mother she needed to pay $30,000 in exchange fees and tax liability to be able to withdraw the money. She said she could cover half, but needed her mother to pay the rest.
The following morning, Gregory wrote back that she agreed it was a good idea to cash up.
Julia DeLuney in the High Court (Source: rnz.co.nz)
DeLuney urged her not tell anyone about the profit. "Please please please don't show this to your friends, once people know that you've made some money they will change," she said.
And in a later email: "Don't tell the bank about your crypto profits, they won't lend you a thing if you tell them that."
On January 23, the day before her death, Gregory went to the bank and deposited $6000 cash into her daughter's account, according to written evidence from the bank assistant who served her.
ADVERTISEMENT
Later that day, she phoned up to take money out of her KiwiSaver.
"We're pre-paying a funeral thing," she explained. "Not that I'm thinking of dying tomorrow or anything."
This part of the recording was met by a collective intake of breath from the public gallery.
But the Crown says DeLuney misrepresented her mother's money having made a profit.
Attached to her initial email, DeLuney sent her mother a screenshot of her account's profit and loss for the past three months.
But the screenshot was of someone else's earnings, the Crown says.
Crown witness Detective Constable Tobias Weavers, who investigated DeLuney's crypto accounts, told the court today the screenshot matched a graph of a different user's account, publicly available on the leaderboard of crypto-trading platform WOO X.
ADVERTISEMENT
Crypto-currency expert Nicolas Turnbull told the court this afternoon the withdrawal fees were "totally false".
"This is just a common tactic we see, especially overseas, where Kiwis get manipulated... especially older people... into paying these fees," he said.
The Crown's case is that DeLuney attacked her mother and staged it to look like a fall, but the defence says, in the 90-minute window when she went to get help after the fall, someone else caused fatal injuries to her elderly mother.
DeLuney cried quietly in the dock while her mother's voice played to the court.
The trial continues, with only a handful of Crown witnesses to go.
rnz.co.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
What would happen if a KiwiSaver provider failed?
There is always the risk that investments could go wrong, but KiwiSaver schemes do have some protections in place. File photo. Photo: 123rf Some Australian investors may be facing the loss of their investments after the failure of a superannuation provider, but KiwiSaver members are being reassured that the situation is different here. Australian media has reported that up to A$450 million may have been lost by the First Guardian Master Fund, which went into liquidation early this year. Co-director David Anderson was reported to be accused of transferring funds into his own bank account. David Callanan, general manager of corporate trustee services at Public Trust, one of the supervisors of New Zealand's KiwiSaver schemes, said there were different protections for KiwiSaver members, which should prevent such a scenario. Providers are subject to oversight from a supervisor, who can also choose to appoint a third-party custodian or act as custodian themselves. "I think we've got a more effective regulatory regime. It's set up really well to protect KiwiSaver members and investors." He said the supervisor was "effectively a trustee". "We're in place to ensure that KiwiSaver providers are doing the right thing for investors. If there was an issue with a KiwiSaver provider then the supervisor would be able to step in and take control back and come up with a solution." He said that could involve appointing another manager if necessary. "We have the power to step in and to take control back in the interests of those investors." He said, because there were a limited number of independent supervisors, they were closely regulated by the Financial Markets Authority. "In Australia there are hundreds of responsible entities who play that role." Callanan said if a fund manager was failing it would not be able to access investor funds. "That's another area that in those scenarios that I've seen in Australia hasn't worked. You've got fund managers just dipping into investor monies, you know, to go and buy a Lamborghini or whatever they feel like on a whim. "That just couldn't happen here because we've got independent custodians and again, Public Trust is an independent custodian for a number of KiwiSaver providers, and that can give investors confidence." He said there was also a strong conflict of interest regime in place. "Even for fund managers who might undertake what is called a related party transaction…the Financial Markets Conduct Act stipulates the process they have to go through to work with their supervisor to get that transaction across the line." But that does not mean you can not lose money in KiwiSaver. Callanan said there was always