
Iran-Israel conflict leaves Iranian Americans feeling helpless, hopeless
Iranian Americans with loved ones in Iran fear reignited war and say conflict could endanger those living in the US.
The texts began coming late one night from somewhere outside Tehran, shaking Shaghayegh Cyrous from her sleep. For more than two weeks, the Los Angeles-based artist had tried in vain to reach her parents, retired designers who live near the capital city of Iran, the country she left 14 years ago.
Israeli bombs had been hitting oil depots, military installations and nuclear facilities. The U.S. had just launched its own attack and worries were rising about a full-blown Middle East war.
Cyrous frantically made a video call. Her parents kept saying they were OK, but the Internet signal was so weak, she could barely see them.
'It's very terrifying,' said Cyrous, 38, who left for America in 2011 and declined to provide her parents' names, fearing for their safety. 'We're just trying to send prayers for peace. Sometimes, I feel both helpless and hopeless.... I don't want them to be in danger.'
As the conflict between Israel and Iran rests on a fragile ceasefire, Cyrous and other Iranian Americans expressed dismay at American involvement and fear for loved ones still in Iran, saying a resurgence in violence could ripple around the world.
'Iranian Americans are worried, obviously, about their loved ones,' said Neda Bolourchi, executive director of the Public Affairs Alliance of Iranian Americans.
Bolourchi said the national advocacy organization, based in Washington, D.C., has lobbied Congress to help Iranian Americans stay in touch with family and friends in Iran during times of crisis.
Reza Rajebi, an Iranian-born novelist and physician who now lives in Houston, said he worries daily about loved ones still living in his homeland.
'Like many in the diaspora, I live in two worlds,' said Rajebi, who came to the U.S. in 2005 and writes under the pen name Diako Hazhir. 'One is here in the U.S, where I work, making a living and care for my family. The other is in my mind, always carrying the weight of anxiety for those I love and all the people in Iran who have no escape.'
Those claiming to protect the oppressed have turned into oppressors
The situation, Rajebi said, represents a 'national tragedy' with roots in the 1979 revolution that vaulted Iran's theocratic regime to power.
'The leadership has made it clear that they would rather see the country burn than surrender their grip on power,' he said. 'Step by step, cell by cell, soul by soul, the holy men who once claimed to protect the oppressed transformed into oppressors.'
Trump this week told reporters he was not seeking regime change in Iran and scolded both sides for violating the ceasefire.
Lana Silk, the Iranian-born CEO of Transform Iran, an international Christian humanitarian organization with offices in Glendale, California, said among the broad emotions unleashed by the U.S. airstrikes were feelings of relief from those who resent the longstanding regime.
'These past days have felt surreal,' Silk said. 'What once seemed like a distant hope now feels within reach …. While any form of military engagement brings with it the heavy burden of civilian suffering, many Iranians are acknowledging that the strikes have delivered the most significant blow to the Islamic Republic in over four decades.'
Silk said the Iranian regime 'does not negotiate in good faith' and employs diplomacy as a deceitful stalling tactic designed to preserve the Islamic theocracy. 'As war unfolds and daily life is disrupted by severe shortages of essential resources, many Iranians are facing displacement and growing fear,' she said. 'In the midst of this suffering, there is a desperate cry not only for freedom but for a swift end to the violence – even if that means welcoming further international intervention.'
Firuzeh Mahmoudi, of Berkeley, California, agreed.
"It is well established that the Islamic Republic of Iran does not mind killing civilians indiscriminately," Mahmoudi said. "We saw this during the Women, Life, Freedom movement and again in Iran's attacks on Israel."
'Historical precedents don't show anything favorable'
War is not the means through which many Iranians want to achieve freedom after decades of undemocratic regimes that have combined religion and authoritarian control, said Nahid Siamdoust, a former journalist who grew up in Iran and is now a professor of media and Middle Eastern studies at the University of Texas, Austin.
'It's a very depressing moment for Iranians right now,' said Siamdoust, who left Iran at age 10 with her family. 'They are not happy with the Islamic Republic, and they do not want war and destruction, but the historical precedents don't show anything favorable.'
More than a third of the nearly 400,000 Iranian immigrants in the United States live in the Los Angeles area, and more than half overall are in California, according to the Migration Policy Institute, a non-partisan think tank based in Washington, D.C.
A national poll conducted last year by the Public Affairs Alliance of Iranian Americans said Iranian Americans were nearly divided on the 2024 presidential election. About 45% of Iranian Americans voted for Kamala Harris, the Democratic nominee, and 41% percent for Trump, the GOP nominee.