the risk that investments could go wrong and financial markets might not perform as expected. "But if you're with a KiwiSaver provider in New Zealand you can have confidence that there's a mechanism in place in the supervisors that if something was to go wrong with that manager, the supervisor would step in and stop you falling down the metaphorical cliff. "There's always the possibility that someone makes a silly financial decision or you could pick an investment that's really bad. My advice would be to avoid a situation where you have all your eggs in one basket." He said that could only happen with the KiwiSaver schemes that allow people to choose their own investments. "Most KiwiSaver providers are offering these diversified products and you can be really confident you've going to get a good outcome because you've spread your risk in an appropriate way." Financial Markets Authority director of markets, investors and reporting John Horner said the law prescribed the segregation of duties in relation to managed investment schemes. "Generally, while the manager of the scheme is responsible for investment decisions , the custodian is responsible for holding and safeguarding the scheme property - segregation of legal ownership - and for keeping records of the scheme property - segregation of functions. Supervisors licensed by the FMA are responsible for custody. Depending on the scheme's governing documents, a supervisor may appoint another appropriate independent person as custodian. "MIS managers and supervisors are obliged to act with care, diligence and skill. MIS managers are expected to maintain strong capital positions, professional indemnity insurance, parent company guarantees or other similar arrangements. Managers are also required to notify the supervisor if they are, or are likely to become, insolvent. The supervisor is responsible for monitoring the manager's performance of its functions and obligations, as well as its financial position. "In the event that the fund manager becomes insolvent or is otherwise unable to continue operations, the supervisor has the power to appoint a temporary manager to ensure the continued management and operation of the fund until a permanent replacement is appointed." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Icehouse Ventures boss says venture capital market is hot again as new fund feeds on golden visas
Paul says things are heating up. 'I'll be the first one to call it – and maybe I'll be wrong – but it's hot right now. There's some really large raises happening. Rocket Lab is is surging. Funds are raising more money. Is it ′21? No, but it's a heck of a lot more vibrant than the last couple of years.' Paul says part of the renaissance is down to 'investor migrants flooding in' on the back of the new Active Investor Plus (AIP) or 'golden visa' programme introduced in April. Of the $16m raised for Seed Fund IV so far, $4m is from immigrant investors, Paul says. There have been 'dozens of queries' from the new arrivals, which Icehouse is working through. Paul says most are under the growth category, which requires total investments of $5m. Immigration Minister Erica Stanford said in June that more than 100 applicants have been approved in principle. Late last week, she said a total of 215 applications have now been received, with total indicated investments topping $1 billion (or $1.3b, including a number of people who had applications under the old system converted to the golden visa programme – which promises to process 80% of applications within four months. The application fee: $27,470). WNT Ventures managing partner Carl Jones also told the Herald that the golden visa push had revved up interest, generating multiple approaches. There is no public list of AIP applicants, Jones said, but immigration agents often steer interested investors toward specific venture capital firms – and New Zealand is a small town. High-net-worth Kiwis returning to New Zealand have also helped, Paul says. The Government has just topped up the Crown-backed Elevate fund-of-fund, which co-invests with venture capital firms – but that's at the Series A level, one step up the food chain from the 'seed' level (usually about $3m investments) where Icehouse Ventures' new fund sits. Hits and heartbreaks Most start-ups fail. Venture capital firms work on the hope that a few big hits will outweigh the many misses. Paul says there have been 14 failures, including the likes of Upside Bio, which sought to cultivate lab-grown skin for burn victims (from a graft taken from a patient) and Chicken-free chicken maker Sunfed Meats. There were also the ones that got away, or the 'heartbreaks' as Paul calls them. Icehouse trailed and failed to access two of hot retail crime reporting firm Auror's early raises. Education startup Kami - sold to US private equity last year for $300m - also slipped through his grasp. But then there are the hits. Fund I invested in now unicorn Halter, Tradie software Tradify, which sold last year to a UK buyer at a 23x multiple on Icehouse's initial investment, Dawn Aerospace, which recently sold its first spaceplane in a US$17m deal, and Sharesies. Fund II followed in 2018 and invested in e-waste recycler Mint Innovation, electric boat maker Vessev, Partly, Basis and nuclear fusion moon-shot Open Star. 