40,000 reasons to worry: U.S. troops in Middle East could face Iran blowback
Until last weekend, Trump had pursued negotiations to end Iran's nuclear enrichment program but began warning of annihilation after Israel's June 13 attacks on the country's nuclear and military operations killed multiple military leaders and nuclear scientists.
Siamdoust said she is "saddened for my people," believing America's involvement further complicates matters.
"It does not appear to be the case of a one-and-done," Siamdoust said. "Trump said he would keep the U.S. out of these 'forever wars,' and the U.S. has just engulfed itself in yet another war in the Middle East that will cost Iranians dearly."
Fear that Iranian Americans could become targets
Persis Karim, an Iranian American and professor of comparative and world literature at San Francisco State University, said that as much as her family dislikes the regime, they've already lived through a war between Iran and Iraq in the 1980s that killed more than a million people combined. They don't want another one.
'They know what war looks like,' Karim said. 'It's messy, it's ugly, and it does not resolve a situation.'
While Karim, 63, doesn't believe Iran is innocent, "I think the negotiating table is the only wise choice,' she said.
However, she fears Iranians in the U.S. will be vilified "just like Latinos are vilified, just like Arabs were vilified and like we were vilified after 9/11."
That concern is shared by Bolourchi, of the Public Affairs Alliance of Iranian Americans, which had worked with the U.S. Justice Department's civil rights division to help fight discrimination and hate crimes against Iranian Americans. She worries the Trump administration's elimination of that unit earlier this year may put the community at risk of increased targeting should the conflict escalate.
'Iranian Americans constitute the fabric of our American society,' she said, and risk 'getting caught up in a resurgence of post-9/11 Islamophobia and hate, even though Jews, Christians and Baha'is make up who we are.'
A 'good omen' or 'more perilous than ever'?
Despite the dire situation in Iran, Mahmoudi said, many Iranians remain cautiously hopeful about the potential for change.
"It is heartwarming to see how unified Iranians (in Iran) are becoming, helping each other wherever they can," said Mahmoudi, founder and president of United for Iran, a non-governmental organization working to improve civil liberties in Iran. "Doctors are offering free medical support, strangers are opening their homes and assisting the elderly, and restaurant owners are providing free food. It's a good omen of what the future could bring."
Siamdoust said she feels for those back home just struggling to live normal lives.
'The country has among the best-educated young people in the Middle East," she said. "They don't deserve the tightrope they have been put on and … the devastation that is yet to come. They've worked so hard to bring about changes to their political and social circumstances.'
"#ww3"?: Gen Z, Iran and the mass panic happening on TikTok
Jamal Abdi, president of the National Iranian American Council, urged restraint and expressed concern for people living in the region who will suffer the consequences should tensions reignite.
'Our hearts are with everyone in Iran who has been impacted by this horrific war already and could soon be put at risk by the consequences of this outrageous choice to broaden the war,' he said in a statement. '… The way ahead seems more perilous than ever.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
29 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Democrats wrestle with how to conduct oversight as Trump officials crack down
WASHINGTON — Just hours after she pleaded not guilty to federal charges brought by the Trump administration, New Jersey Rep. LaMonica McIver was surrounded by dozens of supportive Democratic colleagues in the halls of the Capitol. The case, they argued, strikes at the heart of congressional power. 'If they can break LaMonica, they can break the House of Representatives,' said New York Rep. Yvette Clarke, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus.


San Francisco Chronicle
35 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Democrats wrestle with how to conduct oversight as Trump officials crack down
WASHINGTON (AP) — Just hours after she pleaded not guilty to federal charges brought by the Trump administration, New Jersey Rep. LaMonica McIver was surrounded by dozens of supportive Democratic colleagues in the halls of the Capitol. The case, they argued, strikes at the heart of congressional power. 'If they can break LaMonica, they can break the House of Representatives,' said New York Rep. Yvette Clarke, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus. Federal prosecutors allege that McIver interfered with law enforcement during a visit with two other House Democrats to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Newark, New Jersey. She calls the charges 'baseless.' It's far from the only clash between congressional Democrats and the Republican administration as officials ramp up deportations of immigrants around the country. Sen. Alex Padilla of California was forcibly removed by federal agents while attempting to speak at a news conference for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. At least six groups of House Democrats have recently been denied entry to ICE detention centers. In early June, federal agents entered the district office of Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and briefly detained a staffer. Congressional Republicans have largely dismissed Democrats' behavior as inflammatory and inappropriate, and some have publicly supported the prosecution of McIver. Often in the dark about the Trump administration's moves, congressional Democrats are wrestling with how to perform their oversight duties at a time of roiling tensions with the White House and new restrictions on lawmakers visiting federal facilities. 'We have the authority to conduct oversight business, and clearly, House Republicans are not doing that oversight here,' said New Jersey Rep. Rob Menendez, one of the House Democrats who went with McIver to the Newark ICE facility. 'It's our obligation to continue to do it on site at these detention facilities. And even if they don't want us to, we are going to continue to exert our right.' Democrats confront a stark new reality The prospect of facing charges for once routine oversight activity has alarmed many congressional Democrats who never expected to face criminal prosecution as elected officials. Lawmakers in both parties were also unnerved by the recent targeted shootings of two Minnesota lawmakers and the nation's tense political atmosphere. 'It's a moment that calls for personal courage of members of Congress,' said Rep. Summer Lee of Pennsylvania. 'I wish that we had more physical protection. I think that's one of those harsh realities that members of Congress who are not in leadership recognize: that oftentimes, we do this job at our own peril, and we do it anyway.' The arrests and detentions of lawmakers have led some Democrats to take precautionary measures. Several have consulted with the House general counsel about their right to conduct oversight. Multiple lawmakers also sought personal legal counsel, while others have called for a review of congressional rules to provide greater protections. 'The Capitol Police are the security force for members of Congress. We need them to travel with us, to go to facilities and events that the president may have us arrested for,' said Rep. Jonathan Jackson of Illinois. 'There's not a lot of transparency' As the minority party in the House, Democrats lack the subpoena power to force the White House to provide information. That's a problem, they say, because the Trump administration is unusually secretive about its actions. 'There's not a lot of transparency. From day to day, oftentimes, we're learning about what's happening at the same time as the rest of the nation,' said Rep. Lucy McBath, D-Ga., who led a prayer for McIver at the Capitol rally. Democrats, to amplify their concerns, have turned to public letters, confronted officials at congressional hearings and digital and media outreach to try to create public pressure. 'We've been very successful when they come in before committees,' said Rep. Lauren Underwood of Illinois, who added that she believed the public inquiries have 'one hundred percent' resonated with voters. Tapping into the information pipeline Congressional Democrats say they often rely on local lawmakers, business leaders and advocates to be their eyes and ears on the ground. A handful of Democrats say their best sources of information are across the political aisle, since Republicans typically have clearer lines of communication with the White House. 'I know who to call in Houston with the chamber. I think all of us do that,' said Texas Rep. Sylvia Garcia of how business leaders are keeping her updated. Garcia said Democrats 'need to put more pressure' on leading figures in the agriculture, restaurant and hospitality sectors to take their concerns about the immigrant crackdown to Trump's White House. 'They're the ones he'll listen to. They're the ones who can add the pressure. He's not going to listen to me, a Democrat who was an impeachment manager, who is on the bottom of his list, if I'm on it at all,' Garcia said. Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado, for instance, had a working relationship with a for-profit ICE facility in his district until DHS in February ended reports as part of an agency-wide policy change. A member of Crow's staff now regularly goes to the facility and waits, at times for hours, until staff at the Aurora facility respond to detailed questions posed by the office. Democrats say 'real oversight' requires winning elections Still, many House Democrats concede that they can conduct little of their desired oversight until they are back in the majority. Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Texas, said that 'real oversight power and muscle" only comes 'when you have a gavel." 'Nothing else matters. No rousing oratory, no tours, no speeches, no social media or entertainment, none of that stuff," Veasey said. "Because the thing that keeps Trump up at night more than anything else is the idea he's going to lose this House and there'll be real oversight pressure applied to him.'