'Of the 360 companies we've funded, Tracksuit has been fastest to $1m, fastest to $10m, and fastest to $20m revenue," Icehouse Ventures' Robbie Paul says. Pictured: Tracksuit cofounder Connor Archbold. Photo / Dean Purcell Most recently, Seed Fund III was among the first investors in New Zealand's fastest growing start-up, Tracksuit (the brand-tracking firm that Paul says was the fastest investment to reach $20m in annual revenue), Sean Molloy and Sean Simpson's stealth energy start-up Ternary Kinetics, Watchful (smart security cams, started by ex-cop Josh Pasrsons), Ideally (AI-driven customer intelligence) Starboard (marine intelligence) and Zincovery. First Seed Fund IV investment Seed Fund IV's first investment has been named as Harth, an artificial intelligence-powered platform for collaborative building design, co-founded by Scott Barrington, founder of Modlar, a building design tool used by 95% of the world's top 100 architecture firms, and Tom Batterbury, co-founder of Auror and New Zealand EY Entrepreneur of the Year in 2022 (with Auror co-founders Phil Thomson and James Corbett). Coming out ahead The funds' performance is overlapping. Icehouse has made follow-up investments from its later-stage funds in Halter, for example, as the virtual fencing firm has grown. Icehouse now has more than $80m invested in the smart cow collar/virtual fencing firm at a $200m holding value. Seed Fund I raised $11m in 2016, Seed Fund II raised $26m in 2018 and Seed Fund III raised $45m in 2022. Paul says Seed Fund III had a $30m target, but was ultimately oversubscribed. Asked about performance, Paul says: 'At a high level, anybody who put $1 into Seed Fund I has had $2 back and the remaining is worth $5.50 so everybody is playing with house money.' Seed Fund III has appreciated to $37m and Seed Fund IV to $54m but positive returns still hang in the balance with their multi-year horizons. Chris Keall is an Auckland-based member of the Herald's business team. He joined the Herald in 2018 and is the technology editor and a senior business writer.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Khandallah murder trial: Julia DeLuney's phone inactive for 37 minutes on night of murder
Julia DeLuney pictured on CCTV at the BP station in Johnsonville, on her way to her mother's house, at 5.47pm on 24 January 2024. Photo: Supplied Phone data shows a 37-minute window in which Julia DeLuney's phone was locked and inactive on the night her mother was killed. She is currently on trial at the High Court in Wellington charged with her 79-year old mother Helen Gregory's murder , which she denies. Giving evidence, detective constable Mitchell Murdoch walked the jury through Gregory and DeLuney's movements that night, based off CCTV footage and device data from their phones and Gregory's laptop. DeLuney said she was at her mother's house to book tickets to the ballet. She told police her mother was searching for a shirt she had lost, and went into the attic to look for it. She said her mother then fell from the attic, causing a wound to the back of her head. But from early in the investigation, police questioned her account , saying the injuries DeLuney described did not match the extent of the blood which emergency services found at the scene and were not consistent with a fall. Phone data showed between 9.01pm and 9.38pm DeLuney's phone remained locked and she missed multiple calls and messages from her husband. The data shows there was also a gap of nearly the same length in activity on Gregory's phone. Julia DeLuney on CCTV buying a lighter at the Mobil petrol station in Johnsonville, on her way from her mother's to her own home in Paraparaumu, at 9.52pm on 24 January, 2024. Photo: Supplied DeLuney's phone data showed her flashlight was turned on at 9.39pm, which coincided with CCTV footage of her descending the steps outside her mother's Baroda Street address to the street, captured on a neighbour's security camera. But phone data also showed Gregory's phone ascended one floor - tracked by the Apple Health app - about 9.35pm. The defence said this showed Gregory did go into the attic that evening. Crime scene photographs already shown to the jury showed blood around the entrance to the attic. But Murdoch said the way phones tracked movement between floors was a "relatively inaccurate science". The defence's case is that Gregory fell from the attic, and her daughter went to fetch help. In that window, the defence said, someone else entered the house and fatally attacked Gregory. But the Crown says DeLuney attacked her mother, leaving her dead or dying, before staging the scene to look like Gregory had fallen and driving back to Paraparaumu to fetch her husband. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