The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump, Massie feud reaches fever pitch
President Trump's feud with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) is showing no signs of abating as the president seeks to oust the GOP congressman for his history of regularly breaking with the administration. Massie recently opposed the administration by denouncing its strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and refusing to support the president's legislative agenda, leading Trump's political operation to launch a targeted campaign against Massie. On Friday, a Trump-aligned super PAC, led by the president's co-campaign manager Chris LaCivita, rolled out its first ad as part of a $1 million ad buy targeting Massie. The 30-second ad — titled 'What happened to Thomas Massie?' — hit the GOP congressman over his opposition to Trump-supported legislation to fund border security and cut taxes. It also ties him to Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and progressive Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). But Massie isn't backing down. He hit back in a post on the social platform X, appearing to refer to measures in Trump's legislative agenda that the Senate parliamentarian opposed, including blocking Medicaid funds to be used for gender-affirming care. 'The BBB now allows funding sex changes for minors!' Massie said, referring to what Trump calls the 'big, beautiful bill.' 'This ad slams me for voting against the BBB, but the Senate just stripped the 'ban on sex changes for minors' from the BBB. By the ads' twisted logic, those who support the Senate's edits now support sex changes for minors.' Earlier in the week, Massie invoked former Vice President Mike Pence being targeted in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol after Vice President Vance questioned if his successors saw as much 'excitement' as he has while in office. The ad campaign is the first major sign the president's political operation is flexing its muscles, and Massie's recent digs against Trump foreshadow a fight that is likely only to heat up. 'There's a large feeling that the chickens have finally come home to roost for Massie,' said T.J. Litafik, a Kentucky-based Republican strategist. Massie's break with Trump over his legislative agenda and U.S. military intervention in Iran are only the most recent developments in the feud between the two. In 2020, Massie faced Trump's wrath when he tried to force a roll call vote on the CARES Act coronavirus stimulus bill, forcing lawmakers to rush back to Washington to avoid a delay in passing the legislation. Massie let three calls from Trump go to voicemail before he finally took the president's call in the Speaker's Lobby. Trump then publicly called for Massie to be thrown out of the GOP. Three years later, Massie famously backed Trump rival Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) in what became a deeply personal presidential primary battle. And earlier this year, Massie was the only Republican lawmaker who did not back Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) despite Trump's appeal to House Republicans. 'Massie has chosen to be a tremendous antagonist toward Trump at just about every turn,' Litafik said. The feud has put Johnson in an awkward position as he seeks to navigate a narrow Republican majority in the House. Johnson stopped short of endorsing Massie on Tuesday when asked if he would defend Massie against a primary challenger. 'That's the hardest question I had this morning, and I'm being totally honest with you,' Johnson said. 'Look, the Speaker's job, my role with my party cap on is I'm leader of my party here, and the Speaker leads the incumbent protection program, right, that's what we call it. I got to make sure everybody gets reelected. I travel the country nonstop, relentlessly, raising money to ensure that that happens.' 'But I certainly understand the president's frustration about the colleague you named, and he and I talk about that quite a bit,' he continued. 'Can't quite understand what the rationale is, but if you're here and you're wearing one team's jersey and every single time you vote with the other team, people begin to question what your motive is and what your philosophy is and why you're so consistently opposed to the platform, the agenda of your party.' When asked about Johnson's remarks by reporters on Capitol Hill earlier this week, Massie said that whether the Speaker is 'for me or against me, the result is the same.' 'If they would just quit hitting me, I might get bored and give up,' Massie said, referring to Trump's efforts to oust him. 'But I am not going to lose. I do not lose.' Republicans hold an eight-seat majority in the House, a narrow enough margin where Johnson needs the conference to be united on measures like passing Trump's agenda. 'It needs to be done with these tight margins in the House because essentially, if you can't get the 'yes' on anything, you're just a placeholder and a hindrance to the Trump agenda,' said Ford O'Connell, a Republican strategist. Other Republicans question why Trump and his allies are so deeply invested in kicking Massie off Capitol Hill. 'It does strike me as odd that this is the fight you'd really want to pick at a time when we should be more worried about keeping the House majority than taking out Republicans from it,' said another national Republican strategist. Massie's district is considered safely Republican. Kentucky's 4th Congressional District is situated in the northern part of the state, stretching from Louisville's eastern suburbs to the Cincinnati area along Kentucky's border with Ohio. Massie has trounced his past primary challengers, none of whom have been particularly strong or backed by Trump. 'It is tougher when you're going against someone who is pretty loose and free, and isn't going to cave and doesn't cave into the pressure. I think that's what his district appreciates about him. It's what that district and other parts of the state appreciate about Rand Paul,' the national Republican strategist said. Kentucky GOP strategist Shane Noem noted the state's Republicans come in 'many stripes.' 'The modern Libertarian wing of the party started here when Sen. Paul was elected in 2010. There's room for all varieties of Republicans in the party; it's up to the voters what level of loyalty they expect to the president's agenda,' Noem said. Paul has also broken with Trump in the past, most recently on Trump's legislative agenda and the sweeping global tariffs Trump imposed. Paul earlier this year claimed that he was 'uninvited' from the annual White House picnic, in what he said was retribution for his opposition to parts of the president's agenda. Trump later said that 'of course' Paul was invited to the gathering. Paul also criticized Trump's recent strikes on Iran, arguing that Congress, not the president, 'holds the war power.' But Republicans note Massie's disagreements with Trump have proven to be more intense. 'Rand Paul has had his moments of opposing Trump,' Litafik said. 'Massie has been much more aggressive and much more numerous in his approach.' While Trump's allies are launching the effort with a massive war chest, all eyes will be on a potential Trump-backed primary opponent. 'The one essential ingredient that as of yet has not developed is an opponent,' Litafik said. 'I think that there will be a very viable opponent that emerges.' 'This is a race unlike any that he would have faced before,' he said. Mychael Schnell contributed.